Colin Watson (2024-12-25):
> Oops, very sorry about that! The test that Gioele added for whether
> debconf is installed looked correct, but on closer inspection I found
> that cdebconf installs /usr/share/debconf/frontend as a symlink to
> /usr/lib/cdebconf/debconf. (I'd like to remove that as I
Roland Clobus (2024-12-25):
> The daily installer image [4] is also based on sid, as the version
> from the cdebconf-udebs shows.
>
> So: I'm confused about the desired content of the daily netinst image.
>
> If all is based on sid/unstable, then it is to be expected that
> occasionally somethin
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 08:19:00PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> With cdebconf udebs reverted to their testing version (changing only that,
> feeding them via localudebs after deb-reversion), the problem goes away.
Oops, very sorry about that! The test that Gioele added for whether
debconf is i
Hi,
On 25/12/2024 16:01, Holger Wansing wrote:
An additional point:
testing with an amd64 netinst image from 2024-12-25 10:15 the graphical mode
is again broken, installer starts in text mode instead.
I thought that the daily netinst image [1] is based on testing/trixie,
not on sid (due to it
er fails to start, we get X
> > > starting in a loop (see recent bug reports until the fix in the X
> > > server), there's no fallback to text mode.
> > >
> > > Without any more information, that looks like some live problem…
> >
> > The live
Control: reassign -1 src:cdebconf 0.275
Control: severity -1 serious
Roland Clobus (2024-12-24):
> reassign 1091366 cdebconf 0.275
> severity 1091366 important
> thanks
It doesn't look like that's been (b)cc'd to control@, so let's try
again. I'm also calling this a serious regression, esp. when
reassign 1091366 cdebconf 0.275
severity 1091366 important
thanks
On 24/12/2024 20:19, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
With cdebconf udebs reverted to their testing version (changing only that,
feeding them via localudebs after deb-reversion), the problem goes away.
Paging Colin and Gioele accordingly.
r), there's no fallback to text mode.
> >
> > Without any more information, that looks like some live problem…
>
> The live installer runs 'daily-build' from the debian-installer
> repository. The generated initrd.gz was then started with qemu:
>
> kvm -
started.
With kind regards,
Roland Clobus
Note: The live images build the Debian installer from source.
[1]
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian&version=sid_xfce&build=20241224T021629Z_sid_xfce&groupid=14
[2]
https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian&
ards,
> Roland Clobus
>
> Note: The live images build the Debian installer from source.
>
> [1]
> https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distri=debian&version=sid_xfce&build=20241224T021629Z_sid_xfce&groupid=14
> [2]
> https://openqa.debian.net/tests/overview?distr
Control: tags -1 +pending
Hello Aaron,
On 29/11/2024 02:22, Aaron Rainbolt wrote:
Just tested the patch sent in the initial report, it appears this does
indeed fix the build. The ISO build succeeds, and the generated ISO
boots properly into both live mode and debian-installer using
qemu-system
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +pending
Bug #1088650 [live-build] Bookworm arm64 builds are broken with
`--debian-installer live`
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1088650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088650
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w
Just tested the patch sent in the initial report, it appears this does
indeed fix the build. The ISO build succeeds, and the generated ISO
boots properly into both live mode and debian-installer using
qemu-system-aarch64.
pgpkiYmMUTfW2.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
grub-efi-amd64-unsigned is
available before adding it to DI_REQ_PACKAGES. For arm64 builds
however, grub-efi-arm64-unsigned is unconditionally added to
DI_REQ_PACKAGES. As a result, if you attempt to build an arm64 Bookworm
image with debian-installer enabled, the build crashes with `E: Unable
to
ppens on ISO files with other
> > desktop environments), the non-free firmware packages were installed.
>
> That would be a bug in debian-live then, not in debian-installer. Cc-ing
> accordingly.
>
> > And with the LXQt ISO file, the graphical expert install as well as
> &g
> The official live images are generated already in 8 flavours, and
> duplicating them requires a lot of additional testing effort. Do you
> volunteer to test them?
I understand that providing the live images is a lot of work, that
Debian has limited volunteers, and that perhaps it's not curre
Hello Reid, list,
On 01/05/2024 15:30, Reid wrote:
...snip...
The following is what I found, which I believe are
important Installer bugs that need fixing:
1) Bug #1 / Debian installer / all live image DVDs:
> When using the Debian Installer on live images, it installs 29
non-free compone
s over the next week to figure out what was going on.
The following is what I found, which I believe are
important Installer bugs that need fixing:
1) Bug #1 / Debian installer / all live image DVDs:
When using the Debian Installer on live images, it installs 29
non-free components withou
firmware packages were installed.
That would be a bug in debian-live then, not in debian-installer. Cc-ing
accordingly.
> And with the LXQt ISO file, the graphical expert install as well as
> the text expert install did not ask me if I want the non-free firmware
> packages, they were inst
when I create the 32 bit distro via lb build and start it, the menu is
install denbian but as soon as I launch it it doesn't work, while the
64 bit one works for me
in a nutshell he tells me
.linux /live/vmlinuz initrd=/live/initrd.gz
not found
If you install the iso created with lb build from the debian installer to a
certain pounto does enter the username and appears by default debian how do
you do so that appears by default another name?
On 2021/3/11 下午6:10, Roland Clobus wrote:
> Hello Xiao,
>
> Thank you for the detailed report.
>
> On 11/03/2021 04:18, ZhangXiao wrote:
>> On bullseye, I tried to make an ISO used to install a specific Debian
>> system, but seems `lb config --debian-installer live"
Hello Xiao,
Thank you for the detailed report.
On 11/03/2021 04:18, ZhangXiao wrote:
> On bullseye, I tried to make an ISO used to install a specific Debian
> system, but seems `lb config --debian-installer live" can't make it. My
> operation is:
>
> $ rm -rf *; lb
Hi experts,
On bullseye, I tried to make an ISO used to install a specific Debian
system, but seems `lb config --debian-installer live" can't make it. My
operation is:
$ rm -rf *; lb clean; lb config --debian-installer live; lb build
Then I get an ISO image, when I boot with it, i
Your message dated Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:18:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#952864: fixed in live-build 1:20210122
has caused the Debian Bug report #952864,
regarding [live-build] true|false are confusing values for --debian-installer
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
El 17/7/20 a las 06:51, andy pugh escribió:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 02:49, Fernando Toledo wrote:
>
>> and test debian-installer-distribution with values "stretch", "testing"
>> or "daily" without success.
>>
>> anybody know any workar
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 02:49, Fernando Toledo wrote:
> and test debian-installer-distribution with values "stretch", "testing"
> or "daily" without success.
>
> anybody know any workaround for this?
What sort of lack of success do you have?
You might n
Hi
I try to build a stretch image,
i use live-build from buster or bulseye
--debian-installer live
--debian-installer-gui true
and test debian-installer-distribution with values "stretch", "testing"
or "daily" without success.
anybody know any workaround for th
as per Subhani's suggestion is added
> > > > > and
> > > > > that
> > > > > breaks this configuration.
> > > > >
> > > > > #!/bin/sh
> > > > >
> > > > > set -e
> > > > >
> >
nd non-free are optional
>> > > _AA="main contrib non-free" \
>> > > #_BIT="x86-64" \ x86 = 32 BIT system x86-64 = 64 BIT system
>> > > _BIT="x86" \
>> > > #_DD="buster" \ Debian Distribution e.g. buster
>
"http://deb.debian.org/debian/"; \
> > > #_MS="http://security.debian.org/"; \ Security Repository Mirror,
> > > this
> > > is usually always http://security.debian.org/ unless you are
> > > building
> > > a non Debian system
> > &
M="builder-choice" \ Window Manager used in the build. Choices
>> are,
>> currently, Fluxbox.
>> _WM="Fluxbox" \
>>
>> lb config noauto \
>> --apt "apt" \
>> --apt-indices "${_F}" \
>> --apt-options
apt-indices "${_F}" \
> --apt-options "--yes" \
> --apt-recommends "${_F}" \
> --apt-secure "${_T}" \
> --apt-source-archives "${_F}" \
> --aptitude-options "--assume-yes" \
>
; #
>
> # Phase 3: - Set up build environment
>
> #
>
> lb config --binary-images iso-hybrid --mode debian --architectures
> i386 --linux-flavours 686 amd64 --distribution buster --archive-areas
> "main contrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache
> >>> #
> >>>
> >>> # Phase 1: - Assign WKDIR variable the output of pwd
> >>>
> >>> #
> >>>
> >>> WKDIR="$(pwd)"
> >>>
> >>> #
> >>>
> >>> #
> >>>
&g
t;>
>>> #
>>>
>>> #
>>>
>>> # Phase 2: - Create the build staging folder
>>>
>>> #
>>>
>>> rm -r PakOS10.3
>>>
>>> mkdir PakOS10.3
>>>
>>> #
>>>
>>> cd PakOS10.3
--binary-filesystem "fat32" \
--bootappend-live "boot=live config quiet splash keyboard-layouts=us" \
--bootappend-live-failsafe "boot=live components memtest noapic noapm
nodma nomce nolapic nomodeset nosmp nosplash vga=normal" \
-
- Create the build staging folder
>>
>> #
>>
>> rm -r PakOS10.3
>>
>> mkdir PakOS10.3
>>
>> #
>>
>> cd PakOS10.3
>>
>> #
>>
>> #
>>
>> # Phase 3: - Set up build environment
>>
>> #
>>
>> l
;
> #
>
> lb config --binary-images iso-hybrid --mode debian --architectures i386
> --linux-flavours 686 amd64 --distribution buster --archive-areas "main
> contrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache true
> --apt-recommends true --debian-installer live --debian-
gt; > > > > > > archive-areas
> > > > "main
> > > > > > > contrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache
> > > > > > > true
> > > > > > > --apt-recommends true --debian-installer live
> &
ontrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache true
--apt-recommends true --debian-installer live --debian-installer-gui true
--win32-loader true --iso-application PakOS10.3 --iso-preparer
subhaniminhas-https://sourceforge.net/projects/pakos/ --iso-publisher
subhaniminhas-https://sourceforg
; >>>>
>> >>>>> Nice.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Finally does it installer fetch the packages from the same iso or
>> >>> does
>> >>>>> the
>> >>>>> installer need an internet connect
gt;
> >>>>> Finally does it installer fetch the packages from the same iso or
> >>> does
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> installer need an internet connection to work (e.g. fetches the
> >>> packages
> >>>>> from the i
s 17:01, Pak OS escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>> it installs on both. And automatically selects kernal based on
>>> underlying
>>>>> architecture.
>>>>>
>>>>> gSM
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Ap
16/4/20 a las 14:46, Pak OS escribió:
Ok, here goes:
lb config --binary-images iso-hybrid --mode debian
--architectures i386
--linux-flavours 686 amd64 --distribution buster --archive-areas
"main
contrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache true
--apt-recommends true --d
gt; >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>> El 16/4/20 a las 14:46, Pak OS escribió:
> >>>
> >>> Ok, here goes:
> >>>
> >>> lb config --binary-images iso-hybrid --mode debian --architectures i386
> >>
> El 16/4/20 a las 14:46, Pak OS escribió:
>>>
>>> Ok, here goes:
>>>
>>> lb config --binary-images iso-hybrid --mode debian --architectures i386
>>> --linux-flavours 686 amd64 --distribution buster --archive-areas "main
>>> contrib non-free&quo
d --mode debian --architectures i386
>> --linux-flavours 686 amd64 --distribution buster --archive-areas "main
>> contrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache true
>> --apt-recommends true --debian-installer live --debian-installer-gui true
>> --w
Ok, here goes:
lb config --binary-images iso-hybrid --mode debian
--architectures i386 --linux-flavours 686 amd64 --distribution
buster --archive-areas "main contrib non-free" --updates true
--security true --cache true --apt-recommends true
--debian-installer live
las 14:46, Pak OS escribió:
>
> Ok, here goes:
>
> lb config --binary-images iso-hybrid --mode debian --architectures i386
> --linux-flavours 686 amd64 --distribution buster --archive-areas "main
> contrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache true
> --apt
--archive-areas
"main contrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache true
--apt-recommends true --debian-installer live --debian-installer-gui
true --win32-loader true --iso-application PakOS10.3 --iso-preparer
subhaniminhas-https://sourceforge.net/projects/pakos/ --iso
Ok, here goes:
lb config --binary-images iso-hybrid --mode debian --architectures i386
--linux-flavours 686 amd64 --distribution buster --archive-areas "main
contrib non-free" --updates true --security true --cache true
--apt-recommends true --debian-installer live --debian-installe
d be extremely grateful.
> Regards.
> Michael.
>
> On 16/04/2020, Pak OS wrote:
> > I am maintaining a multi Arch live image with Calamares Installer and
> > debian installer at source forge.
> > Please search for PakOS on Google, it should be 1st result. Go to my
> s
be extremely grateful.
Regards.
Michael.
On 16/04/2020, Pak OS wrote:
> I am maintaining a multi Arch live image with Calamares Installer and
> debian installer at source forge.
> Please search for PakOS on Google, it should be 1st result. Go to my source
> forge page. It's a lar
I am maintaining a multi Arch live image with Calamares Installer and
debian installer at source forge.
Please search for PakOS on Google, it should be 1st result. Go to my source
forge page. It's a large one. 3.3 GB. A lot of software.
Pl see if it suits you. I am available for any help.
ed
debian installer cdrom (with the '--debian-installer cdrom'
flag/option) with no problems.
My original plan with this image is to use it (also) to install debian
in both i386 and amd64 machines, with or without a connection to the
internet.
So, for me, I believe the best option w
.
>
> I speak with no authority as to live-build plans, but afaik there
> are
> no plans at all to do anything in this area.
>
> On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 18:56 +, dbgr wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I was not sure if this email should've been sent to both li
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 18:56 +, dbgr wrote:
> Is there any way that you know of to integrate any of this installer
> options (or even a 'custom' one) in live-build? Is there a plan to do so
> in the future as an option?
Is this what Calamares is supposed to be for? TBH all I know about it
is
Just to add something to what I just said a few minutes ago - of course
you say that you're avoiding using DVDs since you want larger
selections of packages such that the images will not fit onto DVDs (and
I take your word for it that you've checked that your selections will
indeed not fit), and yo
8:56 +, dbgr wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > I was not sure if this email should've been sent to both list. So
> > > sorry
> > > if it should've not :-/
> > >
> > > I am using the live-build version 20191221 (the one in te
rsion 20191221 (the one in testing) on a
debian stable/buster system to build an live image with and
integrated
debian installer cdrom (with the '--debian-installer cdrom'
flag/option)
with no problems.
My original plan with this image is to use it (also) to install
debian
in both i386 and a
uster system to build an live image with and
> integrated
> debian installer cdrom (with the '--debian-installer cdrom'
> flag/option)
> with no problems.
>
> My original plan with this image is to use it (also) to install
> debian
> in both i386 and amd64 machine
Hello.
I was not sure if this email should've been sent to both list. So sorry
if it should've not :-/
I am using the live-build version 20191221 (the one in testing) on a
debian stable/buster system to build an live image with and integrated
debian installer cdrom (with the
Package: live-build
Version: 1:20191221
Owner: jnq...@gmail.com
the --debian-installer option accepts values of
true|cdrom|netinst|netboot|businesscard|live|false. Having 'true' and
'false' here is very confusing. the set of values needs replacing with
cdrom|netinst|netboot|bu
attaching my configurations (ISO GRUB file, the live-build
configuration file, and my preseed file), (I am still on the Debian Buster
repositories).
GRUB2 installs correctly with Debian Installer booting on isolinux on a
classic BIOS boot, however when booting on UEFI, the GRUB installation step
ges and stuff like that. But I can't
>> figure out how to show a custom picture at the top of Graphical
>> Install menu of debian-installer.
>>
>> I booted a Kali Linux image. Their version of debian-installer has
>> KALI logo instead of Debian logo.
>
ема: Change graphic/logo in graphical debian-installer
> За: debian-live@lists.debian.org
> Датум: Среда, 14. Новембар, 2018. 6:44
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was playing around with debian-live,
> trying to build an ISO with
> custom graphics and name.
>
> I have replace
an ISO with
> custom graphics and name.
>
> I have replaced a few splash images and stuff like that. But I can't
> figure out how to show a custom picture at the top of Graphical
> Install menu of debian-installer.
>
> I booted a Kali Linux image. Their version of debian-i
Hi all,
I was playing around with debian-live, trying to build an ISO with
custom graphics and name.
I have replaced a few splash images and stuff like that. But I can't
figure out how to show a custom picture at the top of Graphical
Install menu of debian-installer.
I booted a Kali Linux
Yes, it worked!
Il giorno lun 12 dic 2016 alle 18:14, Federico Bruni
ha scritto:
Indeed, there is this option, even if it's not in the HTML manual but
only in `man lb_config`:
--debian-installer-distribution daily|CODENAME]
I'm trying this and I'll let you know if it
Indeed, there is this option, even if it's not in the HTML manual but
only in `man lb_config`:
--debian-installer-distribution daily|CODENAME]
I'm trying this and I'll let you know if it works.
Thanks
Federico
Il giorno lun 12 dic 2016 alle 14:13, AreYouLoco?
ha scritto:
et an error
about kernel modules not being installed. It never happened
before.
Do you think that it's a bug of debian-installer?
I found this old report which is exactly what happened to me:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749991
## Error message ##
"No ker
s not being installed. It never happened before.
Do you think that it's a bug of debian-installer?
I found this old report which is exactly what happened to me:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749991
## Error message ##
"No kernel modules were found. This probably
new image and when I try to install it I get an error
about kernel modules not being installed. It never happened before.
Do you think that it's a bug of debian-installer?
I found this old report which is exactly what happened to me:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749991
Hi all
I've upgraded from live-build 4 to version 5 in testing.
I've built a new image and when I try to install it I get an error
about kernel modules not being installed. It never happened before.
Do you think that it's a bug of debian-installer?
I found this old report w
The problem is Debian-Live doesn't allow to choose the locale at boot
menu, as other distributions do.
El 18/11/16 a les 11:50, Iain R. Learmonth ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:32:53PM +0300, ha...@bayindir.org wrote:
>> Pardus is also planning to use this package inside their l
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at lists.debian.org archives.
El 18/11/16 a les 11:50, Iain R. Learmonth ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:32:53PM +0300, ha...@bayindir.org wrote:
>> Pardus is also planning to use this pa
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:32:53PM +0300, ha...@bayindir.org wrote:
> Pardus is also planning to use this package inside their live & installable
> hybrid media. While I don't have the time to take full ownership of the
> package, I can happily help in planning and implementing the improveme
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:57:16AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> This sounds like an annoying loss of functionality for those who use it.
Please feel free to adopt this package.
Thanks,
Iain.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Note that this is *only* the package that launches the Debian installer from
> *within* the running live system.
This sounds like an annoying loss of functionality for those who use it.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
f its bugs and fixed #843130, so I'm not
completely inexperienced about d-i launcher.
Best regards,
Hakan
On 17 Kasım 2016 Perşembe 16:47:15 +03 Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:02:46PM +, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> > I am proposing the removal
f its bugs and fixed #843130, so I'm not
completely inexperienced about d-i launcher.
Best regards,
Hakan
On 17 Kasım 2016 Perşembe 16:47:15 +03 Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:02:46PM +, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> > I am proposing the removal
>>It's a native package, there's no need to develop a replacement, just fix
up the thing we have (or entirely replace it if you wish).
Isn't the part in brackets developing a replacement?
If it is broken and no one is working on it, or is willing to work on it,
it is effectively orphaned anyway.
T
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 06:49:43PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On the latter I can't really comment, but I would find it very
> > unfortunate if this package would get removed from stretch *now*… (where
> > there is no time to develop a replace
On Thu, 17 Nov 2016, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On the latter I can't really comment, but I would find it very
> unfortunate if this package would get removed from stretch *now*… (where
> there is no time to develop a replacement…)
Why would anyone develop a replacement instead of taking it over?
In
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 04:02:46PM +, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> I am proposing the removal of debian-installer-launcher from Debian as this
> software generally gives bad user experience and does not see the levels of
> testing required for us to ensure it is of reasonable quali
(When replying to this mail, please reply *only* to
debian-live@lists.debian.org)
Hi,
I am proposing the removal of debian-installer-launcher from Debian as this
software generally gives bad user experience and does not see the levels of
testing required for us to ensure it is of reasonable
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
Following discussion with #debian-live and #debian-boot on IRC, I am orphaning
this package. This will no longer be used in the official live builds as it
tends to give bad user experience and doesn't get the levels of testing it
really needs.
I am not filing a
rong wrote:
On 01/08/16 09:20 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many of you may have already heard, but I retired last month. For
> details, see:
>
> http://syn.theti.ca/2016/08/01/retiring-as-a-debian-developer/
>
> In particular, please note that live-manual and
> de
ong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many of you may have already heard, but I retired last month. For
> details, see:
>
> http://syn.theti.ca/2016/08/01/retiring-as-a-debian-developer/
>
> In particular, please note that live-manual and
> debian-installer-launcher need maintainers, and I
details, see:
> >
> > http://syn.theti.ca/2016/08/01/retiring-as-a-debian-developer/
> >
> > In particular, please note that live-manual and
> > debian-installer-launcher need maintainers, and I should be removed from
> > Uploaders on all live-* packages.
>
On 01/08/16 09:20 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many of you may have already heard, but I retired last month. For
> details, see:
>
> http://syn.theti.ca/2016/08/01/retiring-as-a-debian-developer/
>
> In particular, please note that live-manual and
> debian-installe
Hi,
Many of you may have already heard, but I retired last month. For
details, see:
http://syn.theti.ca/2016/08/01/retiring-as-a-debian-developer/
In particular, please note that live-manual and
debian-installer-launcher need maintainers, and I should be removed from
Uploaders on all live
from
https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/example-preseed.txt which the
necessary changes, but it doesn't even pass from the very first "Select
language" prompt during debian install.
Simply following the example setup from the manual wont work for me:
$ echo "d-i debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unblock 762007 by 775128
Bug #762007 {Done: Christian Perrier }
[debian-installer-utils] Kernel command line handling change breaks d-i
user-params functionality
762007 was blocked by: 775128
762007 was blocking: 764675 764676 764677
Remo
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 debian-live
Bug #760992 [debian-installer] debian-installer: i18n: doesn't load keyboard
layout that was just set
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'debian-live'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bu
Control: reassign -1 debian-live
Tamás Tardos, le Wed 10 Sep 2014 00:03:44 +0200, a écrit :
> Hi and thanks for your quick responses.
>
> The exact ISOs are:
> debian-live-7.6.0-amd64-xfce-desktop.iso
> debian-live-7.6.0-amd64-kde-desktop+nonfree.iso
>
> With both of these I'm able to reproduce
w reading SOME of my preseed.cfg. Is there a specific order items need to
> be in the preseed.cfg?
>
> What I am seeing now, when I launch the installer from the desktop
> (debian-installer-launcher) and when I run it form the boot menu, it
> preseeds the locale and language, but then
from the desktop
(debian-installer-launcher) and when I run it form the boot menu, it
preseeds the locale and language, but then ignores setting the hostname,
does not use an apt-mirror (which is correct), then ignores the cd eject
and reboot. Here is what I last tested (with comments
The below fixed the preseed issue from the boot menu, but not the liceCD
installer. I am pretty sure the details from Fernando will be what I
need to do, but once again, I will update as soon as I make more progress.
Thanks, all.
Z
On 8/29/2014 3:27 PM, Zed wrote:
I accidentally took the list
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
