On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 14:19:43 +0200 Dominique Dumont wrote:
> On Friday, 23 August 2019 23:04:30 CEST Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Please take into account that the postrm script, when called with the
> > "purge" argument, removes the directory, along with all its conten
replace the
above-mentioned index cleanup code?
Could you please clarify?
Thanks for your time and patience!
P.S.: Please Cc me on replies, as I am not subscribed to
debian-mentors. Thanks!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello!
Since I have received one late translation update, I thought I could
prepare a new version of the apt-listbugs package (0.1.28):
it is ready to be uploaded to Debian sid.
Could someone please build the package from commit
[18eb13976d33dc6f0412
.
Bye!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpEJphYgwEEC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hi!
I have just finished preparing a new version of the apt-listbugs
package (0.1.27): it is ready to be uploaded to Debian sid.
Could someone please build the package from commit
[eb4d507254f84432405d36a8f563226a4f145522], and sponsor its upload
to
o the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpKUtehREuSB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpNIzABet48J.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello everybody!
I prepared a new version of the apt-listbugs package (0.1.26):
it is ready to be uploaded to Debian unstable.
Could someone please build the package from commit
[c04fcb88ed8ba0f87c62d5711f394dd455231754], and sponsor its upload to
si
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:25:00 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> If the maintainer field is set to , then I would
> obviously need to subscribe to that list, and the e-mail traffic
> related to apt-listbugs would be intermingled with the rest of
> the messages directed there. I am no
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:47:31 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote:
[...]
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 12:39:48AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > That sounds like a reasonable suggestion: how can I still ship it in
> > the binary package? I guess I should add a debian/apt-listbug
On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:39:48 +0100 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> I had thought about doing so, but I could not figure out how to handle
> the situation: what information should the LICENSE file contain?
> Pretty the same as debian/copyright, I guess.
>
> If this is indeed the cas
On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 19:40:09 + Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> [2018-11-03 11:11] "Francesco Poli (wintermute)"
> > Hello everybody,
> > my usual sponsor has some blocking issues and is currently unable to
> > upload packages on my behalf.
> >
> > I
On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 18:58:04 +0100 David Kalnischkies wrote:
> Hi,
Hello David, nice to see your reply! :-)
>
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
> > Could someone please build the package from commit
> > [999e167ed8a45ce9728
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello everybody,
my usual sponsor has some blocking issues and is currently unable to
upload packages on my behalf.
I prepared a new version of apt-listbugs (0.1.25): it is ready to be
uploaded.
Could someone please build the package from commit
[999
clarify.
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
fsck is a four letter word...
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpnMKTD0vIUV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tter word...
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpcac7Vak1gc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 14:58:46 -0700 Vincent Cheng wrote:
[...]
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Francesco Poli
> wrote:
>
> > So the question is: is there any general purpose tool that scans a
> > directory tree, detects the copyright notice and license of each file,
>
transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpGFqKm8Diea.pgp
Description: PGP signature
tests I want.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpfy55iYqSAH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:42:54 +0900 Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Osamu, thanks a lot for your kind reply!
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:07:21PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > What I am trying to do (and failing miserably at) is to start an X
> > session inside a
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 22:07:21 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hello,
[...]
I forgot to add that I am not subscribed to the list, hence please Cc:
me on replies.
Thanks!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition docum
he web about running X inside chroot environments, but I
failed to find useful hints about my issue.
Thanks for any help you may provide!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
.....
the transition document!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpeSMHfFIebh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
uot; [1].
[1] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLInProprietarySystem
I would say that two programs communicate "at arms length", when one
executes the other and parses its output...
Let's anyway wait for the opinion of other debian-legal regulars.
--
http://www.invent
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:26:51 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:58:42 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Since Ryan will no longer be involved in apt-listbugs maintenance, I am
> > still looking for a co-maintainer.
> > Thanks in advance to anyone who vol
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:58:42 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:29:28 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Also, could someone please review the proposed git work-flow and tell
> > me if it is OK?
>
> However, I still need confirmation that the git work-fl
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 14:30:27 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > [I wasn't Cc:ed, hence I see your message only now, and I am replying
> > after manually quoting the text from the web archive and manually
> > setting the
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > However, I still need confirmation that the git work-flow I am planning
> > to follow won't mess everything up.
> > Could someone please review it (see <http://bugs.debian.org/588636#39>)?
>
> A few min
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:29:28 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> Now I am short of ideas on how to proceed: I would like to take over
> the maintenance of apt-listbugs (possibly with help from someone else,
> see below) and get direct push access to its public git repository on
> al
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:29:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > > My problem is that I've lost contact with him: he seems to be currently
> > > (almost) MIA.
> >
> > FWIW, I have been working with him as well and found him rather inactive
> >
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:29:28 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hi everybody,
[...]
I forgot to add that I am not subscribed to debian-mentors or to
debian-ruby: hence, please Cc: me on replies.
Thanks again.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
Need some pdebu
Ruby expert I would dream to be!) or on packaging
techniques (I am still learning!).
Any volunteer?
Thanks in advance for your time!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
Need some pdebuild hook scripts?
. Fran
e/trtdocs_wo001.html#P192_37445
Whether the Debian Project is or is not willing to accept pseudonymous
works in its archive, it is up to the FTP Masters to decide, I think.
I hope this helps.
--
New location for my website! Update your bookmarks!
http://www.inventati.org/frx
....
e send replies to both debian-mentors and debian-legal, as
appropriate, rather than to me and debian-mentors, or otherwise other
debian-legal participants won't see your replies at all...
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself!
ly agree that upstream could be suggested to drop such a
useless restriction and adopt the plain (unmodified) zlib license.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/progs/scripts/refresh-pubring.html
New! Version 0.6 available! What? See for yourself!
..... Fra
of additional issues
appear.
Please, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/11/msg00271.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/11/msg00272.html
and the rest of the thread, for more details.
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
....
36 matches
Mail list logo
