RFC: Language and fork issues with onscripter

2006-11-19 Thread Bryan Donlan
Hi all, I've been looking at onscripter as a program to package. It's a GPL'd clone of the 'nScripter' game engine, which is frequently used for Japanese visual novel games. insani.org has created an (apparently friendly) fork of onscripter with support for English 1byte character sets, and Engli

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

2006-11-19 Thread Carlos Galisteo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Baumann wrote: > Ana Guerrero wrote: >> If you are completely sure feedparser.py does not need to be executable, you >> can >> remove this line or add a lintian override. Theoretically, feedparser.py could be used as an executable (probably

Re: RFS: edb -- database program for GNU Emacs [sponsored]

2006-11-19 Thread Jari Aalto
Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm looking for sponsor (package 1.21-15 already in Debian). > > Package name: edb > Version : 1.21-16 > ITA/ITP URL : http://bugs.debian.org/353629 > * Package bugs URL: http://bugs.debian.org/edb > License : GPL > Progra

Re: RFS: gcin

2006-11-19 Thread Florent Rougon
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * this is ugly: > > ---snip--- > #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run > ---snapp--- > > and this is beautiful: > > ---snipp--- > #!/bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run > ---snapp--- How so? There are two reasons why I always use the first styl

Re: init script output

2006-11-19 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
well - status has being there for quite a while > invoke-rc.d fail2ban status Status of authentication failure monitor: fail2ban is running but the question is actually an attempt to disambiguate behavior/output of start/stop actions in cases when it was already started/stopped since there is no

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Ana Guerrero wrote: > If you are completely sure feedparser.py does not need to be executable, you > can > remove this line or add a lintian override. Ana, your are too fast for me.. Thanks for answering ;) -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email:

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

2006-11-19 Thread Ana Guerrero
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 10:45:32PM +0100, Carlos Galisteo wrote: > > and there is a lintian warning: > > > > W: python-feedparser: script-not-executable > > ./usr/share/python-support/python-feedparser/feedparser.py > > Well, feedparser.py is supposed to be imported as a library, and > /usr/shar

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

2006-11-19 Thread Carlos Galisteo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Baumann wrote: > sorry, i just saw the last two other things: No problem. > remove dh_python from rules, it's useless because you have dh_pysupport > replaces it. Done. > and there is a lintian warning: > > W: python-feedparser: script-not-

Re: RFS: meep

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Daniel Baumann wrote: > ok, then let's first upload all those build-depends (seperate mail)... here we go for harminv: * ${misc:Depends} is useless here * remove the following line from the dpatch: ---snipp--- ## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch. ---snapp---

Re: init script output

2006-11-19 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hello Yaroslav, Yaroslav Halchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would, of course, prefer a solution with the lsb functions. What >> I want is to know when fail2ban started and when I accidentally >> tried to start it while the daemon was already running. > BTW - it seems that /etc/init.d/skelet

Re: RFS: edb -- database program for GNU Emacs

2006-11-19 Thread Tatsuya Kinoshita
On November 19, 2006 at 9:17PM +0200, jari.aalto (at cante.net) wrote: > I'm looking for sponsor (package 1.21-15 already in Debian). [...] > Mentors URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/e/edb 404 not found. Downloaded from http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/edb/

Re: RFS: meep

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Loic Le Guyader wrote: >> * can't find the build-dep libharminv-dev, where did you get that >> from? > >>From here > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=harminv ok, then let's first upload all those build-depends (seperate mail)... >> * this is ugly:

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Carlos Galisteo wrote: > That would be great. The package is now updated at mentors: sorry, i just saw the last two other things: remove dh_python from rules, it's useless because you have dh_pysupport replaces it. and there is a lintian warning: W: python-feedparser: script-not-executable ./us

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

2006-11-19 Thread Carlos Galisteo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Baumann wrote: > * remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog > * in the first line of the -5 changelog, you imported a space at the > end of the line. Both fixed. > the rest is good, if you fix the mentioned things above, i

Re: RFS: feedparser (updated package)

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Carlos Galisteo wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. fix the following things: * remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog * in the first line of the -5 changelog, you imported a space at the end of the line. the rest is good, if you fix the menti

RFS: feedparser (updated package)

2006-11-19 Thread Carlos Galisteo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 4.1-6 of my package "feedparser". It builds these binary packages: python-feedparser - Universal Feed Parser for Python The package is lintian clean. The upload would fix these bugs: 3976

RFS: edb -- database program for GNU Emacs

2006-11-19 Thread Jari Aalto
I'm looking for sponsor (package 1.21-15 already in Debian). Package name: edb Version : x.y.z ITA/ITP URL : http://bugs.debian.org/353629 * Package bugs URL: http://bugs.debian.org/edb Mentors URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/e/edb License : GPL

Re: RFS: tdicons

2006-11-19 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-11-19 15:33:17, schrieb Willi Mann: > Some of these icons seem to be already available (best example: > audacity). does it really make sense to have the very same version more > than once available in the archive? That seems to be a waste of disk space. But in a size I do not like! MANY P

Re: RFS: tdicons

2006-11-19 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-11-18 12:35:00, schrieb Ricardo Mones: > > Hi Michelle, > This line comes from some mail template for debian-mentors? :) Right > Please, do run an up to date lintian before writting it, you cannot > figure out how disappointing is reading it and then found this: > N: The first

Re: FW by [EMAIL PROTECTED] : 'tdmenu' uploaded to mentors.debian.net

2006-11-19 Thread Michelle Konzack
I hate !!! Why does it delay my messages for over 24 hours? The problem was solved 10 minutes after my message since I had accidently to spaces between the "--" and the Maintainer I have gotten this message for some minutes back from the listserver Am 2006-11-17 17:49:42, schrieb Michelle Konz

Re: To adopt or not to adopt: smstools

2006-11-19 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Patrick and *, Am 2006-11-17 17:02:28, schrieb Patrick Schönfeld: > Hi there, > > i am a so-far happy long-time-user of debian and now would like to give > something back to the debian project. Now i've seen a while ago that the > package smstools is far from the upstream smstools (and has

Re: RFS: meep

2006-11-19 Thread Loic Le Guyader
Daniel Baumann debian.org> writes: > Loic Le Guyader wrote: > > The package is lintian clean. But I have problem with the -dev packages. > > They > > are empty and I don't understand why. > > it wasn't empty here. Damn, for me dpkg -c libmeep-mpi-dev_0.10-1_all.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root

Re: What is "disparity error" ?

2006-11-19 Thread Neil Williams
On 19 Nov 2006 18:18:24 +0200 Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > override file for the following file(s): > edb_1.21-15_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says misc. The override file declares whe

Re: RFS: gcin

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
caleb wrote: > Thank you for the great help. I have corrected them and uploaded. :-) Welcome, uploaded the package. If you need further sponsorship, please ask me off list. http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsoring.html#contact -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3,

Re: RFS: gcin

2006-11-19 Thread caleb
Daniel Baumann wrote: the rest is good. once you correct this, i'm happy to sponsor the package. Thank you for the great help. I have corrected them and uploaded. :-) Wen-Yen Chuang (caleb) -- The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/

Re: What is "disparity error" ?

2006-11-19 Thread Bart Martens
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 18:18 +0200, Jari Aalto wrote: > Recently I received following messages after a DD uploaded package for > me: > > There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the > override file for the following file(s): > > edb_1.21-15_all.deb: package says

What is "disparity error" ?

2006-11-19 Thread Jari Aalto
Recently I received following messages after a DD uploaded package for me: There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): edb_1.21-15_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says misc. Either the package or t

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Willi Mann
> at the upstream site, the patch is advertised as: > "Updated Templates for version 5.1.3 - Martin Kos (updated Patch against > 5.1.3 english)" > > This looks like it is a sqwebmail derivation with additional, > translation related copyright of the patch author. I'd say you try now > to contact

Re: RFS: tdicons

2006-11-19 Thread Willi Mann
Michelle Konzack schrieb: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tdicons". > > * Package name: tdicons > Version : 0.0.3-2 > Upstream Author : Michelle Konzack > * URL : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tdicons > * License :

Re: RFS: knetstats

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. your package is a native package, don't do this. additionally, please fix the following things: * remove the useless empty line at the end of changelog. * this is ugly (in README.Debian): ---snipp--- -- Rite

Re: RFS: meep

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Loic Le Guyader wrote: > The package is lintian clean. But I have problem with the -dev packages. They > are empty and I don't understand why. it wasn't empty here. > I would be glad if someone can check and upload this package for me. please fix the following things: * remove the useless emp

Re: RFS: gcin

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
caleb wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. :-) * your build is unclean, .depends is a left over, remove it in clean:. * remove the useless empty line at the end of the changelog. * debhelper (>= 5.0.0) is over-precise, write debhelper (>= 5) * this is wrong: -

Re: RFS: bouml

2006-11-19 Thread Thomas Girard
On Sun, Nov 19, 2006 at 12:44:19PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > very well done, uploaded. Thanks, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: bouml

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Thomas Girard wrote: > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. very well done, uploaded. If you need further sponsorship, please ask me off list. http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsoring.html#contact -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Bi

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Willi Mann wrote: > that the patch doesn't contain an explicit copyright notice. Is the way > I've done it Ok? at the upstream site, the patch is advertised as: "Updated Templates for version 5.1.3 - Martin Kos (updated Patch against 5.1.3 english)" This looks like it is a sqwebmail derivation wi

RFS: bouml

2006-11-19 Thread Thomas Girard
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bouml". * Package name: bouml Version : 2.19.2-1 Upstream Author : Bruno Pagès <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://bouml.free.fr * License : GPL Section : devel It builds these binary packages:

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Neil Williams wrote: > Why is this double space seen as mandatory? - it is not. Single spacing > is fine in most cases. roumors has it that some automatic tools are in need of having two leading spaces. look at policy, as long as it is not "fixed" there, it should be kept as it is (with two leadin

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:05:47 +0100 Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Before Hompepage:, there must be two leading spaces, not just one. I think this has been covered before and I can't see why it's continued. One space before Homepage is fine - two spaces just prevents linewrapping

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Willi Mann
Daniel Baumann schrieb: > Daniel Baumann wrote: >> Going now to bed, will take care tomorrow. > > ok, here we go: done, except > * debian/copyright is a bit strange formated, and there is no full > GPL blurb. look at e.g. libquicktime in experimental how to do it > right. that the pat

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Daniel Baumann wrote: > Going now to bed, will take care tomorrow. ok, here we go: * '* Old changelog entries just for history.' is not needed in changelog, we do always keep the old changelog, even if the package was completely remade. * remove the useless empty line at the end of