Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-10-01 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 17:39, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Could you suggest any hook point in the code where I can augment > verbosity level to see what's going on? > > In the meantime is there any possibility to add the old radeonfb module > along with the new one? That code is anyway there

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-10-01 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 05:25:53PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 23:51, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 02:42:10PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Sorry for the delay, I've been kept very busy with other things. > > > > > > Can

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-10-01 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 23:51, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 02:42:10PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, I've been kept very busy with other things. > > > > Can you send me dmesg logs after enabling radeonfb verbose debug of > > the boot that

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-09-26 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:44:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:44:32AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 09:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > > I'm having the same problem on a HP Pavilion zt3020EA, which has an ATI > > > > Rade

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-09-25 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 02:42:10PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > Sorry for the delay, I've been kept very busy with other things. > > Can you send me dmesg logs after enabling radeonfb verbose debug of > the boot that leads to incorrect detection ? Also tell me what the > real resolution

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-09-17 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Sorry for the delay, I've been kept very busy with other things. Can you send me dmesg logs after enabling radeonfb verbose debug of the boot that leads to incorrect detection ? Also tell me what the real resolution should be in both cases, and send me also the XFree log. Also, make sure you are t

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-09-13 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:44:55AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:44:32AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 09:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > > I'm having the same problem on a HP Pavilion zt3020EA, which has an ATI > > > > Rade

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-09-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 10:44:32AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 09:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > I'm having the same problem on a HP Pavilion zt3020EA, which has an ATI > > > Radeon 9000 chipset. Native res is 1280x800. Again blank screen with > > >

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-09-13 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 09:00:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > I'm having the same problem on a HP Pavilion zt3020EA, which has an ATI > > Radeon 9000 chipset. Native res is 1280x800. Again blank screen with > > cursor moving on it, and all working fine in 2.4 or X. The problem > > apparently

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-09-12 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 02:55:15PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:17:36PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > > Package: kernel > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > > > 2.4 series radeonfb (1.8-benh) works perfectly (also modular). > > > > 2.6 series ne

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-09-11 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:17:36PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > Package: kernel > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > 2.4 series radeonfb (1.8-benh) works perfectly (also modular). > > > 2.6 series new radeonfb never worked (since 2.6.0 at least), it does not > > > sync here (laptop

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-08-30 Thread Francesco Paolo Lovergine
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 02:48:18PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Benh, just so you are in the loop. > > Friendly, > > Sven Luther > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:45:07AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > Package: kernel > > Severity: normal > > > > 2.4 series radeonfb (1.8-benh) works perfe

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-08-27 Thread Sven Luther
Benh, just so you are in the loop. Friendly, Sven Luther On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:45:07AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Package: kernel > Severity: normal > > 2.4 series radeonfb (1.8-benh) works perfectly (also modular). > 2.6 series new radeonfb never worked (since 2.6.0 at least),

Bug#268352: 2.6.* radeonfb regression

2004-08-27 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
Package: kernel Severity: normal 2.4 series radeonfb (1.8-benh) works perfectly (also modular). 2.6 series new radeonfb never worked (since 2.6.0 at least), it does not sync here (laptop XSVGA). After loading, fbset reports 1400x1050-60, as for the 2.4 version, but screen is blank and stay in nor