On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote: > I intend to rename the glut packages from > glutg3 > glutg3-dev > to > libglut3 > libglut-dev > to follow the convention for library package naming. > > So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces > glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content, > that depends on libglut3. I've done similar for glutg3-dev and libglut-dev. > > Does anyone have any comments or suggestions about this plan? Does it suck, > is there a better way to do it and still provide a smooth upgrade, so > developers depending on the glut libraries aren't shafted?
Go ahead. Actually, there is not a better way using available dpkg fields. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
