On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:47 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> tisdag den 21 december 2010 klockan 15:05 skrev Jonathan Wiltshire detta:
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 03:37:27PM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > However the
> > > watch file doesn't work behind m
Hi Mats Erik,
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 14:20 +0100, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
> The package is pedantically lintian clean and builds in
> pbuilder for testing as well as for unstable.
[...]
> I would please me if someone looked at this package and reported
> conclusions on the packaging.
I can only
Hi,
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 18:08 -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> I'm not a Debian Developer, but my notes follow:
> No lintian errors at all. Rules file looks tight, DEP5 and 3, uscan
> works and reports back correctly.
> Builds great on my pbuilder, and no lintian errors here :)
Yes, seems good,
Hi Arlen,
On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 20:04 +1100, Arlen Christian Mart Cuss wrote:
> I'm a software engineer from Australia, with special interest in OCaml,
> Ruby, and functional programming in general. Nice to meet you!
Nice to meet you too! Your RFS was a good overview so I decided to give
it a qui
Hi Sage,
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 14:33 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ceph".
I was going to make a package of ceph, so I would be happy to be your
sponsor.
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
Actually it has some lintian warnings. The current Standards
Hi Aníbal,
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 18:38 +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:55:48PM +0100, ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
> >I kindly request you to review my package lbzip2-0.18-1. The package
> >is located at
> >
> >http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lbzip2/
[...]
>
Hi Alessandro,
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 14:05 +0200, Alessandro Dentella wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sqlkit".
[...]
> It builds these binary packages:
> python-sqlkit - GUI library to edit data of databases
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
Sure, but it fails to b
Hi,
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:23 +, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "galculator".
[...]
> It builds these binary packages:
> galculator - A GTK+ 2.0 based calculator
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
I would sponsor it, but it is not Lintian clean
Hi Johann,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.48-1
> of my package "uncrustify".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> uncrustify - C, C++, C#, D, Java and Pawn source code beautifier
> Uncrustify is a highly configurable source code formatter.
> It aligns preprocessor define's
Hi Giuseppe,
On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 13:17 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "atmailopen".
>
> * Package name: atmailopen
> Version : 1.01-1
> Upstream Author : @Mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.atmail.org/
> * Licen
Hi Raphael,
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 20:19 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> This package is already in the archive, and I have DM upload rights for it.
> A few days ago I noticed this package doesn't work on non 32bits
> architectures so I've done a few changes to the package.
>
> The relevant part
Hi Barry,
On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 11:46 -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> There is still a lintian warning about the copyright because there are
> not dates but I really don't want to dig through all the tarballs.
According to debian/copyright and debian/changelog , it's around since
2002 march/april
Hi,
In one package I would like to prevent some binary being strip-ped if
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
instruct so.
It's fine if the strip line is:
@$(STRIP) $(DESTDIR)/sbin/$(GRADM_BIN)
I add the following:
ifeq (,$(findstring nostrip,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
@$(STRIP) $(DESTDIR)/sbin/$(GRADM_
Hi Johann,
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 17:13 +0100, Johann Rudloff wrote:
> I am looking for a new sponsor for my updated package "uncrustify".
Your package has two things to mention. First is that your package
builds fine without
autotools-dev, don't know why it is a build-dependency. Moreover
'Homepa
Hi Matt,
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 20:51 -0500, Matt Arnold wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.10-2
> of my package "linux-patch-grsecurity2". formerly called
> "kernel-patch-grsecurity2"
As this is my package, someone forcibly orphaned it - I don't want to,
I will contact yo
Hi Sikon,
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 00:23 +0600, Sikon wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "smplayer".
Well, have you seen the following during compile:
-DCONF_PATH=\"/usr/etc/smplayer\"
? Is it OK?
Please document your takeover in copyright. I don't really understand
your *.install fi
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 14:09 -0430, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Well, is there any good reason why the upstream made this?
Previously it was generated from tcl files, now the docs are static
HTML files. As they were
generated from tcl files, a tcl build dependency was needed, only for
t
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of SQLite3 packages. Upstream used to ship the
sources and
documentation in one tarball. Now this is changed, source still ships in
a tarball, but
docs is separeted to a zip file. What would be the best, merge both to
a .orig.tar.gz or make
two source packages? I plan to rem
Hi Dmitry,
On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 20:35 +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Changes:
> * Added Portuguese translation for debconf messages.
> * Added debian/watch file.
[...]
> I'll be very thankful if somebody makes an upload. :)
I would upload it for you and be your sponsor on the lon
Hi François,
On Sun, 2007-08-05 at 19:07 +0200, François Févotte wrote:
> I just made a package for "sqlitebrowser". Since this is the first
> time I deal with a QT-based application, I am likely to have made
> errors, which is why I send this RFC before trying to find a sponsor.
Well, I dislike
Hi David,
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 23:51 +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-rdp".
>
> * Package name: gnome-rdp
> Version : 0.2.2-1
> Upstream Author : Balazs Varkonyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://gnome-rdp.linuxforge.hu
Hi Ahmed,
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 12:19 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy wrote:
> The upload would fix these bugs: 408610
[...]
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
All wrong. You NMU a package, which has a real maintainer. I know that
he is not really active and/or responsive (well,
Hi Marcelo,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 13:25 -0300, metal wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-xdebug".
Well, for the first look it may be good. But I'm not a cdbs expert, I
need time even if I can sponsor you.
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Well, first
Hi,
My only and primary computer, a laptop lost its HDD yesterday evening.
To all I wanted to sponsor: sorry, but until I can/will buy a new laptop
HDD and/or buy a desktop machine I will be offline.
I hope it will be a week at most, but due to GnuPG issues I may be MIA
longer.
Sorry,
Laszlo/GCS
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 17:59 +0100, R.Penney wrote:
> I've adjusted cryptmount's licensing terms to include
> an explicit exemption relating to linking against OpenSSL,
> roughly following the examples of dillo, fetchmail,
> and the OpenSSL online-FAQ.
Thanks. I don't know, but debian/copyright doe
[I'm subscribed, not need to Cc]
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 12:43 -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Agree. Also, binary ones sounds better for me; or if someone would like
> > to reinvent the wheel, then please do it in Python
Hi Asheesh,
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 15:03 -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> ccd2iso is a program to convert CloneCD images to normal .iso CD image
> files. It's helpful for users who have made CloneCD images of discs that
> they want to use in a Free OS.
Sounds good to have this.
> I want to add t
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 16:26 +0200, Enrico Tröger wrote:
> Geany is a small and fast editor with basic features of an integrated
> development environment. It has some nice features like code
> completion, call tips, code folding and symbol/tag lists. Geany
> supports 19 different filetypes. It is a
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 22:55 +0200, mariodebian wrote:
> I'm a 3 years debian user and I have presented my personal project to
> google summer of code.
[...]
> Google admins say me that I need a DD to be a mentor of my project.
>
> Can anybody help me?
I _may be_ here. The project seems inter
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 00:14 +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> When a bug is tagged "fixed-in-experimental", does that bug number still
> have to appear in debian/changelog for the next upload to unstable or
> will the BTS be updated when the package in experimental is replaced?
It has to appear in cha
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 17:05 -0400, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I've no time to review your package right now, but I think you (or your
> sponsor) should get in touch with someone else of the
> pkg-vim-maintainers alioth project.
>
> Even only because the latest debian available version of vim-late
Hi all,
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 22:58 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > I'm in search of a sponsor to adopt vim-latexsuite.
I could not check it today, maybe tomorrow; but others please don't
hold back.
> - Description: I don't like the short and long description. I realise
> you didn't make it
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 19:35 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:20 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> >> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
> >> and XDamage >= 1.0 to compi
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 18:20 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> checking for GTHREAD... configure: error: Byzanz requires GThread-2.0 >=
> and XDamage >= 1.0 to compile.
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
>
> Currently my package build-depends on: debhelper (>= 4.0.0),
> autotools-dev, libexpat1-de
Hi Marco,
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 17:18 +0100, Marco Cabizza wrote:
> It's quite stable and usable by now. Can this be a good candidate for
> experimental?
Yes.
> It "Conflict"'s with gaim so that if you don't want gaim 1.5 removed you
> can just prevent gaim-snapshot from installing if you don't
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 19:15 +0100, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> Laszlo Boszormenyi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > close your ITP with this line; also it goes to unstable and not stable.
>
> It is closed in line 37 (package v0.4.2+cvs20050923-1)
> Should I move it to the most recent ver
Hi Piotr,
On Sun, 2006-03-05 at 18:26 +0100, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> Griffith 0.6 is released. I'm now searching for a sponsor for my package.
Well, it's quite right, but has problems.
I better like the 'New upstream release.' text, but what you miss is to
close your ITP with this line; also it
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 16:34 +, Martin Meredith wrote:
> Are you still interested in sponsoring this?
Yes, I am just a bit overloaded.
> > But why do you need libstdc++5-3.3-dev for building rar?
You wrote that otherwise the libstdc++5 dependency would not come in
as the binary dependency. Th
Hi Martin,
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 12:19 +, Martin Meredith wrote:
> The package I've just uploaded to mentors.debian.net, [...]
Two minor problems for the first look. Please close your ITA with the
new maintainer line; close _either_ #280595 or #337940 with the new
upstream release line. Also
Hi Martin,
On Sun, 2006-01-22 at 11:27 +, Martin Meredith wrote:
> I am currently looking for a sponsor for this package - I would love to be
> able to upload the latest version and close down a few of the bugs
Well, my point is that I don't like non-free software, but as I have to use
rar (O
Hi Carlos,
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 17:21 -0600, Carlos C Soto wrote:
> Package name: gmysqlcc
> Version : 0.2.5-1
> ITP : 344594
> URL or Web page : http://gmysqlcc.thepozer.org/
> License : GPL
> Description : GTK+ client for mysql databases
> It will help you to
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 10:21 -0600, Carlo Segre wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > I think the changelog is important, so do not delete it. But the epoch
> > should go IMHO for the initial Debian package release, you can use
> > Conflicts/Replaces to
On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 09:18 -0600, Carlo Segre wrote:
> This raises a question. If I have been packaging some software for some
> time and finally decide to get it into Debian, should I wipe out the
> entire changelog, remove any epochs that might have been used, etc?
>
> My guess is yes becaus
Hi,
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 23:32 +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor:
>
> * Package name: ripit
I'm overweighted, so please do not count on me; however it looks
interesting.
Cheers,
Laszlo/GCS
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, 2005-12-04 at 18:44 +0100, Thomas Huriaux wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the mailliststat package, available at
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mailliststat/
> It is lintian, linda and pbuilder clean.
Looks good, but it can not be built twice (debian/rule
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 19:39 -0400, -.JavaManiac.- wrote:
> I need an sponsor for those packages,they are uploaded on:
>
> The last version
> [1]http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/urlgfe/
There is a fatal problem: your package is not buildable. It searches
for GTK+ 2.x, which is not defi
On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 17:20 -0300, Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote:
> I would like to know how can I change in Debian its name to php-imagick ?
The source name does not matter IMHO.
> This source will generate both php4-imagick and php5-imagick binary
> packages.
That's OK even with abracadabra
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 20:57 +0200, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Jeudi 29 Septembre 2005 20:51, Damyan Ivanov a écrit :
> > A very interesting question is "Is this spam or not?"
It is more not than yes. I think she is just a too young girl doesn't
know about life, internet and things in general.
She
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 16:24 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> 6) I caught a quick FTBFS, add libreadline5-dev to your Build-Depends in
>debian/control; you _may_ need autoconf as well.
You do miss libapt-pkg-dev as well as Build-Depends.
Also please remove .svn dirs from the source.
Hi Marcin,
On Sun, 2005-09-25 at 15:37 +0200, Marcin Wrochniak wrote:
> On 25/09/05, Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What does it do besides command completion?
>
> It automatically responds to Apt questions, it finds orphaned
> packages, it helps to find packages with 'ls' and 'rls
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 21:14 +0200, Jonas Genannt wrote:
> I'm searching for a sponsor for Kat.
[...]
> Similar to the application WhereIsIt, but also similar to Google Desktop
> Search, Kat is completely written in C++, and designed for the KDE
> desktop environment.
I would run to spon
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 11:07 -0500, Craig P. Steffen wrote:
> gnushogi doesn't have any bugs filed against it, but it hasn't been
> updated into testing, because it fails to build on arm.
Yes, see the build log[1] please.
> Since I don't
> have any arm hardware available to me, I'm not sure
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 12:27 -0700, Jason Tan wrote:
> should I continue replying to debian-mentors, or just Laszlo?
It depends. Sometimes if your sponsor (to-be) does not respond for
a while, you are free to search an other one.
> And do I wait for further instructions/advice from Laszlo,
I will
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 07:09 +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> I'm open to sponsor it, but can't check it out ATM. I hope I can do it
> today and/or report back/upload.
Ups, just a quick note: I have to check the copyright as it seems to be
restrictive enough for Debian. As I
Hi Jason,
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 21:33 -0700, Jason Tan wrote:
> We just released our latest and greatest, version 1.3.0 just yesterday
> (August 31st UTC), and I was charged with the task of building a
> debian package to accompany the release.
I'm open to sponsor it, but can't check it out ATM.
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 17:00 -0400, Andrew T. Bennett wrote:
> If the package is presumably orphaned and no contact can be made with the
> owner of the ITP, what is the next step? Does someone with authority examine
> the situation and mark the package as "Orphaned",
Until there is no package, n
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 09:48 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 10-May-2005, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> > It's all volunteer work... :)
>
> Though, thankfully, many Debian developers are paid directly to work
> on Debian. Canonical Software, Progeny, and Hewlett-Packard are some
> of the high-profile em
Hi,
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 02:22 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i want to be offician debian developer .
s/offician/official/
> and i am sure i will work my best .
Yup, you have to show it, as you will have a lot to do,
some exams as well.
> give me the information abut it
Please read:
htt
Hi Andreas,
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 22:44 +0200, Andreas Fester wrote:
> Since log4j is already in Debian its natural to also
> include its C++ port.
Yup, I liked log4j.
> So we should at least start with adding log4cxx, and maybe deprecate
> log4cpp.
Replace it would be better.
> This is my fir
Hi Roland,
On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 19:48 +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
> I am looking for someone who can upload the latest version of my package.
> My usual sponsor is Andreas Barth but it seems that he is heavily
> working on releasing Sarge and did not respond to my recent mails.
I think I would d
On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 01:17 -0500, kim wroblewski wrote:
> package looking for a sponsor
>
> XMMS Crystality Plugin v0.92
> Realtime Bandwidth Extender, Harmonic Booster and 3D Echo.
>
> licence: GPL
Sounds good!
> The
> author's email address is out of date but I don't think the project is
> d
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 23:09 +0100, jano kupec wrote:
> i sent this mail four days ago accidentally only to Laszlo, sorry for
> that,
Ups, sorry by me, because I haven't answered it yet.
> i realized that i don't need the script so i don't use it anymore.
Ah, OK.
> However i see your point. But
mine etc.
We can stay in contact if you want, and inform each other how things
are going.
> > What I don't want happening, though, is that I'll work on it, submit and
> > package, and then be told that this package cannot go in because someone
> > else owns the ITP.
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 00:44 +0100, jano kupec wrote:
> PACKAGE:
> It is my first package, so i played a little with it to be linda/lintian
> clean and to see what's packaging all about, so there are three builds
> at the above location.
Ups, second round as it is still not lintian clean:
1) Please
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 00:44 +0100, jano kupec wrote:
> DESCRIPTION:
> Album Shaper is a nice looking, drag and drop photo organizer, with
> simple GUI, based on Qt3 (KDE is not needed as stated in the wishlist
> bug report).
Sounds good, but I haven't used it, but will try it.
> PACKAGE:
> It
65 matches
Mail list logo
