On Saturday 17 January 2004 03:47 am, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 12:29:14AM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > > I could use an upload sponsor for these packages, preferably before > > libxml-filter-xslt-perl is removed from unstable due to FTBFS:
Thanks for looking at these! > > libxml-libxml-perl (I am maintainer; this will be my second upload, and > > contains a major overhaul of the XSUB code) > > On powerpc, 'make test' fails: > > t/02parse...........NOK 454# Failed test 454 in t/02parse.t at line 681 > # t/02parse.t line 681 is: ok( $@ =~ /^:0:/ ); > t/02parse...........FAILED test 454 > Failed 1/460 tests, 99.78% okay This is a regression in libxml2 handling of line numbers (it seems to ignore xmlLineNumbersDefault( 0 ); now). Basically harmless, left in so that I can track it down in libxml2. > t/11memory..........skipped > all skipped: no reason given Slow test, disabled by default upstream. export MEMORY_TEST=1 MEMORY_TIMES=100 to run it. There are still a couple of memory leaks relating to code that croaks out from inside a callback, but I've managed to eliminate leakage of almost everything but perl SVs (much harder to debug), cutting the leakage about tenfold for large values of MEMORY_TIMES. > t/26schema..........ok 2/6Element has no name nor ref > Facet pattern has no value > Element has no name nor ref > t/26schema..........dubious > Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00) > DIED. FAILED tests 3-6 > Failed 4/6 tests, 33.33% okay XML Schema and RELAX NG support are very new in libxml2; this tests cleanly with current CVS libxml2, for which I have an updated package. I will offer it to the libxml2 maintainer (who, it appears, could use some help) once 2.6.5 releases, which is expected to be within the week. > Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >---- t/02parse.t 460 1 0.22% 454 > t/26schema.t 255 65280 6 8 133.33% 3-6 > 1 test skipped. > Failed 2/24 test scripts, 91.67% okay. 5/1079 subtests failed, 99.54% okay. > > Are these architecture-specific or not? Do you need help in > investigating them? None of these is architecture-specific. FWIW, I generally test on i386 and powerpc before RFS'ing. I have also been working with irc.perl.org #axkit regulars to test on other perl and libxml2 versions and other dists. These changes will be submitted upstream once I have finished a refactoring pass that cuts down the size of the patch to something more easily reviewed. > > libxml-sax-writer-perl (orphaned; I would like to adopt; the one > > outstanding bug is fixed in this rev) > > > > libxml-libxslt-perl (orphaned; I would like to adopt; undoes NMU > > workaround for a bug that was really in libxml-libxml-perl) The current version in my repository also fixes a double-free bug that would, I think, be severity Serious (intermittent crashes in applications using it). > > libxml-filter-xslt-perl (orphaned; I would like to adopt; about to be > > removed from sid due to FTBFS, which was mostly the fault of > > libxml-libxml-perl) > > These are all marked ITA by Jay Bonci (cced). Have you confirmed with > him that he's OK with you taking them? > > That said, the ITA was several months ago ... He and I have discussed the matter and agreed that co-maintenance is a good general strategy for these and the other AxKit dependencies I am working on. I neglected to add him to debian/control, and would appreciate if you would do so. > Cheers, > > -- > Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
