On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:53:42PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > Package: debian-jr
> > Conflicts: limewire
> >
> >
>
> Ack! While realizing this is humour, I do feel I have to clear up a bit of a
> misconception here that seems to be prevalent abo
This one time, at band camp, Santiago Vila wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>>
>> So in the control file, I've speci
This one time, at band camp, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
>Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>I pref
This one time, at band camp, christophe barbé wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>>
>> So in the c
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 11:24:16AM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> > glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content,
>
>
I have packaged aqsis, a RenderMan renderer:
Package: aqsis
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: A set of applications implementing the RenderMan Interface.
The Aqsis Rendering System consists of a set of libraries and
applications for creating high-quality computer imagery
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:53:42PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > Package: debian-jr
> > Conflicts: limewire
> >
> >
>
> Ack! While realizing this is humour, I do feel I have to clear up a bit of a
> misconception here that seems to be prevalent ab
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>
> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replace
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 03:18:09AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> I'm working on the limewire deb package, and the developer has asked
> me to do something that I'm sure users are not going to want.
>
> Limewire displays small banner ads in the bottom of the application
> window, and there's a
Damn, I am tired and reading too fast, I tought I was answering to my
upstream...
--
.''`. After all, only the mediocre are always at their best.
: :' : -- Jean Giraudoux
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (2.4.18 + Ext3)
`-
This one time, at band camp, Santiago Vila wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>>
>> So in the control file, I've spec
This one time, at band camp, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
>Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>I pre
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:53:42PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Package: debian-jr
> Conflicts: limewire
>
>
Ack! While realizing this is humour, I do feel I have to clear up a bit of a
misconception here that seems to be prevalent about Debian Jr. Our group is
not about censorship. We have a
This one time, at band camp, christophe barbé wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>>
>> So in the
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am taking a look at renameutils
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/renameutils) in oprder to file an ITP.
>
> Upstream already has a debian/ directory and I am not sure what to do...
>
> ¿Should I just remove it form the .tar.gz and use that as my
> .orig.tar.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 11:24:16AM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> > glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content,
>
>
I have packaged aqsis, a RenderMan renderer:
Package: aqsis
Architecture: any
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: A set of applications implementing the RenderMan Interface.
The Aqsis Rendering System consists of a set of libraries and
applications for creating high-quality computer imager
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>
> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replac
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 03:18:09AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> I'm working on the limewire deb package, and the developer has asked
> me to do something that I'm sure users are not going to want.
>
> Limewire displays small banner ads in the bottom of the application
> window, and there's a
Marcin Owsiany dijo:
> I guess the best way is to ask upstream to remove the debian directory.
> Otherwise you have to repack the source tarball (removing it yourself).
I'll probably do both :)
--
.''`. After all, only the mediocre are always at their best.
: :' :
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 08:15:12PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am taking a look at renameutils
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/renameutils) in oprder to file an ITP.
>
> Upstream already has a debian/ directory and I am not sure what to do...
>
> ?Should I just remove it form the .tar.gz and use tha
Damn, I am tired and reading too fast, I tought I was answering to my
upstream...
--
.''`. After all, only the mediocre are always at their best.
: :' : -- Jean Giraudoux
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux Sid (2.4.18 + Ext3)
`-
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:53:42PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> Package: debian-jr
> Conflicts: limewire
>
>
Ack! While realizing this is humour, I do feel I have to clear up a bit of a
misconception here that seems to be prevalent about Debian Jr. Our group is
not about censorship. We have
Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am taking a look at renameutils
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/renameutils) in oprder to file an ITP.
>
> Upstream already has a debian/ directory and I am not sure what to do...
>
> ¿Should I just remove it form the .tar.gz and use that as my
> .orig.tar
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not
> > the norm. libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev,
> > libglut4-dev, libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades
> > much
I am taking a look at renameutils
(http://freshmeat.net/projects/renameutils) in oprder to file an ITP.
Upstream already has a debian/ directory and I am not sure what to do...
¿Should I just remove it form the .tar.gz and use that as my
.orig.tar.gz or just let diff do its thing and reflect my c
Marcin Owsiany dijo:
> I guess the best way is to ask upstream to remove the debian directory.
> Otherwise you have to repack the source tarball (removing it yourself).
I'll probably do both :)
--
.''`. After all, only the mediocre are always at their best.
: :' :
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 08:15:12PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> I am taking a look at renameutils
> (http://freshmeat.net/projects/renameutils) in oprder to file an ITP.
>
> Upstream already has a debian/ directory and I am not sure what to do...
>
> ?Should I just remove it form the .tar.gz and use th
My name is Philip Hempel, I am looking for someone that would be
willing to sponser me for a package called MessageWall from
http://messagewall.org.
This package hase two libraries that it depends on. The first is
libfirestring, a package used for parsing and managing configurations.
The second
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not
> > the norm. libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev,
> > libglut4-dev, libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades
> > muc
I am taking a look at renameutils
(http://freshmeat.net/projects/renameutils) in oprder to file an ITP.
Upstream already has a debian/ directory and I am not sure what to do...
¿Should I just remove it form the .tar.gz and use that as my
.orig.tar.gz or just let diff do its thing and reflect my
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:34:54 +0200 (CEST),
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > I prefer libglut3-dev .
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
> libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades much easier.
Except that this means
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:37, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> If the developers of limewire want to force people to view the ads,
> they must write this into the license (and we punt it to non-free),
> otherwise it is completely futile to try and make people do so.
Less confrontationally, you might point
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
> Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to rename the glut packages from
> > glutg3
> > glutg3-dev
> > to
> > libglut3
> > libglut-dev
> > to follow the convention for library package naming.
> I pr
My name is Philip Hempel, I am looking for someone that would be
willing to sponser me for a package called MessageWall from
http://messagewall.org.
This package hase two libraries that it depends on. The first is
libfirestring, a package used for parsing and managing configurations.
The secon
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 03:18:09AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> I'm working on the limewire deb package, and the developer has asked
> me to do something that I'm sure users are not going to want.
>
> Limewire displays small banner ads in the bottom of the application
> window, and there's a
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:34:54 +0200 (CEST),
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > I prefer libglut3-dev .
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
> libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades much easier.
Except that this means
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 09:37, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> If the developers of limewire want to force people to view the ads,
> they must write this into the license (and we punt it to non-free),
> otherwise it is completely futile to try and make people do so.
Less confrontationally, you might poin
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
I prefer libglut3-dev .
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Deb
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
> Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to rename the glut packages from
> > glutg3
> > glutg3-dev
> > to
> > libglut3
> > libglut-dev
> > to follow the convention for library package naming.
> I p
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 03:18:09AM -0700, Michael Cardenas wrote:
> I'm working on the limewire deb package, and the developer has asked
> me to do something that I'm sure users are not going to want.
>
> Limewire displays small banner ads in the bottom of the application
> window, and there's a
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>
> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> glutg3 for versio
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
I prefer libglut3-dev .
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
De
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 06:05:04PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
>
> First you don't provide an URL so it's difficult to give you advice.
> Then we have already a package named pwgen which seems to provide the
> same functionality (perhaps it's the same soft but without url we can't
> tell).
URL
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>
> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> glutg3 for versi
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 06:05:04PM -0400, christophe barbé wrote:
>
> First you don't provide an URL so it's difficult to give you advice.
> Then we have already a package named pwgen which seems to provide the
> same functionality (perhaps it's the same soft but without url we can't
> tell).
UR
48 matches
Mail list logo
