Brazilian Key Signer

hat could be so nice as to meet with me and sign my key so I can get going with the rest (and IMO more important) of the tests to become a DD ? Thanx in advance to anyone willing to help -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7ADF9466 "you mus

Changing include directory

main problem is that the -dev package, contains -config, to calculate build flags, and it's pointing the wrong way... it's actually pointing to /usr/local/include/ sorry for my ignorance, still trying to become a real packager =] -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubke

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

od should also be rejected? Cheers -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

e instead of offending me, thanks a lot. I realy hope I can be of any use regarding this issue, even though I'm in NM queue right now. Cheers -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: problem replacing package

your specific processor. /me prepares a trout to slap himself with, if he said something stupid =] Cheers -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Forcing multiple package downgrades.

ities? I'm not really sure I understand your situation, but if your packages are in a directory you could use dpkg -i $(ls ) The --force-downgrade option of dpkg is on by default, so you shouldn't need to set it. Cheers -- Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Installing *i686.deb's with dpkg (wrong system type: i386 vs.i686)

specific optimisation, but dpkg's architecture list does not support sub-archs, therefor you must change the name of you package manualy to something like -i686 to specify what you want. Leave the Arch field in debian/control as i386, that's the best dpkg can do for you right now. Hope I w

Re: dpkg-buildpackage problem

're not using it right. debian/rules should have something like this: make install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp Hope I was of any help =] -- Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut

Re: dpkg-buildpackage problem

ts uppon, maybe it helps... Cheers -- Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: source name change

vious one and some additional binary packages. > Which is the good(TM) procedure to perform such a changes? Did any of the binary package names change? If so, maybe it would be good to leave the old package name there to provide easy upgrade, turning it into a virtual-package. -- Leo Coste

Packaging of SashXB

to the archive)? Sorry if I missed something Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Brazilian Key Signer

hat could be so nice as to meet with me and sign my key so I can get going with the rest (and IMO more important) of the tests to become a DD ? Thanx in advance to anyone willing to help -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x7ADF9466 "you mus

Changing include directory

main problem is that the -dev package, contains -config, to calculate build flags, and it's pointing the wrong way... it's actually pointing to /usr/local/include/ sorry for my ignorance, still trying to become a real packager =] -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubke

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

ould also be rejected? Cheers -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Use of the BTS for managing sponsorship

e instead of offending me, thanks a lot. I realy hope I can be of any use regarding this issue, even though I'm in NM queue right now. Cheers -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: problem replacing package

your specific processor. /me prepares a trout to slap himself with, if he said something stupid =] Cheers -- Leo Costela Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Forcing multiple package downgrades.

ities? I'm not really sure I understand your situation, but if your packages are in a directory you could use dpkg -i $(ls ) The --force-downgrade option of dpkg is on by default, so you shouldn't need to set it. Cheers -- Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Installing *i686.deb's with dpkg (wrong system type: i386 vs. i686)

optimisation, but dpkg's architecture list does not support sub-archs, therefor you must change the name of you package manualy to something like -i686 to specify what you want. Leave the Arch field in debian/control as i386, that's the best dpkg can do for you right now. Hope I w

Re: dpkg-buildpackage problem

're not using it right. debian/rules should have something like this: make install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp Hope I was of any help =] -- Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest

Re: dpkg-buildpackage problem

ts uppon, maybe it helps... Cheers -- Leo Costela [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: source name change

vious one and some additional binary packages. > Which is the good(TM) procedure to perform such a changes? Did any of the binary package names change? If so, maybe it would be good to leave the old package name there to provide easy upgrade, turning it into a virtual-package. -- Leo Coste

Packaging of SashXB

to the archive)? Sorry if I missed something Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

rom doing this, but I'd personally say you don't need to bump versions before the package actually gets into the archive, so you could just stick with '-1' for a Debian version, so merging the changelog entries should do the trick. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antu

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

Felipe Sateler wrote: > This can be triggered with the -v option to dpkg-buildpackage Live and learn. Never noticed that one before! :-) Uploading. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: Mupen64 -- Nintendo 64 emulator and plugins

header, I found them via a dirty 'licensecheck -r ./ | grep UNKNOWN | cut -d: -f1 | while read file; do grep -L "General Public Licence" $file; done' -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: yougrabber

pplication, without having to read the technical fine print to figure it out (it sounds like cheap advertising: "it's graphical! ... but technically, it's not" ;-) ). Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

#x27;, as pointed out by others! :-) Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Help with watch file -- pre-release upstream versions

rator? But I don't really know if uscan even recognizes it... Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: blueproximity

ackage really interesting, if you ever need a co-maint, let me know! :-) Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: blueproximity

nt to intrude into anything you guys might have already talked about, but it seemed like a nice step to integrate it with the team. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: gnocky

t more informative about what the program can do. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager

ian.org/debian-devel/2007/11/msg00722.html -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager

Paul Wise wrote: > Obviously that is a hack/workaround for upstream's buggy build system, > be sure to send a patch upstream that fixes it. Yup, agreed. This shouldn't be too hard since upstream is (was?) a DD (hadess). The package has been uploaded with the workaround for now.

Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager

> Precisely, this did the trick. Just add 'chrpath' to the build-deps too. Update it in the SVN and I'll upload it. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager

use chrpath to clean it after the build and advise upstream to cleanup the configure script. What do you think? Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager

Mike O'Connor wrote: > src/gconf-bridge.* and most of the files in the telepathy directory > have copyright holders not mentioned in debian/copyright. Francesco, will you take a look at these, before I sponsor the package? Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [inser

Re: RFS: gnome-phone-manager

Francesco Namuri wrote: > I'm looking for a temporary sponsor for gnome-phone-manager 0.40-3, Still need this? Can I check it out from svn.d.o, or do you have any uncommited changes somewhere? Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc De

Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

ed the rules file to a file named '\' on the base source code dir. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

ain, I will send you the > whole stuff. Thanky for this ! That doesn't sound very optimistic. But even if you do "fail" (by your standards) there's no need to send me the packages. I can get them from the original website. Cheers and good luck -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: New package "unicornscan" , I GIVE UP !

reading them in a different place? Just the work of the person writing you an answer (in this case: me). At any rate, if you're not interested in making an effort with this package, I might take it over and package it myself. It seems interesting, but I'll need to take a better look before commi

Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

d-time - Patch the configure script on build-time Any other ideas? I'll probably update the wiki[0] with these suggestions and give it a little cleanup, while I'm at it! :-) Cheers [0] http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

Leo "costela" Antunes wrote: > > The way I see it the options for dealing with RPATH are: > - And, of course, using 'chrpath' on debian/rules Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

Anibal Avelar wrote: > On 12/5/07, Leo costela Antunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> - And, of course, using 'chrpath' on debian/rules > > No, it doesn't work for AMD. I tried to use chrpath directly to > binaries files, but it didn't work. Ar

Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

you're NOT rebuilding the configure script. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: rpath issue on 64 bit architectures

Russ Allbery wrote: > lintian.debian.org only checks i386. Oh, now that makes sense! Guess the obvious sometimes slips by unnoticed :-) But anyway, I have an amd64 server and a package with the same problem which chrpath solved, so my argument stands. Cheers -- Leo "costela" An

Re: Packages getting created without signature

evocation certificate in safe, offline places, in case of emergency. Do some research on the topic. Wikipedia is your friend (even if it's not always particularly right about everything). It might ease your life if you intend on becoming a Debian Maintainer or Developer. Cheers and

Re: RFS: dblatex (updated package): 2nd try

quick check with debc, aside from lintian is always a good idea, but the package seems good. After you take a look at these issues (or just justify them) I can sponsor you, if no one with more expertise in this sort of package pops up until - let's say - monday. Cheers -- Leo "costela&

Re: orig tarball in conflict with debian policy

t format is perfectly in order in this case and the name of the base source directory doesn't really matter much. Or did I misunderstand your question? Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org w

Re: orig tarball in conflict with debian policy

problem with it, then I've unknowingly been making this mistake for years... :) Cheers [0]http://changelog.complete.org/archives/910-how-to-think-about-compression [1]http://changelog.complete.org/archives/931-how-to-think-about-compression-part-2 -- Leo "costela" Antun

Re: RFS: homebank

proximity) I'd gladly advocate his DM status, should he want to apply for it. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Building pdf from odt files noninteractively?

ld time: they're arch-indep and could be generated just as well before each new release. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

an.net/debian/pool/main/n/numptyphysics/numptyphysics_0.3-1.dsc > > I would be glad if someone reviewed and uploaded this package for me. I'll take a look at it ASAP and get back to you. Cheers [0] http://bugs.debian.org/496586 -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty ret

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

Gabriele Giacone wrote: > Leo "costela" Antunes wrote: >> Was 0.3 already released somewhere? I can find no traces of it either on >> the homepage, the maemo.org project page or SVN. > > No and yes. There are no 0.3 binary releases but I found this [1]: 7 > wee

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

r.gz. I don't think I'm seeing the issue here. Care to elaborate a bit more? Isn't that the whole idea behind patching and running autoreconf in the first place? If we wanted the changed files produced by autoreconf in the debian.tar.gz we wouldn't need to run it, right? What a

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

ld have thought of that... :) Still, probably wouldn't cause build issues, but it sure is ugly! Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: numptyphysics

ntually a DD, right? So you need the practice! I just wanna have a hand in it. Practically just a psychological thing! :) If you still wanna maintain it, incorporate the mentioned fixes and I'll upload it! Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNS

Re: Joining Debian

t just seems like a bit of a waste of potential help, having it in a different place. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Joining Debian

Leo "costela" Antunes wrote: > Matthew Palmer wrote: >> In addition, the FAQ for this list: >> http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html might answer some >> of your questions. > > As a side note, wouldn't the wiki be the perfect place

Re: Joining Debian

ry end. Mathew had answered saying I was free to do so, I just hadn't realized his reply was private and not on-list. I interpreted this answer as permission, but perhaps an explicit (and public) one would be better. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -

Re: Joining Debian

lists.d.o page. > > Update the IRC channel topic. > > Search the website for the old link and update all the links. I'd consider doing these after the wiki version gathers at least a bit of support. My point was just taking a bit of the responsibility off of Mathew's b

Re: Nitpicking: you are doing it wrong

ally save a significant amount of time by not using dh/cdbs/whatever during package builds (and by significant I mean more than just a couple of seconds per build). Cheers [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Invented_Here [1] http://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/4e176b0d.8060...@debian.org -- Le

Re: Nitpicking: you are doing it wrong

least - for all but the most pathological cases) you're always relying on something you probably don't understand completely and making rules files more explicit, while still using wrappers and helpers, has no direct effect on this. It only makes for more text to parse. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/iv9oln$1k5$1...@dough.gmane.org

Re: RFS: vnstat -- console-based network traffic monitor

On 13/08/11 15:03, Michael Rasmussen wrote: > But vnstat is already present: But it's maintained by the QA team, so maybe an adoption would be in order? Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists

Re: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions

inconsistency) If no pkg-gnome maintainer objects, I could upload it in the coming week. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l

Re: RFS: gnome-shell-extensions

-status-menu) and this should be much > better. User-theme might also be a good candidate, since it's unintrusive and gnome-tweak-tool already expects to find it. Cheers -- Leo "costela" Antunes [insert a witty retort here] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-r

Re: about gzip

y. I'm not sure about the gzip direct usage though (but assume It's OK). Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key Fingerprint: 8AE6 CDFF 6535 192F B5B6 5921 2262 D36F 7ADF 9466 "you must cut down

Re: newbie packaging question

ontrib free My sources.list has: deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free Change "unstable" for the distribution you use. Why the hell did you put "free" in there? That's redundant! =] Hope this works out for you. Cheers -- Leo Costela

Re: Standards-Version

load anything. Good luck Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: How to deal with sql-database structures on upgrade

ish manually the new database 3) do not delete the old one without asking explicitly, with a high debconf priority (IMHO that's the best threshold between user interaction and space bloat) Remember to have a sensible enough preinst to detect the need for migration. Cheers -- Leo Cost

PearPC Section (contrib or main)

, so, does it need to stay in contrib? Maybe it's still time to contact the archive admins and change the section before the first version hits unstable (during security scrutiny). Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

Hi all What can I do about the forwarded problem? I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the same problem. Any pointers? Cheers and thanks -Forwarded Message- > From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

version? Yes, both -1 and -2 versions were built with the exact same file. The .dsc's both have the same md5sum. But thanks anyway. -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the for

Re: RFS: gaim-encryption -- encryption plugin for gaim

like your plan, but you're free to try to convince me, prove me wrong, or just ignore me and upload it anyway. Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: gaim-encryption -- encryption plugin for gaim

ersonal[1] threshold for entry into the archive. I am trying to recompile Gaim and create a dev package, if I succeed I'll poke Robert McQueen about uploading it, if he agreed. That should solve all our problems (in an ideal world, as you pointed out). Cheers [1] To stress it out: that'

pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

Hi all What can I do about the forwarded problem? I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the same problem. Any pointers? Cheers and thanks -Forwarded Message- > From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: pearpc_0.3.1-2_i386.changes UNACCEPT

version? Yes, both -1 and -2 versions were built with the exact same file. The .dsc's both have the same md5sum. But thanks anyway. -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the for

PearPC Section (contrib or main)

, so, does it need to stay in contrib? Maybe it's still time to contact the archive admins and change the section before the first version hits unstable (during security scrutiny). Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: RFS: gaim-encryption -- encryption plugin for gaim

like your plan, but you're free to try to convince me, prove me wrong, or just ignore me and upload it anyway. Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: gaim-encryption -- encryption plugin for gaim

ersonal[1] threshold for entry into the archive. I am trying to recompile Gaim and create a dev package, if I succeed I'll poke Robert McQueen about uploading it, if he agreed. That should solve all our problems (in an ideal world, as you pointed out). Cheers [1] To stress it out: that'

Re: RFS: x-no-session-manager - restore default X behavior with gnome/kde installed

gree, but I don't think this should be put in a separate package. Sounds very kludgy. The "none" option could be included with X itself, this way you'd be able to use the alternatives system without the need for a hack and the setting would persist. This could be a wishlist bug fo

Re: RFS: gaim-hotkeys

ld be appreciated. Files: http://www.ivanwong.info/gaim-hotkeys/ Cheers, Ivan. GPG: 1024D/4A9A664A 2004-10-04 --  Leo Costela  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a her

Re: [mindas@ziedas.ktu.lt: Bug#177332: libphp-adodb on testingshould be applied to the stable]

ion to stable could - if the internal changes were really so big - bring a whole series of unforeseen compatibility issues. I'd advise the user to upgrade manually or use another way to do his thing, record your reasons in the bug's log and tag it wontfix. Cheers -- Leo Costela &

Re: Producing a None-Hardware specific .deb

arch-indep package on the control file. I think that's it, but what do I know? I'm on the AM queue for 6 months =] Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you mu

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

LAGS = "-O2 -Wall" if CFLAGS += "-mieee" endif I'm not sure this is the Best Way(tm), but it should work... Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc &quo

Re: Debian Policy and related documents

have to go > through each page to print it. apt-get install debian-policy =] cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the

Help with RC bugs

apps running, or is it the plan to force gnome1.2 apps into gnome2? THIRD and last: should I bump the changelog's urgency about this bugs? (the next upload will also be recompiled against libsigc++c102/gcc3.2) -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL P

Re: Got program, howto debianize ?

nging the sources to something > suitable. File a RFP on your own program, wait for a suitable Debian Developer (or wannabe Developer) to become interested. IMO, it's easier that way! =] -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Machine access for NM Applicants.

ions are not open and archives are not available. > > Can anyone tell me if I might qualify for access to these machines for > debugging packaging portability problem purposes, and if how, how to > get it. > > Thanks, > > Mike Schacht [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Leo Coste

Re: Documentation

t; > Should I release the doc html and txt version with my package? > Make doc-linux-html a dependency doesn't seems good to me due the size. > > Best cheers, > > -- > -- > Michelle Ribeiro -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | &

Re: Questions of legality WRT dvd software

not in > Debian, although I don't know if this is is the reason. Anybody > familiar with this terrain feel like commenting? For your second problem, I think debian-legal is a better place to ask, though I assume you will encounter resistance in your path... Worst case scenario: packa

Re: about gzip

y. I'm not sure about the gzip direct usage though (but assume It's OK). Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Key Fingerprint: 8AE6 CDFF 6535 192F B5B6 5921 2262 D36F 7ADF 9466 "you must cut down

Re: newbie packaging question

ontrib free My sources.list has: deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free Change "unstable" for the distribution you use. Why the hell did you put "free" in there? That's redundant! =] Hope this works out for you. Cheers -- Leo Costela

Re: Standards-Version

thing. Good luck Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the forest... with... a herring!" signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: How to deal with sql-database structures on upgrade

ish manually the new database 3) do not delete the old one without asking explicitly, with a high debconf priority (IMHO that's the best threshold between user interaction and space bloat) Remember to have a sensible enough preinst to detect the need for migration. Cheers -- Leo Cost

Re: [mindas@ziedas.ktu.lt: Bug#177332: libphp-adodb on testing should be applied to the stable]

ion to stable could - if the internal changes were really so big - bring a whole series of unforeseen compatibility issues. I'd advise the user to upgrade manually or use another way to do his thing, record your reasons in the bug's log and tag it wontfix. Cheers -- Leo Costela &

Re: Producing a None-Hardware specific .deb

arch-indep package on the control file. I think that's it, but what do I know? I'm on the AM queue for 6 months =] Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you mu

Re: need help with bug #178837 (automake)

this: CFLAGS = "-O2 -Wall" if CFLAGS += "-mieee" endif I'm not sure this is the Best Way(tm), but it should work... Cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.a

Re: Debian Policy and related documents

have to go > through each page to print it. apt-get install debian-policy =] cheers -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public Key: http://wallsplash.net/leo/pubkey.asc "you must cut down the mightiest tree in the

Help with RC bugs

apps running, or is it the plan to force gnome1.2 apps into gnome2? THIRD and last: should I bump the changelog's urgency about this bugs? (the next upload will also be recompiled against libsigc++c102/gcc3.2) -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL P

Re: Got program, howto debianize ?

nging the sources to something > suitable. File a RFP on your own program, wait for a suitable Debian Developer (or wannabe Developer) to become interested. IMO, it's easier that way! =] -- Leo Costela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  1   2   >