On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:24:32AM +0800, zhaoway wrote: > Hi, > > When tracking unstable, those packages (fileutils, libgtk1.2 etc) are > installed ok but when be running (like ls) they complained of lacking > a GLIBC 2_2_3 ... I then noticed the libc6 in unstable is 2.2.2, so my > question is how these packages got this weird linkage? They're not > build against unstable? Then how do they get built?
Glibc in unstable follows CVS. So it is actually 2.2.2 and a half. If they complain about symbols, then it sounds like to me that you have forced installation against dependencies, because I increase the shlibdeps correctly. Ben -- -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------ / Ben Collins -- ...on that fantastic voyage... -- Debian GNU/Linux \ ` [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ' `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
