Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-02-16 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 02:13:03AM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: > Thanks for explaining. This makes sense, and I can add this tag. You mentioned > tcpdump, but it does NOT have any Multi-Arch tags. You feel like it should, > right? Indeed. #700727 Helmut -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-

Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-02-16 Thread Dima Kogan
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:56:25 +0100 > Helmut Grohne wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:50:49AM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: > > > Can you check whether Multi-Arch: foreign is applicable to the tcpflow > > > binary package? > > > > I don't follow. The docs suggest that 'Multi-Arch: foreign' is for

Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-02-09 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:50:49AM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: > > Can you check whether Multi-Arch: foreign is applicable to the tcpflow > > binary package? > > I don't follow. The docs suggest that 'Multi-Arch: foreign' is for > dependencies > that can satisfy the depender of any architecture. Tcp

Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-02-02 Thread Dima Kogan
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo > On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 12:04:41 +0100 > Helmut Grohne wrote: > Thank you very much for the suggestions. > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:13:16AM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: > >dget -x > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tcpflow/tcpflow_1.3.0-1.dsc > > I su

Re: Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-01-07 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Paul Gevers , 2013-01-06, 15:21: you bump the Standards-Version but do not mention which (if any) changes were needed for that. In 99% cases, there are no changes needed, 93% of all statistics are made up. so it's pointless to spam the changelog, and if some changes did indeed occur, they

Re: Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-01-06 Thread Paul Gevers
On 06-01-13 14:40, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: >> you bump the Standards-Version but do not mention which (if any) changes >> were needed for that. > > In 99% cases, there are no changes needed, so it's pointless to spam the > changelog, an

Re: Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-01-06 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > you bump the Standards-Version but do not mention which (if any) changes > were needed for that. In 99% cases, there are no changes needed, so it's pointless to spam the changelog, and if some changes did indeed occur, they are not r

Processed: Re: Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #694778 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 694778: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694778 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2013-01-06 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: tags -1 moreinfo On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:13:16AM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: >dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tcpflow/tcpflow_1.3.0-1.dsc I suggest to target experimental instead of sid, because the package is part of wheezy. The changelog is not very verbose

Bug#694778: RFS: tcpflow/1.3.0-1 [ITA] TCP flow recorder

2012-11-30 Thread Dima Kogan
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tcpflow" * Package name: tcpflow Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Simson Garfinkel * URL : http://www.afflib.org/software/tcpflow/ * License : GPL Sec