Could be because it's actually called SNEeSe.
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sneese/
Cheers,
- Michael
(Follow-ups to debian-legal, please.)
FWIW, I would not touch SNEeSe or any fragment derived from it with a
ten-foot pole unless they can tell you where sneese.dat came from and
what's in it. My guess is that it is an infringing copy of the
contents of an SNES64 ROM and that the history of its in
On 7/15/05, skaller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh .. which DD can be responsible for my package Felix then?
> They would have to know:
>
> * C/C++
> * OCaml
> * Python
> * Bash
> * Interscript
> * Felix
> * ocamllex/ocamlyacc and Elkhound
> * HTML/XML
> * Latex/troff/texinfo
> * snippets of 10 o
On 7/18/05, Ryan Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 18 July 2005 11:12 pm, you wrote:
> > >FWIW, I would not touch SNEeSe or any fragment derived from it with a
> > >ten-foot pole unless they can tell you where sneese.dat came from and
> > >what's in it.
> >
> > Well file(1) said it is
I'm interested in adopting and maintaining the axkit source package (i.
e., the AxKit XML application server and its relatives axkit-examples,
axkit-language-htmldoc, and axkit-language-query). Debian has been my
preferred distribution for several years and I've monkeyed with dpkg for
internal pur
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:04:25 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Adopting orphaned packages (axkit and relatives)
From: "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Reply-To: "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Use
> axkit has been on my radar for a while so I'd be willing to sponsor your
> upload.
Thanks, Jaldhar. I built a set of packages under pbuilder, which can be
obtained from http://www-static.sane.net/axkit-1.6.2-4/ (as soon as the
DNS record has propagated; it's the same IP address as www.sane.net)
> Hello,
>
> I've put together a list of neglected RC bugs:
>
> http://memebeam.org/john/tests/bug-mining/neglected-bugs.html
Thanks, John; I found this helpful, on two scores. One, I spotted one
package on your list that I care about and feel competent to help with
(lyx); I'm putting togeth
I could use the help of a DD to confirm that the packages I am building
are structurally fit for upload. I think I'm doing the right thing with
pbuilder, but I expect there are subtleties.
There are three packages available at http://www-static.sane.net/ (each
group of pbuilder results in a separ
> Piotr
>> Michael
> I've uploaded latex-xft-fonts to incoming. The first upload was rejected
> by James Troup for license reasons.
>
> See http://people.debian.org/~dexter/latex-xft-fonts/ for latest version.
>
Good. Testers, please use Piotr's version of latex-xft-fonts, it's
better.(Uses d
>> Two, I find it very encouraging to see that there are so few "neglected"
>> bugs. A few of these bugs stem from known issues like the ruby 1.6->1.8
>> transition; i. e., the lack of follow-ups on a particular bug is
>> misleading, because it's mostly there as a reminder or to block
>> propagati
> The list is short, but I don't consider it to be complete. Several
> cases which aren't covered, such as when someone other than the
> maintainer confirms the bug or provides more info, or where there has
> been a dialog between the maintainer and reporter with the ball left in
> the maintainer'
Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
>
> The warning about the Perl modules in the 'wrong" location has never been
> officially
> approved by the project. This warning has been added by the lintian
> maintainer due
> to someone filing a bug report but without consensus on the debian-perl
> mailing list.
>
> Michael K. Edwards wrote:
>> Perhaps the tool that generates the list could be amended to list
>> "someone
>> other than maintainer has responded, but maintainer has not" cases. Is
>> this likely to generate a lot of false positives?
>
> I'd th
On Friday 26 December 2003 08:00 am, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
[snip]
> And libhttp-ghttp-perl is used by axkit which is ITA'ed. So maybe the
> person that ITA'ed axkit should also take these two packages.
I am that person, and will happily take those packages. I will probably also
port axkit
On Friday 26 December 2003 09:14 pm, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2003 08:00 am, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > And libhttp-ghttp-perl is used by axkit which is ITA'ed. So maybe the
> > person that ITA'ed axkit should also take th
On Friday 26 December 2003 09:14 pm, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2003 08:00 am, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > And libhttp-ghttp-perl is used by axkit which is ITA'ed. So maybe the
> > person that ITA'ed axkit should also take th
I could use an upload sponsor for these packages, preferably before
libxml-filter-xslt-perl is removed from unstable due to FTBFS:
libxml-libxml-perl (I am maintainer; this will be my second upload, and
contains a major overhaul of the XSUB code)
libxml-sax-writer-perl (orphaned; I would like t
On Saturday 17 January 2004 03:47 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:29:14AM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> > I could use an upload sponsor for these packages, preferably before
> > libxml-filter-xslt-perl is removed from unstable due to FTBFS:
Thanks for l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Updated packages for libxml-libxml-perl and friends are in the same place as
before. (The only real differences are Uploaders: Jay Bonci and signature
with a proper securely managed key.) As I mentioned before, the "make test"
failures are harmles
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 03:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] threw a Hail Mary:
> I have a browser bug in my windows XP under Amazon.com. I emptied my
> shopping cart but when I pull up My Favorites for Amazon.com. only, the bug
> notice appears. How do I get rid of this notice.
Recommend you insta
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:50:01 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what, rpath? noo!
> do not hardcode the path.
Could you expand on the scope of this advice? I'm in the process of
repairing a broken build procedure (for a commercial app that runs on
Debian) and would appreci
On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:04:22 +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also sprach Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.12.07.2147 +0100]:
> > So the server core can load these shared libraries with dlopen(), get
> > the "factory" routines
I wrote:
> ... a quick
> perusal of the manpage suggests that RPATH in the loaded object has no
> effect, but I think I'd better UTSL before relying on that.
Note that I haven't verified whether RPATH in the loaded object has an
effect on dlopen(), but it clearly does have an effect on the use of
On 5/17/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Ryan, for your quick reply. I suspected that the correct thing
> to do would be to just accept the performance hit (although 15% seems
> pretty significant). I'll wait to see if anyone else has suggestions.
> Otherwise, I'll just compil
On 5/17/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael K Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> I'd be surprised if it's that bad under NPTL, and if it is, I'd
> Michael> be surprised if
On 5/18/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The configure flags for compiling libgc are: --disable-threads
> --disable-shared --enable-cplusplus (obviously with --disable-threads
> toggled for the different tests). I'm also running on a
> single-processor machine.
Not a hyperthreaded Xeo
On 5/18/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'm trying to compare the single-threaded libgc against the stock
> libgc that is in Debian, so for my baseline, I'm not going to do
> anything that Ryan doesn't do in his package (other than, of course,
> static linking, to make the compar
On 5/18/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "Michael" == Michael K Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Commenting out those lines, and compiling multi-threaded, gives
> performance similar to the single-threaded case. So what doe
On 5/19/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, if you want to use oprofile, you might as well use the
> 0.8.2 release. apt-get source oprofile will get you 0.8.1; grab the
> 0.8.2 upstream, unpack it, grab the 0.8.2 release notes, put them in
> ./Relea
On 5/18/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I'm trying to compare the single-threaded libgc against the stock
> libgc that is in Debian, so for my baseline, I'm not going to do
> anything that Ryan doesn't do in his package (other than, of course,
> static linking, to make the compar
On 5/19/05, Michael K. Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[a copy of a message from yesterday]
Aha! That's where the odd duplicated outbound e-mail is coming from
-- accidentally opening a new URL in the tab where my GMail account is
open, and then hitting the "back" button,
On 5/26/05, Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My upstream reports that according to his measurements, disabling
> THREAD_LOCAL_ALLOC gives only a 5% performance hit instead of 15%. So
> it's much closer to the single-threaded case, but is still a bit
> slower.
Perhaps upstream is on a hype
On 5/27/05, Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/27/05, Matthijs Kooijman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Matthijs Kooijman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> > * Package name: openttd
> > Version : 0.4.0.1
> > Upstream Author
On 5/27/05, Matthijs Kooijman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's correct; and, with or without that dependency, OpenTTD
> > infringes the copyright on Transport Tycoon Deluxe under a "mise en
> > scene" theory, as discussed on debian-legal. (Not to say there's a
> What do you mean by that exact
(copied to debian-legal, where the discussion belongs; next person
please cut debian-mentors)
On 6/4/05, Dafydd Harries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a package Alexandria, written in Ruby, which will depend on a
> new library in the next version. This library, ruby-zoom, is an LGPL Ruby
> bi
I'm interested in adopting and maintaining the axkit source package (i.
e., the AxKit XML application server and its relatives axkit-examples,
axkit-language-htmldoc, and axkit-language-query). Debian has been my
preferred distribution for several years and I've monkeyed with dpkg for
internal pur
AIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 23:04:25 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Adopting orphaned packages (axkit and relatives)
From: "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: "Michael K. Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: SquirrelM
> axkit has been on my radar for a while so I'd be willing to sponsor your
> upload.
Thanks, Jaldhar. I built a set of packages under pbuilder, which can be
obtained from http://www-static.sane.net/axkit-1.6.2-4/ (as soon as the
DNS record has propagated; it's the same IP address as www.sane.net)
> Hello,
>
> I've put together a list of neglected RC bugs:
>
> http://memebeam.org/john/tests/bug-mining/neglected-bugs.html
Thanks, John; I found this helpful, on two scores. One, I spotted one
package on your list that I care about and feel competent to help with
(lyx); I'm putting togeth
I could use the help of a DD to confirm that the packages I am building
are structurally fit for upload. I think I'm doing the right thing with
pbuilder, but I expect there are subtleties.
There are three packages available at http://www-static.sane.net/ (each
group of pbuilder results in a separ
> Piotr
>> Michael
> I've uploaded latex-xft-fonts to incoming. The first upload was rejected
> by James Troup for license reasons.
>
> See http://people.debian.org/~dexter/latex-xft-fonts/ for latest version.
>
Good. Testers, please use Piotr's version of latex-xft-fonts, it's
better.(Uses d
>> Two, I find it very encouraging to see that there are so few "neglected"
>> bugs. A few of these bugs stem from known issues like the ruby 1.6->1.8
>> transition; i. e., the lack of follow-ups on a particular bug is
>> misleading, because it's mostly there as a reminder or to block
>> propagati
> The list is short, but I don't consider it to be complete. Several
> cases which aren't covered, such as when someone other than the
> maintainer confirms the bug or provides more info, or where there has
> been a dialog between the maintainer and reporter with the ball left in
> the maintainer'
> Michael K. Edwards wrote:
>> Perhaps the tool that generates the list could be amended to list
>> "someone
>> other than maintainer has responded, but maintainer has not" cases. Is
>> this likely to generate a lot of false positives?
>
> I'd th
Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
>
> The warning about the Perl modules in the 'wrong" location has never been
> officially
> approved by the project. This warning has been added by the lintian
> maintainer due
> to someone filing a bug report but without consensus on the debian-perl
> mailing list.
>
On Friday 26 December 2003 08:00 am, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
[snip]
> And libhttp-ghttp-perl is used by axkit which is ITA'ed. So maybe the
> person that ITA'ed axkit should also take these two packages.
I am that person, and will happily take those packages. I will probably also
port axkit
On Friday 26 December 2003 09:14 pm, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2003 08:00 am, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > And libhttp-ghttp-perl is used by axkit which is ITA'ed. So maybe the
> > person that ITA'ed axkit should also take th
On Friday 26 December 2003 09:14 pm, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> On Friday 26 December 2003 08:00 am, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > And libhttp-ghttp-perl is used by axkit which is ITA'ed. So maybe the
> > person that ITA'ed axkit should also take th
I could use an upload sponsor for these packages, preferably before
libxml-filter-xslt-perl is removed from unstable due to FTBFS:
libxml-libxml-perl (I am maintainer; this will be my second upload, and
contains a major overhaul of the XSUB code)
libxml-sax-writer-perl (orphaned; I would like t
On Saturday 17 January 2004 03:47 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:29:14AM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> > I could use an upload sponsor for these packages, preferably before
> > libxml-filter-xslt-perl is removed from unstable due to FTBFS:
Thanks for l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Updated packages for libxml-libxml-perl and friends are in the same place as
before. (The only real differences are Uploaders: Jay Bonci and signature
with a proper securely managed key.) As I mentioned before, the "make test"
failures are harmles
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 03:36 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] threw a Hail Mary:
> I have a browser bug in my windows XP under Amazon.com. I emptied my
> shopping cart but when I pull up My Favorites for Amazon.com. only, the bug
> notice appears. How do I get rid of this notice.
Recommend you insta
53 matches
Mail list logo
