[umh.. can you please teach your MUA to split the lines at a rasonable
lenght?]
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:45:17PM -0500, Robert James Clay wrote:
> On Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:13:50 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > as a full source+binary upload, since I don't see the magic
>
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:31:41PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I tried to do this, you can find attached a patch that seems to do this
> transition correctly.
I clearly missed the patch, sorry.
Attached here.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCC
-fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,now)'. and indeed you have several
hardening-no-fortify-functions (which you already have, anyway).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://maprer
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 05:06:16PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> One more iteraction.
oh, this is getting cooler and cooler :)
> On 07/01/16 14:31, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 08:23:34PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> >> On 03/01/16 13:21,
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 07:50:47PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Mattia Rizzolo [2016-01-09 15:53 +]:
> > * debian/rules:
> > + dh_strip --no-ddebs => WHY ?! so much work has been done to get
> > automatically built debug packages, why you wouldn't
his I'll upload, and we shall go one with one r-dep,
I'd say, wouldn't you? :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
La
to time, otherwise we/I
might wonder what happened, and give up if too long has passed without
hearing from you :)
> 2015-12-17 18:18 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo :
> > Ok, first, a question: do you do your debian packaging in git?
> I'm cloning form a git repository, then clean up everythi
ds inside a clean chroot.
BTW, I don't see an update package on mentors (if you meant to upload
one). I can't do much if I can't see what you've done till now :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540
r debian/, as I can read it now
the copyright for debian/* is of "Ericsson Telecom AB".
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :&
packages, close the ITA and help me
> fix the last bits for making the packages fit for Debian.
I'll take care of this one too.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more ab
ndard autofoo
package, --disable-static to configure should do the trick.
+ this will also get rid of unstripped-static-library and
non-empty-dependency_libs-in-la-file lintian tags.
* something to say about https://bugs.debian.org/680449 ?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzol
> 2016-01-13 15:22 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo :
> > hardening-wrapper can just go away, the package builds fine anyway.
> > The canonical way to have hardening buildflags is to export
> > DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+all in d/rules (instead of
> > DEB_BUILD_HARDENIN
age but
> without this dependency, I'm unable to continue.
Well, there are ways to work with dependencies not in the archive
(depends on your workflow).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .'&#x
(reply to
> deb...@jff-webhosting.net).
given that you're withdrawing this request, can I feel free to pick most
of your work and do a QA upload instead?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`
ers, what would you think about
uploading it as it's now and work on it on a later time?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :&#
hing to do with it.
Are you trying to ask to update the version of ultracopier we ship in
Debian? In that case the formal way to do that (that may or may not be
efficient) is to file a wishlist bug against the package in question,
asking to update it.
--
regards,
What is wrong with that? :(
>
> blhc(1) is invaluable for debugging hardening issues.
Yeah, I do use it, even if usually the thing I fixed in the past were
quite easy to fix and I had ever had the need to look at its output
closer than just glancing over it.
--
regards,
M
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:44:23PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> Sorry for taking a long time to reply, adding my delay I had email
> problems.
funny ;)
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:13:29AM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > + I have a extended-description-is-probably-too-sh
cially some uncoordinated ones :S)
> I would love to talk 5 min. with you face to face. To say thank you.
I'm just at 10/11 hours of driving away ;) (Milan, Italy)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .'
not considered for testing
migration (which is something I'd like to help change one day)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org
f who/what to ping would be
here :)
(note that is not the proper way to do it, but in the past happened that
a guy asked here a give-back and by the time somebody replied it was
already done...).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B
ntry
(s/php5$/php5./)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
l. So is time for sawfish, the latest changes are on
> collab-maint.
I'm going to take care of this too :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org
ldn't be difficult at all.
pretty sure I would find something more with a deeper look, even more if
I could build it...
there are 57 open bugs, are you telling me none of them get closed by
this upload? :\
I anyway expect some bug triaging done…
good work! :)
--
regards,
On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:40:10PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> On 06/02/16 23:41, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Umh, couldn't you turn d/rules to use the dh sequencer?
>
> I don't know enough and lintian show many problems with upstream d/rules.
well, let's fix the
s here.
> On 07/02/16 22:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:40:10PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> >> On 06/02/16 23:41, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >>> Umh, couldn't you turn d/rules to use the dh sequencer?
> >> I don't know enou
aging the web server for inclusion with Debian
> releases.
You don't need a permission from somebody from debian to work on it :)
See http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers and links from there to
find out more about our procedures.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
G
>dependencies.
> - Bumped Standards-Version to 3.9.6.
check also against 3.9.7 please
> * debian/rules: DH_COMPAT flag disabled.
just remove that line
also please create debian/source/format and set it to 3.0 (native)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Ke
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 01:46:36PM -0200, Giovani Ferreira wrote:
> On 14-02-2016 07:41, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >> * debian/rules: DH_COMPAT flag disabled.
> >
> > just remove that line
>
> Updated the changes and uploaded to mentors.
uops!
I intended, just re
please also include the fix for #569832 which is a rather easy thing.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: http
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:44:09PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> One more interation.
uops!
This slipped off my sight, sorry for the delay! :|
> On 08/02/16 21:57, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:29:55PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> >> Today I di
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:43:14AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:44:09PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > One more interation.
>
> uops!
>
> This slipped off my sight, sorry for the delay! :|
>
> > On 08/02/16 21:57, Mattia Rizzolo wro
mv(1) in d/rules instead of using the libproxychains3.install
(if I get it right). Can you just add
'debian/tmp/usr/bin/proxyresolv usr/lib/proxychains3/' in the
.install and remove the .dirs?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCC
personally find the following comment useless
# main packaging script based on dh7 syntax
* you don't do hardening, can you consider enabling it? (see
wiki.d.o/Hardening)
* in d/copyright, the years are 2006-2012, I'm confident you want to
bump them.
--
regards,
es, so you can write
a full script in your preferred script language (technically, you can
also have a binary there, iirc). Such script should output in stdout a
list of 'orig target' files, pretty much what the .install would look
like.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzol
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 01:58:14AM +, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
> On 23/02/16 17:45, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 02:06:39PM +, Stefanos Harhalakis wrote:
> >* please meld the 2 changelog entries, the 1 minute, 14 seconds older
> > one never h
h/cfg/main.jl
there actually is an override, but the file is named wrongly and so
not picked up by dh_lintian. maybe you also want to add an override
for the sawfish-data one.
I'd ignore the rest of the complains from lintian and blhc for now, tbh.
--
regards,
M
Gentle ping.
Are you still interested in adopting this package and getting it
uploaded?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :
ion
* in d/changelog, there should be a blank line between the first line
with the package name and the version, and the changelog text
Then, it's good to go :)
[0] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key:
n lintian before uploading,
which is kinda of worrying. I'd expect sponsoree to always double check
their packages…
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
mor
k
that much in this case, and I can live well with it anyway :)
↑ that's the kind of things I want to see changed for me to sponsor it.
If you confirm I should look at the git repository and you're ok with me
as a sponsor please confirm so (and fix the already reported problems,
ple
rstand your sentence, tbh...
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
I see you have #813953 open for that, I will look at that later.
Given that hopefully you want your packages to always be installable,
it's nice to mark the RFS as blocking one another in cases like this, so
I could have looked at popup before, instead of stalling this now :)
--
regards,
.
Also, if you are sending a ping like this please always include the bug
number :) — #814064
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org
bian.org/debian-mentors/2015/09/msg00316.html
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:11:58PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> On 28/02/16 23:00, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:41:32PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> > * I just noticed sawfish.preinst removes /var/lib/sawfish that you are
> > creating in sawf
pyright; please meld the paragraphs
* can you consider enabling hardening buildflags?
* at the end of the iteration please bump the changelog entry
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: h
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> [2016-03-01 13:28] Mattia Rizzolo
> > please DON'T CC debian-mentors (or anybody, for what metters) while
> > filing bugs to sub...@bugs.debian.org. The CCed people will receive an
> > email from you w
lural).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA p
16 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote:
[ anticipation of work that will be done... ]
How's going with this?
Several weeks passed and we haven't heard back from you, this is just a
gentle ping :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4
s one (attached)
Gianfranco is actually waiting for an input from you. I saw there was
another upload in mentors.d.n, but please follow up here and reply to
what Gianfranco asked.
Consider this a gently poke after 2,5+ months of inactivity on this RFS.
--
regards,
Matt
16, #797022, #797241)
> * Drop debian/source/options -- no longer needed.
> * debian/rules:
> + Drop obsolete override_dh_builddeb.
> + Add CPPFLAGS for fix build build warning.
repeated "build" ↑↑↑↑
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzol
e remove the nop override_dh_installman?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
-info -t maintainer-script-without-set-e
to see what you should do, it's fairly simple to understand and action.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org
S. If you are going to pause the work for, say, more
than 2 months, I'd find closing this RFS and getting it off the queue a
kind and gentle action, otherwise feel free to keep it open, is not that
annoying :)
Thanks for replying and making us aware of the current state!
--
regards,
for the update.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page:
b) you override wrong tags (false positive) or tags that for some
reason could never be fixed, not just to hide them
the correct action here is really to leave it as it is, maybe asking
upstream to start signing the tarballs instead of checksum.
--
regards,
and copying
it to d/python3-bond.docs
7) please bump Standards-Version to 3.9.7
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :&
kg/check-all-the-things
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/check-all-the-things
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
[1]
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git
[2]
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/check-all-the-things.git/tree/
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:27:20PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote:
> On 29/02/16 23:09, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > * guessing you are using git-buildpackage, why didn't you just
> > `gbp import-dsc` to import the NMU?
>
> My changes are older than the NMU. So I did n
t least via IRC).
(clearly I'm talking about bdale, I think it's safe to assume the other
are ok with that license).
Please address this thing of the copyright and then I'm good to upload
it :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18
to debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp, and personally I'd prefer to see
an armored keyring instead of the binary blob (just export the key
with -k) (and that way you also drop d/source/included-binaries)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52
me d/docs to d/gtk3-nocsd.docs to be more clear (if you
don't specify the package name it'll act only on the first package
listed in d/control)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .'
in a seblevel of the "New upstream release"; clearly, no need to say
"This version has" while you're in the correct sublevel of a list
+ document the removal of debian/dirs
Then I'm good to go with this.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG
doc/ as suggested by
> the brand new policy's section 12.3.
cool.
I find the package ok, apart from its name. I find no sense whatsoever
to have '-non-dfsg' in the source package name, the section is enough.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE
pc64el machine, and in
Debian NEW packages needs to be uploaded with the binaries.
Have you tried getting in touch with the ppc porters?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about
recipe for target 'build' failed
make: *** [build] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
E: Failed autobuilding of package
I wonder why not just use `help2man ./msi-keyboard ...` instead of
messing around with PATH (which is probably what
ypi,
which seem to be nicer?
In that case please use http://pypi.debian.net/nameparser/watch
There is also a newer upstream, please package that.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 02:23:31PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 03/19/2016 12:34 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 02:01:19AM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote:
> > * d/control:
> > + there are commented out Vcs-Git and Vcs-Browser, either set up a
Nowdays the better way to fix that is to ship only one binary, using the
python3 library, in a separate package (maybe named "faker")
Another thing: please build the manpage at build time, by calling
help2man directly there.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE
nse [2] (I followed the move by
> passing
> from MIT license to Apache 2.0 license to keep things simple).
on it :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 05:34:20PM +, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 19/03/16 14:11, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I began packaging this before my application to join the team was
> approved, and when this happened and I pushed the package to the
> repository, I forgot to add the rela
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 09:38:43PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> On 19/03/16 19:09, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > BTW, for the next time, please consider to enable the hardening
> > buildflags.
>
> My understanding is that it might be set up by one of the Debian tool
> so
ally there is not, but this is by chance) and timestamps
inside the {control,data}.tar member of the .deb, that in the
reproducible toolchain is fixed by a patched dpkg not yet included in
dpkg mainstream)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52
Then, on github the newest tag is 1.0.5, but you are packaging 1.0.6,
which makes me think you are not using github by pypi (checking... not
even, the tarballs are different). Where did you get that tarball?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18
iolation of the MIT.
Please clarify 1) how you could know upstream intended *that* MIT
license (there are several, you reported the most common one called
Expat) 2) really upstream needs to ship one copy of it.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18
n the tarball.
then, as lintian says:
W: r-cran-uuid source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.6 (current is 3.9.7)
I: r-cran-uuid: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
W: r-cran-uuid: extra-license-file usr/lib/R/site-library/uuid/LICENSE
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
DF)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.d
20, 2016 at 05:24:57AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> control: tag -1 moreinfo
> control: owner -1 !
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:49:21PM +0100, Gordon Ball wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "r-cran-pbdzmq"
>
> hi there (3rd time ;))
>
om debian/patches/*, as GPL-2+ is incompatible with
GPL-2 (only).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.n
w.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#tag-itp
[2] https://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/#howto-itp
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://la
Also, you should be aware that newer
debhelper does the very same thing autotools-dev does.
For the rest it looks good, just please check whether some more bugs can
be closed.
I'm more interested in having a proof the current maintainer ACKed the
takeover.
--
regards,
Mattia
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:35:13AM +, Edward Betts wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > * dist/*:
> > + why on the earth is that directory filled with tarballs of old
> > releases? Please ask upstream to stop shipping such tarballs, or
> > (maybe better),
st
ftp.debian.org? actually that would be enough, even without
restricting the architecures where you build, then you can leave the
packages in FTBFS state there until it could build again.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18
o you expect me to do here?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Deb
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 08:37:06AM +, Edward Betts wrote:
> Edward Betts wrote:
> > Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > > Edward Betts wrote:
> > > > I will write to the upstream author and attempt to convince them that
> > > > the
> > > > tests
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:17:43AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Uploading :)
while tagging the release I noticed that the format of the patched tag
was wrong. I had already uploaded, so I did a commit fixing it *after*
the tag, please pull (and pull the tags)
--
rega
control: severity -1 wishlist
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:01:45AM +0100, Jerome Benoit wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
RFSes for ITPs are wishlist.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B94
ce the qt5 binaries are something new.
Well, my suggestion was to completely kick qwtplot3d from armel/armhf
(also otherwise it would still not work). but if you exclude only those
two binaries (that have never built) it's ok, you don't need to do this.
--
regards,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:55:53AM +, Edward Betts wrote:
> Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-nameparser/python-nameparser_0.3.15-1.dsc
now you moved this thing into DPMT.
I'm going to ignore mentors as DPMT mandate the git
:
>
> gbp clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-mozext/mozilla-devscripts.git
> git checkout 0.45.1
> git verify-tag 0.45.1 # if you have my key
> gbp buildpackage
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Sean Whitton
--
regards,
d a public record of the rejection - at
> least I'm not aware of this.)
you can find it in
coccia.debian.org:/srv/ftp-master.debian.org/queue/new/COMMENTS/REJECTED.${package}_${version}_${arch}
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:02:06AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:57:45AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > it seems this package was in NEW queue but it is not any more and I also
> > can't find it in the package pool. Could you please give so
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 12:21:33PM +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Christopher Baines [2016-03-27 10:49 +0100]:
> > On 20/03/16 03:12, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > A possible alternative would be to include a manpage made with help2man,
> > and not generate it for this version (and sw
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:49:55AM +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
> On 20/03/16 03:12, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >> The issues that you commented on above are fixed in this repository.
> >>
> >> 1: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/faker.git
&
Is there something blocking on this?
(gentle ping)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchp
ble
name :D
but I uploaded it!
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: http://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri
one I can download with uscan. how so?
a nitpick: in the DEP-8 test instead of listing all 3 binaries in
the example test you could have just used '@', or even leave out the
Depends: field entirely (in that case the deps on @ is implied).
--
regards,
Mattia Riz
hon modules have to be named python-${module_name}
> but it
> is probably too late now, isn't it?
technically it isn't: it's easy enough to ask to the ftp master to
reject the package, change the name and re-upload it, but it's a bad
idea, as i said above.
--
regards,
iency in the current policy then?
I do think so.
I can accept having the source named with only the module name, but imho
python-$module is better as it provides namespacing also between the
source package names.
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF
301 - 400 of 455 matches
Mail list logo
