This one time, at band camp, Santiago Vila wrote: >On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > >> I intend to rename the glut packages from >> glutg3 >> glutg3-dev >> to >> libglut3 >> libglut-dev >> to follow the convention for library package naming. >> >> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces >> glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content, >> that depends on libglut3. I've done similar for glutg3-dev and libglut-dev. >> >> Does anyone have any comments or suggestions about this plan? Does it suck, >> is there a better way to do it and still provide a smooth upgrade, so >> developers depending on the glut libraries aren't shafted? > >Go ahead. Actually, there is not a better way using available dpkg fields.
Cool, thanks. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
