Le Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 06:37:42AM +, Bart Martens a écrit :
>
> "Files: filename1, filename2" for exceptions.
Actually, it should be:
Files: filename1 filename2
(The separator is a space, not a comma plus a space).
Cheers,
--
Charles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...
Hi Bas,
http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop
Uploaded: 2012-06-23 20:07
Some of my comments on RFS 675701 are not yet processed in this package. I
also have the following additional comments.
The file pg_top.c contains "Copyright (c) 1989 - 1994, William LeFebvre,
Northwestern Universit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 663916 RFS: phonetisaurus/0.4-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme to Phoneme
> conversion tool
Bug #663916 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: phonetisaurus/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Grapheme
to Phoneme conversion tool
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: phonetisaurus/0.4-1 [ITP]
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML
data
has caused the Debian Bug report #678468,
regarding RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data
to be marked as done.
This means t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 678705 RFS: e2defrag/0.80-1 ITP: #678598
Bug #678705 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: e2defrag/0.80-1 ITP: #678598' from 'RFS:
e2defrag/0.80 ITP: #678598'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/23/2012 07:27 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> The ITP was not sent to the debian-devel mailing list. Please use
> report-bug in the future or add pseudo-header:
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> Please forward your ITP to debian-de
Hello Phillip,
Thanks for picking up this package.
Here are some comments
== ITP ==
The ITP was not sent to the debian-devel mailing list. Please use
report-bug in the future or add pseudo-header:
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
Please forward your ITP to debian-devel.
== bugs ==
Boris Pek dixit:
>> I’ve taken care of the RC bug for now, so the freeze won’t be a
>> problem.
>
>Yes, I've got the messages from BTS. You forgot to close bug #606038.
Sorry, didn't see that one (I had a look at the BTS, but didn’t audit
the complete package as I just needed to fix the issue a
Russ Allbery wrote:
> * The formatting of the man page isn't great. There are a few places that
> seem to have spurious line breaks (the --append documentation, for
> example),
That appears to have been some spurious spaces in bad places in the
man page. Fixed.
> and it's traditional to h
Hi,
> I’ve taken care of the RC bug for now, so the freeze won’t be a
> problem.
Yes, I've got the messages from BTS. You forgot to close bug #606038.
I'll close it.
> I’ve not got the time to look at your suggested package,
As usual.
> Like this, you two’ve got more time to get the package
Hi Boris,
I’ve taken care of the RC bug for now, so the freeze won’t be a
problem. I’ve not got the time to look at your suggested package,
and I personally do not like dh > 5 plus Helmut raised a few
points. (Note that an arch:all package can’t be binNMU’d, and an
orphaned package should not be N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "e2defrag". This package used to be
known as defrag,
and was removed from the archive back in 2008 due to being abandoned by its
authors and r
Hell again,
I forgot to CC Joe.
I also forgot to talk about the heisenbug I've been chasing the last
few days, which appears to be caused by newer binary-only nvidia
drivers. Basically, they often cause a crash within a minute of
loading a game. Details can be read at:
http://sourceforge.net/mail
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.1.5+dfsg-1 of the
package "fceux", which was before called "fceu". FCEUX is a very
capable NES (Original 8-bit Nintendo) emulator, with a GTK and SDL
front-end.
Joe Nahmias is the current holder of the ITP of
this package, but nothing
Hi bart,
Made a new version of ptop's copyright file with every file in it.
I hope its oke now, if so can you upload it ?
To access further information about this package, please visit the following
URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/ptop
Alternatively, one can download the package wi
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 07:42:20PM +0200, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> Le 23/06/2012 à 16:29, Bart Martens écrivit :
> > Hi paulproteus, pabs, daemonkeeper,
> >
> > Here is a list of packages to be removed from mentors:
> > http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/toremovefrommentors.txt
> >
Le 23/06/2012 à 16:29, Bart Martens écrivit :
> Hi paulproteus, pabs, daemonkeeper,
>
> Here is a list of packages to be removed from mentors:
> http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/toremovefrommentors.txt
>
> I count currently 124 packages on the list. The list is updated daily.
>
> I
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:23:03PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 23.06.2012 15:17, Marc Haber wrote:
> > How can I build two flavors of a program with different configure
> > parameters if upstream does not properly handle out-of-tree building
> > and I do not want to ditch dh?
>
> You copy the sou
Hi paulproteus, pabs, daemonkeeper,
Here is a list of packages to be removed from mentors:
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/toremovefrommentors.txt
I count currently 124 packages on the list. The list is updated daily.
I have contacted you before about this, but apparently you have
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 03:23:03PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> On 23.06.2012 15:17, Marc Haber wrote:
> > How can I build two flavors of a program with different configure
> > parameters if upstream does not properly handle out-of-tree building
> > and I do not want to ditch dh?
>
> You copy the sou
Hi Marc,
On 23.06.2012 15:17, Marc Haber wrote:
> How can I build two flavors of a program with different configure
> parameters if upstream does not properly handle out-of-tree building
> and I do not want to ditch dh?
You copy the source tree as a preparation and recurse into all flavors
for th
Hi,
I am trying to package the authoritative PowerDNS server in a way that
allows Upstream to use my packaging as well. Additional to the normal
dynamically linked builds, they would like to have a statically linked
binary package as well, which should not be in Debian but only in
their builds.
T
>> Why NMU? First freeze is soft and QA uploads and even upload with
>> increasing of
>> version are allowed. Isn't it? But yes, this can be hard for release team.
>
> Because once the freeze is in effect only RC bug fixes are allowed in.
> So the changes need to be minimal at that point. My NMU
Le Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 02:30:38PM +0200, Helmut Grohne a écrit :
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 02:55:40PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> > > * The description still contains the homepage.
> >
> > Hmm, is it a problem? I don't see nothing about it in the Debian Policy [1].
> > That lintian note was about
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 02:55:40PM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> > * The description still contains the homepage.
>
> Hmm, is it a problem? I don't see nothing about it in the Debian Policy [1].
> That lintian note was about missed homepage field which is possibly present
> in
> description.
>
> [
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:12:54AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Bart Martens wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Bart Martens wrote:
> > > > The file debian/copyright "should name the original authors", and
> > > > David Keppel is such an author.
>
> I have looked through many copyright files and do
Hi,
Thank you for a reply.
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".
>
> You say "QA upload" below, I guess you don't mean to adopt the package,
> right?
Yes, right. That phrase is from template on m.d.n.
> Thanks for taking care of this package. This upload fixes at least one
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 03:07:43AM +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sgml-data".
You say "QA upload" below, I guess you don't mean to adopt the package,
right?
Thanks for taking care of this package. This upload fixes at least one
RC bug.
> http://mentors.deb
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 02:05:32AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bart Martens writes:
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:54:10AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Bart Martens writes:
>
> >>> That "authors" are not the same as "copyright holders" is simply a
> >>> fact regardless of what debian-policy
p12 writes:
> On 06/22/2012 05:29 PM, Simon Chopin wrote:
>> I am not sure in what extent this is mandatory for non-D[MD]s, but
>> people in Debian usually disclose their civilian name. If you intend to
>> apply for DM or DD status, you would have to disclose it eventually for
>> the keysigning p
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 06:54:17PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Russ Allbery writes:
>
> > Bart Martens writes:
> >
> > > That "authors" are not the same as "copyright holders" is simply a
> > > fact regardless of what debian-policy states. For example, the
> > > programmer who wrote some software
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 01:15:55AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bart Martens writes:
(...)
>
> And I'm sorry for my tone in some of my earlier messages. I had a really
> obnoxious week and didn't do a very good job of keeping that out of my
> tone.
Apology accepted. There was only a small part
Hi Simon,
Many thanks for your input.
On 06/22/2012 05:29 PM, Simon Chopin wrote:
I can't download the most recent tarball from [5], the server gives me
back a 404 error. I haven't tried the other tarballs though.
Fixed.
In debian/control, wget and httracks are in Build-Depends. It seems t
Bart Martens writes:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:54:10AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Bart Martens writes:
>>> That "authors" are not the same as "copyright holders" is simply a
>>> fact regardless of what debian-policy states. For example, the
>>> programmer who wrote some software can be th
Russ Allbery writes:
> Bart Martens writes:
>
> > That "authors" are not the same as "copyright holders" is simply a
> > fact regardless of what debian-policy states. For example, the
> > programmer who wrote some software can be the "author" and the
> > company the programmer was working for ca
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:54:10AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bart Martens writes:
>
> > That "authors" are not the same as "copyright holders" is simply a fact
> > regardless of what debian-policy states. For example, the programmer
> > who wrote some software can be the "author" and the comp
Bart Martens writes:
> The file time-1.7/time.c contains this:
> "Originally written by David Keppel ."
> So David Keppel is an "original author" as meant in debian-policy.
> It is a mystery to me why you interpret debian-policy that in this case
> the Free Software Foundation would be the orig
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:27:06AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bob Proulx writes:
>
> > To answer my own question it is stated here:
>
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile
>
> > In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources
> > (i
Bart Martens writes:
> That "authors" are not the same as "copyright holders" is simply a fact
> regardless of what debian-policy states. For example, the programmer
> who wrote some software can be the "author" and the company the
> programmer was working for can be the "copyright holder".
Thi
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:08:36AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Bart Martens writes:
>
> > We know that "authors" are not the same as "copyright holders".
> > Debian-policy uses "should" for the "authors" and "must" for the
> > "copyright information".
>
> I don't agree with this interpretation
Dear Bob,
you can find many recent copyright files in the following subversion repository.
http://svn.debian.org/viewvc/collab-qa/packages-metadata/
Each time a binary package is uploaded, its copyright file is refreshed in this
Subversion repository if the source package was itself stored in
Bob Proulx writes:
> To answer my own question it is stated here:
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile
> In addition, the copyright file must say where the upstream sources
> (if any) were obtained, and should name the original authors.
> So definitely s
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:21:09PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I've reviewed the latest version of your packaging, and I'd be happy to
> upload it. Thank you very much for all the work that you've put into the
> package. Unwinding all the of the patches into quilt format in particul
Bart Martens wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Bart Martens wrote:
> > > The file debian/copyright "should name the original authors", and
> > > David Keppel is such an author.
I have looked through many copyright files and do not see one that
does this. See for example this one along with many othe
Bart Martens writes:
> We know that "authors" are not the same as "copyright holders".
> Debian-policy uses "should" for the "authors" and "must" for the
> "copyright information".
I don't agree with this interpretation of Debian Policy, and I don't
follow it for my own packages.
> To be honest
45 matches
Mail list logo
