This is my suggested change, so far only compile-tested:
--- a/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
+++ b/fs/hfsplus/wrapper.c
@@ -99,6 +99,10 @@
if (hfsplus_get_last_session(sb, &part_start, &part_size))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (part_start + part_size >= 0x1) {
+
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 16:25 -0700, Marc Tamsky wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
> Version: 2.6.26-13
You should install security updates.
> Justification: causes serious data loss
> Severity: critical
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
>
> Attaching a 4TB hfsplus fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 550010 hfsplus corrupts filesystems >2TB
Bug #550010 [linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64] linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64: default
kernel CONFIG_LBD=n, should get with the times and change to 'y'
Changed Bug title to 'hfsplus corrupts filesystems >2TB
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 22:02 +0800, Clayton wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 03:51:54 +0100
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> > Either you made an error in transcribing "c6 " as "e6 ", or
> > that code has been corrupted on disk or in memory.
>
> No transcription error, I just tried again and still get "
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 546809 2.6.26-19
Bug #546809 {Done: Moritz Muehlenhoff } [linux-2.6] listing
contents of remote directory does not show all content and can cause kernel
panic
There is no source info for the package 'linux-2.6' at version '2.6.26-19' with
On Tue, 2009-09-22 at 20:12 -0400, Brent S. Elmer wrote:
[...]
> I finally got a chance to get to this machine. I built a new kernel.
> 2.6.30, I upgraded everything to the squeeze/testing level. I installed
> firmware-linux again. The problem is still there. X won't start with
> firmware-linu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 548397 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14289
Bug #548397 [linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem] linux-image-2.6.30-2-686-bigmem:
Random Lockup with automount, mysqld, and kswapd0 error messages.
Ignoring request to change the forw
Package: linux-image-2.6.26-1-amd64
Version: 2.6.26-13
Justification: causes serious data loss
Severity: critical
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Attaching a 4TB hfsplus formatted volume to this host caused it to silently
identify it as a 2TB device (with a [mac] labelled partiti
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> tags 414690 + pending
Bug #414690 [linux-2.6] package description amendment for greater clarity
Bug #473152 [linux-2.6] successor of linux-image-2.6-k7: linux-image-2.6-a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 414690 - wontfix
Bug #414690 [linux-2.6] package description amendment for greater clarity
Bug #473152 [linux-2.6] successor of linux-image-2.6-k7: linux-image-2.6-amd64
or linux-image-2.6-686
Bug #509245 [linux-2.6] Add K7 to Description
Bu
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009, Simon Richter wrote:
> Package: initramfs-tools
> Version: 0.93.4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> building an initramfs with MODULES=dep fails with
>
> mkinitramfs: for root /dev/mapper/honey-root missing hdc[ /sys/block/ entry
>
> Apparently the opening bracket is misinter
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 14:05 +0200, Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Monday, 5. October 2009 01:29:39 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 00:15 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> > > > > Is this a new problem or did it
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 23:26 +0100, Antonio Marcos López Alonso wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Ben Hutchings
> wrote:
[...]
> > Could you try adding 'noapic' to the kernel command line?
>
> Sure. Here is /proc/interrupts using irqpoll + noapic (yet no much time
> has passed to reproduce
Your message dated Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:24:46 +0100
with message-id <1254867886.4246.142.ca...@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#549647: "hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x21"
errors on VIA VT82C686 chipset
has caused the Debian Bug report #549647,
regarding "hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma statu
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 06:41:56PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Thanks for finally doing this; I had a response to Bastian
> queued up in my postponed folder but I hadn't got around
> to finishing it.
well it is a shame to advertise subversion links.
hope it will soon be changed to somepthing prope
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:49 +0200, Daniel Rodríguez wrote:
> [0.004000] AGP bridge at 00:00:00
> [0.004000] Aperture from AGP @ f000 size 4096 MB (APSIZE 0)
> [0.004000] Aperture too small (0 MB)
> [0.004000] Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole
> [0.004000] Please
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 14:52 +0200, Daniel Rodríguez wrote:
> El mar, 06-10-2009 a las 13:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:49 +0200, Daniel Rodríguez wrote:
> > > [0.004000] AGP bridge at 00:00:00
> > > [0.004000] Aperture from AGP @ f000 size 4096 MB (APSIZ
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 21:37 +0200, Christian Salzmann wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> > I tracked this bug down and a fix should be in the next stable update.
> >
> Wow, thank you for your immediate response!
> > Although the fix is "obvious" to me looking at the code, it would be better
> > if you could ver
Hi Ben,
I tracked this bug down and a fix should be in the next stable update.
Wow, thank you for your immediate response!
Although the fix is "obvious" to me looking at the code, it would be better
if you could verify the fix on your system. Are you happy to build and
install a new kernel
Thanks for finally doing this; I had a response to Bastian
queued up in my postponed folder but I hadn't got around
to finishing it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:19:18PM +0200, Christian Salzmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> Can you please reproduce that without ever loading the nvidia module?
>
> it took me some time to reproduce the oops, apologies. Please find the syslog
> excerpt in the attachment.
> Thank you in advance.
I tracked
Your message dated Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:47:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#502401: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #502401,
regarding redhat-cluster-modules-2.6.18-5-686-bigmem: Null pointer dereference
in gfs_glock_dq
to be marked as done.
This mean
Hello,
Can you please reproduce that without ever loading the nvidia module?
it took me some time to reproduce the oops, apologies. Please find the syslog
excerpt in the attachment.
Thank you in advance.
ciao
Christian
Oct 3 06:44:09 brandt syslogd 1.5.0#5: restart.
Oct 3 06:44:09 brandt s
Your message dated Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:32:23 +0200
with message-id <20091006133223.ga11...@bogon.sigxcpu.org>
and subject line RHCS 3.0.2 is in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #529484,
regarding redhat-cluster: Please package new upstream release 2.03.11
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:33:34 +0200
with message-id <2009100614.ga11...@bogon.sigxcpu.org>
and subject line Fixed in 3.0.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #502401,
regarding redhat-cluster-modules-2.6.18-5-686-bigmem: Null pointer dereference
in gfs_glock_dq
to be marked as done
El mar, 06-10-2009 a las 13:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:49 +0200, Daniel Rodríguez wrote:
> > [0.004000] AGP bridge at 00:00:00
> > [0.004000] Aperture from AGP @ f000 size 4096 MB (APSIZE 0)
> > [0.004000] Aperture too small (0 MB)
> > [0.004000
FYI: My system died on FS corruption. Did not notice this because
mdadm did not report any errors. I noticed it because the system
started to lock up. After a reboot, it did a fsck (which segfaulted)
and the system hung afterwards.
The system behaviour seems like this kernel bug describes:
http://
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:49 +0200, Daniel Rodríguez wrote:
> [0.004000] AGP bridge at 00:00:00
> [0.004000] Aperture from AGP @ f000 size 4096 MB (APSIZE 0)
> [0.004000] Aperture too small (0 MB)
> [0.004000] Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole
> [0.004000] Please
Hello,
I am building a recovery/diagnostic debian-live "live CD". It is a
lenny build with kernel 2.6.26-2-486.
I really want to use hdparm as in:
#hdparm -N p${lbaend} --yes-i-know-what-i-am-doing /dev/hda
but I get this error:
The running kernel lacks CONFIG_IDE_TASK_IOCTL support for this
Your message dated Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:27:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#528420: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #528420,
regarding /usr/share/fence/telnet_ssl not executable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:27:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#528419: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #528419,
regarding should recommend or at least suggest python-openssl
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:27:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#510695: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #510695,
regarding type in included config file for cman initscript
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:27:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#542769: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #542769,
regarding cman: qdiskd fails to run when using device option. Already fixed in
the source
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Tue, 06 Oct 2009 10:27:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#540225: fixed in redhat-cluster 3.0.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #540225,
regarding redhat-cluster: libvolume-id will go away, update for gfs(2)-tools
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
El mar, 06-10-2009 a las 03:54 +0100, Ben Hutchings escribió:
> On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 08:58 +0200, Daniel Rodríguez wrote:
> > Is done, here is the log.
>
> Thanks. Unfortunately the X server log doesn't show much information
> about what went wrong. I will also need to see the kernel boot messa
Ben Hutchings scrisse in data 05/10/2009 15:19:
> Did an earlier kernel version work better on this hardware?
>
I don't know but seem to be at least from 2.4.27
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=323452)
> Please send a longer kernel log showing the errors related to hda (the
> s
36 matches
Mail list logo
