On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 05:54:35PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:10:55PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Yeah, it is called "", as in nothing, as in don't include it. I can't
> > see how any package needs to build-depend on a
On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 05:54:35PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:10:55PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > Yeah, it is called "", as in nothing, as in don't include it. I can't
> > see how any package needs to build-depend on a
lly, the better approach is to include say a loadable module for
each CPU type and load it on demand. Include all of them with the
package. Don't do recompilation after install.
--
.--=======-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins-
any package needs to build-depend on a certain version of libc6
anyway.
Ben
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
east it is all good experience!
Sounds to me like you didn't name your .orig.tar.gz correctly, which
means it doesn't create a .diff.gz.
--
.--=======-=-======-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins--Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
7;s this, I changed only the content of a man page and rebuild.
Sounds like it may not like building with m68k's latest kernel headers.
Did you check the actual build-logs?
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic
the package's
Makefile?
install -d debian/tmp
$(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(PWD)/debian/tmp
Should do the trick.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
the package's
Makefile?
install -d debian/tmp
$(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(PWD)/debian/tmp
Should do the trick.
--
.--===-=-==-=---==-=-.
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [
uld satisfy Dermot.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
uld satisfy Dermot.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
-
f it's truely a bug
in your package (and it sounds like it is), then fix it, or get someone
else to. Until then, it wont go into testing, and this is the right
thing to do.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=========---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantast
f it's truely a bug
in your package (and it sounds like it is), then fix it, or get someone
else to. Until then, it wont go into testing, and this is the right
thing to do.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=========---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantast
should do
it this way anyway, else your package becomes uninstallable if the user
removes the file before removing the package.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
. You should do
it this way anyway, else your package becomes uninstallable if the user
removes the file before removing the package.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic vo
u specifically. IOW, it's not the same thing.
--
---===-=-==-=====-------==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
u specifically. IOW, it's not the same thing.
--
---===-=-==-=====-------==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:17:27AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> * Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010411 21:57]:
> > forced installation against dependencies, because I increase the
> > shlibdeps correctly.
>
> Actually, if perl gets upgraded before the new library is
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:17:27AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> * Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010411 21:57]:
> > forced installation against dependencies, because I increase the
> > shlibdeps correctly.
>
> Actually, if perl gets upgraded before the new library is
whole reason for using gcc).
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
st dependencies, because I increase the
shlibdeps correctly.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
whole reason for using gcc).
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PRO
st dependencies, because I increase the
shlibdeps correctly.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTEC
bsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname
libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by
ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without
the -dev package installed.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=-
in libsocks4, which should compile the library with -soname
libsocks.so.4. I'm willing to bet that libsocks.so is created by
ldconfig when libsocks4 is installed, else it wouldn't even work without
the -dev package installed.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---
here
this can be done automatically in your program.
Ben
--
---===-=-======-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
here
this can be done automatically in your program.
Ben
--
---===-=-======-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==--
v it isn't on Build-Depends. Sould be on Build-Depends? Is
> this the problem?
gettext is not provided by libc6-dev. You have to install the "gettext"
package, and specify it in your build-deps.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
vore.debian.org/buildlogs/
powerpc: http://voltaire.debian.org/buildlogs/
There may be others.
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
ibc6-dev it isn't on Build-Depends. Sould be on Build-Depends? Is
> this the problem?
gettext is not provided by libc6-dev. You have to install the "gettext"
package, and specify it in your build-deps.
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
vore.debian.org/buildlogs/
powerpc: http://voltaire.debian.org/buildlogs/
There may be others.
--
---===-=-==-=---=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [
p things prinstine for main. If you want to build your package for
other archs, check the machines listing and login using your Debian
login, and build them yourself for upload.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fant
p things prinstine for main. If you want to build your package for
other archs, check the machines listing and login using your Debian
login, and build them yourself for upload.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fant
ild the package without the
tools.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=-------======-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
ild the package without the
tools.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=-------======-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--
t's not.
> What must I do?
No, latest glibc does not include compile support for libdb. Install and
Build-Depends on libdb2-dev
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
x27;s not.
> What must I do?
No, latest glibc does not include compile support for libdb. Install and
Build-Depends on libdb2-dev
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantas
ging the interfaces down and back up would
suffice (ifdown -a; ifup -a).
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
nterfaces down and back up would
suffice (ifdown -a; ifup -a).
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=------
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
talled before the
package is unpacked. The ordering of the dpkg install process can be
found in the dpkg-doc package.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROT
talled before the
package is unpacked. The ordering of the dpkg install process can be
found in the dpkg-doc package.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROT
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:38:04AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Hi Ben!
>
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:30:17PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > My point was
> > that he cannot change the version of tcl that is program is *linked*
> > against. That has nothing to
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 02:38:04AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Hi Ben!
>
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 07:30:17PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > My point was
> > that he cannot change the version of tcl that is program is *linked*
> > against. That has nothing to
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:25:50AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:09:58PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > IOW, you are stuck using the version of tcl you compiled against.
>
> Should this be the case? Some of my packages use tcl/tk and I think
> the cu
On the
aside, using tclsh is a dependency you add yourself, but since it is in
the same library package (tcl8.2), you don't need it.
IOW, you are stuck using the version of tcl you compiled against.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Be
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 01:25:50AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 06:09:58PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> > IOW, you are stuck using the version of tcl you compiled against.
>
> Should this be the case? Some of my packages use tcl/tk and I think
> the cu
o work. On the
aside, using tclsh is a dependency you add yourself, but since it is in
the same library package (tcl8.2), you don't need it.
IOW, you are stuck using the version of tcl you compiled against.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Be
o implement anything that makes it harder for discussions to take
place.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=-------=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
g to implement anything that makes it harder for discussions to take
place.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=-------=----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAI
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:36:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >>>> "BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> I've a solution :-)
> >>
> >> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
>
> BC
)
>
> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
libsafe (which also doesn't work with these libraries).
--
---===-=-======-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:36:08PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >>>> "BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> I've a solution :-)
> >>
> >> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
>
> BC
)
>
> Conflicts: libc6-i586, libc6-i686
How about allowing me to conflict with you package, as I have done with
libsafe (which also doesn't work with these libraries).
--
---===-=-======-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that
#x27;s a downfall in atlas, IMO. There should be a way to compile for a
CPU, without actually having that CPU. You will most likely have to hack
the atlas build process to get this done.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
#x27;s a downfall in atlas, IMO. There should be a way to compile for a
CPU, without actually having that CPU. You will most likely have to hack
the atlas build process to get this done.
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fa
quot;osfxsr", "xmm", "26", "27", "28", "29", "30", "amd3d"
};
These coincide with some compiler flags. You can see "amd3d" and "mmx" are
easily identified. I do not know what the rest are. SO you could do
something like:
/lib/mmx/
/lib/i686/amd3d/
/lib/i686/apic/
Have at it :)
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
quot;osfxsr", "xmm", "26", "27", "28", "29", "30", "amd3d"
};
These coincide with some compiler flags. You can see "amd3d" and "mmx&qu
it comes around (since I'm
guessing it will drop this support, in favor of dpkg's conversion).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMA
it comes around (since I'm
guessing it will drop this support, in favor of dpkg's conversion).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMA
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:32:46PM -0800, Michel LESPINASSE wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 06:11:47AM +0100, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > IMO, the better way would be if the CPU intensive portions were in a
> > > shared libr
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:32:46PM -0800, Michel LESPINASSE wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 06:11:47AM +0100, Samuel Hocevar wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > IMO, the better way would be if the CPU intensive portions were in a
> > > shared libr
sparc does support a
/usr/lib/v9/, if you are interested.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
sparc does support a
/usr/lib/v9/, if you are interested.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=
./usr/lib/libmcal.so ->
> libmcal.so.0.6
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2000-11-27 21:57:32 ./usr/lib/libmcal.so.0 ->
> libmcal.so.0.6
a) How did you get it to do that odd ordering!?
b) The .so symlink should be in the -dev package.
c) If this (however odd) ordering makes lintian
>libmcal.so.0.6
> lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2000-11-27 21:57:32 ./usr/lib/libmcal.so.0 ->
>libmcal.so.0.6
a) How did you get it to do that odd ordering!?
b) The .so symlink should be in the -dev package.
c) If this (however odd) ordering makes lintian barf, then lintian is
broken.
d idea, and might be simpler.
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
uot;lapack-dev"
else
dh_gencontrol -p -- -DDepends="atlas-dev"
endif
Then just ommit this dep from the control file, and it will be added at
build-time.
Ben
--
---===-=-======-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantasti
d idea, and might be simpler.
--
---===-=-==-=---=====----=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROT
uot;lapack-dev"
else
dh_gencontrol -p -- -DDepends="atlas-dev"
endif
Then just ommit this dep from the control file, and it will be added at
build-time.
Ben
--
---===-=-======-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on tha
?
SPARC and PowerPC are big-endian. You can login to vore.debian.org using
your developer account. This is an ultrasparc system.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PR
?
SPARC and PowerPC are big-endian. You can login to vore.debian.org using
your developer account. This is an ultrasparc system.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PR
dify the
> makefile or makefile.in or ...?
>
> Thanks in advance... excuse my ignorance; autoconf isn't exactly something
> I'm familiar with.
CFLAGS="-DREENTRANT -O2 -Wall" ./configure
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=---
dify the
> makefile or makefile.in or ...?
>
> Thanks in advance... excuse my ignorance; autoconf isn't exactly something
> I'm familiar with.
CFLAGS="-DREENTRANT -O2 -Wall" ./configure
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=---
d decides it's not g++.
> [...]
> > AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++)
>
> How about
>
> AC_PROG_CXX
> AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$GXX = xyes)
>
> (Cf. autoconf manual)
You can also do "CXX=g++ ./configure"
--
---=====
d decides it's not g++.
> [...]
> > AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++)
>
> How about
>
> AC_PROG_CXX
> AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$GXX = xyes)
>
> (Cf. autoconf manual)
You can also do "CXX=g++ ./configure"
--
---=====
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:28:37PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > > I assume if you have a script which depends on an Architecture: any
> > > or more restrictive Architecture:, you still just go ahead and set
> > &
On Fri, Sep 08, 2000 at 08:28:37PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > > I assume if you have a script which depends on an Architecture: any
> > > or more restrictive Architecture:, you still just go ahead and set
> > &
change your package.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
change your package.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 09:43:16PM +0200, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:30:06PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> EHLO,
> I post this msg here from -devel for a nm dubt.
>
> > > ld.so.preload-manager (0.3.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> > > .
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 09:43:16PM +0200, Cosimo Alfarano wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 03:30:06PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> EHLO,
> I post this msg here from -devel for a nm dubt.
>
> > > ld.so.preload-manager (0.3.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> > > .
lse extra deps
like perl5, but it is complete).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
lse extra deps
like perl5, but it is complete).
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=====---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
--
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 11:39:49PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >>>> "BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> BC> THe correct thing would be to fail if sawfish is running, in the pre-inst.
> BC> Force the user to up
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 11:39:49PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >>>> "BC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> BC> THe correct thing would be to fail if sawfish is running, in the pre-inst.
> BC> Force the user to up
st.
Force the user to upgrade at a console. Lot's of things like XDM and GDM,
do this aswell. It is the only sane way. Folks who do upgrades, are always
advised to do it from a tty, and not in X, anyway.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
st.
Force the user to upgrade at a console. Lot's of things like XDM and GDM,
do this aswell. It is the only sane way. Folks who do upgrades, are always
advised to do it from a tty, and not in X, anyway.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=
dap
> version and consequently support only apache and not apache-ssl? (ssl is
> supported only by Netscape SDK).
Your the package maintainer, so yes and yes. You get to decide.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on t
ap version and
>consequently support only apache and not apache-ssl? (ssl is supported only by
>Netscape SDK).
Your the package maintainer, so yes and yes. You get to decide.
--
---===-=-==-=---=--------=-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on t
should not be part of the normal
build process, and since quite a bit of it is false information (the
libvfork.so library I used to make it work always shows up in there), the
output should only be user parsed and used as a reference, not an
automatic update to the control file.
Ben
--
---===
ite a bit of it is false information (the
libvfork.so library I used to make it work always shows up in there), the
output should only be user parsed and used as a reference, not an
automatic update to the control file.
Ben
--
-------===-=-==-=---==-=--
change/modify or whatever to make it suitable for inclusion in the
archive.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
`
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 12:19:43AM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Sorry to say but this script is fairly useless for most people. Strace
> > > cannot follow vfork() (yes I know -F says it will, but according to th
change/modify or whatever to make it suitable for inclusion in the
archive.
Ben
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
`
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 12:19:43AM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Sorry to say but this script is fairly useless for most people. Strace
> > > cannot follow vfork() (yes I know -F says it will, but according to th
as sgml and tetex related things). So it
works pretty well.
Would you like me to send you the source I have?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMA
as sgml and tetex related things). So it
works pretty well.
Would you like me to send you the source I have?
--
---===-=-==-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMA
root
>
> and then
> $ ../strace2builddepends.pl /tmp/trace
> $
>
> That means I didn't get any Build-Depends! Where's my mistake?
change the double space in the regex for the strace lines to " +" (one
space and a '+'), else it only picks up 4 digit
root
>
> and then
> $ ../strace2builddepends.pl /tmp/trace
> $
>
> That means I didn't get any Build-Depends! Where's my mistake?
change the double space in the regex for the strace lines to " +" (one
space and a '+'), else it only picks up 4 digit
all). Once make -C
executed, strace stopped showing output.
Ben
--
---=======-=-======-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-=-===-==---=--=---'
all). Once make -C
executed, strace stopped showing output.
Ben
--
---=======-=-======-=---==-=--
/ Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \
` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] '
`---=--===-=-=-
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
