Hi,
On Wed, 06 Nov 2024 at 09:31:36 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> So if you know a good way to enable debci to provide the needed locale
> to debci, please let me know.
I believe that the thread starting with
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/yqgfe7ef7wux9...@torres.zugschlus.de
was for test
Hi,
On Thu, 09 Jun 2022 at 08:38:40 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 02:28:48PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 07:28 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> I am working on a package written in python that thankfully has a
>>> test suite. Unfortunately, one of the tests fa
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"
* Package name: lacme
Version : 0.2-1
Upstream Author : Guilhem Moulin
* URL : https://git.guilhem.org/lacme/about/
* License : GPL-3+
Hi there,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 at 02:30:45 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"
> […]
> Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
>
> dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lacme/
Hi there,
On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 at 22:19:06 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 at 22:30:18 -0400, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
>> Guilhem Moulin writes:
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"
>>
>> This looks like a well-De
Hi Harlan,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 at 22:30:18 -0400, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Guilhem Moulin writes:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"
>
> This looks like a well-Debianized package to me.
> […]
> I also want to make you aware of the Let's
Hi Harlan,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 at 22:30:18 -0400, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> I'm curious about how you would differentiate a package like this from
> the other ACME clients out there -- I know specifically letskencrypt
> seems to fall in the same kind of category (highly isolated
> components;
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme"
* Package name: lacme
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : Guilhem Moulin
* URL : https://git.guilhem.org/lacme/about/
* License : GPL-3+
ebian/pool/main/d/dropbear/dropbear_2015.70-1.dsc
More information about dropbear can be obtained from
http://matt.ucc.asn.au/dropbear/ .
Changes since the last upload:
[ Matt Johnston ]
* New upstream release.
[ Guilhem Moulin ]
* dropbear-initramfs:
+ Take dropbear option
is command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netmask/netmask_2.4.3-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
[ Robert Stone ]
* New upstream release. (Closes: #802884.)
[ Guilhem Moulin ]
* debian/patches:
+ Make the build reproducible: setting --version twice no lon
Hi,
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 at 17:19:24 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> how do you feel about merging the two above Ubuntu deltas in the Debian
> packaging?
Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't check the Ubuntu uploads, actually.
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dropbear/2014.65-1ubu
Hi!
On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 at 15:49:18 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> no problem, just ping me whenever your package becomes ready again.
So with Guillem Jover's help on #debian-dpkg I managed to solve the
problem of the configuration file in dropbear 2014.65-1's /usr. (Using
dpkg-maintscrip
Hi,
On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 at 14:47:21 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> cat of what? I'm not sure this is correct... can you please clarify?
cat of the ‘showpubkey’ function's standard input :-) ‘showpubkey’ is
used as follows:
dropbearkey … | showpubkey "$keyfile"
dropbearkey(1) prints th
Hi,
On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 at 17:53:21 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, I could own the bug no problem, just I would like to avoid
> stealing the package to Helmut!
Fair enough :-)
> - dpkg shows that a default configuration file has changed, asking me how to
> proceed
This is because /
Hej Gianfranco!
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 20:25:08 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> You'll find the new upload at
>
> dget -x
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dropbear/dropbear_2015.68-1.dsc
Did you have time to look at the new upload yet? (Since you didn't tak
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 at 11:21:29 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> For the uscan OpenPGP support to work, upstream needs to release
> tarballs (using make distcheck), upload detached OpenPGP signatures
> and debian/watch needs to contain an pgpsigurlmangle= option. The
> github releases feature can be used
Control: retitle -1 RFS: netmask/2.4.2-1 [ITA] - helps determine network masks
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 at 11:37:39 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> Part of the package maintainer's job is to forward patches, bug
> reports and feedback upstream, so thanks for doing that :)
Moreover upstream has been super re
On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 at 11:37:39 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> not a reason for rejection
>
> Not being willing to sponsor the package isn't a rejection, just an
> indicator that I don't have time for a proper
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 at 18:03:41 +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> The source package should not be a native source package as netmask
> isn't Debian specific.
It has however (to my surprise as well) been a native package since its
integration to Debian in 1999. Just made it non-native as you
su
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 13:59:11 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> Making people upset was certainly not my intention. And it's precisely
>> because I don't have upload rights that I didn't put my name in the
>> Uploaders fields. Anyway I don't care either way, so if it's less
>> controversia
Hi! Thanks for your interest. And generally for your mentoring work :-)
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 at 12:11:54 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>> I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses?
>> (Yes I read section 3.3 of the policy, it didn't help me
>> understanding.)
>
> fo
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 at 15:03:16 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> +Maintainer: Guilhem Moulin
> +Uploaders: Gerrit Pape ,
>
> I would do the opposite, but well, as you wish :)
I don't mind either way :-) But why would you swap the addresses? (Yes
I read section 3.3
d:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/netmask/netmask_2.4.0.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
[ Robert Stone ]
* New upstream release. (Closes: #79512.)
[ Guilhem Moulin ]
* New maintainer. (Closes: #784185.)
* debian/compat: bump debhelper compatibility level f
Hi Helmut & Gianfranco,
By the way if you don't have time or are no longer interested in
sponsoring this upload (which is no longer an NMU by the way) please
just say it out loud so I can poke debian-mentors@l.d.o again :-)
Thanks!
Cheers,
--
Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
Control: title -1 RFS: dropbear/2015.68-1 - lightweight SSH2 server and client
Hi Gerrit & al.,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 at 12:19:39 +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> Comaintenance is fine too.
Awesome, thanks! I've therefore removed the NMU annotations and
uploaded 2015.68-1 to m.d.n:
dget -x
http://
Hi Gianfranco,
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 at 07:23:55 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I didn't follow the thread, and seems that other DDs are already caring of
> this one, so I would just put my .02$ (and let me know if you need a review
> or help).
Thanks! So far only Helmut has given feedback
Hi there,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 at 22:21:21 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> In general, I'd find sponsoring this NMU much easier if the package
> split and the fixing of those many bugs could happen in separate
> uploads. Each part is complex and the fallout is hard to estimate. I
> understand that su
/series
have been applied as well.
http://lists.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au/pipermail/dropbear/2015q3/001777.html
However, this time I didn't pull in the changes (although Debian is now 3
releases behind…)
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:44:09AM +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> Alright, this
losely.
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 03:20:52PM +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
>> Note that while the current maintainer (Gerrit, CC'ed) told me to go
>> ahead and proceed with a NMU, they are not able to sponsor me at the
>> moment. Furthermore I'm currently a DM and wou
Hi Vincent, Gerrit,
On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 at 18:42:53 -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> NMUs are intended to be minimally intrusive and be targeted to fix
> specific bugs (and usually RC/important ones); that means that in
> general, you should avoid things like new upstream releases and
> extensive pac
Dear mentors,
I am still in need for a sponsor for my package dropbear, so please
allow me to bump the thread :-)
https://bugs.debian.org/790125
Note that while the current maintainer (Gerrit, CC'ed) told me to go
ahead and proceed with a NMU, they are not able to sponsor me at the
moment.
Hi Mathieu,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 at 21:26:50 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> uscan warning: pgpsigurlmangle option exists, but the upstream keyring does
> not exist
> in debian/watch, skipping:
uscan(1) uses its own keyring, which is usually checked out in the
debian branch: You need to export
w upstream release. (Closes: #775222.)
[ Guilhem Moulin ]
* debian/source/format: 3.0 (quilt)
* debian/compat: 9
* debian/control: bump Standards-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes necessary).
* debian/copyright: add machine-readable file.
* Split up package in dropbear-bin (binaries), dropbear
e
Files: *
Copyright: © 2000, 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006 Peter Palfrader
© 2004-2008 Christoph Berg
© 2001-2005 Simon Richter
© 2005-2008 Thijs Kinkhorst
© 2008-2011 Franck Joncourt
© 2014 Guilhem moulin
License: FIXME
Files: caff/*
C
34 matches
Mail list logo
