, but
again would not be compatible with the DFSG.
Am I worrying too much?
Have a nice day,
Charles
Le Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 09:09:53PM -0700, Soren Stoutner a écrit :
> Charles,
>
> On Monday, January 27, 2025 6:07:54 PM MST Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> >
it was already tried through the FTP team?
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy Nagahama, Yomitan, Okinawa, Japan
Debian Med packaging team http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tooting from home https://framapiaf.org/@charles_plessy
- You
Le Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 10:40:16PM -0700, Soren Stoutner a écrit :
> License: BSD-custom-2-clause
I would recommend a different abbreviation. BSD-custom-2-clause may
give the false impression that this is a standard BSD 2-clause license
where the copyright holders are not the regents of the univ
ense, but I think that I have
seen similar cases where it was.
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Akano, Uruma, Okinawa, Japan
Le Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 11:21:37AM +1100, Ben Finney a écrit :
> Ian Jackson writes:
>
> > I'm afraid you'll have to go back to the authors/copyrightholders and
> > get them to fix the licence for this particular program.
>
> Preferably, convince the copyright holders that the reliable option is
> Eriberto Mota writes:
>
> > However, I will wait more opinions before submit a package to Debian.
Le Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:33:02AM +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
>
> Don't (only) wait for them here. I would advise you to ask the people
> distributing the work what they think the copyright stat
nd then
integrate them in their sofware package.
So my personal point of view is that shipping the PDF in the source package is
harmless, shipping it in a binary package is close to useless, and we should
let the package maintainer chose the solution that he finds most suitable.
Have a nice day,
Char
Hi Shirish,
in complement to Paul's answer, I would like to mention the peer-review process
that I outlined in the Debian wiki: <https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview>.
While it never got traction, you are free to try it if you like.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Me
s on the OSI
website, the 4-clause BSD is not there.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
/upload
So the state of pqueue is very clear.
Of course, a pull request to brush up the LICENCE file might be appreciated by
the author(s) anyway.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
and well-understood
license
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
lmar,
I just wanted to add to the advice of not writing new licenses, that part of
the problem that you are trying to address can be solved by requiring a
contributor agreement before merging contributions into your software's main
line. See for instance <https://owncloud.org/contribute/agre
ve concrete examples of cases
where people fell in that trap and got hurt since then ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>>>
>>> Bump
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
>
>> Happy Holidays!
>>
>> (bump)
Le Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 04:31:07PM +0100, Ferenc Kovacs a écrit :
>
> any progress on this?
> I starting to feel lonely here.
Hi Ferenc,
happy new year !
... you are not alone :) don't give up ! Sometimes things are not quick in
Debian ...
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
long as the PostScript code"
are not found in any other package; good !
Cheers,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
that the commit messages and the revisions of a file are part the source, since
inspecting them is part of the "preferred" way to modify the file. But we are
not there yet...
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
> Charles Plessy writes:
> >
> > Maybe the long line was machine-generated at the beginning, but it does not
> > matter anymore.
Le Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:12:07AM +0200, Ole Streicher a écrit :
>
> Why not? If I take the GPL definition, the question is not wheth
has passed the
screening of the FTP team when it entered our archive. You can also add
Lintian overrides if the Lintian maintainers are uncooperative.
Thanks for your hard work, and have a nice day,
Charles Plessy
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
ree.
Altogether, I think that #689919 should stay closed, although it would be great
of course if the Subversion authors would manage to elimiate this license from
their sources, because this license is not a good example to follow.
Have a nice day,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa
pas and
lazarus_1.2.4+dfsg2-1/components/synedit/synregexpr.pas (thanks,
codesearch.debian.net), so either this was overlooked, or the interpretation
taken by the FTP team is that the second sentence solves the problem introduced
by the first.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
> -use this product in a comercial package, the source may
> > > > > -not be charged seperatly.
> > >
> > > But a developer doesn't have the freedom to sell the software for
> > > profit to other developers.
> On Sat, 30 May 2015 10:46:0
m to sell the software for
> profit to other developers.
Hi Riley,
as suggested in the original question, this clause is similar to clause 1 of
the SIL Open Font License 1.1, which is DFSG-Free.
> Neither the Font Software nor any of its individual components, in Original
> or Modi
it is because he
modified the files, as he says in the README.
In that case, the license to be indicated in debian/copyright should be GPLv3+.
Have a nice week-end,
Charles
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.o
e copyright holder declines to relicense, you can probably ignore the
problem.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
oad Y
because X needs it, they need to read Y's license. If X provides some download
scripts for Y, it would be kind to write somewhere in the documentation that Y
is GPL-licensed.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
icense field of the header, as I am using the machine-readable
format).
However, it is not canonical, nor automated.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
ebian as it is, you do
not need to relicense the files to update to the new upstream release.
- You can work on the resolving the apparent contradiction at the
pace you want, you can even consider it a wishlist, “patch welcome”
issue only.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Debi
010, 2013, 2014 author A
(C) 2000 author B
License: says-public-domain
This program is in the public domain.
Not elegant, but accurate.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCR
Also, the license in question is already present in a
large number of files in Debian.
http://codesearch.debian.net/search?prev=&q=the+name+of+Vinay+Sajip
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
wi
icense will always be
compatible, it may be better to use the same license as upstream, to simplify
their work.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@li
of keeping it as
a Debian-only modification.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.de
Le Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 08:10:49AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>
> I think that it is important that a few of the ‘some members’ would identify
> themselves in support for that request, and explain what they would do if the
> worries expressed below turned out to be true.
S
force
Debian to stop distributing or modifying PHP and its modules.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists
not take a Debian CD, add non-free
software, and sell it as “Debian Enhanced”. We and other protect our names,
and PHP does it too. I do not see a problem.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
w
the
packages automatically (modulo a small delay) become part of Testing again.
This already has been done for packages such as php-memcached, and could be
done for others.
Thank you for your patience !
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Ja
wo holders are on the same line of a copyright
statement, so there is no problem at all.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140604121619.ga21...@falafel.plessy.net
rd to the SKIP codes, Mr Halpern draws your
attention to the statement he has prepared on the matter, which is included at
Appendix F.”
To me, it appears that Appendix F, which has non-Free clauses, applies.
Have you tried to contact the authors of KANJIDIC ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Ple
st, and the
> current CC0 version is *explicitly* discouraged for use
> with software.
Hi Thorsten,
Can you share a link to such a recommendation with a reasonable explanation ?
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa,
CC0
> Creative Commons Legal Code
> [... rest of the CC0 text ...]
>
>
> Or is there an even better third solution?
Solution 2 is fine; "Copyright: [year] John Doe" would be enough as well.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To U
t preserve a good human-readability. Currently, the canonical URL
for the standard is
<http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/>.
As for CC0, as Ben explained, it is a license, and the simplest is to list the
copyright holders as for other licenses.
Have a nice d
beyond
Debian.
Soeren, are you sure you would like this manpage to be licensed under terms that
may be not welcome Upstream ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
icant cost.
This is similar to the requirements for conveying non-source forms in the GPL
and the AGPL, which are accepted as Free by Debian.
I have not studied the other clauses of the ODbL, but section 4.6 therefore
does not seem to make it non-free.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Ples
n program:
>
> --%<---
[…]
> * 3) Other interested research groups will be redirected
> * to the author. The user will not redistribute the code outside
> * his immediate research group.
Dear Johannes,
I think that this clause forbids the redistribution by Debian.
Have a nice Sunday,
signatures.
If Debian bans Francesco from this list, I will fee very ashamed of us.
Also, with such a low threshold for banning people who are polite, precise, who
do not engage into flamewars, and never show aggressivity, we will set the
stage for massive purge and witch-hunting, because of many
insistance is that I really feel like an idiot
when I contact upstream to ask them to relicense works, and I am not able to
explain why it matters.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
the accepted and rejected license is so thin,
I think that we can not blame people being unsatisfied in one direction or the
other and telling it repeatedly their opinion on that matter. If you do not
like this, please write a convincing and authoritative explanation of "Debian's
opinion&
Hello everybody,
for those interested in the subject: SPDX (Software Package Data Exchange,
http://spdx.org) is calling for contributions for their 2.0 version.
Cheers,
-- Charles Plessy, Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
- Forwarded message -
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:57:39 +
Subject
ragraph to give the license information for the package as a whole.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Ar
Dear all,
there is an interesting email on the SPDX mailing list, distributing an article
about the BSD and MIT license families. Here is a link to the page with the
attached file.
http://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx/2012-December/000785.html
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Illkirch
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:41:46 +0100 (CET) x.guim...@free.fr wrote:
>
> > > The complete text can be found here :
> > > * Original text :
> > > http://www.data.gouv.fr/Licence-Ouverte-Open-Licence
> > > * English translation :
> > > http://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/4/37/99/26/licence/Licence-Ouve
ld like, you can open a wishlist bug, and if the specification is
updated in the future (there is no timeline for this and my opinion is that
currently it would be premature), this bug will remind us to consider adding a
recommendation (and asking you at that time if you would like to summarise the
, given that the content of the Copyright field is
free-form.
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121201014747.ga31...@falafel.plessy.net
Le Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:15:01AM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> On Sun, 18 Nov 2012 09:02:13 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> [...]
> > Catalogues available at CDS contain scientific data distributed
> > for free, for a scientific usage.
> [...]
>
> Doesn&#x
d and
redistributed freely as long as they are not sold by themselves.
If one considers that in the statement in 681654#52, "cannot charge for the
data" means the same as "not sold by themselves" in the OFL, then it would be
consistent to keep kstars-data-extra-tycho2 in Debian,
Logo without « Debian » is still distributed under a
persmissive license on www.debian.org/logos, so anybody who worries about
license incompatibilities can make a backup now, and redistribute it under its
permissive license later if it looks useful.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsuru
it is non-free.
>
> What do the others think about it?
>
> To me, it doesn't just seem to be a (re-)distribution issue. Rather, the
> need for an additional agreement with CAcert.
Hello Raphael,
could it be a very strangely phrased disclaimer of warranty ? That
"A l
them on this lit.
If you think they create more noise than signal, perhaps you or others can
consider asking for a change to the NM templates via a bug reported to
nm.debian.org.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debia
> > Le Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:54:05PM +0100, Noel David Torres Taño a écrit :
> > > On the package kstars-data-extra-tycho2 it has arisen a doubt about its
> > > distributability: See bug #681654
> On Martes, 21 de agosto de 2012 02:55:43 Charles Plessy wrote:
> &g
files are in a subdirectory, the grep
command can also be run on '*/*.copyright' instead of recursively; this will
remove some noise as Subversion keeps copies in subdirectories.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Ts
in a commercial product, you
do so with the understanding that you agree to defend, indemnify and
hold harmless Adobe against any losses, damages and costs arising
from the claims, lawsuits or other legal actions arising out of such
distribution.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Pl
ing for a clarification to one of the current mainstream
distributors ?
http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/Cat?target=http&cat=I/259
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
]
under [...] a later version of this License » only applies to derivatives
(called adatpations in version 3.0). Section 4.a, which applies to the
original work, does not give this permission.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
domain works, such as
Creative Commons zero license, the SQLite public domain dedication, or the GNU
all-permissive license.
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html
read the URL below.
.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2012/03/msg00031.html
.
By the way, can you confirm if the following terms of service are relevant to
Google Translate ?
.
http://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/terms/#toc-content
.
Have a nice week-end,
.
--
Charles Ples
d before pasting
GPLed text in Google Translate.
For the resulting translations, however, I think that I agree that there is no
copyright claimed on them, and that they can be freely added to the original
project.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRI
ns.
Hello everybody,
this reminds me the behaviour of virtaal, which will propose to pre-fill
tranlsations with the output of Microsoft Translator. If it is not possible to
translate copylefted text with such services, maybe the functionality should be
disabled by default ?
Have a nice day,
upport for the Derived Work.
By analogy, it looks that the npm license is free.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.d
PL if among
their worries there is the case where a competitor would make a proprietary web
service encapsulating Picviz.
Similarly, it looks like the GPL considers the the build and install system as
part of the source code, and the clarification that Picviz should not be
installed via InstallShie
case, machine-readable or not, you should not disregard copyright and
license notices when writing the Debian copryight files.
Have a nice day, and thank you very much for maintaining xul-ext-zotero !
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ.
les that are matched by that pattern,
regardless of the notices they contain or not, are distributed under the license
stated by that paragraph. For the copyright statements, the current practice
is to reproduce them and optionally combine them. If they are missing, then
there is nothing to reprodu
If one can read it, it is written. But I am not a native
speaker. If it is the meaning of the Internet2 license that both parties must
sign a document in order to “enter into a written license agreement”, then it
is not a free license.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
ibute derivatives under non-copyleft terms.
Thefore, while the validity of this concept of default license may be
questionable, I do not think that it is non-free.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
ease (an old,
> unfinished project)
Regardless of the license, this calls in question whether this piece of code is
fit for the level of support expected for a Debian package. If there are
possible replacements that are actively maintaine, it may pay off to switch to
them.
Have a nice da
he
relicensing would be even more simplified by targetting all
contributions to the webwml repository.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian
t be separated. Which is another good reason to go for relicensing or
copyright disclaiming instead.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.o
ense.org/
http://translationproject.org/html/whydisclaim.html
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.de
BSD" is that it does not indicate the terms clearly, as for instance the first
version of the BSD license had a GPL-incompatible advertisemnt clause…
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Le Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:49:47AM -0500, Hendrik Weimer a écrit :
> Charles Plessy writes:
>
> > The public-domain short name is reserved for cases where the work is
> > really in the public domain in the strict legal sense of it; this is a
> > rare case (for inst
a rare case (for
instance, some works of U. S. government employees).
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
his said, there are some minimalistic license that have a very short
disclaimer,
like the GNU All-Permissive license:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
t in some files in the debian directory, using the same license as
upstream will keep the debian/copyright file valid without debian/* sections
through the catch-all files paragraph.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists
work, I will ask for the removal of EMBOSS and re-upload to
non-free.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "uns
not extend to the information and
ideas expressed in these materials.”
To me, the contents of the records above look factual. Can I conclude that,
being non-copyrightable, the file is not non-free despite its license
statement ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
ht
ble with our
guidelines, after undelining the potential problems.
This may be a good opportunity to ask them if they would kindly consider
a free license, or at least a non-free license that is already in Debian.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Le Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 11:06:22AM +0100, Bruno Lowagie a écrit :
> Op 7/03/2011 11:02, Charles Plessy schreef:
> >
> >Regardless of the purpose and the intentions behind requiring to ‘retain the
> >producer line in every PDF that is created or manipulated using iText’, if
&
reconsider this additional term.
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110307100240.gc22...@merveille.plessy.net
Le Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:16:26AM +0100, Harald Jenny a écrit :
>
> I also thought about this but as the license text for the University of
> California differes slightly from the one of Petr Rehor I wasn't sure this is
> the correct way to do it - I also thought about:
Oops, I missed this as th
are
picky on copyright reproduction, unless it is the will of the copyright holders
to have their names accompanying each and every derivative. But can you imagine
the mess if one had to track which contributor to acknowledge when reproducing
an extract of the human genome ?
Cheers,
--
Charles Pless
rkaround, yes.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110113225938.ge7...@merveille.plessy.net
of our
archive, the package would be very difficult to maintain.
So it looks like a bad start…
Cheers,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
is distributed in Debian.
http://www.python.org/psf/trademarks/
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://l
t makes v3.0 better.)
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101104014920.gb17...@merveille.plessy.net
ster, etc. This will take
time, but we think that it is a better way to support Upstream in return for
the software they give us.)
Have a nice thay, and many thanks to you and Platinum Arts for your efforts
with licensing !
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
strictions but does not cancel the terms of the MIT and BSD
licenses, so their requrirement that ‘Redistributions in binary form must
reproduce the above copyright notice…’ still fully applies: you have to quote
them entirely.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
T
derstanding, not on the imitation of the others.
It is the addition of extra clauses and vague disclaimers that sometimes make
licenses non-free (clauses like ‘do not kill people with my software’), so
let's resist to temptation of making our license statements longer than what
is nece
t the DFSG.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100409003426.ga28...@kunpuu.plessy.org
Le Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:56:44PM -0500, Joe Neal a écrit :
>
> http://wonko.com/post/jsmin-isnt-welcome-on-google-code
Hi Joe,
have you seen the comment of Joey Hess, that it ‘Looks like the jsmin.py in
libv8 is now a reimplementation with a standard license.’
Have a nice week-end,
--
Charl
pies or derivative works are solely in
the
form of machine-executable object code generated by a source language
processor.
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
al author is not reachable, then replacing
the file can be the easiest solution to the problem.
Have a nice sunday,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100321014305.ga31...@kunpuu.plessy.org
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
