Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "serious-engine":
* Package name : serious-engine
Version : 0~git20230515+dfsg-1
Upstream contact : https://github.com/ptitSeb/Serious-Engine/issues
* URL : https://w
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "serious-engine":
* Package name : serious-engine
Version : 0~git20230724+dfsg-1
Upstream contact : https://github.com/ptitSeb/Serious-Engine/issues
* URL : https://w
control: tags 1072226 - moreinfo
Le vendredi 31 mai 2024 à 10:11 +0200, Gianfranco Costamagna a écrit :
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hello, some copyright/licenses are missing
>
> GPL-3+
> Sources/Ecc/Parser.cpp: GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
> Sources/Ecc/Parser.h: GNU General Pub
control: tags 1072226 - moreinfo
Hi,
Le 2024-07-28 06:34, Tobias Frost a écrit :
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
a short review:
- You're repacking the source. It's not clear to me why you are
removing the
files. Can you expand?
The removed files basically falls down into 4 categories:
- u
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Le 2024-08-19 10:05, Phil Wyett a écrit :
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Sebastien,
Preamble...
Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your
contribution
to the Debian project.
The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help
pack
Hi,
Le 2024-08-19 16:54, Phil Wyett a écrit :
Hi,
Slight miscommunication. I should have just said to put >= instead of
>>.
Really unless you want to avoid backports, the package needs no version
depend on 'game-data-packager-runtime'.
If you want the version depend and be OK for a stable
Le 2024-08-19 19:29, Phil Wyett a écrit :
[...]
So, really >= 79 would maybe be the best way forward.
Can you please explains why you think that ?
The package requires bits that were added in g-d-p v74.
The depends field contains "game-data-packager-runtime (>= 74)"
And you push for ">= 79",
Hi Phil,
Le 2024-08-28 10:12, Phil Wyett a écrit :
On Wed, 2024-08-28 at 09:42 +0200, Sébastien Noel wrote:
Le 2024-08-19 19:29, Phil Wyett a écrit :
> [...]
> So, really >= 79 would maybe be the best way forward.
Can you please explains why you think that ?
The package requires
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "descent3":
* Package name : descent3
Version : 1.5.0+ds-1
Upstream contact :
https://github.com/DescentDevelopers/Descent3/issues
* URL : https://github.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openmohaa":
* Package name : openmohaa
Version : 0.70.0+dfsg-1
Upstream contact : https://github.com/openmoh/openmohaa/issues
* URL : https://github.com/op
control: tags 1084795 - moreinfo
Hi,
thank you for the review!
On 15/11/24 18:24, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> short review, ran out of time to complete it:
>
> - d/scripts/mohaa-server references /usr/lib/openmohaa/README.mohaa-
> data maybe it should directly me
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On 27/12/24 16:16, Phil Wyett wrote:
Control: tags -1 -confirmed
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Sebiastien,
[...]
2. Lintian [3]: Issue
Lintian should be happy now
https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/openmohaa/-/commit/36e898f6487245934bfdc2fe31658e854c0a0174
3. Lice
Hi Phil,
Le 2025-01-07 17:13, Phil Wyett a écrit :
Hi,
While waiting for a sponsor, it would be nice to clean up the patches.
I: serious-engine source: invalid-dep3-format-patch-no-origin
[...]
[Done]
But let's be honest, I have zero hope that these packages will ever
reach the Debian arch
Hi,
Le 2025-01-08 16:49, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz a écrit :
Hi,
I feel bad for your frustration and I think it makes sense for you to
feel so
after so long trying to get a package into the archive. That said, a
few
comments follow.
[...]
Thank you for your kind words and for taking the time t
Hi,
Le 2025-01-08 14:58, Chris Hofstaedtler a écrit :
Hi,
I strongly disagree. There is no institutional "old farts club
only".
I'm sure it's not an institutional moto; but it's how it feels
externally :-/
My experience is that if you don't have strong ties with people "on the
inside" (or w
Hi Chris,
Le 2025-01-08 15:54, Chris Hofstaedtler a écrit :
My experience is that if you don't have strong ties with people "on
the
inside" (or write 'provocative' email like I just did) you will mostly
be
ignored, plain and simple. The "normal" processes leads to dead ends
unfortunately.
I
/pool/main/p/plutovg/plutovg_1.0.0-1.dsc
Changes for the initial release:
plutovg (1.0.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1099422)
Best regards,
Sébastien Noel
On 13/04/25 20:33, Phil Wyett wrote:
On Sun, 2025-04-13 at 19:42 +0200, Sébastien Noel wrote:
Spaces are allowed.
no they are not. Here is what Lintian as to say if I include a snippet
"License: Expat and/or Unlicense" :
W: plutovg source: space-in-std-shortname-in-dep5-copyright
On 13/04/25 19:29, Phil Wyett wrote:
No, you do not need to add this. LEft in output in error.
ok thanks
[...]
The value of the "License" field can't have space.
"Expat and/or Unlicense" isn't allowed; how I am supposed to express
this in the dep5 format ?
Spaces are allowed.
no they are
Hi Phil,
I have multiple questions for you:
On 13/04/25 18:34, Phil Wyett wrote:
[...]
Expat| FTL source/FTL.TXT
Do I really need to begin to document license file in d/copyright ??
Looking on my system in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright this doesn't seems to
be a common
Hi Jeremy,
On 14/04/25 13:57, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
Sébastien,
I suggest naming the source package gnome-shell-frippery. This matches
the upstream tarball naming and what other distros have done.
https://repology.org/project/gnome-shell-frippery/versions
+1, let' not diverge if we don't need to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-frippery":
* Package name : gnome-shell-extension-frippery
Version : 48.0-1
Upstream co
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi Phil,
On 21/02/25 22:07, Phil Wyett wrote:
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
[...]
I used to find value in your reviews, but i'm doubtful with this one...
The package pass all your tests but you conclude that it
"is not yet ready".
What is wrong with the package ?
Is
On 22/02/25 15:10, Phil Wyett wrote:
Sebastien,
A 'moreinfo' tag is simply that. I asked if you could make an addition and if
you were going to import to Salsa. A DD can pick-up a package at any point,
deem it ready for upload and do that upload.
Additionally to doing the first reviews, I also
Note: This is a new dependency of the next release of src:descent3
Best regards,
Sébastien Noel
On 6/06/25 11:08, Jeroen Ploemen wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 14:19:53 +0200
Sébastien Noel wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
sphinx-substitution-extensions:
hi Sébastien,
nice work, just one thing that needs to be fixed before I can upload
this package
nstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release; Closes: #1107269
Note: I need this package in Debian to be able to rebuild the HTML
documentation of another package (namely src:eggdrop, that I entends to
salvage, see #1100637)
Best regards,
Sébastien Noel
27 matches
Mail list logo
