Re: RFS: NMU for chkrootkit

2005-04-17 Thread Romain Beauxis
Le Dimanche 17 Avril 2005 22:13, lmoore a écrit : > Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > chkrootkit is not orphaned, however the maintainer[1] seems missing in > > action again. Did you already try to contact him by mail about your > > efforts? At least I doubt that you would find some spon

Re: RFS: phpicalendar -- clean, logical iCal/vCalendar web interface

2005-04-17 Thread Craig Small
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:56:16PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Both Chad & I really look forward to making this package part of > >>Debian > >>- please consider sponsoring it : ) What's happened to the website for the project? It's still down. That's a shame because I'm looking for someth

Re: RFS: tinywm - Ridiculously tiny window manager

2005-04-17 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > > > With these points fixed, your package looks good that I could sponsor. > > Thank you very much . I've uploaded it to the archive. regards, junichi -- Junichi Uekawa, Debian Developer 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4 http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/ --

RFS: Moviefly - a Linux Movie Catalogue

2005-04-17 Thread Uwe Mayer
Hi, For 4 months now I have released Moviefly under GPLv2 on the web and I very much'd like to see it part in the Debian package archive. Short description: Moviefly (alias lmc) is a port of the Ant Movie Catalog by Antoine Potten from Windows (http://www.antp.be/software/moviecatalog) to GNU/

Re: RFS: NMU for chkrootkit

2005-04-17 Thread lmoore
Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 17 Apr 2005, at 18:40, Romain Beauxis wrote: >> I found out that there had been an new upstream release for chkrootkit, >> and I >> intented to package it. > > chkrootkit is not orphaned, however the maintainer[1] seems missing in > action again. Did y

Re: Shared library concern

2005-04-17 Thread François-Denis Gonthier
> Did you run lintian with -i? Lintian can explain its tags on request. > It's such a pity this seems to be such an unknown feature... Thank you! This was a precious hint. I realise I was a bit off on this SONAME thing. Reading the guides and policy manual also made me realise this package ne

Re: Shared library concern

2005-04-17 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 08:43:08PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 17 Apr 2005, at 20:24, François-Denis Gonthier wrote: > >The soname doesn't seem to be the problem in that case: > >E: codeblocks: sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib > >usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.1.0-beta6 > > ``1

Re: Shared library concern

2005-04-17 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:24:16PM -0400, Fran?ois-Denis Gonthier wrote: > On April 17, 2005 08:29 am, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Here the problem is probably that it doesn't have an soname. The > > libcodeblocks.so should be a symlink to the real library. And > > the library itself should get ver

Re: Shared library concern

2005-04-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On 17 Apr 2005, at 20:24, François-Denis Gonthier wrote: The soname doesn't seem to be the problem in that case: E: codeblocks: sharedobject-in-library-directory-not-actually-a-shlib usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so.1.0-beta6 ``1.0-beta6'' is not a SONAME. Please read the Debian Library Packaging Guide.

Re: Shared library concern

2005-04-17 Thread François-Denis Gonthier
On April 17, 2005 08:29 am, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > Here the problem is probably that it doesn't have an soname. The > libcodeblocks.so should be a symlink to the real library. And > the library itself should get version number added to it. > > I suggest you read section 8 of the policy about share

Re: RFS: NMU for chkrootkit

2005-04-17 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Romain Beauxis [Sun, 17 Apr 2005 18:40:44 +0200]: > Hi at last! Hi Romain, > I found out that there had been an new upstream release for chkrootkit, and I > intented to package it. New upstream releases are not material for a NMU, have a look at the Developers Reference (this is true ex

Re: RFS: NMU for chkrootkit

2005-04-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On 17 Apr 2005, at 18:40, Romain Beauxis wrote: I found out that there had been an new upstream release for chkrootkit, and I intented to package it. chkrootkit is not orphaned, however the maintainer[1] seems missing in action again. Did you already try to contact him by mail about your efforts

RFS: NMU for chkrootkit

2005-04-17 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi at last! I found out that there had been an new upstream release for chkrootkit, and I intented to package it. Also, I closed many many false positives that are related in README.debian file, specificaly or generaly - like for false positives due to tcp port tests... Then I added some transl

RFS: kshutdown

2005-04-17 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi again mentors! I've made a package for a very usefull kde apps that trigger a clean KDE shutdown timer and many other coll features. The package is of course lintian and linda clean and can be found there: deb http://www.cti.ecp.fr/~beauxir5/debian/ binary/ deb-src http://www.cti.ecp.fr/~beaux

RFS: peercast

2005-04-17 Thread Romain Beauxis
Hi mentors! Another try for my peercast package! Description: P2P audio and video streaming server PeerCast is a fresh new P2P streaming server It can stream music and video from a broad variety of formats. . Many audio players can listen to peercast streams, as it's been built to remain co

Re: RFS: tinywm - Ridiculously tiny window manager

2005-04-17 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi , On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 13:11:23 +0900 Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > 1. > > > 2. > > > Is the priority '50' for x-window-manager alternatives > > > correct? How did you calculate the value? > > > > > I did't notice this . > > I changed this priority to 10. > > The reas

Re: RFS: tinywm - Ridiculously tiny window manager

2005-04-17 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi , On Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:40:19 +0900 Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > My comments against your description: > > Description: Ridiculously tiny window manager > TinyWM is a ridiculously tiny window manager implemented > in nearly as few lines of C as possible, without being

RFS: prosilla -- multi-threaded download accelerator for ssh

2005-04-17 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, I packaged prosilla and search a sponsor for it cause I am not a dd yet: * Package name: prosilla Version : 1.2 Upstream Author : Andrzej Szombierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://v-lo.krakow.pl/~anszom/prosilla/debian/ * License : GPL Description

Re: RFS: volume.app - A dockapp enabling esay control of the volume level

2005-04-17 Thread Carlos Parra
El sáb, 16-04-2005 a las 15:18 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt escribió: > Carlos Parra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Package name : volume.app > [...] > > This program it's quite simple, and have been orphaned for a while... i > > use it frequently, that's the reason i would like to adopt i

Re: Shared library concern

2005-04-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 02:29:29PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I suggest you read section 8 of the policy about shared > libraries. You may also want to read: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.xml Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: Shared library concern

2005-04-17 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 01:37:17PM -0400, François-Denis Gonthier wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm having a bit of a concern with a library target Code::Blocks produces > (It's a C/C++ IDE). > > Lintian currently reports: > > E: codeblocks: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/libcodeblocks.so Shared li