On 2017-04-18 14:55, Roger Shimizu wrote:
I cannot sponsor your package. But still wish you find my review
helpful.
Hope you can fix these and put your work in some SCM. Thank you!
- d/copyright:
MIT license has some variants, so it's better to specify as Expat
license.
- d/*-docs:
Bett
Hello,
>Secondly, testing-proposed-updates is highly inconvenient for the
>release team. It requires manual intervention and slows everything
>down. So we shouldn't upload to unstable unless we *expect* it to be
>unblocked.
also, TPU means that semi-automatic bug reports (e.g. piuparts, ftbfs
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:24:21 +0100
with message-id <1492590261.3324.1.ca...@gmail.com>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #860415,
regarding RFS: python-xarray/0.9.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Hi,
some hours ago the Debian Med team was flooded with lots of bugs
regarding build on i386 - I guess this is not the only team. I need to
admit I'm a bit astonished about this kind of bugs that are showing up
right now ... may be autobuilding on i386 started right now?
Anyway. I try to tackle
Hello Lucas
Can you please fix your script? :)
rmadison -u debian snap-aligner
snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfsg-1 | testing| source, amd64, arm64,
mips64el, ppc64el
snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfsg-1 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64,
mips64el, ppc64el
snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfs
Hi Lucas,
could you please be more verbose why this is a RC bug? Crac was never
Build on i386 (neither was it on any other arch than amd64) exactly
because this not installable Build-Dependency. As far as I know there
is no point in restricting the Build-Architectures explicitly since once
the B
On 19/04/17 at 11:28 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> could you please be more verbose why this is a RC bug? Crac was never
> Build on i386 (neither was it on any other arch than amd64) exactly
> because this not installable Build-Dependency. As far as I know there
> is no point in re
Hi,
On 19/04/17 at 09:19 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello Lucas
>
>
> Can you please fix your script? :)
> rmadison -u debian snap-aligner
> snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfsg-1 | testing| source, amd64, arm64,
> mips64el, ppc64el
> snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfsg-1 | unstable
Hi Lucas,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 11:33:11AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 19/04/17 at 09:19 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Can you please fix your script? :)
> > rmadison -u debian snap-aligner
> > snap-aligner | 1.0~beta.18+dfsg-1 | testing| source, amd64, arm64,
> > mips64
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:01:56 + (UTC)
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >Secondly, testing-proposed-updates is highly inconvenient for the
> >release team. It requires manual intervention and slows everything
> >down. So we shouldn't upload to unstable unless we *expect* it to be
>
Hello Roger,
>Targeting t-p-u need pre-approval from release team, while targeting
>unstable doesn't.
>
true
>I didn't targeting t-p-u. What I meant was if:
>- my upload to unstable don't get unblock permission from release
>team
>- the original version of this package in stretch get a new RC ne
Dear Andrew,
Thank you for reviewing my package!
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 22:46:19 -0400
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Roger Shimizu
> wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "simple-obfs", which is a new
> > dependency of shadowsocks-libev since v
Le 19 avril 2017 08:09:11 GMT+02:00, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>Hi Christian,
>
>On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:07:03PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> >
>> > which is probably due to the fact that I did not changed hmmer2 to
>> > create a shared rather than a static library and lhmmer is not
>comp
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 01:32:43PM +, Bastien Roucaries wrote:
>
> Le 19 avril 2017 08:09:11 GMT+02:00, Andreas Tille a écrit
> :
> >
> >Psortb[1] was using header files from biosquid[2] and hmmer2[3] but did
> >not shipped the according library code. No idea how this might hav
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Dear Gianfranco,
Thanks for your detailed explanation!
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:39:00 + (UTC)
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello Roger,
>
>
> >Targeting t-p-u need pre-approval from release team, while targeting
> >unstable doesn't.
>
> >
> true
> >I didn't tar
Your message dated Thu, 20 Apr 2017 04:27:55 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: capstone/4.0.0-next-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #846348,
regarding RFS: capstone/4.0.0-next-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
16 matches
Mail list logo
