should check on superfluous information,
such as debugging symbols. The absence of sections should exonerate a program
from containing superfluous information.
Groetjes Albert
ree
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openlierox/openlierox_0.57-beta4.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Albert Zeyer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
izing
non-shell email accounts when a user authenticates over POP3 or IMAP,
triggering OfflineIMAP to sync with a redundant IMAP server.
Thanks for any suggestions,
Albert
--
http://www.docunext.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
hanks in advance.
- Albert
--
http://www.docunext.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ng in preparing these?
Thank you,
Albert
--
My Blogs:
http://www.docunext.com/
http://www.albertlash.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For what its worth, I was *just* searching for this package yesterday.
I ran into a problem with the one from the outside repository needing
the older mysql client. Does this one work with the newer client
library by chance? I tried to compile it with no luck:
http://www.docunext.com/blog/2007/11/
On Nov 9, 2007 9:31 PM, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03-11-2007 12:37, Albert Lash wrote:
> > I have a few PHP packages which may be appropriate for inclusion in
> > the deb
uildprocess and dependencies are quite similar for
all versions (at least at the moment.)
any directions or hints on how to best solve this situation?
(i'm not new to git and have some knowledge on debian packaging, though
i'm not a real expert on the later)
thanks,
yours,
albert
signature
graphing
calculators (and evoking nostalgia too!).
As always, the emulator does NOT provide ROMs, but it does offer ways to
dump or create a ROM legally.
Please consider sponsoring my package!
Regards,
Albert Huang
with the
same email...
I would assume that this usage falls under fair use... but to be sure, I'll
ask upstream about it (CC'ed).
[Upstream: please reply to all emails - my email, the reporter's email, and
CC to the two bug reports.]
Thanks!
Albert
copyright issue in using photographs of these products as skins for non
> TI software?
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich Schuchardt
>
Oops, didn't actually CC upstream... let's try that again!
[Upstream: please reply to all emails - my email, the reporter's email, and
CC to the two bug reports.]
Thanks!
Albert
ource package:*
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gfm/gfm_1.06-1.dsc
(This is basically a RFS in email format due to the magnitude of the
packages.)
Thanks in advance!
Albert
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Bart Martens wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:36:50AM -0400, Albert Huang wrote:
> > *Mentor page:* https://mentors.debian.net/package/libticables
> > *Mentor page:* https://mentors.debian.net/package/libticonv
> > *Mentor page:* https
README "A special exception applies when linking the
> library
> into TilEm, see the COPYING file for details." but I don't find such
> exception
> in the COPYING file (it's identical to /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2)
> nor in
> debian/copyright. Please ask upstream for clarification.
CC'ed. Resolution to this problem will fix #686635.
Thanks,
Albert
in advance!
Albert
firms that this
> exception
> | is no longer valid.
> | Author: Albert Huang
>
> But there is no LICENSE file. I guess you meant the COPYING file.
>
Ah yes, my mistake.
I suggest to not patch README but to quote what upstream wrote about this in
> debian/copyrigh
y time as the
> maintainer...
> | I _think_ that this exception is obsolete nowadays, as TilEm 2.0 is
> | completely free software. TilEm 0.x used a component with a non-free
> | license, but it has been replaced with free software for the TilEm 2.0
> | release, produced this year,
upstream maintainers.
- The exception is now invalid, does not apply to the current packages,
and will eventually be dropped in the upstream VCS (and future releases).
That said, should I still change the debian/copyright to include the
exception, or go with upstream and leave it as
I'm not a DD but I've been quite interested in trying out redmine. Thanks
for packaging it!
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "redmine".
>
> * Package name: redmine
>Version : 0.9.0-1
>Upstream Author : Jean-Philippe Lang
> * URL : http:
t in order to function. (Specifically, it relies on
shell scripts to produce binaries, and requires a certain TIGCC
environmental variable to do anything...) I'm in discussion with upstream
on what could be done to resolve this. But that probably deserves another
email/thread on debian-mentors...
Thanks!
Albert
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:21, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
> How can I install the missing dependecies? Or is there an other
Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin
On Saturday 21 February 2004 23:37, wrote:
> Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS
> game that was called the mother of all games. It is a multi-player,
> turn-based, artilary stratagy game with many large weapons to blow of
> your friends with. It's big fun. For more i
On Saturday 21 February 2004 16:06, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> I'm sorry to insist, but do you think that the workaround described
> below is acceptable regarding debian policy ? By workaround, I mean
> (shorrt version): as the libs needed by pgAdmin3 won't enter debian
> for the moment (and may be ne
On Saturday 21 February 2004 04:04, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-21 01:46]:
> Hello I search a sponsor for my packet binclock.
> I read more documentation and know the package is lintian bug free.
>
> > You can find the files it under:
> sorry, this is right:
> >
> Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS game
> that was called the mother of all
..
> You've probably guessed that I'm looking for a sponser.
> I hope you'll at least play the game to see if you like it.
>> I'm sorry i couldn't, the orig.tar is missing?
>> No binaries
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:08, Frank Küster wrote:
> In particular, I'm looking for something like
>
> "The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the
> downloaded archive, as specified in copyright, as closely as
> possible. If there are changes, they have to be documented in ...
---Original Message---
Van: Kabelfoon Content Checker
Datum: 03/31/04 15:56:53
Aan: undisclosed-recipients: ,
Onderwerp: VIRUS (W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) IN EMAIL (van/from )
(English translation below)
VIRUS ALARM
Onze email scanner vond
W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
virus in e
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:40, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
> I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
>
> I tried to check some packages to find how do they solve this issue,
> but now I'm really confused.
>
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:31, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, WHAT'SYOURNAME wrote:
> > I'm debianizing a package that I would like to split up, like:
> > package-backgrounds
> > package-icons
> > package-examples
>
> Why? How big are the components? Would somebd
On Monday 05 April 2004 20:57, Erik Bourget wrote:
> I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source
Any specific problems?
Create two trees from debian/rules
(man dpkg-deb ! and related (man deb) !!).
You may want to do this using debhelper scripts (man debhelper, watch
out fo
On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
> someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
> maintained since 1.5 years...
>
> (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
>da/)
>
> I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to spo
d API allows for rapid bluetooth application prototyping and
development.
homepage: http://org.csail.mit.edu/pybluez
http://people.csail.mit.edu/albert/pybluez/0.2/pybluez_0.2-2.dsc
http://people.csail.mit.edu/albert/pybluez/0.2/pybluez_0.2-2.tar.gz
http://people.csail.mit.edu/albert/pyblue
I have picked up a new upstream source and packaged cthugha, which was
orphaned.
If somebody could sponsor the upload for me, I'd appreciate.
Deb-src line is:
deb-src
http://home.t-online.de/home/eislink/debian woody non-free
Download and info also on http://cthugha.debox.de
tnx and greetings,
Hello!
I'm looking for info/doc/scripts/hints on proper / practical ways to
submit patches.
Of interest to me is also the proper way to generate a patch to a
single file - what is the best point in the dir structure to start?
Toplevel, ../Toplevel, ... ?
But currently i do have fixes for around
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 31-Jan-2001 Martin Albert wrote:
> > proper / practical ways to submit patches?
>
> what i do is:
> ..
> mv package package.shaleh
> dpkg-source -x package.dsc
> # the N makes it include files I
Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
Two small (<10k) demos, where at least one is practically usable, this
is, would be nice to have it installed as binary, are to be installed
with the binary pkg.
The previous debian release has
On Friday 16 February 2001 00:15, Martin Albert wrote:
> Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
>
> I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
And that was looong ago. Sorry, that i didn't say thanks to
Matt Zimmerman, Ingo Saitz, Brian Russo, Hamish Moffa
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:30:49AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > you also fail to install a menu file. I am coming up with a
> > lintian check for packages linked to X and not installing one. So
> > you reminded me of another bug (-:
No, i'm sure you wouldn't do that. :) libggi-target-
On Saturday 24 February 2001 14:22, Sam TH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yet another thing: your Build-depends seems wrong.
> > Policy says: 'A source package may declare a dependency or a
> > conflict on a binary package', but your are depending o
Hello, ya all!
I chose the above mentioned pkgs from the beginning, prepared a NMU of
the old packages, but now have new upstream packages ready.
My first try to contact the corresponding debian maintainer was mid Jan
2001. Feb 2nd i received:
> Are you alive?
Yes. Alive, but busy. I just st
On Saturday 24 February 2001 17:48, Eric VB wrote:
> Now if I add a line to debian/postrm.debhelper, everytime I re-build
> my package (dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot), this line is erased. Where
> do I have to declare my cutomized commands ?
>
> man dh_installdeb doesn't help and is a bit confused :
> > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Hmm, the configure file should also check for ghttp.h, it didnt
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:21:13PM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
> > This produces unnecessary hassles when, fo
Hello, dear developers!
libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
following:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libggi-target-fbdev
Version: 1:1.99.2.0b3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
When I upgraded the g
Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
enough, it seems.
All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
sorry, thanks, greetings martin
I've send to the wrong adress, here it is to the list again:
Thanks Matt Zimmermann for your kind and reassuring answers.
For a summary see his answers. I couldn't express better.
I'm planning to use debconf as soon as it has settled somewhat.
Open are the questions:
- How to find out that deb
(Crossposted d-devel intentionally. Replies to d-mentors only, please).
GGI project released GGI 2.0. Debian is going woody. I would like to
have a clean GGI in woody, but trouble with bugs and policy.
Libgii and libggi, the DYNAMIC duo, lived, more or less happily, for a
long time without any
On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
> someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
> maintained since 1.5 years...
>
> (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
>da/)
>
> I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to spo
ed
API allows for rapid bluetooth application prototyping and
development. PyBlueZ has been used for several research projects at
MIT.
http://org.csail.mit.edu/pybluez/
Regards,
Albert Huang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
I have picked up a new upstream source and packaged cthugha, which was
orphaned.
If somebody could sponsor the upload for me, I'd appreciate.
Deb-src line is:
deb-src
http://home.t-online.de/home/eislink/debian woody non-free
Download and info also on http://cthugha.debox.de
tnx and greetings
Hello!
I'm looking for info/doc/scripts/hints on proper / practical ways to
submit patches.
Of interest to me is also the proper way to generate a patch to a
single file - what is the best point in the dir structure to start?
Toplevel, ../Toplevel, ... ?
But currently i do have fixes for around
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 31-Jan-2001 Martin Albert wrote:
> > proper / practical ways to submit patches?
>
> what i do is:
> ..
> mv package package.shaleh
> dpkg-source -x package.dsc
> # the N makes it include files I
Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
Two small (<10k) demos, where at least one is practically usable, this
is, would be nice to have it installed as binary, are to be installed
with the binary pkg.
The previous debian release ha
On Friday 16 February 2001 00:15, Martin Albert wrote:
> Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
>
> I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
And that was looong ago. Sorry, that i didn't say thanks to
Matt Zimmerman, Ingo Saitz, Brian Russo, Hamish Moffa
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:30:49AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > you also fail to install a menu file. I am coming up with a
> > lintian check for packages linked to X and not installing one. So
> > you reminded me of another bug (-:
No, i'm sure you wouldn't do that. :) libggi-target
On Saturday 24 February 2001 14:22, Sam TH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yet another thing: your Build-depends seems wrong.
> > Policy says: 'A source package may declare a dependency or a
> > conflict on a binary package', but your are depending
Hello, ya all!
I chose the above mentioned pkgs from the beginning, prepared a NMU of
the old packages, but now have new upstream packages ready.
My first try to contact the corresponding debian maintainer was mid Jan
2001. Feb 2nd i received:
> Are you alive?
Yes. Alive, but busy. I just s
On Saturday 24 February 2001 17:48, Eric VB wrote:
> Now if I add a line to debian/postrm.debhelper, everytime I re-build
> my package (dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot), this line is erased. Where
> do I have to declare my cutomized commands ?
>
> man dh_installdeb doesn't help and is a bit confused
> > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Hmm, the configure file should also check for ghttp.h, it didnt
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:21:13PM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
> > This produces unnecessary hassles when, fo
Hello, dear developers!
libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
following:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libggi-target-fbdev
Version: 1:1.99.2.0b3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
When I upgraded the
Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
enough, it seems.
All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
sorry, thanks, greetings martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've send to the wrong adress, here it is to the list again:
Thanks Matt Zimmermann for your kind and reassuring answers.
For a summary see his answers. I couldn't express better.
I'm planning to use debconf as soon as it has settled somewhat.
Open are the questions:
- How to find out that de
(Crossposted d-devel intentionally. Replies to d-mentors only, please).
GGI project released GGI 2.0. Debian is going woody. I would like to
have a clean GGI in woody, but trouble with bugs and policy.
Libgii and libggi, the DYNAMIC duo, lived, more or less happily, for a
long time without an
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
> > fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
> >
> > If this abuse continues, I might
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 19:52, Mike Schacht wrote:
> Here we go again... Looking for a sponser for knoda.
I had a look on that package, but as i don't know about current kde3
practices, i'd rather not step forward to upload.
> knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on hk_classes
Say, i have a need of a certain pkg, depended on by others that i want
to be in the pool quickly, so that i can continue with those depending.
Is it a good idea in general to try to build and upload from debian
machines for some archs?
thank you for your reply, martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:21, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
> How can I install the missing dependecies? Or is there an other
Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 21 February 2004 23:37, wrote:
> Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS
> game that was called the mother of all games. It is a multi-player,
> turn-based, artilary stratagy game with many large weapons to blow of
> your friends with. It's big fun. For more i
On Saturday 21 February 2004 16:06, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> I'm sorry to insist, but do you think that the workaround described
> below is acceptable regarding debian policy ? By workaround, I mean
> (shorrt version): as the libs needed by pgAdmin3 won't enter debian
> for the moment (and may be ne
On Saturday 21 February 2004 04:04, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-21 01:46]:
> Hello I search a sponsor for my packet binclock.
> I read more documentation and know the package is lintian bug free.
>
> > You can find the files it under:
> sorry, this is right:
> >
> Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS game
> that was called the mother of all
..
> You've probably guessed that I'm looking for a sponser.
> I hope you'll at least play the game to see if you like it.
>> I'm sorry i couldn't, the orig.tar is missing?
>> No binaries
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:08, Frank Küster wrote:
> In particular, I'm looking for something like
>
> "The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the
> downloaded archive, as specified in copyright, as closely as
> possible. If there are changes, they have to be documented in ...
---Original Message---
Van: Kabelfoon Content Checker
Datum: 03/31/04 15:56:53
Aan: undisclosed-recipients: ,
Onderwerp: VIRUS (W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) IN EMAIL (van/from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
(English translation below)
VIRUS ALARM
Onze email scanner vond
W32/[EMAIL PR
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:40, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
> I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
>
> I tried to check some packages to find how do they solve this issue,
> but now I'm really confused.
>
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:31, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, WHAT'SYOURNAME wrote:
> > I'm debianizing a package that I would like to split up, like:
> > package-backgrounds
> > package-icons
> > package-examples
>
> Why? How big are the components? Would somebd
On Monday 05 April 2004 20:57, Erik Bourget wrote:
> I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source
Any specific problems?
Create two trees from debian/rules
(man dpkg-deb ! and related (man deb) !!).
You may want to do this using debhelper scripts (man debhelper, watch
out fo
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
> > fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
> >
> > If this abuse continues, I might j
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 19:52, Mike Schacht wrote:
> Here we go again... Looking for a sponser for knoda.
I had a look on that package, but as i don't know about current kde3
practices, i'd rather not step forward to upload.
> knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on hk_classes
Say, i have a need of a certain pkg, depended on by others that i want
to be in the pool quickly, so that i can continue with those depending.
Is it a good idea in general to try to build and upload from debian
machines for some archs?
thank you for your reply, martin
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 16:14, David Roundy wrote:
> > The usual way is using "pre1", "pre2", ..., "rc1", ..., "rel". As a
> > matter of fact, this sorts nicely.
>
> Doesn't this have the problem that debian considers 1.2pre1 to be a
> later version than 1.2?
As Andrew and others wrote: no if y
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 14:18, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> So the question is, is it permissable to put such a basic test of a
> library into the rules file that gets executed as part of the build
> process? If so, are there any guidelines anywhere as to how one
>
> The test would involve compili
According to [0], noblenote has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 698557
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], noblenote has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 698557
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], udevil had not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #701014
title. However, #691812 was a RFP for this package. I have retitled this RFP to
ITP and have set you as its owner.
You should close this ITP bug from your package.
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/
According to [0], spacefm had not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #701010
title. However, #691811 was a RFP for this package. I have retitled this RFP to
ITP and have set you as its owner.
You should close this ITP bug from your package.
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm
According to [0], simpleburn has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 701020
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
retitle 701011 RFS: dzen2/0.9.5~git09022013.f7907da3a4-1
thanks
I'm retitling this bug, removing the word ITA from the title, since dzen2 is
neither in adoption nor orphaned:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/dzen2
Thanks for your work!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.de
retitle 701021 RFS: tinywm/1.3+git11122012.b663a26b83-1 [NMU]
thanks
I'm retitling this bug, removing the word ITA from the title, since tinywm is
neither in adoption nor orphaned:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/tinywm
Thanks for your work!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@l
retitle 701017 RFS: evilwm/1.1.0-1
thanks
I'm retitling this bug, removing the word ITA from the title, since evilwm is
neither in adoption nor orphaned:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/evilwm
Thanks for your work!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
them to comply with the GPL.
If they refuse there are two courses of action:
1. Sue them
2. Just ignore the second license, but send a a polite letter.
If they sue you, mobilise the forces of the free world and
the USA.
> Many thanks
> Gert
Groetjes Albert.
--
Suffering
Thibaut Paumard schreef:
> Le 17/03/2014 13:34, Albert van der Horst a écrit :
>>> one version, 2.21 is GPL, but already for reasonable sized brain image
>>> data the code crashes, and the way the code is written there is no easy
>>> way to fix this, and hence, Osca
equires lina for
building only, not for running. An alternative build with lina for e.g.
``factor'' 2] is as simple as the factor build in C, one executable, one
man-page.
lina scripts have been proposed in a webserver. A sub ms startup time
makes some applications practical.
http
I didn't mean to put this off list, my bad.
Oorspronkelijke bericht
Onderwerp: Re: Preliminary questions for sponsoring a compiler
Datum: 2016-07-25 15:58
Afzender: Albert van der Horst
Ontvanger: Paul Wise
Paul Wise schreef op 2016-07-25 15:12:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at
Oorspronkelijke bericht
Onderwerp: Re: Preliminary questions for sponsoring a compiler
Datum: 2016-07-25 16:15
Afzender: Paul Wise
Ontvanger: Albert van der Horst
Not sure why you moved the discussion off-list, in Debian we prefer to
discuss things in public. Feel free to
Albert van der Horst schreef op 2016-07-25 18:00:
Oorspronkelijke bericht
Onderwerp: Re: Preliminary questions for sponsoring a compiler
Datum: 2016-07-25 16:15
Afzender: Paul Wise
Ontvanger: Albert van der Horst
Not sure why you moved the discussion off-list, in Debian we
Christian Seiler schreef op 2016-07-25 18:14:
On 07/25/2016 02:51 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
The problem is: ld is not stable w.r.t. linking pure assembler files.
How so?
$ cat write.s
.text
.global _start
.type _start, @function
_start:
mov $1, %rax
mov %rax
Paul Wise schreef op 2016-07-26 07:15:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
It has been published, the generic system is GPL as well.
It is on the net since ages
http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst/ciforth-5.0.tar.gz and
http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst
Paul Wise schreef op 2016-07-30 09:16:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
Do you really demand that a Debian package can generate windows
executables, and booting floppies in double density?
We already have tested and working GCC cross-compilers for Windows.
https
with
the power to do that.
So please help!
With this out of the way I can start looking for a sponsor.
Groetjes Albert
--
Suffering is the prerogative of the strong, the weak -- perish.
Albert van der Horst
P.S.
There are more requirements in the policy that fail on such simple
programs:
Supp
Paul Wise schreef op 2017-06-29 15:55:
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
I'm working on packaging lina and I'm stuck.
I do have a correct .deb but that seems not to be enough.
Yes, as I suggested in my last mail, you need a source package for
Debia
an internal representation
and nobody could have guessed (nor benefited.)
So is the .s accepted as source conform Debian policies?
G.
groetjes Albert
1] And more. But that doesn't make it fundamentally different.
--
Suffering is the prerogative of the strong, the weak -- perish.
Albert van der Horst
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
