* Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-01 16:27]:
> I wait an answer from Matt Hope, but if he won't answer to messages
> from another developers.
Try talking to Pascal Hakim (CCed). He might know what's up with
Matt.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com
* Joe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-04 13:47]:
> Why don't we just find the creator and ask him?
> The original image is named raul-0.gif, so somebody named Raul made the
> image. (Was this Raul D. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED])
No, Raul Silva.
--
Martin Michlmayr
h
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-27 22:13]:
> In this thread[1], the previous DPL (Martin Michlmayr) stated that the
> issue was worked on.
> But I got no more news since that time.
I told the new DPL back in April what needs to be done. He (or,
really, anyone) just
a link. This is really only helpful for people who are very
keen on following -legal anyway. For others, a summary in the style
of Kernel Traffic
(http://www.kernel-traffic.org/kernel-traffic/index.html) would be
more appropriate; of course, such summaries are also more work.
--
Martin Michlma
o send another reminder to the
list.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
arist of the logo
has agreed to sign it and thereby hand ownership over to SPI. Once
this is done, we can change the license. At the moment, we're waiting
for SPI and the artist to sign this agreement.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
s improved
but that -legal could do a better job at communicating their ideas to
people who don't have time to follow the list. For example, I don't
think that many people are aware of
http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ and the page is also fairly
incomplete; http://wiki.debian.net/ind
east in some cases.
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/10/msg00175.html
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/10/msg00195.html
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y MJ Ray (from the same discussion) have been the
longest outstanding messages I have to respond to. I'll do so now.
As to your message above: yes, I agree that the snide remark I made
was inappropriate and I hereby apologize for it.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
* Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-12-14
20:55]:
> Definition as well as the DFSG and have asked for out input. When we
> originally started the discussion, the license had not been published
> so I asked Don Armstrong and Matthew Garrett privatel
Deutschen Freien Software Lizenz?
Um jedermann den Abschluss dieser Lizenz zu
ermöglichen, wird empfohlen, das Programm mit
folgendem Hinweis auf die Lizenz zu versehen:
"Copyright (C) 20[jj] [Name des Rechtsinhabers].
Dieses Programm kann durch jedermann gemäß den
Bestimmungen der Deutschen Freien Software Lizenz
genutzt werden.
Die Lizenz kann unter <http://www.d-fsl.de>
abgerufen werden."
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
sonally feel that this name has the same problems that "Trusted
Debian" has - it suggests that "normal" Debian is not secure. In any
case, I think you should post your question to debian-project rather
than -legal since -project is more appropriate and might get more
feedback.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
h SPI's trademark lawyer and
others on spi-trademark.
What would a good license for the logo be?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ference is that ftpmaster actually has authority over the
archive (including licensing issues) whereas -legal doesn't and
therefore can only play an advisory role.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;s useful and once it's clear who would
be a good candidate for that.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ng away
from XFree86.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As per the recent discussion, I thought I'd mention
http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/02/21/230259.shtml (NASA Open Source
License Still Up For Discussion).
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s and that, and this
is why it is different to the OSI guidelines and we why feel it is
important to comply with the DFSG." I don't think such a mail would
be perceived as rude. Some people might ignore it and not care, but I
cannot see people seeing it as rude.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hances of a Single Official Summarizer not being buried under
Yes, which is also why I'm relucant to appoint one delegate for this
right now. It would be good if a group of people would do it and
after a few months we see automatically who the people are who are
doing it regularly.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iscussion,
post a summary to -legal to get the "ok" and then send it on. We
don't necessarily need one specific person to do that - what we need
are volunteers willing to do it.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-11 18:01]:
> I'm willing to take on a position to summarize our discussions,
> and present them to upstream. I think I can do this diplomatically, and
> I have some experience with this. (I was responsible for ironing out
don't care as much as we). My prime example is OLS.
Many people (e.g. Alan Cox) think it's a great license, and it will
and is being used by projects. This is a loss for us and for the free
software community, and if possible we should try to make licenses
DFSG free.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gal to be more proactive and talk to
upstream authors of licenses instead of waiting for them to contact
us.
I'd like to hear what other people from -legal think. I'm certainly
not going to appoint anyone without the consent of -legal since this
is just not the way it can work. But perhaps we can find a solution
together.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
exceeded
Please fix this.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to
our projects.
Cheers,
Roy T. Fielding, director, The Apache Software Foundation
(fielding AT apache.org) <http://roy.gbiv.com/>
[*] ApacheCon is in Las Vegas, Nov 16-19 <http://www.apachecon.com/>
- End forwarded message -
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
th
My point was that we knew about the SSL linking problem before the
release. (I have not checked the archived, but I'm fairly sure this
was the case.) [And before I'm cited out of context, my original
sentence was followed by "However, I don't want to use this example to
justify further violations".]
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
; and licensing issues is.
I'm afraid I cannot give you an answer to this. As you should know from
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
or #97671, "sarge-ignore" is used and defined by the Release Manager.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and asked them about their opinion, and there were no
objections with having Don on this committee. I also tried asking
Bruce, but he hasn't responded yet.
> the stages of the NM process, pledged to uphold the Social Contract
He has agreed to uphold the Social Contract in private mail to
Has anyone tried talking to the author of OSL in order to get the
license changed?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ll, who I have just appointed
as Debian representative in the discussion with FSF.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Benj. "Mako" Hill, Debian.
I hereby appoint Mako Hill as Debian's delegate in this committee,
representing Debian. All official communication related to GFDL
discussions with the FSF should, if possible, go through him.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
he package said the tools
were public domain, even those not marked as such. Does that help, or
is it not clear enough?
I suppose this is not "good enough" and that metrics should be
removed, but I'm not positive.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
> We do not derive anything. We compile and distribute the software
> and include the license, as permitted. That is not the problem.
We *do* derive since you made changes to the upstream. However,
renaming the package should solve this problem.
I'm CCing debian-legal@lists.debian.org and preserving the relevant
copyright notice above, so we get some real advice.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
33 matches
Mail list logo
