On Fri, 2024-07-12 at 10:44 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 05:54:59AM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > > Morning all, > > > > As we embark on a new process where packages submitted to mentors are > > reviewed > > and brought to a "Ready" stage for then busy DDs who are gracious enough to > > give > > their time to review and possibly sponsor into Debian. We have a unique > > problem > > (one which is now a nice one to have to be honest :-)) where more than one > > DD > > may input on the same package review. > > > > Could submitters to mentors and DDs please ensure that only one DD is > > working on > > a package. This is to avoid conflicting info and also not waste valuable DD > > time. If a package is taken, please find another to work on, as there are > > many > > at the "Ready" stage. > > Do you also suggest to not review packages one isn't going to sponsor? Or > how should this work? >
Morning Andrey, Anyone can review packages, that has been part of mentors forever really. But whoever does review a package, I would hope they see it through its journey. * For non DDs. Hopefully take it to that ready stage where a DD can then take over and finish a packages journey. * For DDs. Hopefully take a package on prior to or at the ready stage and take it through its full journey. Is this reasonable? Regards Phil -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
