* MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-14 23:52]: > Posts from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to -legal in February 2004 about "debian-legal > review of licenses" suggested that "anyone can volunteer to > summarize a particular discussion, post a summary to -legal to get > the "ok" and then send it on" and that debian-legal should be "more > proactive". It also seemed to be your idea that these summaries were > mainly for forwarding upstream if requested, but I'm not sure that's > been the main use of them so far. > > Your messages suggested that you'd review "after a few months" > mainly to see who is summarising, so now seems like a good > opportunity. Do you have other comments about whether this turned > out like you imagined?
Sorry for the delay in responding. I think the situation has improved but that -legal could do a better job at communicating their ideas to people who don't have time to follow the list. For example, I don't think that many people are aware of http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ and the page is also fairly incomplete; http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DFSGLicences should probably be merged into the former or integrated in some way. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
