Hi,
On Sun, 11 Apr 1999, Chris McKillop wrote:
> Hello all...
>
> Well, I am finally getting around to applying to become a
> developer so I can help out Jim on the ARM port. How long does it
> usually take for the developer application to be processed? I have
> heard depressing com
Hi,
its time that I upload my first source package. I have built the source with
dpkg-source -b and the binary package with debbuild/sbuild (building tool
used by porters, well, at least by me).
Now I have the following files:
ftpgrab_0.0.4a-1.diff.gz ftpgrab_0.0.4a-1_m68k.deb
ftpgrab_0.0.4a-
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
> You just need to exec 'dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot' from the source
> directory. It'll do everything for you, including putting everything in
> the changes file, and signing the dsc and changes file. After that go
Wow thanx! It works :-)
> one dir up, and
Hi,
what is the best way to include the debian directory (no patches to the
source) in the upstream source? Or is this not recommended at all? I have
sent the debian diff to the upstream author and he included it (I wrote a
small manpage, but he is not using it in his makefile yet). The problem I
Hi,
stupid little question of somebody who is too lazy to read through all the
docs again:
Where should the score files of a game be stored? Automake/conf has proposed
/usr/com/ but I guess Ill be badly hurt if I use that...
bsdgames is using /var/lib/games/ should that be used also? The configure
Hi,
how do I use dh_suidregister correctly?
I was trying (using dh_make and co) with
dh_suidregister usr/bin/moon-buggy
but the the file is installed as root.root, which is bad AFAIK.
I couldnt find any option to set to change the user/group.
>From the potential packages README:
* Moon-buggy
Hi,
I am building a package, using debhelper scripts. Now I have to call a
program (to create a score file with defined ownership) from the postinst.
In the docs I found something about autoscript, but it seems I can not call
it from debian rules. So how do I add a programm call in postinst using
d
Hi,
On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> All that debhelper will do is to place appropriate lines in the
> postinst to handle "standard" things such as info file installation,
> window manager installation, suidregister and so forth. As soon as
> you want to do something package-specific, y
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 02:27:51PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I don't believe that debhelper will create the script otherwise.
>
> It will. If you don't have postinst, but dh_* scripts create
> postinst.debhelper, dh_installdeb will copy that to
> deb
On Wed, 8 Sep 1999, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 08, 1999 at 02:48:43PM +0200, Fernando Sanchez wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I have found that a package for which I am not the maintainer
> > (ocaml) is not being built for i386 architecture in its latest versions (it
> > is ok for powerpc and alph
Hi,
I was trying to update ftpgrab to standards version 3.0.0.
As we are now also using gcc 2.95 (at least "now" on m68k), I ran into a
problem when building the package:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/package/ftpgrab/ftpgrab-0.1.0>make
g++ -c main.cc
In file included from main.cc:2:
fgstring.h:34: ANSI C++
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Educated guess: s/operator+=/FGString& operator+=/
Ok, thanks for both suggestions, will try at home.
> > PS It seems the package is orphaned upstream, should I also orphan it then?
>
> If you are confident you can work without the help from
Hi,
I invested many hours in porting the non-free package snes9x to m68k.
Last week I (thought I) succeeded in makeing it compile for both m68k and
i386, and it should also be buildable for other arches now.
Packages for m68k are ready, source also, and it builds fine on my
i386/slink box.
Before u
On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> I invested many hours in porting the non-free package snes9x to m68k.
> Last week I (thought I) succeeded in makeing it compile for both m68k and
> i386, and it should also be buildable for other arches now.
> Packages for m68k are r
Hi,
I have a little problem with the scorefiles of a package, where should the
scorefiles be? The author wants them in /var/games/ where I
had put it originally. Now I learned at the linux day that they should go
into /var/lib/games/ and I changed the package to do so,
moving old score files also t
Dear John Smith,
On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 06:12:20PM +0100, John Smith wrote:
> Dear Mentor List;
this is the wrong mailing list for your request. Go back to the debian
webpages and read what the several mailing lists are good for. Maybe you
will find out what this list is good for and that you shou
Hi,
I have reported a few bugs which are really realy easy to fix (in the sense
that I wrote in the bug report what to do to fix it) or are allready fixed,
but the maintainer forgot to close it or did not get it quite right in the
changelog to close it automatically.
I find that annoying, when I wa
Hi,
I am having a little dispute with another developer about the orig.tar.gz
file. As I understand (or probably read somewhere) the upstream source,
which ends up as _.orig.tar.gz should be _the_ source from
the upstream author, no changes allowed (only under certain circumstances,
like completely
Thanks for both answers, thats what I wanted to hear :-)
On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 01:10:31PM +0100, Bart Schuller wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2000 at 12:11:59PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > relative to this source. Now for reference I looked into other packages for
> > refe
On Mon, Jan 17, 2000 at 11:43:25PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> The name has just been changed from mixer to SDLmixer, so now there is much
> less namespace pollution. From the README:
The name has just changed again, the final name is SDL_mixer.
Is it ok when I call the source p
On Tue, Jan 18, 2000 at 02:02:59PM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The name has just changed again, the final name is SDL_mixer. Is it
> > ok when I call the source package SDL-mixer1.0 and the resulting
>
Moin,
On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 04:33:43PM +0100, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Dear Debian-Mentors
>
> I wonder, why my "Build-Depends:" Field is ignored by dpkg-source and
> dpkg-buildpackage ? I added the "Build-Depends" to my debian/control like
> this:
> ---8<---
Hi,
after reading the "menu" docs, I found out how to use icons for menus in the
(hopefully) correct way. Just one thing makes me wonder:
3.4. Icons
--
Please, make sure the icons you specify are always available on the
system. So, if you want to have an icon with your menu ent
Hi,
I am trying to package a program using autoconf, automake, the whole bunch
of it. I have no experiance with that, my problem is, after building the
package, config.in, configure, Makefile, Makefile.am have changed and I get
a huge diff file for the package (I needed several tries to build). I
t
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 02:29:01PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 02:09:45PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > I am trying to package a program using autoconf, automake, the whole bunch
> > of it. I have no experiance with that, my problem is, aft
Hi,
I got the automake/conf stuff to work, the diff is very small now, thanks!
My next problem is with another wanna-be package, the orig.tar.gz contains
illegal flags for directories, which have to be corrected after unpacking
(the author did not want to release a new version yet, just to correct
Hi,
I have a weird problem with a package I just uploaded to unstable:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/package/bumprace>dpkg --info bumprace_1.2-2_i386.deb
[...]
Package: bumprace
Version: 1.2-2
Section: games
^
Priority: optional
Architecture: i386
[...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 06:43:20PM +, michael d. ivey wrote:
> > You have set your Standards-Version line to 3.1.1 but you don't
> > have a Build-Depends line. At the very least, your package is going
> > to have a build dependency on debstd, and probably others.
>
> switched to 3.0.1
On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 07:53:10PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 07:04:57PM +0100, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/package/bumprace>dpkg -s bumprace
> > Package: bumprace
> > Status: install ok installed
> > Priority:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:41:14PM +0200, E.L. Willighagen wrote:
>
> Hi all! I have a couple of questions dealing with packaging software. I've
> read
> and applied the Manuals, but still have some problems:
>
> 1. a mkdir-ed a new directory named debianize/ in which i unpacked a
> distrib
On Tue, Apr 04, 2000 at 09:51:03AM +0200, Andreas Voegele wrote:
> I'm wondering if the package build-essential should be put into the
> control file or not.
>
> For example:
>
> Build-Depends-Indep: build-essential, flex, bison
I dont think so, thats why the packages are build-essential. Sbuild
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Well, I never received a mail froma an autobuilder saying that one of
> > my packages (about 10) were examined and found to have the following
> > buildtime dependencies.
>
> Probably becau
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 05:45:44PM +0200, Andrea Fino wrote:
> Hi to all,
> First I am sorry if the question is off topic, it is few time I read this
> list but I really need help.
> I produced my first debian package, it is installable via dpkg and it works!
> We have a mirror of the debian dist
Moin,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:51:52PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to provide Debian packages for the parts of my GOSSIP project.
>
> http://gossip.sourceforge.net
>
> GOSSIP is a set of packages for doing synchronous data-flow
> simulations on top of and beneath Guile.
Hi,
where do /usr/info/dir.gz and /usr/share/info/dir.gz come from?
On master usr/share/info/dir.gz is part of emacs20, on va /usr/info/dir.gz
is part of emacs20 and on my (potato) system it does not exist at all (no
/emacs20 installed).
I got a bug report for a package, that the info file of th
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > where do /usr/info/dir.gz and /usr/share/info/dir.gz come from?
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 04:49:44PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> Before forcing the maintainers to make themselfes the work to figure these
> dependencies out we should tell them that such a list already exists!
> (And don't tell me that they should have known it from various discussions
> u
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 12:52:30PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2000, Itai Zukerman wrote:
>
> > > For this situation, I would suggest that we start to be really strict, and
> > > use chroot jails for *all* builds.
>
>
> It may resolve the situation, but I would much more elgeant,
Hi,
I have a little trouble with SDL_image which I maintain. I made two packages,
libsdl-image1.0 and libsdl-image-dev. Until recently SDL_image was built
with SDL1.0, the stable release. The current versions need SDL1.1, the
unstable release. Unfortunately I built and uploaded SDL_image with that,
Hi,
is it possible to get bugreports of a package automatically forwarded/copied
upstream? The author of one of my packages wants that (without being the
maintainer himself).
Christian
Moin,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > is it possible to get bugreports of a package automatically forwarded/copied
> > upstream? The author of one of my packages wants that (without being
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> set of options. I don't remember whether I had to patch upstream build
> sys
Moin,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 05:20:13PM +0100, Cesar Talon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First at all, this is my first mail here, so sorry if this isn't the best
> place
> to ask.
This is absolutely the best and only place to ask questions like this!
> The question is:
>
> I've been packaging it with the
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:16:25PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am patient and I am not worry.
> But I think you should first send me above your message privately only
> before blaming me in such public way.
So that everybody else who is annoyed by the priority also send you a
private ma
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
Whats wrong
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:18:51PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> i don't have woody yet; didn't know they existed. i'll upgrade one of my
> computers.
If you don't tell anybody, these packages work fine on potato:
> > /debian/dists/woody/main/binary-i386/libs/libsdl-image1.0_1.0.8-1.deb
> > /d
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:34:16PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> You might like to compare with how other sdl-based games have been
> packaged, for instance defendguin (available in woody).
argh, no no, please not that. The one in incoming, but not the one installed
currently. I am trying to fix
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 04:20:54PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> # include
kernel-[headers|source] ?
Christian
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:14:29PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
> I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
> want to have my gpg key on a machine out there.
You don't have your keys on the debian mac
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:10:36PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Does this mean I can never become a maintainer? I believe that
> I have demonstrated my knowledge of debian's policy and skills with
> the packages that I've done.
You have not yet proven your patience, which is next in the DAM proces
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 04:03:58PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > You have not yet proven your patience, which is next in the DAM process.
>
> You have read Kafka, haven't you? I don't remember wh
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:54:31PM +0100, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> Either being an official Debian developper has any sense or not. If it's
> the latter then Debian better stop wasting time with this theatre *now*.
> If it does make sense to be a Debian developper (I sure do hope it does!)
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 09:31:21PM -0500, Chris Ruffin wrote:
> Well, I posted a similar message to debian-devel and receieved a good
> analysis from Anthony Towns, release whiz and master of the cryptic
> output file. The actual culprit appears to be xlibs and libxaw6 (third
> level deps), which
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 01:06:48PM +0100, Marek Habersack wrote:
> yes, but you can't expect all the maintainers hava a park of machines of all
> architectures. And yet, the Debian OS runs different kernels and on
> different architectures. The conclusion is obvious.
I am pretty sure that if you a
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 05:50:53PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to pick up the orphaned chbg package
> and tried to pack the new upstream release.
> The files are at
>
> http://www.mathematik.uni-kl.de/~wwwstoch/voss/chbg/
>
> Would anybody sponsor the package?
Stupid questi
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:23:06PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:26:32AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > Jochen, I get this from lintian:
> > N: unknown interpreter
> > [repeat N times]
> > W: chbg: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
>
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:46:01PM -0500, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> I'm in Toronto, and I can probably sign your key (depends on the
> schedule). Dirk Eddelbuettel is another Debian developer in Toronto who
> can do that (in fact, he was the one who signed my key). I'm not sure if
> Dirk is subscribed to
Hi,
I am using dh_suidregister in my packages, one of those actually has to
register files as sgid games. How do I do that now with dpkg-stateoverride?
Is it enough to just set the permissions in debian/rules (as before) and
just omit the dh_suidregister call? Or do I have to do something with
dpkg
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 02:06:35PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Is it possible to ask for a summary of the change in procedure? If it is OK
> > to setgid in the package, then why was dh_suidregister being used in the
> > first
> > place?
>
> The explanation was posted to debian-devel-announce a
On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:21:00PM -0800, Mike Markley wrote:
> IMO the best name is the one that does the best job of expressing what it's
> called without being so generic as to cause potential name conflict. I'd
> personally go with libmetakit, with -dev, -tcl, -python if you split it up.
> In g
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:43:14AM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote:
> On which machines? The machines list web page says that
> chroot is available on vore.debian.org (sparc). I used it
> to build a sparc port but I could not find other chroot-available
> machines.
>
> machines list: http://db.debi
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 11:45:34AM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 04:40:31AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > [...] After all, non-free is not part of debian AFAIK,
> > thats why the buildds prefer to spend their time on main packages.
>
> This I un
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 06:49:24PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote:
> Christian T. Steigies:
>
> > And you will note m68k is not the fastest arch on the world
> > (allthough the nicest ;-)
>
> Hmm, perhaps I should dust off the Amiga 1200 that is lying in a
> desktop dr
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In section
> 8.2 "Guidelines for Porter Uploads", the Developer's Reference says:
>
> In a binary NMU, no real changes are being made to the source. You
>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * "Christian T. Steigies"
>
> | On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 02:30:13PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote:
> | > Hi,
> | >
> | > how do you invoke dpkg-buildpackage for a binary-only NMU? In sec
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Yes, you are right. But there are not problems with hundreds of
> packages, are there?
No, only 80 known packages currently
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/quinn/needs-failed
but an unknown number of not-yet-known proble
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 03:37:12PM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote:
> Describe the changes made and added a (Closes: Bug#86243)
> # cd ..
> # ls
> sntop-1.3.1/ sntop-1.3.1.orig.tar.gz
rename this to sntop_1.3.1.orig.tar.gz (note the underscore)
Christian
--
http://people.debian.org/~cts/debian-m68k/
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:34:07PM +0100, Peter van Rossum wrote:
>
> Yes, of course, and that is what I did. But the actual question was:
> how do I get dpkg-buildpackage to give the potato version a different
> *name*? Just renaming the files gives problems with the signature on
> the .changes/.
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 12:32:54PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
> Is it ok to configure a package differently on one arch?
> I want to build solfege with --disable-oss-sound on m68k until
> the binutils/glibc problems are fixed.
>
> If I use --disable-oss-sound (only on m68k), the package conta
On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 01:10:19PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> What I am proposing is a source package that generates *both* a "main"
> and a "contrib" .deb. What would the autobuilder do with that? In
> fact, how would the autobuilder even know that is the case? The
I guess it depends o
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 01:42:19AM +0400, Peter Novodvorsky wrote:
> "John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Current snapshot (please do not redistribute since it is not
> > finished): qemacs-0.2.tar.gz
>
> Current version of qemacs segafaults after a typing ~ 20 letters
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:50:37PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> I just noticed the debian/rules file for mirrormagic which I inherited from
> Joey Hess uses dh_testroot to check that the build is run as root (or
> fakeroot).
>
> I'm wondering what the justification for doing this is. It prevents
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I know a little about buildd, but I guess that it try to build a package
> and it if fail someone take its logs and submit a bug report.
> At the end of the build process I guess that the build environment is
> totally cleaned an
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 02:05:29AM +0200, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:19:21PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> > > hi developers,
> > > this is my first message, i hope it's appropriate. there's talk going
> >
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:00:44PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> My understanding was that we're not using suidregister in
> postinst now, and instead setting the ownership/permissions in
> the package itself.
>
> So I moved this from postinst:
>
> if [ -x /usr/sbin/suidregister ];
Hi,
I am trying to convert moon-buggy to use debconf. Following the tutorial it
was fairly easy to close #89118, ie use debconf in the preinst.
I also want to close #94969, which is not that hard, but I seem to be unable
to use debconf to display a message in the postinst as well, the files get
mov
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 10:26:19AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
>
> Emacs users can use debian-changelog-mode.el from the dpkg-dev-el
> package. The closes: statements will be fontified when the sytax
Ah! And I always wondered why that file kept dissappearing from my
boxes. It used to b
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 02:03:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> No, the GET command retreives the answer to a question so the postinst
> can act on it. Look at the turorial again, you will see the config
> script uses an INPUT command to ask that same question.
Now this is confusing like accounting
Hi,
I have a little problem with dpkg-source (or tar?), was there a change
recently?
dpkg-source -x hp2xx_3.4.0-2.dsc
dpkg-source: error: tarfile `./hp2xx_3.4.0.orig.tar.gz' contains unexpected
object listed by tar as `drwxr-xr-x mk/users 0 2001-02-08 14:30:12
hp2xx-3.4.0/'; expected
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Abraham vd Merwe wrote:
> Hi!
>
> How do I specify all the architectures a package can build on? For instance,
> I have a package that can only build on the following architectures:
>
> i386 alpha arm powerpc sparc mips mipsel
>
> Now, first of all, I'm
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 02:47:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 11:59:32AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Probably because they were uploaded between the time you did ls
> > and the time you did the rm.
>
> what about the build daemon? does it retry to build the p
Hi folks,
debconf is driving me crazy. I am using debconf on a multi binary package to
display a note. Its working fine in one package but not at all in the main
package and I do not understand why.
Installing the package (with DEBUG) gives me this:
Unpacking replacement moon-buggy ...
Setting up
On Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 10:42:41PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Christian Hammers wrote:
> > Well, I never received a mail froma an autobuilder saying that one of
> > my packages (about 10) were examined and found to have the following
> > buildtime dependencies.
>
> Probably beca
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 05:45:44PM +0200, Andrea Fino wrote:
> Hi to all,
> First I am sorry if the question is off topic, it is few time I read this list but I
> really need help.
> I produced my first debian package, it is installable via dpkg and it works!
> We have a mirror of the debian dist
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 04:49:44PM +0200, Christian Hammers wrote:
>
> Before forcing the maintainers to make themselfes the work to figure these
> dependencies out we should tell them that such a list already exists!
> (And don't tell me that they should have known it from various discussions
>
Moin,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 02:51:52PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to provide Debian packages for the parts of my GOSSIP project.
>
> http://gossip.sourceforge.net
>
> GOSSIP is a set of packages for doing synchronous data-flow
> simulations on top of and beneath Guile
Hi,
where do /usr/info/dir.gz and /usr/share/info/dir.gz come from?
On master usr/share/info/dir.gz is part of emacs20, on va /usr/info/dir.gz
is part of emacs20 and on my (potato) system it does not exist at all (no
/emacs20 installed).
I got a bug report for a package, that the info file of t
On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2000 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > > where do /usr/info/dir.gz and /usr/share/info/dir.gz come from?
> > >
> > >
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 12:52:30PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2000, Itai Zukerman wrote:
>
> > > For this situation, I would suggest that we start to be really strict, and
> > > use chroot jails for *all* builds.
>
>
> It may resolve the situation, but I would much more elgeant,
Hi,
I have a little trouble with SDL_image which I maintain. I made two packages,
libsdl-image1.0 and libsdl-image-dev. Until recently SDL_image was built
with SDL1.0, the stable release. The current versions need SDL1.1, the
unstable release. Unfortunately I built and uploaded SDL_image with that
Hi,
is it possible to get bugreports of a package automatically forwarded/copied
upstream? The author of one of my packages wants that (without being the
maintainer himself).
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE
Moin,
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 02:37:02PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > is it possible to get bugreports of a package automatically forwarded/copied
> > upstream? The author of one of my packages wants that (without being
On Sun, Oct 22, 2000 at 03:20:23PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> In one package (malaga) I finally settled on taking advantage of VPATH:
> I simply configured and built it in different directories for different
> set of options. I don't remember whether I had to patch upstream build
> sy
Moin,
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 05:20:13PM +0100, Cesar Talon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First at all, this is my first mail here, so sorry if this isn't the best place
> to ask.
This is absolutely the best and only place to ask questions like this!
> The question is:
>
> I've been packaging it with the h
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 12:16:25PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am patient and I am not worry.
> But I think you should first send me above your message privately only
> before blaming me in such public way.
So that everybody else who is annoyed by the priority also send you a
private m
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> dear all,
>
> i'd like to package a friend's game, but it requires:
>
> >=libsdl1.0 which debian provides
> sdl_imagea library which debian doesn't provide
> sdl_mixera library which debian doesn't provide
Whats wrong
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 02:18:51PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> i don't have woody yet; didn't know they existed. i'll upgrade one of my
> computers.
If you don't tell anybody, these packages work fine on potato:
> > /debian/dists/woody/main/binary-i386/libs/libsdl-image1.0_1.0.8-1.deb
> > /
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:34:16PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
>
> You might like to compare with how other sdl-based games have been
> packaged, for instance defendguin (available in woody).
argh, no no, please not that. The one in incoming, but not the one installed
currently. I am trying to fix
On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 04:20:54PM +0200, Hugo van der Merwe wrote:
> # include
kernel-[headers|source] ?
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 03:14:29PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> How do you handel zour gpg keys when you build on debian machines?
> I would want to build my packages on a debian machine but would not
> want to have my gpg key on a machine out there.
You don't have your keys on the debian ma
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
