On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 12:11:26AM +0100, Frederik Schueler wrote: > Coordination is already needed now, and will be needed even more when > this change is implemented. > If this means waiting with a new upstream kernel version for a week or > two until the next beta of d-i is done, we will of course wait, no one > wants to break d-i development by purpose.
No, but some kernel team uploaders are rather indifferent to the installer team's needs. > > Another thihk that I see as a _must_ is that d-i team could nack a > > kernel upload. This is requred since d-i won't be allowed to diverge > > from sid kernels anymore (I mean during development) and those > > migrations would need to be much more coordinated with d-i RM and d-i > > porters. > Nobody will insist on uploading a new kernel version if this breaks the > release schedule, I have just seen two members of the kernel team insisting exactly that, that the d-i beta should not be allowed to block the latest 2.6.24 kernel from being accepted into testing... -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
