On Friday 26 December 2003 09:14 pm, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > On Friday 26 December 2003 08:00 am, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote: > [snip] > > > And libhttp-ghttp-perl is used by axkit which is ITA'ed. So maybe the > > person that ITA'ed axkit should also take these two packages. > > I am that person, and will happily take those packages. I will probably > also port axkit to another HTTP library at some point. [snip]
I am looking for an upload sponsor for my adoption of libghttp and libhttp-ghttp-perl as a new maintainer. This is my first actual RFS, and ideally I would like a sponsor who is willing to see me through the NM process if my work is good. I selected these because I have also ITA'ed axkit (which depends on them) and a collection of related packages, which I am working on testing thoroughly before sending an RFS. Candidate packages for libghttp (the original GNOME HTTP client library) and libhttp-ghttp-perl (a Perl module wrapped around libghttp) are in my debarchiver repository at http://www-static.sane.net/debian/. They are lintian and linda clean, and debian/rules has been reworked in each to reflect what I understand to be current packaging practice. The libghttp package includes a fix for the one outstanding bug in the BTS; regression testing with other packages that depend on libghttp would be very welcome. The key with which they are signed (ID 7D3E9B5F) is one that I am using to work through technical issues with auto-signing. I would like some guidance with regard to primary key / subkey best practices before I generate a permanent private key and seek to join the web of trust. - Michael
