Hi Andreas, On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 22:44 +0200, Andreas Fester wrote: > Since log4j is already in Debian its natural to also > include its C++ port. Yup, I liked log4j.
> So we should at least start with adding log4cxx, and maybe deprecate > log4cpp. Replace it would be better. > This is my first approach with creating a debian package, and > I am absolutely aware of the fact that I violated two basic > rules of the NMG, not to create a library and not to create > multiple binary packages; I hope that the result is not *that* > bad though ;-) I will look into it, but please do not count on me. > There is only one warning reported from lintian about a missing man > page for an included binary. Since the upstream package does > not include a man page either I still will have to fix this. Yes, please write a basic manpage for it at least. Some quick notes: - please remove unneeded, commented out lines from debian/rules, - in debian/changelog you should close your ITP request, - your package was unbuildable: dh_installchangelogs ChangeLog dh_installdocs cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/share/log4cxx/html': No such file or directory dh_installdocs: command returned error code 256 make: *** [binary-arch] Error 1 debuild: fatal error at line 765: - also /usr/share/log4cxx/ should be /usr/share/doc/log4cxx/ as I know. Regards, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
