OKe
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Bart Martens [mailto:ba...@master.debian.org] Namens Bart Martens
Verzonden: dinsdag 5 juni 2012 7:20
Aan: Bas van den Dikkenberg; 675...@bugs.debian.org
Onderwerp: RFS: ptop/3.6.2-7
Hi Bas,
I suggest to do the following changes:
- Remove machine/m_gnu.c
For the (lib)freefoam* packages I am building I came across some
non-free files in the source. I got some remarks that the non-free files
will have to be removed and the source will have to be re-packed in a
new +dfsg tar file (instead of providing patches in debian/).
As I will have to remove an
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
> As I will have to remove an entire directory, containing a module, its
> parent directory contains a CMakeLists.txt file containing
> 'add_subdirectory(subdir_containing_non_free_files)'
> My question is: do I have to provide a patch in
Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
> For the (lib)freefoam* packages I am building I came across some
> non-free files in the source. I got some remarks that the non-free files
> will have to be removed and the source will have to be re-packed in a
> new +dfsg tar file (instead of providing patches in de
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "veromix"
* Package name: veromix
Version : 0.17.0-1
Upstream Author : Nik Lutz
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/veromix-plasmoid/
* License : GPL 3+
Sect
Bart Martens wrote:
> The information in debian/copyright is not yet complete, see
> GNUstep.h.
Thanks, added and switched to copyright format 1.0. I reuploaded the
package to mentors.d.n.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
Hi Philip,
Philipp Hartwig wrote:
> thank you very much for your comments.
Thanks for the feedback.
> > a few observations (without having gone too deep yet, so I might have
> > overseen
> > some reasoning):
> >
> > notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz from your package and
> > notion-3-2012042300-
Dear mentors :-)
I wrote this morning to upstream people and they agree and are very
happy to switch from OpenSSL to GnuTLS.
They tell me the following:
«That is good. I will switch to GnuTLS.
Please pass my thanks to the debian people for spotting it.»
Best regards
El 05/06/12 07:49, José L
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ustr"
It builds those binary packages:
libustr-1.0-1 - Micro string library: shared library
libustr-1.0-1-dbg - Micro string library: debugging symbols
libustr-dev - Micro string library
Hi,
Dmitry E. Oboukhov has added some Ruby code to
wordnet packaging (debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb) which worked for two
years and at least up to "Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:45:40 +0200" when I did
the last upload. Yesterday I wanted to try to fix two (unrelated) open
bugs and realised the FTBFS problem
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012 06:55:38 -0700
with message-id <20120605135537.ga30...@ftbfs.org>
and subject line Sponsored
has caused the Debian Bug report #675403,
regarding RFS: viewpdf.app/1:0.2dfsg1-4 [RC, ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012 06:55:38 -0700
with message-id <20120605135537.ga30...@ftbfs.org>
and subject line Sponsored
has caused the Debian Bug report #675910,
regarding RFS: grr.app/0.9.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012 06:55:38 -0700
with message-id <20120605135537.ga30...@ftbfs.org>
and subject line Sponsored
has caused the Debian Bug report #675963,
regarding RFS: cynthiune.app/0.9.5-14 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Václav Ovsík writes:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
Does the RC in your subject refer to release critical? If so, what RC
bug does this close?
d
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "termit"
* Package name: termit
Version : 2.9.3-1
Upstream Author : Evgeny Ratnikov
* URL : https://github.com
(I don't intend to sponsor this NMU.)
* Rob Adams , 2012-05-31, 11:53:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-cups/python-cups_1.9.61-0.1.dsc
[...]
Changes since the last upload:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release. (Resolves: #656640)
Did you mean s/Reso
On 06/05/2012 10:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII)
debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII)
debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: syntax error, unexpected $end, expecting ')'
print_array(@words, 'Syn', "[c blue
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 676218 wishlist
Bug #676218 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: ustr/1.0.4-3 [RC] -- enable hardening
flags and multiarch
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'important'
> retitle 676218 RFS: ustr/1.0.4-3 -- enable hardening flags and multiarch
Bug
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:44:57AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Václav Ovsík writes:
>
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: important
>
> Does the RC in your subject refer to release critical? If so, what RC
> bug does this close?
You catch me. I search on http://www.debian.org/Bugs
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:27:23AM +0200, Gerber van der Graaf wrote:
> For the (lib)freefoam* packages I am building I came across some
> non-free files in the source. I got some remarks that the non-free files
> will have to be removed and the source will have to be re-packed in a
> new +dfsg tar
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 16:14:25 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: projectcenter.app/0.6.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #675978,
regarding RFS: projectcenter.app/0.6.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:37:02 +
with message-id <20120605163701.ge9...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: cover-thumbnailer/0.8.3-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #668007,
regarding RFS: cover-thumbnailer/0.8.3-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 661507 RFS: libblocxx/2.3.0~svn544-1 [ITP] BloCxx - C++ Framework for
> Application Development
Bug #661507 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libblocxx/2.3.0~svn544-1 [ITP] BloCxx -
C++ Framework for
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: libblocxx/2.3.0~
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012 16:45:22 +
with message-id <20120605164522.gf9...@master.debian.org>
and subject line RFS: libblocxx/2.3.0~svn544-1 [ITP] BloCxx - C++ Framework for
Application Development
has caused the Debian Bug report #661507,
regarding RFS: libblocxx/2.3.0~svn544-1 [ITP
Hi Sam,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:26:42AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 06/05/2012 10:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >>>debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII)
> >>>debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII)
> >>>debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: syn
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:08:51PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Dmitry E. Oboukhov has added some Ruby code to
>wordnet packaging (debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb) which worked for two
>years and at least up to "Fri, 01 Jun 2012 13:45:40 +0200" when I did
>the last upload. Yesterday I wanted t
Hi Steve,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:10:55PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >Any better hint?
>
> It sounds like you should replace the functionality of the script in a
> more suitable language, specifically:
>
> * one you (and other maintainers) understand
> * one that's stable and supported
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 07:24:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi Steve,
>
>On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:10:55PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> >Any better hint?
>>
>> It sounds like you should replace the functionality of the script in a
>> more suitable language, specifically:
>>
>> * one you
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:20:29AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
Hi Bas,
I'm now reviewing your upload of 2012-06-05 07:30.
> I suggest to do the following changes:
> - Remove machine/m_gnu.c from debian/patches/ptop_hurd,
OK.
> - Add "cp -f machine/m_linux.c machine/m_gnu.c" to debi
Your message dated Wed, 6 Jun 2012 01:50:36 +0800
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#674684: About your qpdfview package on mentors.d.n
has caused the Debian Bug report #674717,
regarding RFS: qpdfview/0.3~beta2-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:35:28PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Sounds like you made a mistake, I'm afraid. :-(
My barrier to revert this mistake is low. If there is no simple solution
in three days (OK, I'll be offline weekend+Monday - so there is some
additional delay) - I'll kick the binary
* Jonathan McCrohan , 2012-06-05, 02:53:
Another version uploaded with a revised postinst which is based on the
updated DEP-9 example.
You don't need to check for existence of /usr/sbin/reconf-inetd. In
postinst configure, it's guaranteed that packages you depend on are
unpacked and configure
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012 22:37:25 +0200
with message-id <201206052237.26811.o...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#672268: RFS: kde-gtk-config/2.0-1 [ITP] -- KDE
configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style selection
has caused the Debian Bug report #672268,
regarding RFS: kde
I installed old nyancat-server, enabled the service, appended "-n" to
its command line, and then upgraded the package. Afterwards
/etc/inetd.conf looked like this:
telnet stream tcp nowait nobody /usr/bin/nyancatnyancat
-t -n
telnet stream tcp6 nowait nobody /usr/bin/n
tag 676114 + patch
kthxbye
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Sam,
>
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:26:42AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On 06/05/2012 10:08 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> >>>debian/wn-for-goldendict.rb:465: invalid multibyte char (US-ASCII)
>> >>>debian/wn-for
José Luis Segura Lucas writes:
> I wrote this morning to upstream people and they agree and are very
> happy to switch from OpenSSL to GnuTLS.
>
> They tell me the following:
>
> «That is good. I will switch to GnuTLS.
>
> Please pass my thanks to the debian people for spotting it.»
An excellent
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kpartsplugin"
* Package name: kpartsplugin
Version : 20120605-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Fischer
* URL : http://www.unix-ag.uni-kl.d
On 05/06/12 22:28, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Is this the desired outcome?
No. AFAICT this is because the new entries are pointing to
/usr/bin/nyancat-server rather than /usr/bin/nyancat which makes
reconf-inetd believe that they are not related.
[background]
/usr/bin/nyancat-server is a symlink to /usr
Hi,
Per Andersson escreveu isso aí:
> Please see the attached patch and try if it works.
Heh, except that you missed other usages of the same pattern. Andreas,
please try the attached patch.
As Per explained, the problem is that in Ruby 1.8, a string is an array
of bytes, so str[0] returns a num
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 672185 RFS: gnome-session-shutdown/1.82-1 [ITP] -- Shutdown command
> for GNOME
Bug #672185 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gnome-session-shutdown/1.81-1 [ITP] --
Shutdown command for GNOME
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: gnome-session-shutdown/1
Your message dated Wed, 06 Jun 2012 04:14:14 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP] -- scene change detector
has caused the Debian Bug report #662026,
regarding RFS: shotdetect/1.0.86-1 [ITP] -- scene change detector
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 06 Jun 2012 04:14:14 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #675487,
regarding RFS: ebtables/2.0.10.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On 04/06/2012 15:58, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> (I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
Thank you anyway for your useful review.
> I'd use "=" instead of ":=" in debian/rules, so that the variable is not
> uselessly evaluated even when it's not used. (And it won't be used most
> of the time.)
Fixed.
Thank you for your feedback Jakob. I apologize I can't quote you properly below
as I found your message only while browsing the web archives.
>Did you mean s/Resolved/Closes/?
Yes. I just wasn't sure if a NMU could use "Closes".
>* debian/control:
> - bump standard-version to 3.9.3
>
>We
Hi,
I have attempted to patch the extract, the patch provided almost worked, my
changes seem to work.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675063
The problem is the _ in the x86_64, so I made a hack around that. Also
added in debug info,
also i turned off dh_strip, because the program
> Per Andersson escreveu isso aí:
>> Please see the attached patch and try if it works.
> Heh, except that you missed other usages of the same pattern. Andreas,
> please try the attached patch.
> As Per explained, the problem is that in Ruby 1.8, a string is an array
> of bytes, so str[0] return
46 matches
Mail list logo
