Re: building jack packages for sarge

On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote: > Is it possible to build a package of jack 0.100.0 that would satisfy > dependancies of other pacakges in sarge that depend on jack 0.99.0 / > libjack0.80.0? Hi, Seems that I am the last one on this list :) The short answer: No Longer explica

Re: Re: midi, sarge, 2.6, sb awe 64, woes

Hi, If you can't get MIDI working on your SB, you can also try to load the snd-virmidi module and use a software synthesizer such as timidity or fluidsynth. I think you will have to search for the "patch" files for the softsynths on the web though, as they might not be included in Debian. Guent

Re: JACK 0.99

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Robert Jordens wrote: > Hi! > > Any comments about trying to get JACK 0.99 (the one in experimental) > into unstable/sarge? I looked through the diff and tested with a bunch > of appplications and everything worked fine. I'd say go for it. You problably are maintaining the mos

Re: XMMS/ALSA - how to get mono output?

Hi, Add the following to your /.asoundrc (or /etc/asound.conf for system wide changes). pcm.mono { type plug slave { pcm default channels 1 } route_policy average } This defines a new virtual alsa device called "mono". In xmms you have to configure the ALSA driver to use

Re: RFP: kernel-patch-voluntary-preempt -- lower kernel latency by voluntary preemption

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Robert Jordens wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > > Hi debian-multimedia! > > Who is interested in packaging this? I can't do it because I only have > my powerpc to test on which voluntary-preempt is not yet available for. > I know Guenter already did realtime-lsm (

Mediainlinux @ Siggraph (www.mediainlinux.org) : New Web Site and Name (fwd)

-- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:20:28 +0200 From: Marco Ghirlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Mediainlinux @ Siggraph (www.mediainlinux.org) : New Web Site and Name Hi, we would like to inform you that Mediainlinux 2 Siggraph Edition is out www.mediainlinux

realtime now realtime-lsm

A new package realtime-lsm jsut got accepted into Debian. There are no precompiled modules for 2.6.6 yet, but you can compile them on your own, by using the realtime-lsm-source. The name change is not ideal from the users point of view, but I decided to reflect upstream, and I thought I do it as

Re: jack-audio-connection-kit 0.98.1

I am for uploading to unstable. Guenter On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Robert Jordens wrote: > Hi all! > > I think it would be nice to have JACK 0.98 in sarge. Compatibility seems > to be really good. What is the general opinion about uploading JACK to > unstable now? > > Robert. > > -- > Worst V

Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel

On 7 Jun 2004, Jack O'Quin wrote: > guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Just for the record, I had terrible troubles using 2.6.6 from Debian > > on my machine. This means random segmentation faults and crashes, without > > using jack, nor the realtim

Re: [a-devel] AGNULA/DeMuDi 1.1.1 and 2.6.x kernel

On 6 Jun 2004, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > I have not seen segfaults at all, just xruns (and weird situations where > I can get the machine to almost lock up - everything slows down > enormously, killing jack stops the problem). Hi, Just for the record, I had terrible troubles using 2.6

Re: JACK 0.98.1 in experimental

On Sat, 15 May 2004, Robert Jordens wrote: > Hello! > > [Thu, 13 May 2004] guenter geiger wrote: > > On 13 May 2004, Jack O'Quin wrote: > > > My feeling is that we should leave this as an obscure feature for > > > expert users to experiment with at this point

Re: JACK 0.98.1 in experimental

On 13 May 2004, Jack O'Quin wrote: > My feeling is that we should leave this as an obscure feature for > expert users to experiment with at this point. Eventually, full > support will evolve, but that will take a while. Agreed. Its a really cool and nice feature for the experienced user, it wil

Re: JACK 0.98.1 in experimental

On 12 May 2004, Jack O'Quin wrote: > Robert Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I wonder if we should change the default to starting the daemon even if > > upstream doesn't do that yet. > > I would not recommend that. We decided to release it dependent on > JACK_START_SERVER because some c

Re: JACK 0.98.1 in experimental

On Wed, 12 May 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2004, guenter geiger wrote: > > On alpha it compiles fine, I have some problems running it though, > > have to take a look the next days. I get: > > jack(1): cannot open jack FIFO directory (No such file or direc

Re: Problens with gstreamer

Hi, Did you try to use the OSS emulation layer ? If you do not have a multichannel soundcard you loose nothing using ALSA's OSS support. Guenter On Wed, 12 May 2004, Andre Filipe de Assuncao e Brito wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi people! > > I have used gstreame

Re: JACK 0.98.1 in experimental

On Tue, 11 May 2004, Robert Jordens wrote: > Hi all. > > JACK 0.98.1 is in experimental. It should not break binary > compatibility but adds the nice feature of automatically starting jackd > based on ~/.jackdrc or /etc/jackdrc if $JACK_START_SERVER is set. > That plays really nicely with the rece

Re: realtime-module-2.6.5-1_0.0.4-3+2.6.5-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)

This week I started learning pd :-) Thanks for the flowers, learning pd will definitely be a nice experience. Take care that you do not get addicted :) Guenter > > cheers > > tim hall > > On Tuesday 11 May 2004 11:18, guenter geiger wrote: > > Just to let you know, the realt

realtime-module-2.6.5-1_0.0.4-3+2.6.5-3_i386.changes ACCEPTED (fwd)

p, as well as programs that are set gid audio. Now we have to check if all our favourite applications play well with this settings. Guenter -- Forwarded message -- Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 03:35:58 -0400 From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Guenter Geiger &

Re: ITP: realtime -- Realtime Linux Security Module (fwd)

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > GG> Feeback is highly appreciated. > > I've just given it a short try. It works fine, good work :) > > I'm used to start the jack server via qjackctl, which AFAIR uses > jackstart as the default command. Awfully to launch jackstart as > n

Re: ITP: realtime -- Realtime Linux Security Module (fwd)

and removing packages, and then I would sit in front of my computer wondering why there is no realtime-module-2.4.6. ... Thanks for pointing that out. Guenter > >ciao, >marco > > > 25/03/2004 alle 18:07:02, +0100, guenter geiger [AKA geiger] ha > scritto/escr

Re: ITP: realtime -- Realtime Linux Security Module (fwd)

On 25 Mar 2004, Jack O'Quin wrote: > Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 06:07:02PM +0100, guenter geiger wrote: > > > When the module has been installed succesully you should be able > > > to run jack without jackstar

ITP: realtime -- Realtime Linux Security Module (fwd)

ource packages the next days, and later on the compiled binary modules. Greetings, Guenter -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 16:19:17 +0100 From: "Guenter Geiger (Debian/GNU)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFC: EXP merge of OSX portability work

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote: > Hallo guenter! hi robert, > > guenter geiger schrieb am Tuesday, den 23. March 2004: > > > > * files/links seem to be missing for the config includes. make dist > > > fails from a fresh checkout > > > >

Re: RFC: EXP merge of OSX portability work

On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote: > Make dist doesn't work from a fresh checkout/autogen.sh: > > * depcomp is missing in CVS in config/ AFAICS > * files/links seem to be missing for the config includes. make dist > fails from a fresh checkout For me a autogen.sh/configure/make cycle wo

Re: Tuning the system for jackd

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote: > Plus: There is kernel-patch-2.4-lsm. And last time i checked 2.4 was still the > default kernel. So we can build on (manybe recommend) kernel-patch-2.4-lsm. Ah, thats good to know. > > Then, this would need to be someone who has a bit of insight into

Re: Tuning the system for jackd

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote: > >c. Do not setuid the jackstart binary, but rather prepare a 2.6 > >kernel for DeMuDi (I'm assuming that Debian is not going to adopt > >such patch in the short term), using the Jack O'Quin's kernel > > Someone should just _packa

Re: [Agnula-Developers] [ demudi-Feature Requests-723 ] Compile Muse 0.6.3 with givertcap support

On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Is module-assistant appropriate for such task? > Yes, I think this is exactly what we need :) So whats missing is only the security part. Guenter > Free > > >> guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >&g

Re: [Agnula-Developers] [ demudi-Feature Requests-723 ] Compile Muse 0.6.3 with givertcap support

DeMuDi - Debian Multimedia Distribution On 3 Mar 2004, Jack O'Quin wrote: > I will ask on the linux-security-modules mailing list for other's > experience with separate packaging and building. Surely there are > examples we can look at. That would be great, meanwhile I found this message [0] a

Re: [Agnula-Developers] [ demudi-Feature Requests-723 ] Compile Muse 0.6.3 with givertcap support

> works well. Now the big caveat is, that we have to ask the kernel maintainer to compile the kernel with security modules, and that building modules external to the kernel is not that easy with the new kernel build system. Have to investigate ... Guenter > > guenter geiger <[EMAI

Re: [Agnula-Developers] [ demudi-Feature Requests-723 ] Compile Muse 0.6.3 with givertcap support

Hi, I let your message appended, and I am trying to respond in a more general way. Well, we all know that Debian is pretty conservative. It won't be a problem to get a kernel-patch package included for 2.4 (the way you describe it, with additions and same interface as 2.6). But then we still woul

Re: [Agnula-Developers] [ demudi-Feature Requests-723 ] Compile Muse 0.6.3 with givertcap support

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > "ln" == noreply <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ln> Feature Requests item #723, was opened at 27/02/2004 18:18 You > ln> can respond by visiting: > ln> > http://devel.agnula.org/tracker/?func=deta

Re: jack 0.94.0-2

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote: > So if for example hydrogen is removed from testing during a libjack > transition, it can _not_ stay installed anymore and will be removed by apt, > if all libjacks conflict with each other (or depend on a versioned > jackd, what comes out to be the sa

Re: Medialinux 2

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Marco Ghirlanda wrote: > Sorry, wrong subject as usual at this time (23 pm in Italy)... ;-( > Marco > Hi Marco, Great, I have been away over the weekend but I am going to try your new release ASAP. (You know how this goes ... too much to do and no time for the interesting stu

Re: Scheduling another freeze of Jack-related packages

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Okay, time to update what's been done with Jack. [snip] > libhydrogen0,libjack0.71.2-0 0.75.0 libhydrogen can be removed as soon as the new hydrogen package gets in. hydrogen used to be split into a library and an application, this is not the case

Re: Scheduling another freeze of Jack-related packages

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > It seems to be another round of large-scale dependency chain, > close to release, thus we probably need a scheduled freezing > to get this thing to be released in sarge at all. > > Here's a rough timeline that I came up with: > > > 16 Jan 2004 :

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Daniel Kobras wrote: > Please don't upload a new version of muse until the present one is in > testing. It used to be blocked by jack, these days it's stalled by the > new fluidsynth. pkg-muse CVS on alioth has a basically ready-to-roll > Debian package of 0.6.2. 0.6.3 should b

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Robert Joerdens wrote: > Nice. JACK 0.94.0 is at , my > first tries to rebuild all the packages are at > . > > muse libhydrogen and spiralsynthmodular failed because of the > jack_nframes_t type c

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Robert Jordens wrote: > We had a request from Junichi for a "mini-freeze" around JACK in > November. I don't know if that really is still valid because the goal of > that freeze is reached and the timetable for the release changed a lot. > I think we can do it and push another

Re: JACK 0.91.1-1

Hi Robert, Looks good to me - only did some barebone tests, qjackctl and ladcca compiled against 0.80.0 work. Anyhow, now that 0.75.0 is in testing we can go ahead and upload to unstable directly. Jack related packages will have to be recompiled anyhow, as 0.80.0 was only in experimental. Can y

Re: jack 0.75 mini-freeze

On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, fellow debian audio developers, and release managers. > > > > > I think jack-audio-connection-kit and related packages should enter > > > mini-freeze, > > > to get something released to testing. > > > This is my (3rd?) update on the freeze status.

Re: jack 0.75 mini-freeze

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 10:02:15AM +0100, guenter geiger wrote: > > > > From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for > > > > > * gem -- which seems to have experienced build failure for powerpc and

Re: jack 0.75 mini-freeze

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Matt Kraai wrote: > > For my part, I would prefer that jack gets pushed in and gem stays > > uninstallable for some days, than having jack to wait another 10 > > days. ... So feel free to remove gem from testing, I will try to > > figure out whats happening on ppc and hppa and

Re: jack 0.75 mini-freeze

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:11:14AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > Update: > > > > > > From the look of it, jack-audio-connection-kit is waiting only for > > > > * gem -- which seems to have experienced build failure for powerpc and hppa For my part, I

Re: Trouble with Alsa 0.9.6-5, 2.4.22 AC97 audio and /dev/mixer under Gnome 2.4.0-1

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Ron Johnson wrote: > Hi, > > In Gnome Volume Control 2.4.0, I try to set the volume, but get > the error > > Unable to open audio device '/dev/mixer'. > Please check that you have permissions to open 'dev/mixer' > and that you have sound support in your kernel. > > > Well...

Re: FW: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

On 7 Nov 2003, Jack O'Quin wrote: > guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > From reading these comments and taking a look at the mlockall call and > > how it is used in jack, I understand that this might really be > > very dangerous ... mlockall

Re: FW: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

On 7 Nov 2003, Jack O'Quin wrote: > Zenaan Harkness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > From: Matthias Urlichs > > > Hi, Jack O'Quin wrote: > > > > > > > So far, no one is sure why CAP_SYS_RESOURCE is needed, but we find > > > > that mlockall() fails without it. > > > > > > For good reason. The resou

Re: Some random ideas (was Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy)

ot;DJ apps", "Pro Apps" etc. There are lots of multimedia and related packages in Debian .. not so easy to have the overview. Guenter > > Em Ter, 2003-11-04 ?s 08:36, Zenaan Harkness escreveu: > > On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 20:08, guenter geiger wrote: > > > Hi,

Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

On 4 Nov 2003, Jack O'Quin wrote: > Some people have reported good results running jackd without realtime > privileges using larger buffers (hence larger latencies). For me, > running Debian without SMP, this does not work well at all. The > largest buffer my soundcard supports is 2048 frames,

Re: fw: jackd/ audio apps mini policy

Hi, thanks for your explanations, The way I see it the only solution to have realtime functionality with JACK is to build a capability and lowlatency patched kernel and set jackstart suid root via the debconf system. Setting jackd root does not work, because in that state JACK does not accept c

Re: jack 0.75 mini-freeze

On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, fellow debian audio developers, and release managers. > > > I think jack-audio-connection-kit and related packages should enter > mini-freeze, to get something released to testing. > > python2.3, which was one of the largest stumbling blocks has now

Re: Matroska tools package

On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Christian Marillat wrote: > Hi, > > Nobody is interested to package MKVtoolnix ? > > http://www.bunkus.org/videotools/mkvtoolnix/ It definitely looks interesting. Might be worth to file an RFP bug, in order to let the developers list know. Greetings, Guenter

Re: Respect the wishes of the mplayer authors

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > If you do want to include mplayer in your distro, how about releasing it > > under another name than mplayer, so that the real and lovable mplayer won't > > be mistaken for a cripled and unusable application? To quote Bruce Perens > > explaining

Re: jack 0.80.0

On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Jack 0.80 has been released, and some apps that requires 0.80 > (like ecasound 2.3) have already come out. > > I'm not quite sure of the binary compatibility; it should > somehow work. > > Status of current jack is that currently it compiles on all arche

Re: Bug#205552: jack-audio-connection-kit: new upstream release available

On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > I very much appreciate your efforts to keep binary compatibility, > but I just hope it doesn't burden development too much. > I'd rather see liberal development until satisfaction than seeing > a lot of compatibility code already accumulating on jack. >

Re: Debian and Zapping recording

On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Andrea Glorioso wrote: > > "emm" == Eduardo Marcel Macan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > emm> That is probably going away when ALSA + JACK becomes the > emm> standard, I think we should start to help their adoption by > emm> the upstream authors of the sound soft

Re: Debian and Zapping recording

On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Christian Marillat wrote: > guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Christian Marillat wrote: > Already did : > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2001/debian-devel-200111/msg01972.html > http://lists.debian.org/

Re: Adapting Debian to Music Making

On 1 Aug 2003, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote: > The 2.6 series of kernels will bring the turning point when OSS > gets deprecated and ALSA becomes the standard. We shouldn't > stay behind to try to improve debian on this field. Hi Eduardo, sorry for loosing the thread on this important topic. Thats

Re: Debian and Zapping recording

On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Christian Marillat wrote: > guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Christian Marillat wrote: > > [...] > > >> Execpt if ftpmasters are blind, my packages are still in the queue and > >> thus ftpmasters

Re: Debian and Zapping recording

On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Christian Marillat wrote: > guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Christian Marillat wrote: > > [...] > > >> I did an ITP for rte 2 years ago, but the packages has been never > >> installed by oirs ft

cinelerra (was: Re: Adapting Debian to Music Making)

On 2 Aug 2003, Herman Robak wrote: > > They work fine for me. Don't know, why they not entered the official > > pool. > > We are working on it. I talked with the Debian maintainer who > packages xmovie, libmpeg3 and quicktime4linux at Debconf?. He > would like to package Cinelerra, too. I enco

Re: Debian and Zapping recording

On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Christian Marillat wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Janusz S. Bie?) writes: > > > Many thanks for so quick answer. > > [...] > > >> zapping need to be compiled against rte, simply installing rte do nothing. > > > > I noticed you are the Debian zapping package maintainer. Do you inte

Re: Adapting Debian to Music Making

On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Klaus-M. Klingsporn wrote: > Am / On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:30:48 +0200 (CEST) > schrieb guenter geiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On the video side I don't know, but there are several interesting > > projects out there, starting from cinelerra,

Re: Adapting Debian to Music Making

On 1 Aug 2003, Eduardo Marcel Macan wrote: > Is this a good forum to reach the other developers dealing with > multimedia related software in debian? I see this is a very low > volume list nowadays. I think this is the perfect forum for that. It is true that it is low volume up to now, but with s

Re: upgrade xine from woody to testing

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi there, > > I would like to upgrade xine from the stable version (DVD navigation does > not seem to work (I guess, I do not know how it looks like if it works...) to > testing. To do so I want to use the testing source files provided by Debian > and

Re: mplayer

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, martin f krafft wrote: > > Fact is, mplayer should be packaged for Debian. Let's here the > devoted step forward and take it on! Actually that is what I wanted to say with "it needs someone to package it". I am well aware that the packaging is already done (upstream provides

Re: jack-rack and ftgl

On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 12:55:51PM +0200, guenter geiger wrote: > > > One is ftgl. I am currently in the process of uploading a new version > > of gem, which depends on gltt or ftgl. AS ftgl is the newer of these > > two p

jack-rack and ftgl

Hi, I have a question regarding two packages of yours that are not yet in Debian. One is ftgl. I am currently in the process of uploading a new version of gem, which depends on gltt or ftgl. AS ftgl is the newer of these two packages, I would like to use ftgl together with gem. Are you plannig t

Re: Logitech Stereo20 USB unter Debian

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Philipp Knappke wrote: > ah excuse me, i didn't think about that, > i was actually sending this mail to debian-user-german@lists.debian.org, > when i realised i could make use of this new debian-multimedia-list. > so here is my problem in english again: > > i own a logitech hea

Re: libasound2 and jack

On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that asound-jack plugin is available, which seems like > a jack-output plugin for ALSA? > > It's probably made a Build-Depends loop between jack-audio-connection-kit > and alsa-lib. > > Is this desirable ? Probably not desireable. E

Re: jack-a-d-k 0.71.2 now accepted into archive, please recompile

Great, You are right, the transport ABI is not compatible (not even the API is). Most applications do not use the transport API, so they will need no fixing. Greetings, Guenter On Wed, 28 May 2003, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > jack-audio-development-kit 0.71.2 is now accepted into the arc