You were only added to the qt6 variant afaict.
https://ftp-master.debian.org/dm.txt
Hilmar
20.07.2025 00:11:28 Ben Westover :
> Hi Bastian,
>
> I am still not able to upload (same error). Are you sure I was added
> properly to DM access for this package?
>
> --
> Ben Westover
>
> On 6/28/25
On 20.05.25 21:19, Andrew Bower wrote:
Hello,
It seems a given that a new upload with a new changelog entry and a
later version number will work
Yes, do exactly this. Re-uploading the same version again won't work.
And in any of these cases is there an automated removal mechanism for
the
On 09.05.25 18:53, Golf Team wrote:
Hi,
I presume you're referring to the GG_DEBIAN_BUILD variable in
Makefile, which is used only to guard against including files (or to
guard against specific actions) for Debian. It's not used to include
anything specific for Debian or to do anything specific
On 07.05.25 05:29, Golf Team wrote:
Hello,
-std=gnu99 was used when we transitioned from a pure C language
framework to Golf (which is still a C framework, but it's now also
its own language). It just stayed even after we fixed the issues.>
-std=gnu99 is now removed.
I installed gcc 15 from d
On 05.05.25 01:17, Golf Team wrote:
Hello,
Removed dh_dwz override, it was there because lintian said that
compression isn't beneficial, but it doesn't break anything, so it
should be fine.
Thanks for the changes for now. I don't really believe that lintian
complains about this, hence I rat
On 27.04.25 09:27, Golf Team wrote:
Hello,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [wishlist]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golf":
* Package name : golf
Version : 479-1
I evaluated version 501.
- there is no need to declare a BD libcurl4 (is
On 16.04.2025 22:01, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
On 2025-04-16, at 14:07:46 +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
From the dh_python3 man-page:
private dirs
/usr/share/foo, /usr/share/games/foo, /usr/lib/foo and
/usr/lib/games/foo private directories are scanned for Pytho
On 16.04.2025 20:24, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Hello,
Can you please upload the repository to Salsa? That will make it
easier to figure out what is going on.
For historical reasons the repo is on github. Did not decide yet to move
back to salsa.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Descri
On 17.03.2025 23:57, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hello,
another question for BD's. Due to a bug in ghostscript 10.04 it can't be
used on armel / armhf to build the asymptote package (version <= 10.03 &
>= 10.05 are fine). How would you phrase that in the BD's:
Build-Depen
Hello,
another question for BD's. Due to a bug in ghostscript 10.04 it can't be
used on armel / armhf to build the asymptote package (version <= 10.03 &
>= 10.05 are fine). How would you phrase that in the BD's:
Build-Depends: ghostscript
Build-Conflicts: ghostscript (= 10.04)
or
Build-Depe
On 15.03.2025 01:46, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
On Fri, 2025-03-14 at 21:40 +0100, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hello,
and I should rather write
Replaces: , texlive-binaries (< 2024.20240313.70630+ds-6)
Breaks: , texlive-binaries (< 2024.20240313.70630+ds-6)
Use "<<" f
Hello,
I have some relationships defined in latest texlive-extra-utils:
Package: texlive-extra-utils
Replaces: , texlive-binaries (<= 2024.20240313.70630+ds-5)
Breaks: , texlive-binaries (<= 2024.20240313.70630+ds-5)
Nevertheless a test suite fails:
38s Unpacking texlive-extra-utils (2024.202
On 22.02.25 09:25, Sébastien Noel wrote:
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi,
On 21/02/25 22:07, Phil Wyett wrote:
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
[...]
I used to find value in your reviews, but i'm doubtful with this one...
The package pass all your tests but you conclude that it
"is not yet ready"
On 27.11.24 04:31, Soren Stoutner wrote:
On Tuesday, November 26, 2024 3:42:39 PM MST Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Am 19.11.2024 um 23:39 schrieb Hilmar Preuße:
Hi,
How do I have to name the additional tar balls? Putting the needed
directory into the tar balls does not seem to do the trick
Am 19.11.2024 um 23:39 schrieb Hilmar Preuße:
Hi,
How do I have to name the additional tar balls? Putting the needed
directory into the tar balls does not seem to do the trick. Currently my
only idea is to merge the two tar balls into one and name it
asyorig-acextlibs.tar.xz
Am 21.11.2024 um 08:32 schrieb Andrius Merkys:
On 2024-11-20 22:16, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Hello Andrius,
I don’t think MUT (Multiple Upstream Tarballs) has any provisions
for unpacking them to `acextlibs/ vectorgraphics/LspCpp`.
I can confirm this from my practical experience. Nevertheless
Hello,
the debci test for proftpd-dfsg 1.3.8b-3 succeeds unexpectedly on
riscv64 and only on riscv64. I tried to reproduce the issue on a riscv64
porter box and failed. I've asked upstream, what the purpose of the test
is: the answer was that it tries to resolve an unresolvable address,
which
Hello,
I hope this is an easy question: the new version of asymptote downloads
additional tar balls (two) during configure, which are unpackaged and
used during build. Page [1] describes how to add additional tar balls.
It says, that the name (extension) of the additional tar ball determines
Hi,
before pushing a broken package to the NEW queue: I started again
working on #698886 and have a here a package, which is quite lintian
clean. What causes headache is the license "Modified MIT license".
The following paragraph has been added by the author:
If you copy or distribute a
Am 09.09.2024 um 08:17 schrieb Niels Thykier:
Hello,
```perl
push @cmd, ("-o${tempdir}", $upstream_tar);
```
Should do.
>
Works fine! Thank you.
hille@rasppi2:~/devel/wp2latex/wp2latex.git $ uscan
Newest version of wp2latex on remote site is 4.10b, local version is 4.10
(mangled loca
Am 07.09.2024 um 23:49 schrieb Preuße, Hilmar:
Hi,
Can I tell mk-origtargz to use 7z instead of unzip to uncompress the zip
file?
The unzip binary is hard coded in MkOrigtargz.pm, I tried to replace, by
7z, but failed until now:
@cmd = ('7z','x');
Hi all,
before opening a bogus bug. My upstream provides zip files, which needs
to be repacked, but can't be uncompressed using UNIX unzip:
hille@rasppi2:~/devel/wp2latex $ unzip wp2latex-4.10.zip
Archive: wp2latex-4.10.zip
skipping: wp2latex-4.10/bin/win/wp2latex.exe need PK compat. v6.3
Hi all,
for some historic reasons some of our (Debian TeX task force)
repositories are sitting on github. I'd like to use the Debian provided
CI/CD even on these repos. Here [1] is description how this could be
done, but I'm failing to implement it, b/c some steps can't be executed
as describ
Control: merge -1 1077252
On 27.07.2024 13:16, EiPiFun wrote:
Hello,
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tty-clock":
I guess this is a duplicate of 1077252. Merging.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 23.07.2024 23:33, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Hi,
Alternately, you could mark it as fixed in the current version of fq.
Actually I solved the issue by marking as notfound in fq. This ist not
100% correct, as it was package fq, which introduced the file conflict.
Anyway; nq has now migrated to t
Fixed in version nq/1.0-0.1
Done: Hilmar Preuße
I can try again to close it, but I guess that won't help.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1005961
--
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
for nq the excuse [1] currently reads
Migration status for nq (- to 1.0-0.2): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates
migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing migration:
Updating nq would introduce bugs in testing: #1005961
The bug has been closed in latest upload. What needs to
On 05.07.2024 11:04, Håvard F. Aasen wrote:
On 05.07.2024 00:25, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to bring TeX Live 2024 into Debian testing. The excuse
pages for texlive-base/texlive-extra/texlive-lang say
"Migration status for texlive-... (2023.20240207-x to 2024.2024040
Hi,
I'm trying to bring TeX Live 2024 into Debian testing. The excuse pages
for texlive-base/texlive-extra/texlive-lang say
"Migration status for texlive-... (2023.20240207-x to 2024.20240401-x):
Will attempt migration (Any information below is purely informational)"
Unfortunately these pac
On 11.05.2024 09:08, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hi,
Please also announce the NMU / RFS to the package maintainer,
preferable as bug reported against it. Thanks!
The package is flagged as
Control: block -1 by 1005961
On 03.05.2024 23:45, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Hi,
That would be necessary - although I don't know how to solve this in a
sensible way.
Sorry for disturbing your best intentions to bring nq back in shape -
but this problem will not disappear by ignoring it.
Complet
On 03.05.2024 22:29, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote...
Hi Christoph,
Changes since the last upload:
nq (0.5-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
.
* New upstream version (Closes: #1038937).
* Bump Standards and dh compat version, no chang
On 28.02.24 23:59, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hello,
dumb question: in an error I uploaded luametatex 2.11.01+ds-2 to Debian
unstable. This was a mistake, it should have been uploaded to
experimental, as it is part of the upcoming TL 2024. Is it possible to
downgrade the Debian archive (unstable
On 04.03.2024 02:09, Loren M. Lang wrote:
Hi,
Have you just tried passing through -S from gbp? As in "gbp
buildpackage -S"? It might not work if you have set a different
builder like schroot, but you can just pass --git-builder=debuild or
similar in that case.
Yes, I tried that option "-S",
On 29.02.24 00:42, Lyndon Brown wrote:
Hello,
b) Re-upload 2.10.08+ds-1 with a version number like '2.11.01+ds-3-
really2.10.08+ds-1', such that it will count as a higher version number
than the mistaken upload of 2.11.01+ds-3 and thus replace it in package
upgrades. You'd then continue with
Hello,
dumb question: in an error I uploaded luametatex 2.11.01+ds-2 to Debian
unstable. This was a mistake, it should have been uploaded to
experimental, as it is part of the upcoming TL 2024. Is it possible to
downgrade the Debian archive (unstable) to 2.10.08+ds-1 and upload the
2.11.01+ds
On 23.02.24 01:15, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Hello,
Try the following:
That worked fine. Many thanks!
Hilmar
opts="searchmode=plain,repack,compression=xz,repacksuffix=+ds1,dversionmangle=s/
\+ds1//, \
pgpsigurlmangle=s%$%.asc%" \
https://api.github.com/repos/silnrsi/teckit/releases \
https://g
Hello,
I could need some help with a debian/watch file [1]. The file is mostly
not written by me, I just replaced just some regexes to introduce the
correct versioning scheme. When running "uscan -vv" it downloads
correctly upstreams tar ball, the pgp is checked and the tar ball is
repackaged
On 21.01.24 11:29, Loren M. Lang wrote:
Hi,
As I don't currently have access to Salsa, I have put a copy of the
repo up on my site here:
http://www.north-winds.org/git/rpm.git
Just for the records:
hille@haka2:~$ LANG=C wget http://www.north-winds.org/git/
--2024-01-21 11:35:25-- http://ww
Hi all,
sorry to bother again. I was requested to stop building package on i386
(#1057407) so libqt6 can drop the i386 support too. So, how do do I do
that? Do I have to specify (and maintain) the list of all supported
arches in the debian/control file or can I specify something like "any
[!i
Moin,
dumb question, I did not find anything in the policy.
We got #1056587: in the postinst stage of a package a broken TeX format
file is generated. The root cause is that the user placed a customized
TeX input file anywhere and changed the TEXINPUTS variable in the
environment of user root
On 10.11.2023 00:37, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 11:06:32PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hello Mattia,
Can we override that anyhow?
Even if it was possible, how would that be of any help? You do realize
that versioning order matters for much more than whatever is shown on
On 10.11.2023 03:10, Wookey wrote:
Hi Wookey,
I think your options are
1) add an epoch (which exists to deal with this sort of problem)
Well, would like to avoid it, if possible.
2) wait till the next (numerical) release 1.3.9 and upload that.
Do releases happen often? This approach on
On 10/13/23 01:32, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 11:52:30PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi Mattia,
The upstream minor versions are always determined by letters, so I'm unsure
how to make clear that 1.3.8a+ is later than 1.3.8+. Any hints?
This is a real sad intera
On 07.11.2023 01:07, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hi,
Hi. I see that the previous change was also requested by you (and
uploaded by someone else) due to its interaction with Texinfo.
If you feel attachment to an orphaned package, you can also adopt it.
I'm aware of that, but currently I'm not inter
On 07.11.2023 00:25, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 6/11/23 a las 23:42, Hilmar Preuße escribió:
Hi,
TeXinfo 7.1 does not migrate to testing b/c the test suite of
autoproject returns with exit code > 0. I've filed a bug report and
created a patch for the issue. The package is maintaine
Hi all,
TeXinfo 7.1 does not migrate to testing b/c the test suite of
autoproject returns with exit code > 0. I've filed a bug report and
created a patch for the issue. The package is maintained by the Debian
QA group. What else can be done from my side?
Hilmar
--
Testmail
OpenPGP_signatu
On 21.10.2023 00:32, Judit Foglszinger wrote:
Hi,
That should be opening an rt ticket with DSA, as access on those guest accounts
expires after a while.
One only needs to go through the NM page the first time.
Yes, that worked. I had to open a ticket at rt.debian.org to reactivate
the accoun
Hi,
I have the need to access a porter box, in this situation
zelenka.debian.org. The DSA page [1] says DM's (like me) would need to
apply through the NEW members site. I went to [2] and logged in using my
salsa account, selected "Site wizard" and "Request guest account". The
resulting page s
Hello,
dumb question. Currently the vcswatch for proftpd-dfsg [1] reports:
"OLD: VCS is behind the version in the archive: 1.3.8a+dfsg-1 <
1.3.8+dfsg-8."
According to deb-version(7) this is absolutely correct:
First the initial part of each string consisting entirely of non-digit
character
On 27.09.2023 19:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
In your case, I would start with a give back and then if this attempt
fails, contact the buildd admins.
AFAICT that option is limited to Debian Developers. So if anybody would
be so kind
Hilmar
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature
Description:
Hi all,
the package texinfo has been built successfully for architecture loong64
and is in status "Uploaded" for about a month now. I'm pretty sure there
are a lot of packages in status "BD-Uninstallable" b/c it does not get
installed.
What can be done here?
Hilmar
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_si
On 13.09.2023 00:00, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 23:51:26 +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
My guess is different lintian versions, aka ftp-master running an
older lintian version which had a different formatting of the output.
Compare the strings:
texlive-binaries: lintian
Hello,
again a dumb question. I tried to upload texlive-bin into the NEW queue.
The upload was rejected:
texlive-binaries: lintian output: 'embedded-library usr/bin/pdftex:
poppler', automatically rejected package.
texlive-binaries: If you have a good reason, you may override this
lintian ta
On 04.09.2023 13:30, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
I signed the package now correctly, the processing E-Mail said:
dvisvgm_3.1.1+ds-1.debian.tar.xz has incorrect size; deleting it
Do I have to re-upload or remove the "associated files" in any way?
The ACCEPTED mail just rolled in. M
On 04.09.2023 12:42, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 12:28:01PM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this does
not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the E-Mail that
the uploa
Hi all,
I'm trying to upload a new package for dvisvgm[1]. Unfortunately this
does not work: the dput command runs fine, but I did not even got the
E-Mail that the upload was successful and the package is processed.
In the meantime I could upload a new revision of texlive-bin, so there
is no g
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 27.07.2023 00:17, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texlive-bin":
* Package name : texlive-bin
Version : 2023.20230311.66589-3
Upstream contact :
Control: block 1041668 by -1
On 7/25/23 23:12, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
Add blocking statement.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "hintview":
* Package name : hintview
Version : 1.3.1-1
Upstream contact : Martin Ruckert
* URL : https://hint.userweb.mwn.de/hint/hintview.html
* License
On 17.07.2023 09:31, Gábor Németh wrote:
Hi,
So basically I think I'm now looking for a new sponsor. I don't think
I can file a new RFS so that my package is in the repos already.
You can file an RFS file, in case you need help with uploading to
Debian. This does not depend on if the package
Hello,
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/texlive-bin/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/texlive-bin/texli
On 04.07.2023 16:34, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Hi,
Thank you, you have the right idea, and this action is appreciated! :)
Assuming all of those deps are in Debian main, it sounds like the "+ds"
suffix would be the most appropriate.
I've changed the make-orig-tar script to append the string nex
On 04.07.2023 15:42, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Hi Nicholas,
texlive-bin (2023.20230311.66589-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream snapshot made for TL 2023.
- Remove sources of dvisvgm from orig.tar.xz, we don't build
it anyways.
Thus shouldn't the upstr
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texlive-bin":
* Package name : texlive-bin
Version : 2023.20230311.66589-1
Upstream contact : Karl Berry
* URL : https://www.tug.org/texlive/
* License
On 04.03.2023 23:30, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Changes for the initial release:
srcpd (2.1.5-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1032354)
Updated to new upstream version, changed distribution to unstable.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_0x0C871C4C653C1F59.asc
Descripti
Control: severity -1 normal
On 01.06.2023 09:53, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
On 17.04.2023 23:44, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Ping! Would anybody so kind to upload to experimental? That package is
prereq for the next version of ConTeXt.
Setting to Sev. normal.
Hilmar
On 20.06.2023 13:34, Ramūnas Keliuotis wrote:
Hi,
We just opensourced our NordVPN Linux application
and want to make it available from the public Debian repository.
As we are planning to do packaging and support by
ourselves, it is still not clear how to properly go
through the Debian packaging
On 01.06.2023 09:53, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
Dear mentors,
Ping! Would anybody so kind to upload to experimental? That package is
prereq for the next version of ConTeXt.
Now that bookworm is released I changed the target distribution to
unstable and re-uploaded
On 17.04.2023 23:44, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "luametatex":
* Package name : luametatex
Version : 2.10.07-1
Upstream contact : Hans Hagen
* URL : https://github.com/contextgarden/luametatex
* License
On 22.05.2023 05:52, Ko Ko Ye` wrote:
Hello,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wifi-qr":
* Package name : wifi-qr
Version : 0.2-3+18
AFAICT the version 0.2-3 has never entered Debian, hence the version you
have to use is still 0.2-3. Not sure if it will be accepte
On 15.05.2023 18:14, Oliver Reiche wrote:
Hi Oliver,
I just updated the package again, with the upstream beta2 release.
Could you please tell me if it is acceptable for Debian that I have
build dependencies (proto files) in ./debian/third_party, with the
copyright file explicity mentioning tho
On 5/11/23 15:11, Oliver Reiche wrote:
Hi,
The source builds the following binary packages:
justbuild - Justbuild generic build system
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/justbuild/
If you look at that
On 06.05.2023 00:25, Dominik George wrote:
Hi,
Now I need to move some files to another package. Is there an easy
method the exclude some files from this package or do I have to compile
a positive list (which might vary between versions)?
In debian/rules:
Well, errrm. I should have looked i
Hi all,
sorry, dumb question: currently a Debian package contains all files it
find below usr/bin and usr/share.
hille@sid-amd64:~/t2/texlive-bin/debian$ cat texlive-binaries.install
usr/bin
usr/share
Now I need to move some files to another package. Is there an easy
method the exclude some fil
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 17.02.2023 23:39, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"monitoring-plugins-check-oracle-health":
Package is not finalized, I deleted it from mentors.d.o. For now I tag
the RFS bug moreinfo.
H.
--
sigfault
On 20.03.2023 16:38, Aaron Boxer wrote:
Hi Aaron,
are you subscribed to debian-devel-annou...@lists.debian.org ?
Thanks, Santiago. How do I contact the release team to ask about unblock ?
"According to schedule, we have frozen bookworm a bit more
(2023-03-12). This means that we are one step
Am 12.02.2023 um 07:54 teilte min sun mit:
Hi,
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcommons-collections4-java/
If you look at that link you'll see a few things, which should the
resolved. At least the dist
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proftpd-mod-sftp-ldap":
* Package name : proftpd-mod-sftp-ldap
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream contact : TJ Saunders
* URL :
http://www.castaglia.org/proftpd/modu
Am 07.01.2023 um 16:16 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
The NIV has to be represented in d/copyright regardless of having the
"right" wording or not.
You currently do not mention it at all. GFDL-1.3+ (no NIV) is considered
non-free, so please fix this.
I do not mind the lintian override
Am 07.01.2023 um 02:30 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Am 07.01.23 um 02:27 schrieb Bastian Germann:
Hi,
boilerplate code
boilerplate license text (in @quotation):
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Versi
Am 07.01.2023 um 02:27 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 23:49:43 +0100 Hilmar Preusse wrote:
- "license-problem-gfdl-non-official-text": override and fix.
The GFDL variant has to be GFDL-NIV-1.3+ and the short license text that
you have in d/copyright has to c
Am 29.12.2022 um 18:41 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Hi.
Works, many thanks!
Would it make sense to open an issue at lintian?
Done. #1027292 .
H.
--
sigfault
Am 29.12.2022 um 16:52 teilte Jeroen Ploemen mit:
On Thu, 29 Dec 2022 16:14:58 +0100
Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
An override has been added, but the line, which is found to be to
long seems to move, hence lintian complains or does not complain.
What do I do?
Use an asterisk (*) as a
Hi all,
I'm just building Lintian overrides and I'm struggling with a test. Here
is the output of two lintian runs with unchanged source package, limited
to the interesting lines.
hille@sid-amd64:~/devel/TeXLive/github$ lintian --tag-display-limit 0
--pedantic -I texinfo_7.0.1-3.dsc
W: texinfo s
Am 29.12.2022 um 14:02 teilte Barry Scott mit:
Hi,
On Fedora/RHEL I would use mock to build a RPM from source to ensure
that I have the RPM spec file correctly written. Mock ensures that
no packages in my dev machine are used to build the RPM.
What is the debian version of that tool?
https:
Am 19.12.2022 um 19:41 teilte Andrius Merkys mit:
On 2022-12-19 20:36, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I uploaded latexml_0.8.7-1_source.changes to Debian FTP. Until
now I just got the information that the package was received, no reject
or accept.
I requested a package rebuild (#1026239
Hi,
yesterday I uploaded latexml_0.8.7-1_source.changes to Debian FTP. Until
now I just got the information that the package was received, no reject
or accept.
I requested a package rebuild (#1026239), which was approved, but the
builders did not even start to work?
Is there a general problem in
Am 25.11.2022 um 06:41 teilte David Bannon mit:
Hi David,
Is the something wrong ? If so, why no announcement ? If not, will
some one PLEASE tell me what I am doing wrong ? How I can diagnose this
problem ?
I have in the past uploaded several packages, I am not totally new to
this process.
Hi,
I'm a DM with upload permits. Recently I pushed
monitoring-plugins-check-logfiles to the archive. Would be nice if
anybody could set the upload permissions for my user id so I can
maintain the package myself:
dcut dm --uid 0x0C871C4C653C1F59 --allow=monitoring-plugins-check-logfiles
I guess
Am 16.11.2022 um 20:16 teilte Alexander Reichle-Schmehl mit:
Hi,
Thanks for the upload!
Just two small remarks:
* I think it would be relatively easy to add autopkgtest to the
package, allowing automatic verification of the functionality.
* Feel free to ping me for additinal pointers
Am 08.11.2022 um 11:05 teilte Alexander Reichle-Schmehl mit:
Hi,
We are using that plugin at the company, so thanks for packaging!
I'm willing to sponsor and will try to take a closer look at it in the
evening.
Good. Thanks!
But just a first question: Mentors service says, that you didn't
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I'm aware that there is no debian/watch file yet, I'll implement it
later. Further there seems to be some kind of test suite, which needs to
be activated.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"monitoring-plugins-check-logfiles"
Am 29.09.2022 um 01:01 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
As you have added yourself to the Uploaders with
https://github.com/debian-tex/tex-gyre/commit/5b1a987a6abb0f57ee6ba4af45abab17124b03ae please mention this change instead. I checked on the
current unstable version.
OK, next try.
Am 28.09.2022 um 22:47 teilte Bastian Germann mit:
Hi Bastian,
Is this a team upload? If so, please add an entry to the changelog.
I've added "* Team upload." to the top of the changelog. Now lintian
complains:
unnecessary-team-upload
The debian/changelog file refers to a "Team upload" but
Am 07.06.2022 um 18:32 teilte André Flechs mit:
I added all issues to changelog as Closes.
How can I remove the tag?
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
Hilmar
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 04.06.2022 um 09:36 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Am 04.06.2022 um 00:24 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Dear mentors,
I've uploaded a new improved version of
texlive-bin/2022.20220321.62855-4, dget link is on mentors, please be so
kind to upload to the archive.
https://mentors.debian.net/d
Am 04.06.2022 um 00:24 teilte Hilmar Preuße mit:
Dear mentors,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
My GPG key has expired, hence I need a sponsor for this upload.
Please put the request on hold, I'll (eventually) prepare a new upload.
Hilmar
--
sig
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
My GPG key has expired, hence I need a sponsor for this upload.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "texlive-bin":
* Package name: texlive-bin
Version : 2022.20220321.62855-4
Upstream Author : [fill in n
Am 01.06.2022 um 13:16 teilte Arnaud Ferraris mit:
Hi Arnaud, hi Andrey,
You can use the "--arch-all --no-arch-any" combination of options
(--no-arch-any being the important part). Generally speaking, sbuild
provides a lot of useful options, I encourage you to read its man
page so you get an
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
