Package: src:linux
X-Debbugs-Cc: sb56...@gmail.com
Version: 6.1.94-1
Severity: important
Hi again, apologies for my slow response. This is a follow-up to
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076034 which got archived.
Would it be possible to re-open it? This bug continues to affec
Had the same thing happen with the 6.1.0-21 kernel, so I tried the 6.7.12
kernel from Backports. Then while booted into that kernel it happened again,
but this time I SSHed into the system from another computer and found a
coredump from i915:
Jul 10 15
Had the same thing happen again but with firmware-iwlwifi 20230625, so moving
back to the Debian Stable version, and I'm going to test the previous 6.1.0-21
kernel.
Package: src:linux
X-Debbugs-Cc: sb56...@gmail.com
Version: 6.1.94-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I have been experiencing frequent system lockups when the computer is under
moderate CPU load, usually while running an audio editing program with Wine or
soon after closing the program. T
, q=8379 ncpus=4)
Sep 27 00:49:42 myserver kernel: rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected expedited
stalls on CPUs/tasks: { P2155714 } 5276 jiffies s: 1125909 root: 0x0/T
Sep 27 00:49:42 myserver kernel: rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal
RCU debug):
However t
Package: firmware-amd-graphics
Version: 20230210-5
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: sm.snowstorm...@passinbox.com
Dear Maintainer,
When running update-initramfs I get the following warnings:
---
Setting up linux-image-6.1.0-10-amd64 (6.1.38-2) ...
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools:
update-in
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Version: 20221214-5
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: mathi...@hotmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
My system has the following network card
02:00.0 Network cont
ds,
-Mathi
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso on behalf of
Salvatore Bonaccorso
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 1:21 PM
To: Mathirajan S. Manoharan
Cc: 1030...@bugs.debian.org <1030...@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#1030741: firmware-brcm80211: Package firmware-brcm80211 not
found in bookworm
H
Package: firmware-brcm80211
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: mathi...@hotmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I'm using bookworm as my desktop OS. I have the following wireless card.
02:00.0
Hi there, for those that have tried the newer version of the firmware and
didn't see any improvements, it turns out that you have to **power-cycle** (not
just reboot) the machine after installing the newer firmware package. Some
users even recommend pulling the laptop battery and letting it sit
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 06:10:00PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-06-21 at 17:34 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:24 PM David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > >
> > > On 20.06.22 20:49, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > I've tested a 5.19-rc3 kernel on top of QEMU/KVM with mach
chipset info :
https://www.realtek.com/en/products/communications-network-ics/item/rtl8188ftv
Some forums (https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=295485) report that
the driver for this device is here (https://github.com/kelebek333/rtl8188fu)
Package: firmware-realtek
Version: 20201218-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: mathi...@hotmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? i plugged in the usb realtek adapter to my
pc hoping to connect to
(via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
firmware-realtek depends on no packages.
firmware-realtek recommends no packages.
Versions of packages firmware-realtek suggests:
ii initramfs-tools 0.133+deb10u1
-- no debconf information
--
,
Janusz S. Bien
emeryt (emeritus)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
It turns out that in the new version I have to use backslashes instead of
forward slashes in the kernel command line.
e. g. "initrd=\EFI\EFISTUB\INITRD.IMG" instead of
"initrd=/EFI/EFISTUB/INITRD.IMG"
Forward slashes work in the previous version, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: linux-image-5.7.0-rc5-amd64-unsigned
Version: 5.7~rc5-1~exp1
That kernel has dropped to the experimental repo a few hours ago, so I
installed it, regenerated the initrd, and copied them to the ESP, and added an
entry for it.
When booting
=- Michael Biebl wrote on Sat 5.Oct'19 at 12:44:14 +0200 -=
> Control: reassign -1 linux-image-4.19.0-6-686
>
> It looks like a kernel indeed with the information you've provided
> so far. So reassigning the bug report.
Summary update:
shutdown fails 99%, reboot once in a while (maybe 20-30%)
Package: firmware-misc-nonfree
Version: 20190114-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I am seeing this warning message:
W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/i915/icl_dmc_ver1_07.bin for
module i915
Could we have it included, please?
Thank you.
-- System
f is the problem (as 4.19-trunk works but
4.19 does not), so the problem is the firmware.
--
"And in the naked light, I saw ten thousand people, maybe more. People \
talking without speaking, people hearing without listening. People writ\
ing songs that voices never shared, no one dared distu
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.18.20-2
Followup-For: Bug #914495
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? Booting into linux-image-4.18.0-3-amd64.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective
On 1/31/18 9:01 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Srivatsa S. Bhat (sriva...@csail.mit.edu):
>> From: Srivatsa S. Bhat
>>
>> The existing patch which disallows unprivileged CLONE_NEWUSER applies
>> the check for CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability on the 'init_user_ns'
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat
The existing patch which disallows unprivileged CLONE_NEWUSER applies
the check for CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability on the 'init_user_ns'
namespace, which is not entirely correct. Consider the following sequence:
1. A process with root privileges calls
clon
Package: src:linux
Version: 4.13.13-1
Severity: normal
When I try to install kernel-image 4.13.0-1 amd64 I get the following errors:
DKMS make.log for 8192cu-1.10 for kernel 4.13.0-1-amd64 (x86_64)
Fri Dec 22 20:47:07 CST 2017
make: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-4.13.0-1-amd64'
AR
pn firmware-netxen
pn firmware-qlogic
ii firmware-realtek 20161130-3
pn firmware-samsung
pn firmware-siano
pn firmware-ti-connectivity
pn xen-hypervisor
-- no debconf information
--
,
re-misc-nonfree
pn firmware-myricom
pn firmware-netxen
pn firmware-qlogic
ii firmware-realtek 20161130-3
pn firmware-samsung
pn firmware-siano
pn firmware-ti-connectivity
pn xen-hypervisor
-- no debconf inform
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > AFAIK, there's no (performance or size) penalty in enabling it [...]
>
> It's not very large, but yes there is a cost.
>
>
Is it enough to leave it disabled? It seems that being a (standard) sysfs
interface, the penalty is not really muc
ms
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Ben Hutchings
> To: 858084-d...@bugs.debian.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:13:03 +0100
> Subject: Re: Bug#858084: linux-image-amd64 - kernel option enable request
> On Sat, 2017-03-18 at 10:16 +0
Hello,
I think this bug can be closed as the kernel version has been updated which
pretty much was the purpose of the original bug request.
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Narayanan.
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 4.9+79~bpo8+1
Can you please enable the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS option for the
kernels.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Narayanan.
:50 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> [Reply to all, not just to me.]
>
> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 08:42 +0530, Narayanan R S wrote:
> > Hello Ben,
> >
> > I did have the documented ICMP network issues when I used the 4.9 version
> > of the backported kernel.
> >
>
Package: linux-image-amd64
Version: 4.9+78
The current (backported) version of linux-image-amd64 (for Jessie) appears
to need a few important fixes from the kernel source (upstream).
Please see:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2406212.html
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1402
-f debian/control || sed -e 's/=V/4.8.7.161128/g' \
-e 's/=D/4.8.7.161128-10.00.Custom/g' -e 's/=A/amd64/g'
\
-e 's/=SA//g' \
-e 's/=I//g'\
-e 's/=CV/4.
As just a data point, when -march=i686, the kernel builds and seems to
work well using 6.2.0-10 and with no patches to Makefile at all.
On 10/29/2016 10:24 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
-no-pie is not a useful option here, because it's passed to the _linker_
only.
i got it to build with this
y mean
that the kernels are currently only built/supported with gcc-5.
vanilla kernels (Linus' tree and the stable ones) could be compiled just fine
with gcc 6.2.0-6 and that now fails.
I still think this is a major regression and regard gcc 6.2.0-7 simply as
broken.
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 11:
I agree. When the version changes from 6.2.0-6 to 6.2.0-7, only bug
fixes should be included, not changes in functionality. In this case
setting enable-default-pie essentially broke backwards compatibility.
Kernel code that built in -6 failed to build in -7. That, I agree,
should be cons
Concurring with Wolfgang; pulling the source straight from kernel.org
and using identical .config files will work with 6.2.0-6 but fail with
6.2.0-7. I was able to build and install 4.8.3 with no issues after
back-revving gcc et. al. to 6.2.0-6
-- sRw
On 10/20/16 11:09, Wolfgang Walter wr
o know if
conflicts between Intel Eth driver exist
- ip -s link show # we want to know if there are 1 or more Ethernet
netdevice
- callstack backtrace (from dmesg or /var/log/message)
- firmware version
- Original Message -
Sent: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 09:08:14 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
I NEED YOUR HELP
ep
[ 4311.108021] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds) done.
[ 4311.123381] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.01 seconds)
done.
[ 4311.139406] PM: Entering mem sleep
[ 4311.139430] Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
[ 4311.139826] sd 0:0:0:0: [s
earned the patch has been applied to the media tree on 11th
December - I somehow missed this.
Best regards
Janusz
--
Prof. dr hab. Janusz S. Bień - Uniwersytet Warszawski (Katedra
Lingwistyki Formalnej)
Prof. Janusz S. Bień - University of Warsaw (Formal Linguistics Department)
j
required?
I report the problem directly to Debian maintainers. Please correct me
if this is not the proper procedure.
Best regards
Janusz S. Bień
(a Debian user since Sarge)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.112
Severity: normal
When I upgraded my jessie box on Monday, I started getting this error in
Synaptic:
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.21.120712
cp: cannot stat `/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/pango/1.6.0/
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.41-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
--
I have upgraded today from Squeeze to Debian-7.0.
However, while booting in the last 3 occasions, the machine hanged twice
with kernel Panic.
In both the occasions, the kernel waited unusually
This issue vanished for unknown reasons. A least for my part.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1343840637.12837.3.camel@t500sg
Same problem here with linux-image-3.2.0-3-amd64, Version 3.2.21-3. So
this bug does not seem to be specific to the binary package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 jsb...@mimuw.edu.pl (Janusz S. Bień) wrote:
> Package: linux-2.6
> Version: 2.6.32-45
> Severity: normal
> File: /lib/modules/2.6.32-5-686/kernel/drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88xx.ko
>
> I've just installed a second hand AverMedia Studio 303 which works u
686/postinst/bootloader-error-2.6.32-5-686:
linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/depmod-error-initrd-2.6.32-5-686: false
linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/ignoring-do-bootloader-2.6.32-5-686:
linux-image-2.6.32-5-686/postinst/missing-firmware-2.6.32-5-686:
--
,
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.102
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
The mouted size of /dev is larger then 10M (which is default, in the init
script itself).
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or ineffective)?
On examining
I can confirm the fix also for the latest kernel in experimental:
3.3-1~experimental.1.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1332939577.1
I can confirm the fix for the latest kernel in testing: 3.2.12.
Cheers,
Sven
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1332923683.20061.4.camel@t500sg
Reported upstream, bug number 42825
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42825
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1330270176.5016.1.camel@t500sg
gt;0 0 61<>61 100<>100│
│ < Master > PCM Mic S/PDIF S/PDIF D Beep Docking Internal│
└──┘
So I don't see how to reproduce things with alsamix
Hi Jonathan,
please find attached the requested outputs.
Cheers,
Sven
Am Donnerstag, den 23.02.2012, 12:31 -0600 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Hi S.G.,
>
> S. G. wrote:
>
> > after upgrading from kernel 3.1.8 muting the master channel is ignored.
> >
> > A workarou
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.2.4-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
after upgrading from kernel 3.1.8 muting the master channel is ignored.
A workaround is to set volume control to zero.
-- Package-specific info:
** Version:
Linux version 3.2.0-1-amd64 (Debian 3.2.4-1) (wa...@debian.org) (g
Package: linux-patch-debian-3.1
Version: 3.1.8-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? I applied the patch to my source tree
(3.1.8-1)
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (o
Hi Jonathan,
3.2-rc7 fixes this issue for me.
Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Sven
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Sven,
>
> S. G. wrote:
>
> > since upgrading the kernel from 3.1.1 to 3.1.5 wireless-n connection
> > establishment is not completed in a way that results in a usa
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.1.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: upstream
Dear Maintainer,
since upgrading the kernel from 3.1.1 to 3.1.5 wireless-n connection
establishment is not completed in a way that results in a usable connection.
Incoming IP packages can be observed using Whireshark but outg
I'm having this issue almost daily..any chance to solve it?
wlan is disconnecting and need to be forced to retry.
root@ALiX-2:/home/stefano# uname -a
Linux ALiX-2 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 04:15:24 UTC 2011 i586
GNU/Linux
root@ALiX-2:/home/stefano#
tail dmesg
[132198.212041] ath5k phy0: no
Chances are you all have your nfsidmap Domain mismatched between
client and server
That was it! I would never have discovered that without help.
I guess this is part of the charm of running Sid :)
Thank you!
Nils
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Package: nfs-common
Version: 1:1.2.5-2
Severity: important
After upgrade to nfs-common 1:1.2.5-2 I noticed that uid/gid's are displayed as
'nobody' and 'nogroup' respectively. This is the case checking with both
Nautilus and terminal.
Downgrading to 1:1.2.4-1 from Testing fixes the problem.
I am
After reading the Ubuntu bug report (#794642) I found that this Debian bug is
also due to the SATA mode in my computer being set to IDE. When this is changed
to AHCI the problem vanishes: /dev/cdrom appears.
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:04:41 +0530 wrote
>On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 04:36 +,
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 3.0.0-5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropiate ***
* What led up to the situation? I noticed that it didn't mount the
CDROM.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
inef
Package: linux-source-3.0.0
Version: 3.0.0-1
Severity: normal
I am trying to build linux-source-3.0.0 and getting the following error:
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/linux-source-3.0.0'
/usr/bin/make -j5 EXTRAVERSION=.110816 ARCH=i386 \
-C Documentation/l
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 04:22 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 23:12 -0400, Wendy Elmer wrote:
> [...]
> > I will try the earlier versions when I get a chance. It may not be
> > very soon since that computer is at my church and I will be on
> > vacation for a week. By the way, si
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.39-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
My computer never boots with 2.6.39-2-486 or 2.6.38. Currently I am running a
custom built 2.6.30 kernel. When I boot with 2.6.39 or 2.6.38 the screen goes
black after I select the kernel in grub. Nothi
Issue occurs only against a user's secondary group. If two users belong to
the same primary group, they can both write to the same directory that is
writable by their primary group.
As a workaround, removing the following option from
/etc/default/nfs-kernel-server fixes the group permission issue
This issue is present in the newly released Squeeze. Using kernel:
2.6.32-5-amd64
nfs-common: 1.2.2-4
nfs-kernel-server: 1.2.2-4
Workaround is by downgrading to lenny's version of nfs-comon and
nfs-kernel-server:
nfs-common: 1.1.2-6lenny2
nfs-kernel-server: 1.1.2-6lenny2
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:01 PM, maximilian attems wrote:
> Politness asks to keep Mailinglist postings on Mailinglist,
> thank you, also top posting is considered to be rude.
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 02:19:59PM +0530, janani s wrote:
> > Ya i installed 2.6.37 linux i
Hello everyone,
I am facing some problems while booting up newly compiled
kernel(2.6.37).. I took the source for 2.6.37 kernel(.tar.gz) from
kernel.org website.. I have took the config file of already existing stable
2.6.32 kernel and created the debs for image and header.. When i installed
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1.2.2
Architecture: amd64
This issue is related to nfs-utils 1.2.2 against amd64 (x86_64)
architecture. This test works against the x86 (32 bit) architecture.
When using nfs-kernel-server on amd64, files cannot be written even though
the group permission is se
t;.
I am not sure about an udev rule that does automatically pair though.
It is a process we wanted to push towards the user with some UI in a
form like: Do you want to pair with device "Foo Bar's iPhone"? [Yes][No]
Cheers.
--- Martin S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
flag and the ipheth module being "added", then calls
the idevicepairing tool to pair?
Thus the ipheth module would simply depend on
libimobiledevice-tools/-utils and the ipheth-pair package thingy would
be gone.
In order to add some more to the mix, we'd thought about showing some
kin
ot;TrustedHostAttached" to be switched to "True" by the device. This is
confirmed and reported by running "ideviceinfo -k TrustedHostAttached".
Some idevicepair tool could provide this information.
I think to solve this discussion we need to look at how this issue is
s
intain any usb id
ranges which clearly belong into usbmuxd.
If you like we can create a simple "idevicepair" tool to allow cli based
manual pairing, unpairing and managing pairing records on the host.
Besides that, the only thing I would add for discussion is to question
the need for a
The upstream kernel people have resolved the issue. You can go there
for the details. Basically, when the ext4 file system was created, it
used the large file system default even though the hard drive is only
160GB and a large file is 2TB. The large file system is the default for
ext4. So, a sp
Em 02-02-2010 19:16, maximilian attems escreveu:
Squeeze will release with 2.6.32 can anyone of you still
reproduce this?
also please make sure to use latest powertop, aka
ii powertop 1.13~pre201001 Linux tool to find out what is using power
$ uname -a
Linux mandachuva 2.6.30-2-686 #1 S
I submitted upstream as bug 15209. I don't know how to get the oops
message as kerneloops is having problems which I submitted as Debian bug
567555.
Brent
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 21:43 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:09 -0500, Brent S. Elmer Ph.D. wrote:
> >
Package: linux-source-2.6.32
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: important
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I get a kerneloops on 2.6.32 kernels unless CONFIG_LBDAF is yes. This is on a
Lenovo W500 thinkpad that only has a 150G
hard drive so there shouldn't be any need for LBDAF. The k
I reported this to the linux-wireless list, thread available
here:
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3c4B5CB7AB.7010105%40bzz.no%3e
One of the replies suggested installing CRDA (RFP #536502), which fixed
the problem.
According to Luis R. Rodriguez:
"No, Atheros cards by default abid
Further information:
This also occurs on 2.6.30 using ath5k from compat-wireless-2010-01-23.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-5
Severity: normal
With kernels 2.6.26 and 2.6.30 I am able to connect to an AP on channel 13
without problems, with the following /etc/modprobe.d/cfg80211_reg.conf :
options cfg80211 ieee80211_regdom=EU
On linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686 I am not able to connec
So sorry, but someone taking a looking here?
This bug make me lost an important time, because battery is drained very faster.
Regards,
Renato S. Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Package: initramfs-tools
Version: 0.92o
Severity: normal
If I add "break=init" to the kernels boot parameters I expect init to run a
shell in the initrds environment instead of running the root partitions init.
But it seems initrds init ignores break=init.
digest of initrds init:
# don't le
I compiled 2.6.30.5 vanila kernel by my hand and don't find this
problem, so I think that something is wrong with Debian Kernel.
With Debian Kernel my battery is drained in ~2h, with Vanilla Kernel the
battery is drained in ~3,25h.
Best regards
Renato S. Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 05:50:10PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>> Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-686
>> Version: 2.6.30-8
>> Severity: important
>> File: linux-image-2.6.30
>> "0a5c:2101 Broadcom Corp. A-Link BlueUsbA2 Bluetooth" unusable, but works in
>> linux-image-2.6.30-1-686=2.6.30-6.
> c
Package: linux-image-2.6.30-2-686
Version: 2.6.30-8
Severity: important
File: linux-image-2.6.30
"0a5c:2101 Broadcom Corp. A-Link BlueUsbA2 Bluetooth" unusable, but works in
linux-image-2.6.30-1-686=2.6.30-6.
It is not listed in 'hcitool dev' and not available from 'hciconfig' etc, but
listed
reopen 550379
severity 550379 wishlist
thanks
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:50:04 +0100 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 18:18 -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote:
> [...]
> > in one sentence, my request is for the linux-2.6 and linux-kbuild-2.6
> > *source* packages to be mer
maybe there is also some confusion due to my use of the term "kbuild
binary packages". i am referring to the linux-kbuild-$(uname -r)
binary packages when i say that, not the plain old kbuild binary/source
package.
mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:56:57 +0200 maximilian attems wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 03:40:02PM -0400, Michael S Gilbert wrote:
> > > # explanation given by maintainer
> > > close 550379
> >
> > there is no explanation in the bug logs. the close
> # explanation given by maintainer
> close 550379
there is no explanation in the bug logs. the closest thing to an
explanation is:
This is not possible for other reasons.
where the 'other reasons' are never explained. if someone can state
these reasons, i would be content to give this up i
BLITZVERSAND
#
Liebe Kunden Wir erweiteren unseren Service und garantieren ihnen einen
Lieferung bis um Nächsten Werktag für Bestellungen die bis 18 uhr 30 getätigt
werden, und über Sofortüberweisung oder Paypal getätigt werden.
###
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:47:09 +0200 Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ben Hutchings schrieb:
> >> Wasting time and bandwidth (fetching linux-headers etc)? Great...
> >
> > Building obscure modules for every kernel flavour on Debian's own
> > auto-builders
BLITZVERSAND
#
Liebe Kunden Wir erweiteren unseren Service und garantieren ihnen einen
Lieferung bis um Nächsten Werktag für Bestellungen die bis 18 uhr 30 getätigt
werden, und über Sofortüberweisung oder Paypal getätigt werden.
###
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:03:06 +0200 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 05:49:13PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 02:04:20PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > >> the linux-kbuild-2.6 source package includes portions of code from the
> > >> linux-2.6 source pa
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 12:10:04 -0400 Thomas Krichel wrote:
> Michael S Gilbert writes
>
> > 'apt-get update && apt-get upgrade' followed by a reboot into the new
> > kernel should bring you up to date.
>
> Since I just download the kernel last week I
I have seem this bug on my Lenovo 3000-V200 laptop too!
Battery is drained very fast!
With Lenny, my battery go to 10% after ~3,5h but with Squeeze the battery go to
10% after 2,5h.
And powertop show me a strange value:
Uso de energia (estimado por ACPI): 191,6 W (0,2 horas)
191,6W??
$ dp
es/e1000e%20stable/1.0.2.5/e1000e-1.0.2.5.tar.gz/download>
--
Regards,
Renato S. Yamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:51:40 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:06:58PM -0400, Michael S. Gilbert wrote:
> > Package: linux-2.6
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: security
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following CVE (Common Vuln
while this bug is still open, would it make sense to disable the gcc
option/optimization/bug/flaw that allows this vulnerability to exist?
the "-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks" flag will completely disable
this option kernel-wide [1].
obviously there is a tradeoff here. the null pointer optimizat
this is CVE-2009-1389. patches available[1].
[1] http://git.kernel.org/linus/fdd7b4c3302c93f6833e338903ea77245eb510b4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
1 - 100 of 184 matches
Mail list logo
