> On Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:56:25 +0100 > Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:50:49AM -0800, Dima Kogan wrote: > > > Can you check whether Multi-Arch: foreign is applicable to the tcpflow > > > binary package? > > > > I don't follow. The docs suggest that 'Multi-Arch: foreign' is for > > dependencies > > that can satisfy the depender of any architecture. Tcpflow isn't a library > > and > > it's not a 'common' part of anything. Does this apply here? > > At this moment it is a leaf package. That could change though. Once it > changes having the multi-arch header there helps. tcpdump is not a > library either yet it has a number of reverse dependencies by now. > tcpflow seems similar in scope and likely to be used my higher level > tools.
Hi Helmut. Thanks for explaining. This makes sense, and I can add this tag. You mentioned tcpdump, but it does NOT have any Multi-Arch tags. You feel like it should, right? Thanks, again. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130216021303.7858c521@shorty.local
