Re: Request for sponsor for Runescape

Em dom, 2017-07-23 às 10:13 +0200, Johannes Schauer escreveu: > the debdiff between versions 0.1-4 and 0.2-1 is 41318 lines long - what > happened? We have one more developer where we are implementing improvements to continue our project for this new version, so we have this amount of lines. > Ac

Re: Request for sponsor for Stendhall Installer

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > Sorry, but I do not know about the "game-data-packager" and what has to do > with > my installers. It is a tool to convert upstream data packages into .deb files: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/game-data-packager > Is there a wik

Re: Request for sponsor for Stendhall Installer

Em dom, 2017-07-23 às 11:14 +0100, Phil Morrell escreveu: > As this is an initial release, have you considered using > game-data-packager (if default-jre can be considered a game engine)? > It think it would avoid proliferation of simple download wrappers, > easing maintenance of e.g. menu entries

Re: Request for sponsor for Stendhall Installer

On Sun, 23 Jul 2017 at 11:14:16 +0100, Phil Morrell wrote: > As this is an initial release, have you considered using > game-data-packager (if default-jre can be considered a game engine)? game-data-packager does not place any limitations on what can be considered a game engine. In addition to the

Re: Request for sponsor for Stendhall Installer

Hello Carlos, As this is an initial release, have you considered using game-data-packager (if default-jre can be considered a game engine)? It think it would avoid proliferation of simple download wrappers, easing maintenance of e.g. menu entries and would also make the game available to all users

Re: Request for sponsor for Runescape

Hi Carlos, Quoting Carlos Donizete Froes (2017-07-23 09:44:10) > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runescape" version 0.2 > > To access further information about this package: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/runescape > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/runescape the debdiff bet

Re: request for sponsor for installer package

On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:41:33AM -0600, Ben Hildred wrote: > I am writing a package for the installer to make restoring backups onto > bare metal easier. This package will add menu entries to the installer > (when preseeded). It is not ready yet as one of the things I need is menu > entry numbers

Re: Request for sponsor

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:31AM +0100, Ksamak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:50:18AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > * please build-depend on libjpeg-dev rather than libjpeg8-dev, while the > > latter exists in unstable we really don't want anything to depend on > > it in stretch > Ok,

Re: Request for sponsor

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:50:18AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > Wouldn't it be easier to start directly from Ubuntu packages instead of > outdated Knoppix ones? > It probably would, yes. We have the upstream version packaged, we just haven't run that many tests yet, that is why we chose to fir

Re: Request For Sponsor: Bug 731282

Andrei I think I'll probably just give up - I feel like I'm banging my head against a brick wall. I don't think I want to spend a week or so studying reams of documentation learning what all this is about - I learned how to make a (compiled) deb package and then how to create a repository and

Re: Request For Sponsor: Bug 731282

On Mi, 04 dec 13, 09:25:25, ChrisofBristol (gmail) wrote: > I'm told that I need to "file a separate RFS bug against the > sponsorship-requests pseudo-package". JFTR, that was me, while triaging bugs filed against unknown packages. > I have spent hours reading the documentation and I thought tha

Re: Request for sponsor: mactelnet

On 1 May 2011 20:45, Fernando Lemos wrote: > 2011/5/1 Håkon Nessjøen : >> On 1 May 2011 03:08, Fernando Lemos wrote: >> I don't know what you mean about splitting the patches, but if you are >> talking about the doc changes, they will be added upstream instead. > > What I mean is you currently h

Re: Request for sponsor: mactelnet

2011/5/1 Håkon Nessjøen : > On 1 May 2011 03:08, Fernando Lemos wrote: >> * In debian/rules, why exactly do you export DH_OPTIONS? > > This was added by the script, not me. So I have no idea. I don't think that's required, I don't remember dh_make ever doing that for me. Could be a different vers

Re: Request for sponsor: mactelnet

On 1 May 2011 03:08, Fernando Lemos wrote: > * In debian/rules, you probably want to get rid of the "sample" comments True! > * In debian/rules, why exactly do you export DH_OPTIONS? This was added by the script, not me. So I have no idea. > * You might want to split the patches so it's easy

Re: Request for sponsor: mactelnet

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Håkon, On 01.05.2011 12:59, Håkon Nessjøen wrote: > What about the extra tools like mndp and macping? Should they be > included in both? Or a third mactelnet-tools package? I think those are useful for the client side only, right? If so, you can s

Re: Request for sponsor: mactelnet

2011/5/1 Arno Töll : > I am no DD, so feel free to ignore my advises but I really like the idea > of your package so I'd like to see it in Debian as well. Therfore I took > a quick look on it. Thank you! > * You do not provide a watch file. Learn more about it on [1] Thats weird, I must have upl

Re: Request for sponsor: mactelnet

> On 01.05.2011 02:06, Håkon Nessjøen wrote: >> I would really like for a DD to look at my package, and be my sponsor, >> as I am eager to begin as an active package maintainer. This is >> hopefully the first of many to come. > > I am no DD, so feel free to ignore my advises but I really like the i

Re: Request for sponsor: mactelnet

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01.05.2011 02:06, Håkon Nessjøen wrote: > I would really like for a DD to look at my package, and be my sponsor, > as I am eager to begin as an active package maintainer. This is > hopefully the first of many to come. I am no DD, so feel free to ig

Re: Request for sponsor of rinputd

Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: (note: IANADD and can't upload, sorry) On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 01:24:36PM -0500, Chase Douglas wrote: Earlier today I submitted an ITP bug and uploaded a package for inclusion of rinputd into debian unstable. I would appreciate it if someone would review it and spons

Re: Request for sponsor of rinputd

(note: IANADD and can't upload, sorry) On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 01:24:36PM -0500, Chase Douglas wrote: > Earlier today I submitted an ITP bug and uploaded a package for inclusion of > rinputd into debian unstable. I would appreciate it if someone would review > it and sponsor it. Feel free to res

Re: Request for sponsor: flpsed

On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:16:31PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote: > >> I already have a flpsed package in unstable. Unfortunately my usual > >> sponsor, Bill Allombert, is unavailable to do a new upload. > >> > >> The new package fixes grave bug #321430 (uninstallable due to C++ ABI > >> transi

Re: Request for sponsor: flpsed

> > And how you can be sure that it's gonna be rebuilt with new fltk? > > Please put proper version in Build-Depends line. It's possible that some > > autobuilders still have old version of -dev package. > On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:16:31PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote: > As far as I know, th

Re: Request for sponsor: flpsed

Hi Bartosz, > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:31:03PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote: >> Hi, > > Hello. > >> I already have a flpsed package in unstable. Unfortunately my usual >> sponsor, Bill Allombert, is unavailable to do a new upload. >> >> The new package fixes grave bug #321430 (uninstallable

Re: Request for sponsor: flpsed

On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:31:03PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote: > Hi, > > I already have a flpsed package in unstable. Unfortunately my usual > sponsor, Bill Allombert, is unavailable to do a new upload. > > The new package fixes grave bug #321430 (uninstallable due to C++ ABI > transition)

Re: Request for sponsor: flpsed

On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:31:03PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote: > Hi, Hello. > I already have a flpsed package in unstable. Unfortunately my usual > sponsor, Bill Allombert, is unavailable to do a new upload. > > The new package fixes grave bug #321430 (uninstallable due to C++ ABI > tran

Re: request for sponsor: bomberclone

2005/8/8, Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: (1) If you'd contacted the current maintainer of bc you might have noticed,that the current maintainer is willing to do the sponsoring, but not justfor a "new maintainer release" -- and BTW that you are not the first one (me included: http://venthur.de

Re: request for sponsor: bomberclone

pedro silva wrote: > Hello, debian-mentors > > Bomberclone is a free BomberMan like game. > It was in the list of packages up for adoption. I'd like to maintain it. > > I've packaged upstream's new version of this game, > 0.11.6.2. > > Ergo, debian's new package number should b

Re: request for sponsor for package Tripwire

On 07-Aug-2005, Pat P wrote: > I have submitted an Intent to Adopt for the package Tripwire. Great! > I now am requesting someone to sponsor me while I work on this package. Best to ask for a sponsor once you actually have a new source package ready, since that's what prospective sponsors want

Re: request for sponsor for package Tripwire

On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 09:24:50PM -0500, Pat P wrote: > I now am requesting someone to sponsor me while I work on this package. Where is the source package (the .dsc, .orig.tar.gz and .diff.gz files)? Anibal Monsalve Salazar -- .''`. Debian GNU/Linux : :' : Free Operating System `. `' http://d

Re: Request for sponsor : python-simpy -- a Python-based simulation package

On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 03:38, Antal A. Buss wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged the SimPy (ITA ##206274), now I'm looking for a sponsor. > > > Package: python-simpy > Description: SimPy -- a Python-based simulation package > SimPy is a process-based discrete-event simul

Re: Request for sponsor : python-simpy -- a Python-based simulation package

On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 03:38, Antal A. Buss wrote: > Hi, > > I have packaged the SimPy (ITA ##206274), now I'm looking for a sponsor. > > > Package: python-simpy > Description: SimPy -- a Python-based simulation package > SimPy is a process-based discrete-event simul

Re: Request for sponsor

Hallo Mark, * Mark Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-10 15:22]: > Greetings, i am looking for sponsor for this package. [...] > I am in contact with upstream developers, they have no problems with > packaging. > Licence: GNU General Public License > > The package is lintian clean, except

Re: Request for sponsor

Mark Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greetings, i am looking for sponsor for this package. > > Source: yaffa-alpha > Package: yaffa-alpha > Version: 0.9-1 > Section: net > Priority: optional > Upstream Authors: Magnus Ekdahl, Joacim Häggmark, Anton Persson, Johan Thim. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > M

Re: Request for sponsor

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Mark Wilson wrote: > Greetings, i am looking for sponsor for this package. [...] > The package is lintian clean, except the following : > yaffa-alpha: binary-without-manpage yaffa_askpass > (I will contact authors about this). You should probably write t

Re: Request for sponsor

Hallo Mark, * Mark Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-10 15:22]: > Greetings, i am looking for sponsor for this package. [...] > I am in contact with upstream developers, they have no problems with > packaging. > Licence: GNU General Public License > > The package is lintian clean, except

Re: Request for sponsor

Mark Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greetings, i am looking for sponsor for this package. > > Source: yaffa-alpha > Package: yaffa-alpha > Version: 0.9-1 > Section: net > Priority: optional > Upstream Authors: Magnus Ekdahl, Joacim Häggmark, Anton Persson, Johan Thim. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > M

Re: Request for sponsor

On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Mark Wilson wrote: > Greetings, i am looking for sponsor for this package. [...] > The package is lintian clean, except the following : > yaffa-alpha: binary-without-manpage yaffa_askpass > (I will contact authors about this). You should probably write t

Re: Request For Sponsor : NWS - Grid monitoring infrastructure

On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:20:32PM -0700, Martin Quinson wrote: > Hey dudes, > > I have packaged the NWS, a computational grid monitoring infrastructure (ITP > #167891, which I just enhanced), and I'm not seeking for a sponsor. Erm. s/not/now/, of course. Mt. -- Testing can only prove the pre

Re: Request For Sponsor : NWS - Grid monitoring infrastructure

On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:20:32PM -0700, Martin Quinson wrote: > Hey dudes, > > I have packaged the NWS, a computational grid monitoring infrastructure (ITP > #167891, which I just enhanced), and I'm not seeking for a sponsor. Erm. s/not/now/, of course. Mt. -- Testing can only prove the pre

Re: Request For Sponsor : NWS - Grid monitoring infrastructure

* Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-03 13:20:32 -0700]: > > I have packaged the NWS, a computational grid monitoring infrastructure (ITP > #167891, which I just enhanced), and I'm not seeking for a sponsor. Hi Martin, I'm Mats from ISI, and I know Larry at UCSB has tried to introduce

Re: Request For Sponsor : NWS - Grid monitoring infrastructure

* Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-03 13:20:32 -0700]: > > I have packaged the NWS, a computational grid monitoring infrastructure (ITP > #167891, which I just enhanced), and I'm not seeking for a sponsor. Hi Martin, I'm Mats from ISI, and I know Larry at UCSB has tried to introduce

Re: Request For Sponsor : NWS - Grid monitoring infrastructure

also sprach Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.03.2220 +0200]: > I have packaged the NWS, a computational grid monitoring > infrastructure (ITP #167891, which I just enhanced), and I'm not > seeking for a sponsor. You're not? If you are... then I'd be willing... -- Please do not CC me

Re: Request For Sponsor : NWS - Grid monitoring infrastructure

also sprach Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.06.03.2220 +0200]: > I have packaged the NWS, a computational grid monitoring > infrastructure (ITP #167891, which I just enhanced), and I'm not > seeking for a sponsor. You're not? If you are... then I'd be willing... -- Please do not CC me

Re-request for sponsor: python-albatross

Hi, This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my reply, however, so I assume he has other things to do at the moment. Meanwhile, I'm continuin

Re: Re-request for sponsor: python-albatross

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:20:46PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the > python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer > who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my > reply, however, so I ass

Re: Re-request for sponsor: python-albatross

On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:20:46PM +0300, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the > python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer > who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my > reply, however, so I ass

Re-request for sponsor: python-albatross

Hi, This is my third or fourth attempt to find a sponsor for the python-albatross package. So far, I've been contacted by one developer who was interested in sponsoring the package; he never replied to my reply, however, so I assume he has other things to do at the moment. Meanwhile, I'm continuin

Re: Request for sponsor/mentor: albatross

On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 06:17, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On 16 May 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > > I've packaged the Albatross Web Toolkit. I've filed an ITP: Bug #193574. > > Once you've got it to the quality of wanting it in Debian, contact me and > we'll work something out. It certainly looks

Re: Request for sponsor/mentor: albatross

On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 06:17, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On 16 May 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > > > I've packaged the Albatross Web Toolkit. I've filed an ITP: Bug #193574. > > Once you've got it to the quality of wanting it in Debian, contact me and > we'll work something out. It certainly looks

Re: Request for sponsor: vtun

If noone already did, I will sponsor it since i use vtun on several machine. On Fri, 23 May 2003, Morgon Kanter wrote: > I'm the new maintainer of vtun, after it was orphaned. I have finished > packaging the new vtun (2.6), which includes a number of new goodies > and bug fixes. Available from:

Re: Request for sponsor/mentor: albatross

On 16 May 2003, Fabian Fagerholm wrote: > I've packaged the Albatross Web Toolkit. I've filed an ITP: Bug #193574. > Now I'm looking for a mentor that could take a look at the package, and > be prepared to sponsor it once the packaging is good enough. Comments > and suggestions from anyone are wel

Re: Request for sponsor to become a new maintainer.

"Erik Welander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Request for sponsor to become a new maintainer. > > My name is Erik Welander, and I am making a request for sponsorship in > order to become a new maintainer for a package I have created and > tested. I have read the New Maintainer's Guide and followed

Re: Request for sponsor: mozilla-radialcontext package

Hi David On Sunday 30 March 2003 21:38, David Pritchard wrote: > Hi, > > I've put together a new Debian package, mozilla-radialcontext. I'd like > to find a sponsor to help me through the process of packaging. [snip] I'm not a DD, but in the NM queue, and currently maintaining livehttpheaders, c

Re: Request for sponsor: mozilla-radialcontext package

Hi David On Sunday 30 March 2003 21:38, David Pritchard wrote: > Hi, > > I've put together a new Debian package, mozilla-radialcontext. I'd like > to find a sponsor to help me through the process of packaging. [snip] I'm not a DD, but in the NM queue, and currently maintaining livehttpheaders, c

Re: request for sponsor/mentor in nl

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 04:17:45PM +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > > Hi there, > > I'd like to get in touch with any debian developers here in the Netherlands > who are willing and able to: > I am not living in the netherlands but living 20km away from dutch border in NRW, Germany. If you live so

Re: request for sponsor/mentor in nl

On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 04:17:45PM +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > > Hi there, > > I'd like to get in touch with any debian developers here in the Netherlands > who are willing and able to: > I am not living in the netherlands but living 20km away from dutch border in NRW, Germany. If you live so

Re: Request for Sponsor: [libnet-easytcp-perl]

Hi, Thanks Tony. Please Upload this package into the archive after your security checking. I have fixed a small typo in control file. You can d/l latest from the same location. Cheeers, --madhu +++ tony mancill [26/11/02 06:37 -0800]: * -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M

Re: Request for Sponsor: [libnet-easytcp-perl]

Hi, Thanks Tony. Please Upload this package into the archive after your security checking. I have fixed a small typo in control file. You can d/l latest from the same location. Cheeers, --madhu +++ tony mancill [26/11/02 06:37 -0800]: * -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M

Re: Request for Sponsor: kdirstat - Graphical disk usage display

Hi Mike, Mike Schacht wrote: > Package location: > www.midstatesd.net/~mschacht/debian/kdirstat_2.0.1* > [...] > > KDirStat (KDE Directory Statistics) is a small utility program that > sums up disk usage for direcory trees, very much like the Unix 'du' > command. It displays the disk

Re: Request for Sponsor: kdirstat - Graphical disk usage display

Hi Mike, Mike Schacht wrote: > Package location: > www.midstatesd.net/~mschacht/debian/kdirstat_2.0.1* > [...] > > KDirStat (KDE Directory Statistics) is a small utility program that > sums up disk usage for direcory trees, very much like the Unix 'du' > command. It displays the disk

Re: Request for Sponsor: kdirstat - Graphical disk usage display

Mike Schacht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package location: > www.midstatesd.net/~mschacht/debian/kdirstat_2.0.1* > > Be sure to get this version, 2.0.1. The 2.2.0 version depends on some > kde3 libs that have still not made it into unstable. > > From the .deb description: > > KDirStat (K

Re: Request for Sponsor: kdirstat - Graphical disk usage display

Mike Schacht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package location: > www.midstatesd.net/~mschacht/debian/kdirstat_2.0.1* > > Be sure to get this version, 2.0.1. The 2.2.0 version depends on some > kde3 libs that have still not made it into unstable. > > From the .deb description: > > KDirStat (K

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > can't see anything other than a slightly different layout and the > word 'porn' in its name. ... which will make it easier to find for some people. Of course we could help these as well by including "porn" in gqview's description, or make gqview

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This one time, at band camp, Brian Nelson wrote: >>* Package name: pornview >> Version : 0.1.0 >> Upstream Author : "trem0r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>* URL : http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ >>* License : GPL >> Descript

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > can't see anything other than a slightly different layout and the > word 'porn' in its name. ... which will make it easier to find for some people. Of course we could help these as well by including "porn" in gqview's description, or make gqview

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This one time, at band camp, Brian Nelson wrote: >>* Package name: pornview >> Version : 0.1.0 >> Upstream Author : "trem0r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>* URL : http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ >>* License : GPL >> Descript

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

On Monday 04 November 2002 01:24, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Brian Nelson wrote: > >* Package name: pornview > > Version : 0.1.0 > > Upstream Author : "trem0r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >* URL : http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ > >* License :

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

On Monday 04 November 2002 01:24, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > This one time, at band camp, Brian Nelson wrote: > >* Package name: pornview > > Version : 0.1.0 > > Upstream Author : "trem0r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >* URL : http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ > >* License :

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

This one time, at band camp, Brian Nelson wrote: >* Package name: pornview > Version : 0.1.0 > Upstream Author : "trem0r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >* URL : http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ >* License : GPL > Description : GTK+-based image viewer/manager > >PornView

Re: Request for sponsor: PornView

This one time, at band camp, Brian Nelson wrote: >* Package name: pornview > Version : 0.1.0 > Upstream Author : "trem0r" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >* URL : http://pornview.sourceforge.net/ >* License : GPL > Description : GTK+-based image viewer/manager > >PornView

Re: Request for Sponsor

"Shiju p. Nair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I have packaged phpbb (a bulletin board program in PHP) and looking > for a sponsor who can check and upload this package. Since am a newbie > in debian packaging I expect some help from the mentor(s). > > You can download related files from

Re: Request for Sponsor

"Shiju p. Nair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I have packaged phpbb (a bulletin board program in PHP) and looking > for a sponsor who can check and upload this package. Since am a newbie > in debian packaging I expect some help from the mentor(s). > > You can download related files from

Re: Request for sponsor, SML/NJ

On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:35:24PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote: > Hi, > > I used to use the SML/NJ package when I was in college for doing projects, > so I know it is a useful package to have around. Also, it is one of my > favorate languages, so I would like to see it around in Debian. > > I

Re: Request for sponsor, SML/NJ

On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:35:24PM -0800, Aaron Matthew Read wrote: > Hi, > > I used to use the SML/NJ package when I was in college for doing projects, > so I know it is a useful package to have around. Also, it is one of my > favorate languages, so I would like to see it around in Debian. > > I

Re: Request for Sponsor for Xeukleides/Xeuklides

sbt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My packages are available in: > > http://www.ginkwunk.net/~sbt/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/ > > I would greatly appreciate any help from a developer/potential sponsor > who would look at may packages and provide constructive criticism. > Please be gentle, I'

Re: Request for Sponsor for Xeukleides/Xeuklides

sbt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My packages are available in: > > http://www.ginkwunk.net/~sbt/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/ > > I would greatly appreciate any help from a developer/potential sponsor > who would look at may packages and provide constructive criticism. > Please be gentle, I'

Re: Request for Sponsor for Xeukleides/Xeuklides

sbt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not yet a debian developer, although I would like to be. Have you checked http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint? It contains pointers on how to become a Debian developer. > I have changed the title of the ITO bug against wnpp indicating my > intention

Re: Request for Sponsor for Xeukleides/Xeuklides

sbt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I am not yet a debian developer, although I would like to be. Have you checked http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint? It contains pointers on how to become a Debian developer. > I have changed the title of the ITO bug against wnpp indicating my > intention

Re: Request for sponsor

martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.03.0013 +0200]: > > Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS? > > Please give me exact information what this does. I'd be happy to > sponsor you if I know more and if I know about the general t

Re: Request for sponsor

martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.03.0013 +0200]: > > Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS? > > Please give me exact information what this does. I'd be happy to > sponsor you if I know more and if I know about the general

Re: Request for sponsor

also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.04.2051 +0200]: > In case you don't mind, I'm about upload IJS later today. If you want to > take over, go ahead. All yours. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMA

Re: Request for sponsor

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:17:32PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.03.0013 +0200]: > > Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS? > > Please give me exact information what this does. I'd be happy to > sponsor you if I know more and if I know

Re: Request for sponsor

also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.03.0013 +0200]: > Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS? Please give me exact information what this does. I'd be happy to sponsor you if I know more and if I know about the general topic that this library deals with. -- martin;

Re: Request for sponsor

also sprach Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.04.2051 +0200]: > In case you don't mind, I'm about upload IJS later today. If you want to > take over, go ahead. All yours. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net

Re: Request for sponsor

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:17:32PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.03.0013 +0200]: > > Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS? > > Please give me exact information what this does. I'd be happy to > sponsor you if I know more and if I kno

Re: Request for sponsor

also sprach Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.03.0013 +0200]: > Please could someone sponsor an upload of IJS? Please give me exact information what this does. I'd be happy to sponsor you if I know more and if I know about the general topic that this library deals with. -- martin;

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Does your package check spells or spelling? > > I think your package would be better described as a "spelling-checker > add-on" rather than a "spell-checking addon", unless it really checks > spells. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Lan

Re: request for sponsor: guarddog

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sam Johnston, the previous packager of guarddog has agreed to upload my packages for me, and so I am no longer looking for a sponsor for this. Thank you. Paul Cupis - -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/L

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 07:40:50PM -0400, Ari Pollak wrote: > I've created packages for GtkSpell2 by Evan Martin, an updated version > of GtkSpell for GTK+2. > Description: a spell-checking addon for GTK's TextView widget Does your package check spells or spelling? I think your package would be

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 17:24, Ari Pollak wrote: > Looking at > configure.ac, it really only requires GTK+2 and pspell, so I just added > libgtk2.0-dev to the build-depends. Hm, but it still appears to need libpspell-dev, which isn't in the Build-Depends. If it's left out, my pbuilder build dies

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 17:24, Ari Pollak wrote: > Looking at > configure.ac, it really only requires GTK+2 and pspell, so I just added > libgtk2.0-dev to the build-depends. Hm, but it still appears to need libpspell-dev, which isn't in the Build-Depends. If it's left out, my pbuilder build die

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

Hm, commenting out the dh_foo lines aren't against any policy, and many packages do it - it's really just for reference in case they have to be added later. There aren't any example debhelper files in the debian/ directory, only commented out lines in debian/rules. I know that upstream should u

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 10:36, Ari Pollak wrote: > Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while > and I've been on "Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah" for more than a > month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded > updated packages which close the

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

Hm, commenting out the dh_foo lines aren't against any policy, and many packages do it - it's really just for reference in case they have to be added later. There aren't any example debhelper files in the debian/ directory, only commented out lines in debian/rules. I know that upstream should

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 10:36, Ari Pollak wrote: > Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while > and I've been on "Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah" for more than a > month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded > updated packages which close th

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while and I've been on "Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah" for more than a month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded updated packages which close the ITP bug - I didn't increment the revision, since that

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

Yeah, I am registered as a New Maintainer, but the process takes a while and I've been on "Waiting for DAM to approve blah blah" for more than a month now. I'm registered under [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've uploaded updated packages which close the ITP bug - I didn't increment the revision, since tha

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 21:53, Ari Pollak wrote: > Ack, woops. It should be up there now. Ok, I got a chance to look at your package; it looks good to me. I will be happy to sponsor you. I see your GPG key is already signed by a Debian Developer; that's a good sign. You should file an ITP bug now

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

Ack, woops. It should be up there now. Colin Walters wrote: On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 19:40, Ari Pollak wrote: The packages can be found at . Suggestions welcome. Hmm..the .orig.tar.gz seems to be missing. -- ___ ___ / _ | / _ \ Ari Pollak - [E

Re: request for sponsor: GtkSpell

On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 19:40, Ari Pollak wrote: > The packages can be found at . > Suggestions welcome. Hmm..the .orig.tar.gz seems to be missing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

  1   2   >