terate over all of the dtbs for the current kernel and copy them around.
But I think we're even farther from having any kind of standard
boot.scr/uEnv.txt infrastructure that would cope with this, than we are from
having dtbs themselves as a standard interface.
--
Steve Langasek
looks like a dupe of 754420.
Doh. Sorry, read the dak output wrong! (Too many distracting backports
kernels in the way :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
nger-supported kernel version.
Is there any chance you could try upgrading to a later kernel? kirkwood
appears to still be supported through jessie.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
p && *cp) {
> buf[0] = 'Q';
> }
> }
>
> int main(void) {
> add_name(0);
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the
es 'cp'
> cannot be NULL, forgetting that both 'cp' and 'old' could have been
> NULL, making these expressions valid for NULL cp.
Are you seeing this problem on i386 (like the original submitter), or do you
see this problem on a different architecture?
(If it&
or segfaults
ensue. If there is a reason for switching the linkage away from gssglue,
then a coordinated transition would be needed.
libtirpc has two reverse dependencies in the archive, rpcbind and nfs-utils.
I would appreciate it if you would test both of them when making changes to
libtirpc.
s
work. If you want to provide a patch, I'll apply it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debi
nd manually creating the directory may let the package upgrade, but will
not give the correct behavior since this must be a mountpoint, not a
directory.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and
Hey Bastian,
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:56:54AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:15:31AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > + * Fix to look directly in /run instead of via the /var/run symlink.
> Where is the bug report for this?
This is mentioned in
tags 719357 patch
tags 623377 patch
thanks
With Luk's approval, I've prepared an NMU to address these two bugs in
rpcbind. Please find the NMU diff attached.
This NMU will be uploaded to unstable shortly.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 01:18:00AM +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Source: nfs-utils
> > Source-Version: 1:1.2.8-3
> > We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
> > nfs-utils, w
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 09:32:59AM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote:
> > > Thanks, that is a very kind offer and with ARM hat on, we cannot
> > > reject
to does imply some logistical
challenges for ensuring that we continue to have good kernel support during
the development cycle, so that release+1 will be supportable on the box.
But this is a problem we've dealt with before, and certainly in this case
the upstream kernel support is quite good
s had a VFP unit,
> but that forward path is easy.
> It seems a net win compared to a few % extra speed in FPU-intensive
> apps on v7+ CPUs.
The v7+ CPUs far outnumber the v6 CPUs, of which there's only one platform
that anyone is interested in (the RPi). Amortizing that few % spee
only by definition).
> 1. Migration of existing systems is easier.
> 2. There are still machines bought new which aren't ready for x32.
Any such machine would also need a 32-bit kernel, so doesn't seem to be what
we're talking about here.
--
Steve Langasek Give m
ian to switch this default than it is for
Ubuntu, since Debian's choice of default arch doesn't have quite the same
"all or nothing" impact on pressed CDs and the like. But IMHO it's better
for our users to choose a default that's safe, at the cost of some users not
get
is not guaranteed to work unless the
gcc-multilib package is installed; and if gcc-multilib is installed, you get
a /usr/include/asm compatibility symlink pointing to
/usr/include/$triplet/asm. There are still some problems with this setup,
but I don't agree that the issue reported here is o
is it ok
for these to be uploaded to stable-proposed-updates? This fixes a bug that
makes squeeze kerberized NFS servers unusable with newer clients (e.g.,
wheezy).
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 02:31:36PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Steve" == Steve Langasek writes:
> Steve> Hi Sam, I've also run into this bug, in the context of
> Steve> preparing to update nfs-utils in Ubuntu for IPv6 support. My
&g
path.
You mention that fixing this properly requires backporting patches to both
nfs-utils and krb5. Could you provide a reference for the krb5 patch? (I
assume the nfs-utils one is the one Luk already linked to) I'm potentially
willing to help with getting this int a stable update.
Thanks,
--
St
Hi Ben,
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:26:43AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 12:10 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Hello,
> > This is the patch from bug #750585 on the linux package, which I've just
> > gotten a freeze exception for; I've been
script reports a red FAILED because of that.
This is the only symptom you describe, and that's certainly not critical!
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
sphrase. Instead we need to fix
update-initramfs itself to not fail on a non-modular kernel.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
this in the release notes either. :)
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
ere's something here that we've overlooked; but we shouldn't hold up our
call for upgrade testing waiting for such logs to appear, in the absence of
some other evidence of a problem when using grub.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free O
of caution; if lenny grub really
doesn't need to be added to the Breaks, please close again - but please also
let me know why, so we can write the release notes appropriately.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to s
., that they're *not* local
modifications by the admin. With appropriate uses of ucf, this would not
have been silently overwritten.
And nfs-kernel-server calling ucfr wouldn't have saved you from this anyway,
because the documented standard use of ucf is to call ucfr *after* calling
ucf; so
other package.
This situation can never arise among Debian packages, because Debian policy
stipulates that each configuration file has one and only one owning package.
Supporting this for the benefit of third-party or local packages sounds like
a wishlist bug to me.
--
Steve Langasek
ion 2.6.32-18.
I'm sorry for the difficulty you're experiencing, but that does not meet the
definition of a 'grave' bug. A grave bug is when the package is unusable
*in general*, not when it is unusable on a particular piece of hardware.
--
Steve Langasek
nly way we're likely to find those corner
cases is by trying this change and seeing what bug reports come back.
I'm definitely in favor of adding the Breaks. Doing this should shorten the
squeeze release notes' upgrade instructions by about 20%.
--
Steve Langasek
h
up front.
Fixing this is probably not going to be high on anyone's priority list, but
I would argue against a lintian override in this case because I think
there's real room for improvement.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
severity 590923 grave
thanks
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 08:48:34AM +0200, Jaekle, Andreas wrote:
> the whole system hang up. I have to reboot the machine.
Ok, raising the severity of the bug back to grave.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Deb
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 07:57:14PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Maybe since awk is essential by way of being a pre-depends of base-files
> both mawk and gawk should behave as if they were essential.
No.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:27:40AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 04:51:50PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > > Only because it's a cdebootstrap bug. Unless you see something that
> > > > causes
> > > > initramfs-tools to be p
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 01:10:36AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 06:38:41AM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:10:26PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > O: Selecting previously deselected package mawk.
> > > O: dpk
's a cdebootstrap bug. Unless you see something that causes
initramfs-tools to be pulled into the essential set (which I do not), this
is a cdebootstrap bug for not fulfilling the pre-depends of the essential
packages before continuing.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
factors), kernel device names are not stable.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
sla
ipath in the initrd-image.
> When i create a symbolic link in lib64 pointing to lib/multipath the
> initializing of the multipaths works.
> I hope this helps to find the Bug.
Almost certainly a bug in the multipath-tools package or its initramfs hook,
not in initramfs-tools. Reassigning.
sign
choice. But *if* it is included in the initramfs, then several other
components need to be started before it in order to get the desired results
(namely, the udev and framebuffer scripts).
But the plymouth package in Debian doesn't install a script to start
plymouth /at all/ in the initramfs
usion of mdadm.conf in initramfs is the responsibility of the mdadm
hook, not of initramfs-tools itself. Reassigning.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
est
builds on a buildd is adequate for uploading a bootloader with a different
toolchain, so I haven't officially orphaned the package). If you care about
getting feedback for alpha, I'd suggest mailing
debian-al...@lists.debian.org.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a
is look at the "enterprise" versions was already done, and is what
resulted in picking 2.6.32. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
xpress wishes of python upstream.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
OME+devickeit / lvm2 conflict has
resulted in the lvm2 package being removed from your system?
(This happened to me here - fortunately I noticed the problem when trying to
create a snapshot, and didn't have to wait for a reboot to discover it...)
--
Steve Langasek Give me
der file into the aufs-tools source package
> > like btrfs-tools does but I just think it's better to include it here,
> > especially considering Debian derivatives.
> Does Ubuntu include it in linux-libc-dev?
No.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enou
in 2.6.31-rc8 is much more stable
than EXA has been in the recent past.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.d
0
rx_errors: 0
rx_missed: 0
align_errors: 0
tx_single_collisions: 0
tx_multi_collisions: 0
unicast: 284
broadcast: 8
multicast: 1
tx_aborted: 0
tx_underrun: 0
#
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian De
; RTL_W32(MAR0 + 0, mc_filter[0]);
> RTL_W32(MAR0 + 4, mc_filter[1]);
> RTL_W32(RxConfig, tmp);
> to:
> RTL_W32(RxConfig, tmp);
> RTL_W32(MAR0 + 0, mc_filter[0]);
> RTL_W32(MAR0 + 4, mc_filter[1]);
> in rtl_set_rx_mode().
Applied, r
el team
wants, please first try to reconcile the "release team: yes" with waldi's
"Luk: no".
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu D
s list, he proposed the venue?
> I'm assuming he'll be around, as he lives in Portland anyway. If you
> ask him nicely, I'm sure he'll show you the best places to find good
> beer too. :-) I'm cc:ing him anyway.
Yep, I'll be here, and I think beer might be arran
30
[1573779.83] r8169: mac_version = 0x04
[1573779.83] r8169: Set MAC Reg C+CR Offset 0x82h = 0x01h
[1573780.57] r8169: eth0: link down
[1573780.57] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
[1573781.34] r8169: eth0: link up
[1573781.34] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0:
ights will certainly be cheaper the sooner people are able
to commit, so I would suggest trying to reach a yes/no on this particular
idea in the next week or so.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I c
Downgrading, this isn't a release-critical bug. (Unless the alsa-base
maintainers agree with you that this makes the package "unsuitable for
release", in which case they can raise the severity again.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
De
deem correct so that you don't
have to worry about it, but don't close it so that it can't be found.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
we don't add a
versioned Depends: on udev outright. The use case for a recent Linux system
without udev is diminishingly small.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the worl
here an easy workaround, or do I have to install "udev"?
You ought to be using udev, on any modern Linux system.
(As for downgrading to an old kernel - any kernel that doesn't support the
new rtc system is also not supported by the glibc in squeeze.)
--
Steve Langasek
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 07:35:52PM +0200, Francis Debord wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-k7
> Version: 2.6.26.lenny
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
This does not "break" anything. The i686 image works fine on k7 system
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 04:23:35PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> Also, SUSv3 is different from POSIX; TTBOMK, SUSv3 includes all the XSI
> extensions, while POSIX leaves them as options.
Yes; policy currently specifies SUSv3.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
lude running 'bterm'?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 03:20:49PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Is 'command -v' in SUSv3? 'which' is the predominant idiom used in
> > maintainer scripts...
> it is supported by dash as builtin.
Whic
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:44:16PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Apr 2009, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:52:07PM -0600, dann frazier wrote:
> > > --- initramfs-tools-0.93.2/update-initramfs.orig 2009-04-20
> > > 14:50:15.
ly this should be if [ -x $(which elilo 2>/dev/null) ], since paths
aren't supposed to be hard-coded in maintainer scripts at all?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the worl
uploaded once already and rejected by the ftp team for
debian/copyright irregularities.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
release of the alpha port with Debian
squeeze, but we can certainly put this on the list for documenting in the
release notes for Debian 5.0.1.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and
force), and set to 1 (force probing) when either
CONFIG_ALPHA_JENSEN or CONFIG_EISA_VLB_PRIMING are set.
Perhaps you could try passing virtual_root.force_probe=1 as a kernel option
when booting the installer, to see if that fixes the problem for you?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a
> let me know what more debugging info I can provide.
Please check whether this is the same as bug #515956.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the w
ue leading up to
release, I guess there aren't a whole lot of alpha users left to worry about
it.
This is something I think we should get fixed for 5.0.1.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 11:44:11PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:06:12PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 11:32:50PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > > Could you please retest this with a current 2.6.14 or 2.6.15-rc (from
en know what this error means, or what component is responsible for it; I
think we need a KDE maintainer to tell us what "CPU overload" means before
we can treat this as a kernel bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
tags 483781 -wontfix
thanks
How is a mount helper supposed to address this? Having anything other than
utf8 exposed on the vfs is broken, so it needs to be mounted as utf8; the
fact that mounting as utf8 breaks vfat case-insensitivity is a bug in the
vfat kernel driver.
--
Steve Langasek
ysical
> memory. Or am I missing something?
Yes, you are. A kernel loaded at the legacy address *won't boot* on the
newer hardware.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
[my proxy] http://www.zdziarski.com
> causes the web page to hang every other query. disabling net.ipv4.tcp_dsack
> seems to resolve the problem, leaving me to believe something might be wrong
> in how linux handles dupe sacks.
This is probably <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 01:19:37PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> One of the following modules have to go, both claims the same hardware:
> - snd-pcsp
> - pcspkr
Are we meant to be voting? snd-pcsp sounds terrible, I think it should go
away. :)
--
Steve Langasek
, since the release team is actively
working on getting 2.6.26 into testing.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:40:31AM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> On 13:15 Sun 24 Aug , Steve Langasek wrote:
> SL> severity 496410 important
> SL> thanks
> You are mistake :)
> Your script places in /usr/sbin, ie it runs with root privs.
> If I create symlink /
ch are not valid shell,
cron entries, password/shadow entries, or any other config file that I know
of.
So at best this appears to be a DoS symlink attack; therefore downgrading.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
ey should go ahead and do the work themselves.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.deb
for domU, with the intent
that the associated image package (if it were actually fully functional) be
shareable for both dom0 and domU?
But then, in that case I would expect the image package to also include
various non-hardware-related modules that are useful in a domU context.
--
Steve Langasek
y assesment of severities is "best-effort". If a severity is
> wrong, we can surely discuss it!
> Do you mind if I reopen with non-RC severity, untill my question above has
> been clarified?
Yes, I mind. If there's not a DFSG violation here, then there is no bug
that the ke
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:38:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:09:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:20:12PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > Following the discussion some weeks ago I have a patch to fix most of
>
t; - Definitions for AF_WANPIPE socket
Seems ok, any regression is going to be very localized.
If someone can take care of patching the two issues mentioned above, then
I'm happy with a 2.6.26 upload to unstable. Otherwise I'll work on the
patch myself tomorrow night.
--
Steve Langas
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.33
# recommends are not serious
severity 492301 normal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
side is
really considering 2.6.25 to be an option for lenny, and the sooner we get
2.6.26 into unstable the sooner we can get everything smoothed out for
lenny.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I
600 lines diff.
Have you gotten any closer to finding the cause of this regression?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://
SMB file system support (OBSOLETE, please
> use CIFS)". Just follow it and use cifs.
No, we've already discussed this on IRC. CONFIG_SMB_FS should not be
disabled in etch, the userspace support isn't there to give us feature
parity via CIFS.
--
Steve Langasek
"
> ATTR{stat}==" 2228010170 15301778412411589
> 82721 75569632288074092 116412"
> ATTR{capability}=="13"
>
> As can be seen, then DRIVER thing is empty. Thought I'd mention it,
> even though I am unsure why DRIV
this is a commonly reported issue and there is potentially
some work to be done on the kernel package to improve this, I'm instead
merging it with the other open report, bug #473877.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:50:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:06:07PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 05:51:26PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > /usr/include/asm/page.h is _not_ provided by linux-libc-dev, but
> > &
n back out of the kernel again and
maintained separately if it can't comply with the freeze requirements when
maintained in-tree.
What's the best way forward here?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Fre
ustification: breaks the whole system
Overinflated severity.
> initramfs-tools: seems not to build usable initrd, even with MODULES=most
> in initramfs.conf boot fails (xfs)
You'll need to show a transcript of this boot failure for anyone to help
diagnose it.
--
Steve Langasek
mpting to close bugs in contradiction of fact.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
[EMAIL PRO
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 09:26:03AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Rest assured that max speaks on behalf of the Debian _kernel_ team, not
> all of Debian.
No, he speaks on behalf of himself.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Dev
apper device, which was previously renamed into eth2, now
> became wlan0_rename (sic). Also, colleague experiences similar issues
> with his ipw3945 card.
This is bug #465775 in udev.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to
ntly, not a bug of this package.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
[
dn't create that file; this should be handled in udev, which needs
to be able to correct the rules there that are only compatible with old
modules.
There is a corresponding (release-critical) bug in Ubuntu about this issue;
please see <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug
force-loading the module fixes it, we may be
looking at the same issue; dunno if it's a kernel or udev bug, haven't had
time to dig into it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can
se schedule,
I have just seen two members of the kernel team insisting exactly that, that
the d-i beta should not be allowed to block the latest 2.6.24 kernel from
being accepted into testing...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
Hi Maks,
Could you please provide a rationale when downgrading bugs like this? To an
outside observer, it looks to me as if this module package truly is
"unusable or mostly so" as a result of this bug.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 05:10:42PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:25:04AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Which means that linux-latest was never updated at all for the 2.6.23 series
> > in unstable. Why?
> there is no 2.6.23 left in sid.
Du
inux-latest was never updated at all for the 2.6.23 series
in unstable. Why?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
1 - 100 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
