On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 11:06:31AM +0100, Ksamak wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 04:50:18AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > * please build-depend on libjpeg-dev rather than libjpeg8-dev, while the > > latter exists in unstable we really don't want anything to depend on > > it in stretch > Ok, so we will try to depend on libjpeg-turbo, if that is the preferred
It's best to depend on "libjpeg-dev" rather than a specific version, this way you can use whatever future default may change to. > > * please build-depend on libpng-dev first (or solely) > The upstream version has already been packaged with libpng-dev. However, > there is a whole compiz plugin bound to managing jpeg, getting rid of libjpeg > would mean getting rid of that plugin. I meant instead of "libpng12-dev | libpng-dev". The buildds strip any alternative dependencies but the first, thus your package will become unbuildable when the png16 transition starts in a few days. I did not mean "please drop libjpeg, libbmp or libpcx" :) Meow! -- A tit a day keeps the vet away.