On Tuesday 03 August 2004 21:44, Henning Moll wrote: > Chris, thank you for your answer! > > On Sunday 01 August 2004 22:18, Chris Cheney wrote: > > Otherwise if it > > isn't really built against gcc 3.2+ it should not be using the c102 > > form of the name. > > Hmm, i think they must be compiled with gcc < 3.2. Otherwise they won't > work on woody, right?
Not necessarly, they would need a compatible libstdc++ though. But I think you are right, just checked g++ --version and it says 2.95 but a Qt application compiled with it can link to libqt-mt.so.3.2.3 from the libqt3c102-mt package just fine. > So i assume, that the creator just took the sid source packages. > Unfortunately, these backports are available on all kde mirrors, and so > i think they are used very often. > > Hmm, to all participants of this list: Which KDE backport for woody are > you using? download.kde.org or more specific the mirror on gd.tuwien.ac.at However there seems to be a minor packaging problem: kslash and others require libxcursor1 >= 1.1.2 while libqt3-dev depends on libcursor-dev 1.0.2 1.0.2 is also the version on the mirrors. > I really appreciate experiences of people who also backport other KDE > applications. I am not a backporter myself but I just wanted to say I really appreciate the work you and the other backporters do! Cheers, Kevin
