Sean Whitton wrote on Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:40:00 -0700:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > I think that the current stable sbuild is meant to be able to build
> > for unstable (pretty common use case), so if you can reproduce it, a
> > stable update might be in o
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
having been unsuccessful in contacting the maintainer of this package
and after
having consulted m...@debian.org, I am looking for a sponsor for the
package
"libcgicc"
* Package name: libcgicc
Version : 3.2.16-0.1
Hi,
> Due to the way dpkg-maintscript-helper is implemented, the symlink
> created with dh_installdocs is ignored, so dpkg-maintscript-helper will
> create it for you. The manpage for dpkg-maintscript-helper also contains
> an explanation of why 'just removing the directory in preinst' can cause
>
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:40:20 + (UTC)
with message-id <935688972.2003560.1473871220...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#837792: RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.14-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837792,
regarding RFS: python-hdf5storage/0.1.14-1
to be marked as done.
Thi
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:33:35 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: usbguard/0.5.14+ds1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #837704,
regarding RFS: usbguard/0.5.14+ds1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-hdf5storage"
* Package name: python-hdf5storage
Version : 0.1.14-1
Upstream Author : Freja Nordsiek
* URL : https://github.com/frejanordsiek/hdf5storage
Hey Ben,
thanks for your help!
On 14/09/2016 03:17, Ben Finney wrote:
> * When removing code, just remove it. You are tracking the work in a
> VCS, there is generally no reason to commit changes that comments out
> lines of code.
>
> So, in ‘debian/patches/’, the
> ‘0001-Remove-check-for-pyt
On 14/09/2016 04:51, Ben Finney wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-09-14 11:17 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Here are some comments I have for improving the packaging work:
>
> Further:
>
> * The source package should ideally not contain non-source forms of the
> work.
>
> I see that there is a tree of ge
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I think that the current stable sbuild is meant to be able to build
> for unstable (pretty common use case), so if you can reproduce it, a
> stable update might be in order.
Sorry for a second e-mail, but I just remembe
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:46:02AM +, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I still don't know why the stable sbuild didn't work, though. (Or
> whether upgrading sbuild was the fix: perhaps something changed in the
> archive since Friday.) Should I file a bug about that?
It's more likely jus
Hi Andrew,
2016-09-14 9:15 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley :
> Good points - I guess it is not worth making a new package to fix
> these items you mention - but the next one I should consider them. See
> below for more details
However, I can't upload the package without "QA upload" text and
changes abo
Good points - I guess it is not worth making a new package to fix
these items you mention - but the next one I should consider them. See
below for more details
On 11 September 2016 at 23:18, Eriberto Mota wrote:
> Contol: tag 837408 moreinfo
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I have some considerations:
>
> 1.
Hi,
>Please review my new package for kpmcore,
ok
>thanks for any tips or advice!
using mentors would be so appreciated
review:
1) grep copyright . -Ri
missing copyrights
2)
usr/lib/*/libkpmcore.so.2*
usr/lib/*/libkpmcore.so.3
why are you installing both SONAMEs?
3) dpkg-gensymbols is
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2016 10:07:58 + (UTC)
with message-id <1900664498.1506785.1473847678...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#837749: RFS: forge/0.9.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #837749,
regarding RFS: forge/0.9.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Hi
>Thanks for reviwing! I must say I've addressed most of your points but
>testing the new version (25), I've found that it doesn't work as
>expected in Scid. Scid has a feature to play versus Phalanx (tactical
>game) but it needs a special version. The package in sid works well
>while new versi
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:48:31 + (UTC)
with message-id <1942153070.1470241.1473846511...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#837609: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #837609,
regarding RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.7-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi,
On 13/09/16 18:37, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> I have to update 4 debian/*.preinst files.
>
> Right now the files are like here[0]:
>
>
> if dpkg --compare-versions "$2" lt "1.2.4+dfsg1-7" ; then
>rm -rf /usr/share/doc/bogofilter || true
> fi
>
>
> [0] -
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git
Hi
>because there is still some stuff to sort out with the new usbguard 0.6
>release, i fixed the bugs in the already uploaded release and made a new
>debian revision. I hope that approach is oke.
simple is better! sponsored
G.
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2016 09:01:29 + (UTC)
with message-id <248477810.1407785.1473843689...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#836381: RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #836381,
regarding RFS: couchapp/1.0.2+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.
This means th
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge":
* Package name: forge
Version : 0.9.0-1
Upstream Author : ArrayFire
* URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/forge
* License : BSD
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
Please review my new package for kpmcore,
* ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810063
* Git clone: https://gitlab.com/highvoltage/kpmcore-packaging.git
* Git br
21 matches
Mail list logo
