Daniel Baumann <daniel <at> debian.org> writes: > Loic Le Guyader wrote: > > The package is lintian clean. But I have problem with the -dev packages. > > They > > are empty and I don't understand why. > > it wasn't empty here.
Damn, for me dpkg -c libmeep-mpi-dev_0.10-1_all.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./usr/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./usr/share/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./usr/share/doc/ drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2006-11-19 18:36 ./usr/share/doc/libmeep-mpi-dev/ -rw-r--r-- root/root 1425 2006-11-19 17:48 ./usr/share/doc/libmeep-mpi-dev/copyright -rw-r--r-- root/root 174 2006-11-19 17:48 ./usr/share/doc/libmeep-mpi-dev/changelog.Debian.gz and the same for libmeep-dev_0.10-1_all.deb and I don't see why. > * can't find the build-dep libharminv-dev, where did you get that > from? >From here http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=harminv I also posted an RFS on debian.devel.mentors for it. The thread is here http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors/21708/focus=21708 I also have one on libctl http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.mentors/21717/focus=21717 I updated those packages also according to your current comments. > * this is ugly: > #! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run That's from dpatch. I corrected but maybe we should fill a bug report for that. > * debian/rules: > - if you include dpatch.make, you don't need to define the dpatch > targes, look at cdrdao on how to make it right. Well, it work like this so I prefer to not change it. Thanks for your report. The corrected packages can be found there: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=harminv http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=meep http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=libctl -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
