Hi, On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 14:09 -0430, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote: > Well, is there any good reason why the upstream made this? Previously it was generated from tcl files, now the docs are static HTML files. As they were generated from tcl files, a tcl build dependency was needed, only for the docs. With the split and static docs the tcl build dependency does not needed; but still upstream split out the docs.
> Are the manpages in the source tarball? Remember that each binary needs > a manpage. Yes, it does have the manpage. > The docs zip contains which kind of documentation? PDFs? HTMLs? Is > needed in the sqlite3 package? Only static HTMLs. I don't say it's needed, but a new source package would be stay in NEW for some time, yes? On Sun, 2007-12-16 at 19:40 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote: > If there's any chance that they release a new version of only one of the > files without the other, then I think it makes sense to split it into > two source packages as well. I think it's highly unlikely, but I got your point. Popcon shows 692 installations, I don't know if it's less or much for a documentation package. I remerge them for now. Thanks, Laszlo/GCS -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
