Le Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 05:43:09PM +0100, Ian Jackson a écrit : > > Thanks a lot for your reply Charles. But I am a bit confuse... Is the > > debian/ a derivative work from upstream code? If yes, must be the > > license GPL-3+ or not? > > No, it is not a derivative work. (Except for debian/patches/ if you > use that, but that's presumably not what you mean.)
Yes, sorry for not being clear: by « if combined » I meant debian/patches. I agree with Ian that a permissive license is the most helpful in general. For the patches to upstream, while a permissive license will always be compatible, it may be better to use the same license as upstream, to simplify their work. Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140821220807.ga...@falafel.plessy.net
