Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Dear Sean,
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 09:36:24 -0700
Sean Whitton wrote:
> I'd like to note that I'm planning to upload with dgit, so you shouldn't
> rebase after the upload. It's okay to rebase before the upload.
Understand.
I always cut the final releasing commit and appe
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Roger,
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:10:52AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> And I pushed my fixes to branch qa_upload2.
> (I removed the final releasing commit of branch qa_upload, and added update
> commit)
I'd like to note that I'm planning to upload with dgit, so y
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Dear Gianfranco,
Thanks for your detailed explanation!
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:39:00 + (UTC)
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello Roger,
>
>
> >Targeting t-p-u need pre-approval from release team, while targeting
> >unstable doesn't.
>
> >
> true
> >I didn't tar
Hello Roger,
>Targeting t-p-u need pre-approval from release team, while targeting
>unstable doesn't.
>
true
>I didn't targeting t-p-u. What I meant was if:
>- my upload to unstable don't get unblock permission from release
>team
>- the original version of this package in stretch get a new RC ne
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:01:56 + (UTC)
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> >Secondly, testing-proposed-updates is highly inconvenient for the
> >release team. It requires manual intervention and slows everything
> >down. So we shouldn't upload to unstable unless we *expect* it to be
>
Hello,
>Secondly, testing-proposed-updates is highly inconvenient for the
>release team. It requires manual intervention and slows everything
>down. So we shouldn't upload to unstable unless we *expect* it to be
>unblocked.
also, TPU means that semi-automatic bug reports (e.g. piuparts, ftbfs
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:10:52AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Thanks for your review!
No problem.
> I think these are all simple fix that suitable for stretch.
> The policy don't require pre-approval to upload to unstable [0].
>
> If the unblock is rejected, and som
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Dear Sean,
Thanks for your review!
Very helpful. And I pushed my fixes to branch qa_upload2.
(I removed the final releasing commit of branch qa_upload, and added update
commit)
Package also re-uploaded to DoM amd64 and mentors.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:37:20 -0700
Sean
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Roger,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:25:16PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "equivs"
Thanks for working on all these improvements and fixes.
Here is a review of 9818bd99a15efbbbf37eace90480f69e682f2e8f:
- Shouldn't this targe
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "equivs"
* Package name: equivs
Version : 2.0.10
Upstream Author : Debian Native Package
* URL : https://tracker.debian.org/
10 matches
Mail list logo
