On August 6, 2004 02:43 pm, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Friday 06 of August 2004 03:12, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> > But that requires a recent debconf, > 1.2.9 which doesn't get installed
> > using only the 3.2.2 sources, and kde woody sources.. And if I manually
> > get the deb for 1.4.30 then it need
On Friday 06 of August 2004 03:12, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> But that requires a recent debconf, > 1.2.9 which doesn't get installed
> using only the 3.2.2 sources, and kde woody sources.. And if I manually
> get the deb for 1.4.30 then it needs the b version of dialog, which
> screws everything u
On August 5, 2004 06:12 pm, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> Thanks, the dependency problem was there.
>
> ii xfree86-common 4.3.0.dfsg.1-0.woody X Window System (XFree86)
Spoke maybe too soon, as debconf still is an issue..
debconf on the download.kde.org site requires the 0.9b-20020814-1 versio
On August 4, 2004 03:27 pm, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 of August 2004 04:27, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> > A major part of this is the backports for xfree86 that are needed, which
> > were needed to install 3.2.2, but even things like openoffice1.1 need
> > older packages. fontconfig which
On Wednesday 04 of August 2004 04:27, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> A major part of this is the backports for xfree86 that are needed, which
> were needed to install 3.2.2, but even things like openoffice1.1 need
> older packages. fontconfig which is needed by a bunch of stuff, comes
OO from
deb ht
The last approved KDE version on Woody that we would approve for our support
clients was 3.1.4 also..
I have never yet got a woody box up without complications on 3.2.2, however
grateful to Andrea we are for those debs.. And by the looks of it, we will
move to sarge before this is resolved..
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 21:44:12 +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
>Hmm, to all participants of this list: Which KDE backport for woody are
>you using?
My machines (one at home, several at work) are all using the 3.1.4
debs for Woody from download.kde.org.
The 3.2.2 debs won't install on these boxes withou
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 09:44:12PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
> Hmm, to all participants of this list: Which KDE backport for woody are
> you using?
Our Woody machines are still on kde.org 3.1.4. The 3.2 packages seem to
have given people little but trouble, especially if installed on a system
t
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 21:44, Henning Moll wrote:
> Chris, thank you for your answer!
>
> On Sunday 01 August 2004 22:18, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > Otherwise if it
> > isn't really built against gcc 3.2+ it should not be using the c102
> > form of the name.
>
> Hmm, i think they must be compiled w
Chris, thank you for your answer!
On Sunday 01 August 2004 22:18, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Otherwise if it
> isn't really built against gcc 3.2+ it should not be using the c102
> form of the name.
Hmm, i think they must be compiled with gcc < 3.2. Otherwise they won't
work on woody, right?
So i as
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 03:09:21PM +0200, Henning Moll wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have an additional question to an old mailing list discussion:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2004/04/msg00259.html
>
> It was about dependency problems just due to the fact, that packages are
> (unnecessarily)
11 matches
Mail list logo
