BTW, On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > (Reopening the bug out of an abundance of caution; if lenny grub really > > doesn't need to be added to the Breaks, please close again - but please also > > let me know why, so we can write the release notes appropriately.)
> I think the release notes should encourage people to update their boot > loader first. Adding extra steps to the release-notes-recommended upgrade path is always a poor substitute for having the system automatically upgrade packages for you in the intended order. If you believe that users should be encouraged to update their boot loader before upgrading their kernel, then please declare this in the Breaks: for the package so that we do the right thing for *all* users, including those who don't read the release notes; as <http://www.bebt.de/blog/debian/archives/2010/09/19/T13_31_11/index.html> shows, even DDs who should know better often upgrade without reading the release notes. Conversely, if you disagree that there's any reason for the kernel to declare a Breaks: against the old bootloaders, then I disagree that we should document this in the release notes either. :) Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
