Dear science team and debian mentors,
Please, some DD could push the ompl package?
The ompl package is located here:
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ompl
The package is clean, with autopkgtest. It must go to experimental
because there was a mistake in the package version ABI of the libra
Am Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:59:11PM GMT, schrieb Steven Schubiger:
> Pierre Gruet wrote:
> > Thanks for digging into this matter. Yes, keeping the flags is something I
> > have already seen. If you don't want to fix it in your main software, it
> > could be patched in Debian, I have already done th
Pierre Gruet wrote:
> Thanks for digging into this matter. Yes, keeping the flags is something I
> have already seen. If you don't want to fix it in your main software, it
> could be patched in Debian, I have already done this sort of things e.g. in
>
> https://sources.debian.org/src/atomes/1.1.1
Hi Steven,
Le 14/07/2024 à 16:51, Steven Schubiger a écrit :
Pierre Gruet wrote:
I am sponsoring right now your package colorize/0.66 into Debian, as you
submitted it on mentors.debian.org last month.
Thank you so much! :)
You're welcome :)
I will juste change the version numb
Pierre Gruet wrote:
> I am sponsoring right now your package colorize/0.66 into Debian, as you
> submitted it on mentors.debian.org last month.
Thank you so much! :)
> I will juste change the version number in debian/watch : 3 to 4.
Yeah, that makes sense. It makes less sense (to me)
[Sending again so that it appears on the RFS bug page]
Le 14/07/2024 à 08:06, Pierre Gruet a écrit :
Hello Steven,
I am sponsoring right now your package colorize/0.66 into Debian, as you
submitted it on mentors.debian.org last month.
I will juste change the version number in debian/watch
On Fri, 2024-07-12 at 10:44 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:54:59AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > Morning all,
> >
> > As we embark on a new process where packages submitted to mentors are
> > reviewed
> > and brought to a "Ready" stage for then busy DDs who are grac
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:54:59AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> As we embark on a new process where packages submitted to mentors are reviewed
> and brought to a "Ready" stage for then busy DDs who are gracious enough to
> give
> their time to review and possibly sponsor into Debia
Morning all,
As we embark on a new process where packages submitted to mentors are reviewed
and brought to a "Ready" stage for then busy DDs who are gracious enough to give
their time to review and possibly sponsor into Debian. We have a unique problem
(one which is now a nice one to have to be ho
Hello.
I've prepared an update for the cutecom package (Qt-based serial terminal),
please review/sponsor it. The package is available at
https://roman.khimov.ru/temp/deb-cutecom/51-try-2/cutecom_0.51.0-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* New upstream release (Closes: #911378, #1020432)
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 11:17:04PM +0300, Roman Khimov wrote:
> I've prepared an update for the cutecom package (Qt-based serial terminal)
> that I want to get to buster (as there are important bugs fixed there).
Have you consulted the freeze policy and made sure this upload complies to
it?
--
W
Hello.
I've prepared an update for the cutecom package (Qt-based serial terminal)
that I want to get to buster (as there are important bugs fixed there). But I
didn't get any reply from my previous sponsor (Gianfranco Costamagna) so I'm
trying to find someone to review/sponsor it. The package i
Control: retitle -1 RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.2-1 [ITA]
Sorry for the delay. I have made the changes that you have suggested.
Here are the updated details.
* Package name: nautilus-admin
Version : 1.1.2-1
Upstream Author : Bruno Nova
* URL : https://github.com/brun
Juhani Numminen schrieb am 2017-09-15 um 15:24:
debian/parlatype.manpages is only needed when upstream build system
doesn't install the man pages, please remove it.
done
debian/watch can be updated to version 4 (changing the first line is
enough).
done
Additionally removed build-dependency o
Spotted two more items.
debian/parlatype.manpages is only needed when upstream build system
doesn't install the man pages, please remove it.
debian/watch can be updated to version 4 (changing the first line is
enough).
With best regards,
Juhani
Gabor Karsay kirjoitti 14.09.2017 klo 20:37> Thank you Ross and Juhani!
No problem!
W: parlatype source: newer-standards-version 4.0.1 (current is 4.0.0)
I guess no need to override this.
Correct.
I: parlatype source: testsuite-autopkgtest-missing
There are no tests and it's only informationa
Juhani Numminen schrieb am 2017-09-10 um 17:27:
Ross Gammon kirjoitti 10.09.2017 klo 13:15:
I would be happy to take a look at this. Unfortunately, I am quite busy
at the moment so I can't promise much this week.
I have cc'd you because you did not say whether you are subscribed to
the Multimed
Paul Wise schreef op 2017-07-04 04:29:
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 17:48 +0200, Albert van der Horst wrote:
To really help me you should have answered:
.deb files? the purpose of packaging is to build a dsc file.
Thanks for the feedback. I had assumed the packaging guide referenced
by that page w
Hello, Gabor and Ross,
Ross Gammon kirjoitti 10.09.2017 klo 13:15:
I would be happy to take a look at this. Unfortunately, I am quite busy
at the moment so I can't promise much this week.
I have cc'd you because you did not say whether you are subscribed to
the Multimedia list. I have also copi
Hi Gabor,
On 08/24/2017 11:13 AM, Gabor Karsay wrote:
> Dear Debian Multimedia Maintainers,
>
> I'm looking for a reviewer or sponsor of my package Parlatype which is
> a minimal audio player that helps you to transcribe speeches,
> interviews, lyrics etc. It's based on GStreamer and GTK+.
>
> It
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:20:02PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have sponsored libmseed to new since you requested it via SoB.
There is no such package in NEW and in the archive.
Anyway, should this ITP be closed or updated?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Pierre,
I have sponsored libmseed to new since you requested it via SoB.
I have two remarks:
1. I've set Debian GIS team in CC since I think it might be
sensible to add libmseed to the Debian GIS Blend task as
well.
2. Your suggestion to add libmseed to the tasks is technically
On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 03:00 +0100, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> [Sorry for the long quote]
Sorry for the delay :)
> The generic system for ciforth is now present in github.
> https://github.com/albertvanderhorst/ciforth
Great :)
> This is a complete copy of the rcs/cvs system with all version
bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-requests
> > from
> > time to time and take care of pending request, whereas emails in a
> > mailing list are much harder to keep track of.
Also, please keep in mind that we are currently focusing on getting
Stretch out in the next few months, so new pac
n't have any package already in the archive, so my
personal
policy (https://people.debian.org/~mattia/sponsoring.html) "forbids"
me
to sponsoring the package, but I trust there are several other
developers willing to do so :) I just wanted to explain better the
usual procedure ^^
I understand your position for sponsoring, no problem !
Best regards, Damien.
eral of us look at https://bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-requests from
time to time and take care of pending request, whereas emails in a
mailing list are much harder to keep track of.
Now, you don't have any package already in the archive, so my personal
policy (https://people.debian.org/~mattia/s
Hello all,
My name is Damien André, I am french and I am looking for
menthoring/sponsoring for
the openmeca software (see https://gitlab.com/damien.andre/openmeca).
Openmeca is a graphical application for building multibody dynamics
simulations.
It may be usefull for learning and teaching
Paul Wise schreef op 2016-07-30 09:16:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
Do you really demand that a Debian package can generate windows
executables, and booting floppies in double density?
We already have tested and working GCC cross-compilers for Windows.
https:/
On Friday, 25 November 2016 17:42:13 EST Bastien Roucaries wrote:
> Can i add a newer patch fixing the last cve ?
Do you think you can upload it for tomorrow? Let me unroll everything on this
end (I already asked for a DSA id, but I think I can put it back). Let me know
if you can upload to ment
Can i add a newer patch fixing the last cve ?
Le 25 novembre 2016 17:30:54 GMT+01:00, Luciano Bello a
écrit :
>Hi,
> I will sponsor imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u6 and release the DSA.
>
>Thanks for you effort of keeping imagemagick secure!
>
>/luciano
--
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-
control: owner -1 luci...@debian.org
> I will sponsor imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u6 and release the DSA.
thanks!
G.
Hi,
I will sponsor imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u6 and release the DSA.
Thanks for you effort of keeping imagemagick secure!
/luciano
* Paul Wise , 2016-07-30, 15:16:
I myself use Alioth, Savannah, SourceForge, GitHub and LaunchPad for
different projects. There are no hosting facilities that I personally
like, mostly because they are all web services.
There are many command-line tools that let you distance yourself from
the
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> Do you really demand that a Debian package can generate windows
> executables, and booting floppies in double density?
We already have tested and working GCC cross-compilers for Windows.
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=mi
Paul Wise schreef op 2016-07-26 07:15:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
It has been published, the generic system is GPL as well.
It is on the net since ages
http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst/ciforth-5.0.tar.gz and
http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst/ci
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> It has been published, the generic system is GPL as well.
> It is on the net since ages
> http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst/ciforth-5.0.tar.gz and
> http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst/cifgen.html
>
> I doubt that any one
On 07/25/2016 09:28 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> Christian Seiler schreef op 2016-07-25 18:14:
>> I don't quite get what you mean, I never had any problem with
>> that.
>
> {Probably going off topic here]
> A pure assembler file means full control over section names, their
> properties (in pa
Christian Seiler schreef op 2016-07-25 18:14:
On 07/25/2016 02:51 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
The problem is: ld is not stable w.r.t. linking pure assembler files.
How so?
$ cat write.s
.text
.global _start
.type _start, @function
_start:
mov $1, %rax
mov %rax,
Albert van der Horst schreef op 2016-07-25 18:00:
Oorspronkelijke bericht
Onderwerp: Re: Preliminary questions for sponsoring a compiler
Datum: 2016-07-25 16:15
Afzender: Paul Wise
Ontvanger: Albert van der Horst
Not sure why you moved the discussion off-list, in Debian we
On 07/25/2016 02:51 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> The problem is: ld is not stable w.r.t. linking pure assembler files.
How so?
$ cat write.s
.text
.global _start
.type _start, @function
_start:
mov $1, %rax
mov %rax, %rdi
lea str, %rsi
mov
Oorspronkelijke bericht
Onderwerp: Re: Preliminary questions for sponsoring a compiler
Datum: 2016-07-25 16:15
Afzender: Paul Wise
Ontvanger: Albert van der Horst
Not sure why you moved the discussion off-list, in Debian we prefer to
discuss things in public. Feel free to
I didn't mean to put this off list, my bad.
Oorspronkelijke bericht
Onderwerp: Re: Preliminary questions for sponsoring a compiler
Datum: 2016-07-25 15:58
Afzender: Albert van der Horst
Ontvanger: Paul Wise
Paul Wise schreef op 2016-07-25 15:12:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Albert van der Horst wrote:
> Question 1: Am I obliged to supply a .s file and linking prescripts?
You need to supply the upstream source code and build system. If those
are the upstream source code and build system, then yes.
> (Because fasm is not in main)
fas
Dear mentors,
Since 2002 lina is a stable Forth compiler under x86 linux (And
compatible compilers available for OSX, win32 ).
From the beginning it has been fully documented using texinfo, plus a
man-page, that documents the options and a judicious excerpt.
lina page
http://home.hccnet.nl/a
Hi,
On 18/04/2016 11:48, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Uh... isn't that something more for upstream than for me?
Again, that's for upstream.
Yes, however it would be great if you could file bugs/patches and or
work with upstream to include those tools
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Uh... isn't that something more for upstream than for me?
> Again, that's for upstream.
Yes, however it would be great if you could file bugs/patches and or
work with upstream to include those tools into their QA procedures.
> See above : up
Hi,
quite some time ago, Gianfranco wrote:
> something needs changes:
>
> - std-version is now 3.9.7
Done.
> - unsecure VCS fields
Done.
> - call ldconfig in rules? what?
Uh... removed.
> - changing names usually is just bad, people won't find the package,
> and you will diverge from upst
On 2 March 2015 at 19:31, Christoph Mathys wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> While waiting for my package mercurial-keyring to be sponsored, upstream has
> released a new version of the software. So what do I do with the old
> sponsorship request bug? (#779049) Can I just update it? Or close it?
>
I would s
Hi folks,
While waiting for my package mercurial-keyring to be sponsored, upstream
has released a new version of the software. So what do I do with the old
sponsorship request bug? (#779049) Can I just update it? Or close it?
Thanks!
Christoph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ
Hello Laszlo,
I'm uploading a fixed version of this into Debian mentors.
Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
2013/8/28 László Böszörményi (GCS) :
> Hi Ho Wan,
>
> Wanted to package zbackup myself. Thus I'm open to sponsor this
> package for you. Basically it looks fine. However when I tried to
>
Hi Ho Wan,
Wanted to package zbackup myself. Thus I'm open to sponsor this
package for you. Basically it looks fine. However when I tried to
build it:
-- cut --
-- Found PROTOBUF: /usr/lib/libprotobuf.so
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:27 (MESSAGE):
Could not find protobuf compiler. Make sure pr
Am Dienstag, den 25.12.2012, 11:35 -0500 schrieb Paul Tagliamonte:
> Or, see if you can barter with the FTP folks to keep `sun'
Jup, I agree. I think, we should just try to get 'sun' into the
archives. It's still worth the try, than continue discussing... ;-)
If the name gets rejected, we could e
Paul,
you may also sponsor the package if you want to. I am still busy with
kismet :).
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 05:27:28PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:02:58 +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
>
> > Here are my proposals:
> >
> > sun - fits calculations related to the planet sun
> >
> > suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
> > Determi
On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 16:02:58 +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
> Here are my proposals:
>
> sun - fits calculations related to the planet sun
>
> suncal - seems only to be correct for time/date related calculus.
> Determination of the sun position in coordinates is not covered.
Depends on if you expa
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 04:02:58PM +0100, Steffen Vogel wrote:
> As I'm not willing to change the packagename, once its in the archive, I
> think it's important the choose a suitable name which also covers these
> new features.
>
> Here are my proposals:
>
> sun - fits calculations related to the
Hi Paul's :-)
Im very glad you want to sponsor my package!
Some more thoughts about an appropriate packagename:
I'm currently not clear about the future development of the sun tool.
There are several features which might extend the tool in future
releases:
- add muslimic prayer times: http://www.
Just to let everyone know, I am making myself available to sponsor
uploads that fix RC bugs. Those uploads may be either NMUs or
maintainer uploads, just make sure to mark your sponsorship-request
with RC and I (and others) will notice it.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Am 22.09.2012 15:42, schrieb Bart Martens:
> Hello Mechtilde,
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Mechtilde wrote:
>> I want to put the programm 'Loook' into the package repository I
>> already read the New-Maintainer-Guide and did t
Hello Mechtilde,
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:53:58PM +0200, Mechtilde wrote:
> I want to put the programm 'Loook' into the package repository
> I already read the New-Maintainer-Guide and did the first steps to
> package it.
> Can someone help me to bring it into the repo?
I suggest to upload the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I want to put the programm 'Loook' into the package repository
This a a smart python programm which you can use to search textstrings
in ODF files esp. created with OpenOffice.org, LibreOffice and
ApacheOpenOffice.
I already read the New-Main
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Andreas Rütten wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> do you still have some time available for reviewing NMUs?
>
> If so I would like to point you attention to this one:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676927
Hi,
The bugs solved in your version are not relea
Hi Mike,
do you still have some time available for reviewing NMUs?
If so I would like to point you attention to this one:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676927
Looking forward to some feedback,
cheers,
Andreas
Am Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:11:31 -0400
schrieb Michael Gilbert :
Hi,
I have sent these two RFS a little bit more than two months ago. I have
put a lot of effort into them (for instance I've worked with upstream to
fix bugs in yp-svipc and port it to Python 3) and I'd be sorry if they
missed Wheezy for lack of a sponsor.
yp-svipc: System V InterProcess Communic
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 670334 + pending
Bug #670334 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: notion/3+2012042300-1 [ITP] -- Notion
tiling tabbed window manager
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 647048 + pending
Bug #647048 [wnpp] ITP: notion -- Tiling, tabbed window manager for the X
tag 670334 + pending
tag 647048 + pending
kthxbye
Hi Philipp and Arnout,
Philipp Hartwig wrote:
> > I know debian/copyright is already quite lengthy, but basically
> > everything in the source package should also be mentioned in the
> > debian/copyright package as it's at least redistributed via
Hi Axel,
> As I discussed quite some stuff about the sponsoring of notion with
> Arnout on IRC, here's a list of what I consider as still open (with
> regards to the package on http://mentors.debian.net/package/notion
> from 2012-05-27 11:34Z):
>
> It looks mostly
log, thanks.
Good.
> > [hardening flags]
>
> We have enabled hardening flags through a Debian patch to the build system. A
> few Lintian warnings remain, but according to a discussion in
> #debian-mentors,
> these are false positives.
Yeah, that's fine, too.
As I discussed
Hi Axel,
thank you very much for your comments.
> a few observations (without having gone too deep yet, so I might have overseen
> some reasoning):
>
> notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz from your package and
> notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz from SF seem to differ:
>
> 0ffd57a75f2c1a75ce551b3baef1
Hi Arnout,
a few observations (without having gone too deep yet, so I might have overseen
some reasoning):
notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz from your package and
notion-3-2012042300-src.tar.gz from SF seem to differ:
0ffd57a75f2c1a75ce551b3baef1fee0 notion_3+2012042300.orig.tar.gz
96d004374e92e3
Hi,
I'm going to be making some of my time available to review packages.
So, I'm primarily interested in looking at work that fixes
release-critical bugs, security issues, and just regular bugs as well
(i.e. non-maintainer uploads, NMUs). So, if you're the bug fixing
type, this is for you. I am
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package src:tcng
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'src:tcng'
Limit currently set to 'package':'src:tcng'
> block 666336 by 667092
Bug #666336 [src:tcng] tcng: FTBFS: ! LaTeX Error: File `url.sty' not found.
666336
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Octavio Alvarez, 2012-01-24]
> > Just a note, though: the non-automatic subscription behavior of the
> > BTS could confuse new potential package maintainers, as they might
> > not subscribe to the corresponding bug (this has happened to me).
>
> Is it
[Octavio Alvarez, 2012-01-24]
> Just a note, though: the non-automatic subscription behavior of the
> BTS could confuse new potential package maintainers, as they might
> not subscribe to the corresponding bug (this has happened to me).
Is it a bad idea to modify BTS or reportbug to automatically
[ please Cc:-me on replies if you want to get my attention, I'm not
subscribed to -mentors ]
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:26:49 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Second concern i have here is that (AFAIK) everyone can upload
> everything to mentors.debian.net. Which would mean we then would/could
> d
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:59:14 -0800, Ansgar Burchardt
wrote:
We propose to use the BTS to handle sponsoring requests. Both sponsorees
and sponsors should already be familiar with its usage and we hope it
will improve the sponsoring process for both sides. It will also make it
easier to analyse
ect to change). A workflow for handling sponsoring
> requests is proposed below. It is based on an earlier discussion on the
> debian-mentors list[1].
>
> The workflow will also be made available on [2].
>
> [1]
> <http://lists.debian.org/s2svcsm447s@bistromathics.math
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:47:59PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> DSA is the team which makes a DNS CNAME record, or provides a hosting
> facility. In my interpretation they are not making facts by that. Making
> mentors.debian.net a .org makes the project official part of Debian,
> just like any other
Michael van der Kolff writes:
> But in setting it up in the US, don't you only have to care about US
> law?
I think that because Debian itself has a legal presence (in the sense of
having a bank account and therefore assets that can be confiscated in
judgement) in Europe as well as the US (and i
But in setting it up in the US, don't you only have to care about US law?
Cheers,
Michael
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Michael van der Kolff writes:
>
>> IANAL, etc., but how about getting some legal advice on this? It seems
>> to me it wouldn't be nearly as cut and
Michael van der Kolff writes:
> IANAL, etc., but how about getting some legal advice on this? It seems
> to me it wouldn't be nearly as cut and dried as all that; have you
> examined whether or not such a scheme could be set up in such a way that
> makes it a DMCA safe harbour?
DMCA safe harbor
IANAL, etc., but how about getting some legal advice on this? It
seems to me it wouldn't be nearly as cut and dried as all that; have
you examined whether or not such a scheme could be set up in such a
way that makes it a DMCA safe harbour?
Cheers,
Michael
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Russ
Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> For the main archive, the NEW check I think is best thought of as a
>> spot check to ensure maintainers are doing their jobs. The real
>> responsibility of not uploading non-redistributable material lies with
>> th
Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:07:02AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Like I've said before, this is not about eliminating ambiguity. Every
>> single word in every single language is ambiguous. It's simply
>> unavoidable. It's about choosing the word with the right context
; name is still subject to change). A workflow for handling sponsoring
> requests is proposed below. It is based on an earlier discussion on the
> debian-mentors list[1].
I would like to add that FreeBSD is successfully employing a very
similar mechanism. Everyone can send patches to the po
I'm putting the l10n-english team in BCC as they *might* want to help us
out here but I don't really want to start cross-posting. You'll figure
out which list to proceed on, right?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 01:07:02AM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
> DSA is the team which makes a DNS CNAME record, or provides a hosting
> facility. In my interpretation they are not making facts by that. Making
> mentors.debian.net a .org makes the project official part of Debian,
> just like any other core team
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jakub Wilk writes:
>> * Gergely Nagy , 2012-01-19, 17:24:
>
>>> I might be mistaken, but the amount of NEW
>
>> Why only NEW? Checking only NEW packages doesn't buy us more than, say,
>> checking only package with with have "r" in their name.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm generally not a big fan to overuse the BTS for stuff it wasn't
> really designed for. This tends to result in complex processes that are
> difficult to follow for newcomers.
That statement actually describes the Debian project as
* Lucas Nussbaum , 2012-01-19, 19:27:
I'm generally not a big fan to overuse the BTS for stuff it wasn't
really designed for. This tends to result in complex processes that are
difficult to follow for newcomers. For example, the wnpp bugs are often
misformed, or people don't follow the right pr
Hi,
I'm generally not a big fan to overuse the BTS for stuff it wasn't
really designed for. This tends to result in complex processes that are
difficult to follow for newcomers. For example, the wnpp bugs are often
misformed, or people don't follow the right process.
> * Integration into UDD bug
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:07:01AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jakub Wilk writes:
> > * Gergely Nagy , 2012-01-19, 17:24:
>
> >> I might be mistaken, but the amount of NEW
>
> > Why only NEW? Checking only NEW packages doesn't buy us more than, say,
> > checking only package with with have "r"
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Gergely Nagy , 2012-01-19, 17:24:
>> I might be mistaken, but the amount of NEW
> Why only NEW? Checking only NEW packages doesn't buy us more than, say,
> checking only package with with have "r" in their name.
> I know, this is what ftp-folks do. I call this securi^Wdis
Arno Töll writes:
> On 19.01.2012 15:30, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>> As said, I don't think there's a problem distribute .dsc and
>> diff.gz/debian.tar.gz files. (which still allows a limited review.)
> Discussing the idea, I pointed out, you can still hide non-distributable
> files in
* Gergely Nagy , 2012-01-19, 17:24:
I might be mistaken, but the amount of NEW
Why only NEW? Checking only NEW packages doesn't buy us more than, say,
checking only package with with have "r" in their name.
I know, this is what ftp-folks do. I call this securi^Wdistributability
theater.
s
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl writes:
> Am 19.01.2012 12:26, schrieb Arno Töll:
>> On 19.01.2012 05:32, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Second concern i have here is that (AFAIK) everyone can upload
everything to mentors.debian.net. Which would mean we then would/could
distribute non-distribite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello again,
for the record, as we talked in IRC:
On 19.01.2012 15:30, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Well, don't take it wrong: Mentors is a very usefull service, it was a
> just an idea which might allow you to become mentors.debian.org.
I di
; name is still subject to change). A workflow for handling sponsoring
> requests is proposed below. It is based on an earlier discussion on the
> debian-mentors list[1].
>
This is a really smart, simple and good idea to use the BTS. I sometimes just
keep the RFS packages which get no r
source packages to
> non-developers a lot, and even developers can be scared off by that
> requirement.
>
> A substantial problem in our whole approach is to attract Debian
> Developers to sponsoring again. If we're complicating access to
> packages, that's sort of
cates handling with source packages to
non-developers a lot, and even developers can be scared off by that
requirement.
A substantial problem in our whole approach is to attract Debian
Developers to sponsoring again. If we're complicating access to
packages, that's sort of counterproducti
1 - 100 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
