Hello Daniel, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 07:17:10AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > I think that the current stable sbuild is meant to be able to build > for unstable (pretty common use case), so if you can reproduce it, a > stable update might be in order.
Sorry for a second e-mail, but I just remembered that there is a backport of a version of sbuild that can build for unstable, so I don't think the sbuild maintainer would want to a stable update in addition to this. If you can reproduce the bug with the backport, though, it should definitely be reported. -- Sean Whitton