On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000, > Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I intend to rename the glut packages from > > glutg3 > > glutg3-dev > > to > > libglut3 > > libglut-dev > > to follow the convention for library package naming. > I prefer libglut3-dev .
We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm. libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev, libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades much easier. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]