Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 12:43 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch:
> Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 12:05 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> [...]
> > Those are:
> > kdeedu-*
> > libkdeedu*
> > and the KDE meta packages.
> >
> > The meta packages are probably only changed if a dependency changed.
> >
> > kdeedu cau
Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 12:05 schrieb Hendrik Sattler:
> Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 11:40 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch:
> > Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2004 12:26 schrieb Steffen Hein:
> > > On Thursday 26 August 2004 01:56, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > will KDE 3.2 make it
Am Freitag, 27. August 2004 11:40 schrieb Wolfgang Jeltsch:
> Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2004 12:26 schrieb Steffen Hein:
> > On Thursday 26 August 2004 01:56, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > will KDE 3.2 make it into the next stable release or will there be a
> > > mixture of 3.2 a
Am Donnerstag, 26. August 2004 12:26 schrieb Steffen Hein:
> On Thursday 26 August 2004 01:56, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > will KDE 3.2 make it into the next stable release or will there be a
> > mixture of 3.2 and 3.1 as it is currently the case in testing?
>
> Haven't seen any KDE
* Steffen Hein [Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:26:19 +0200]:
> PS [OT]: Can anyone tell if GIMP 2.0 will make it into Sarge? It would be a
> shame if Debian would release with 1.2 a half year after the 2.0 release...
effort is being put in ensuring so.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es |
On Thursday 26 August 2004 01:56, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Hello,
>
> will KDE 3.2 make it into the next stable release or will there be a
> mixture of 3.2 and 3.1 as it is currently the case in testing?
Haven't seen any KDE 3.1 stuff in Sarge (but I'm not using the whole KDE
system so maybe...)
On Sunday 27 June 2004 10:56, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > Does anyone here know what's going on with this? Is it an X problem or
> > > KDE (or both)? Anyone able to disable it?
> >
> > Go play around in kcontrol under Regional, Keyboard Shortcuts.
>
> So I had looked there before, but I looked again
> > Does anyone here know what's going on with this? Is it an X problem or
> > KDE (or both)? Anyone able to disable it?
>
> Go play around in kcontrol under Regional, Keyboard Shortcuts.
So I had looked there before, but I looked again and I still don't see
anything. I imagine it should be in "
Frank Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone here know what's going on with this? Is it an X problem or
> KDE (or both)? Anyone able to disable it?
Go play around in kcontrol under Regional, Keyboard Shortcuts.
--
Paul Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Linux. You can find a worse OS, but i
"Broughton, Derek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ack!! I just did a major dist-upgrade in Sarge and suddenly my
> desktop icons all have _extremely_ ugly drop-shadowed labels. I
> can't read them. How can I turn this off? It isn't obvious to me
> anywhere in the Control Center.
Right click on the
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 7:20 pm, Broughton, Derek wrote:
> Ack!! I just did a major dist-upgrade in Sarge and suddenly my desktop
> icons all have _extremely_ ugly drop-shadowed labels. I can't read them.
> How can I turn this off? It isn't obvious to me anywhere in the Control
> Center.
> --
> d
Tried this; both were up to date. Reinstalled. Still nothing in Kcontrol
centre. Strange.
B.
> Try `apt-get -t unstable install kdesktop kdm` and make sure to
explicitly select "kde" as session upon logging in.
>
>
> Auke
>
> On Saturday 27 March 2004 04:12, you wrote:
>> >> I notice that, on my
Thank you very much! Kdebase was the right tip: After reinstalling, everything
works fine.
On Thursday 08 April 2004 11:46, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:17:40AM +0200, Michael Kirchhof wrote:
> > No replies yet - so, nobody else is experiencing this?
>
> The greeter widget is
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 10:17:40AM +0200, Michael Kirchhof wrote:
> No replies yet - so, nobody else is experiencing this?
The greeter widget is in kdebase-bin which is depended on by kdm, so it
should work fine, and does for me.
Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
No replies yet - so, nobody else is experiencing this?
On Friday 19 March 2004 13:50, Michael Kirchhof wrote:
> Since upgrade to kde 3.2 (debian), kdm fails with the following error
> message: "No greeter widget plugin loaded."
>
> Kicker and Kicker-Applets 3.2 are installed, too.
>
> Any ideas?
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 05:11:35PM +, jmdeleu wrote:
> According to this week's Debian News :" A user on Debian Planet
> noticed that it is quite unlikely for sarge to include GNOME 2.6,
> which has been rescheduled for March 31st. This would be a pity,
> especially as KDE 3.2 has gotten in."
>
>> I notice that, on my Debian/Libranet system, KDE unstable has
>> almost nothing in the the Control Center.
>
> This was solved for me by removing and then re-installing kdebase-data:
>
>apt-get remove kdebase-data
>apt-get install -t unstable kdebase-data
Hmmm; tried this. Of c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Wednesday 24 March 2004 17:44, Courtney Sherman a écrit :
> The debs from kde.org were compiled for woody and will have dependency
> problems on Libranet which is a mixture of sarge and sid.
>
> Courtney
>
> Benjamin Azan wrote:
> > You can get kde
The debs from kde.org were compiled for woody and will have dependency
problems on Libranet which is a mixture of sarge and sid.
Courtney
Benjamin Azan wrote:
You can get kde 3.2 not 3.2.1 which is the latest stable version on the
repository :
deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/Debian stab
Bruce wrote:
>> I notice that, on my Debian/Libranet system, KDE unstable has
>> almost nothing in the the Control Center.
>
> Same thing here after an apt-get upgrade to sid from a new install of
> Mepis linux. Seems like the control centre can't find the modules; the few
> that show up (K3bSetu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You can get kde 3.2 not 3.2.1 which is the latest stable version on the
repository :
deb http://download.kde.org/stable/3.2/Debian stable main
You can use it with the woody distrib too
Le Monday 22 March 2004 22:58, Courtney Sherman a écrit :
> Gra
Graham,
Use the unstable (sid) repositories. KDE 3.2 is there and installed
fine on my Libranet system.
Courtney
Graham wrote:
Can anyone give me an indication what I should add to my sources.list to
get KDE 3.2.? If it makes any difference I'm running Libranet 2.8 and
not straight Debian sar
Jeff, you are using a reply-to: field.
I am sending my reply to you to the list now.
J.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: KDE 3.2: Control Center almost gone
Date: Monday 22 March 2004 18:29
From: John van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon
On Sunday 21 March 2004 09:32 pm, jedd wrote:
>On Mon March 22 2004 01:15 pm, Jeff Elkins wrote:
> ] I've done both. I dist-upgraded a Mepis system to 3.2 and it was hosed. I
> ] wiped the box, installed Woody/KDE, dist-upgraded to Sid and it's working
> w/o ] any major problems.
>
> I still don't
On Mon March 22 2004 01:15 pm, Jeff Elkins wrote:
] I've done both. I dist-upgraded a Mepis system to 3.2 and it was hosed. I
] wiped the box, installed Woody/KDE, dist-upgraded to Sid and it's working
w/o
] any major problems.
I still don't get why people think a pretty installer warrants
On Sunday 21 March 2004 05:24 pm, John van Spaandonk wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I installed Debian by upgrading Debian from stable through testing to
>unstable (sid) (since at the time the testing installer did not work)
>and I have no such problems.
>
>Best
>
>John
>
>On Sunday 21 March 2004 19:48, Bruce wrot
Hi,
I installed Debian by upgrading Debian from stable through testing to
unstable (sid) (since at the time the testing installer did not work)
and I have no such problems.
Best
John
On Sunday 21 March 2004 19:48, Bruce wrote:
> > I notice that, on my Debian/Libranet system, KDE unstable has
>
> I notice that, on my Debian/Libranet system, KDE unstable has
> almost nothing in the the Control Center.
Same thing here after an apt-get upgrade to sid from a new install of
Mepis linux. Seems like the control centre can't find the modules; the few
that show up (K3bSetup, Digital Camera) seem
Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can anyone give me an indication what I should add to my sources.list to
> get KDE 3.2.?
Please read the archives before posting. Had you searched the
archives, you would have found that you should take a look through
http://www.apt-get.org/ if you don't kno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Es Dimecres Març 10 2004 20:22, en Jeff Elkins va escriure:
> On my wife's powerpc, the knotes app is spawning multiple notes when
> started. And each time you start it more notes are added. It's running sid
> as is my i386 box, but the app is fine on
Run the following as root:
update-alternatives --auto x-session-manager
Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 03:18 pm, Sean O'Dubhghaill wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 7:42 pm, uwe Herion wrote:
> > Hallo
> > i make a dist-upgrade with unstable debian.
> > now i have kde 3.2:
> > ipc1:/home/uwe# dpkg --list | grep kde
> > ii kde-i18n-de3.1.5-1German (de) intern
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 01:18 pm, Sean O'Dubhghaill wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 7:42 pm, uwe Herion wrote:
> > Hallo
> > i make a dist-upgrade with unstable debian.
> > now i have kde 3.2:
> >
> > The new kde will not start.
> > An other displaymanger (icewm) starts.
> >
> > Can you help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 21:18, Sean O'Dubhghaill wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 7:42 pm, uwe Herion wrote:
> > Hallo
>
> hi
> I had to delete my .kde directory in my home directory to make kde start
> again. Unfortunately you lose all your kde
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 7:42 pm, uwe Herion wrote:
> Hallo
> i make a dist-upgrade with unstable debian.
> now i have kde 3.2:
> ipc1:/home/uwe# dpkg --list | grep kde
> ii kde-i18n-de3.1.5-1German (de) internationalized (i18n)
> files f ii kdebase3.2.1-1KDE Base me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 07 March 2004 06:01, Matt Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Here is my sources.list:
>
> #deb copy:///cdrom/ sarge main
>
> #deb http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib
> #deb-src http://ftp.au.debian.org/debian/ testing main
I'm supposing you're running unstable.
First, remove the download.kde.org apt source and add ftp.us.debian.org
and ftp.debian.org after your favorite mirror to be sure that that
mirror is not missing something.
Second, since the unstable version seems to be incomplete, also add this
source:
de
Klaus,
I discovered, (well not a real significant discovery), that you can use kdm -
just click on menu->session type->kde, the kdm panel doesn't show that it
will boot in kde but it does. As for my icons, they are still missing
(sigh).they can't have gone far. Thanks.
Paul
On Saturday
Hi Paul,
On Saturday 06 March 2004 20:56, Paul Winkler wrote:
> This morning I performed a dist-upgrade going from 3.1.4 to 3.2,
> (in sid). I then noticed kde did not start from kdm but rather
> dumped me into twm. This I now know is simply due to kdm not
> defaulting to kde startup. Later wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday March 01 2004 06:16 pm, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
> I'm afraid not. You're describing the old file-selection dialog. The KDE
> developers introduced a new dialog for folder-selection, and in this one,
> all the functionalities that were available
I'm afraid not. You're describing the old file-selection dialog. The KDE
developers introduced a new dialog for folder-selection, and in this one,
all the functionalities that were available have been removed.
--
Sylvain Joyeux
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 15:50, Sylvain Joyeux wrote:
> Is there any way to remove the hidden directories from it ? And to create a
> new directory ?
I think you have to press F8 to toggle hidden files.
If you want to create a new directory in a open/save dialog just click on the
button with th
I was disappointed with the speed of 3.2, until I cleaned up my config files.
On one machine, where I had little personal data, I copied out the bookmarks
file, mv'ed my .kde to .kde.bak, and relogged in. On the other, I just went
through and deleted every rc file in .kde/share/config that wa
On Tuesday 24 February 2004 04:27 am, Jan De Luyck wrote:
>
> Anyway: since installing KDE3.2 my non-kde applications are shown in a
> toplevel menu "Debian" by themself, instead of being nested in the KDE menu
> structure. Can I fix this one way or another, or is this a bug in the
> package?
>
I'
> Hidden Files in that dialog seem to be controlled from the general
> "View" Settings for that folder. If you set kfm to not show hidden
> direktories, the dialog won't show them either. IIRC :-S
Well, I don't show hidden files anywhere ! :(
--
Sylvain Joyeux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2004 15:50 schrieb Sylvain Joyeux:
> Is there any way to remove the hidden directories from it ? And to create a
> new directory ?
Hidden Files in that dialog seem to be controlled from the general "View"
Settings for that fol
On Tuesday 17 February 2004 13:17, David Pashley wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2004 at 21:38, Josh Metzler praised the llamas by saying:
> > Now to your argument - I agree it doesn't make sense for KDE 3.2 packages
> > to be available for stable but not for unstable. A final reason for this
> > is that ther
On Feb 16, 2004 at 21:38, Josh Metzler praised the llamas by saying:
> Now to your argument - I agree it doesn't make sense for KDE 3.2 packages to
> be available for stable but not for unstable. A final reason for this is
> that there are two KDE teams. The stable packages were not made by the
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:15:27PM +0100, Anders Ellenshøj Andersen wrote:
> On Monday 16 February 2004 21:20, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > > Do we _have_ to have KDE 3.1 working in platforms like M68000?
> > > I doubt that old chip family has the horsepower to handle KDE.
> >
> > Runs about as fast
On Monday 16 February 2004 10:34 am, Robert Tilley wrote:
> I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE 3.2.0
> existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from the "unstable" or
> "testing" branches.
>
> I will have to give the KDE Team minus points on this one. While
On Monday 16 February 2004 21:20, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Do we _have_ to have KDE 3.1 working in platforms like M68000?
> > I doubt that old chip family has the horsepower to handle KDE.
>
> Runs about as fast as a Pentium from what I've seen. Actually gets
> reasonably quick about it if you ove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 12:11:28PM -0700, Doug Holland wrote:
> Do we _have_ to have KDE 3.1 working in platforms like M68000?
Yes.
> I doubt that old chip family has the horsepower to handle KDE.
Runs about as fast as a Pentium from what I've see
On Monday 16 February 2004 08:26 am, Bruce Miller wrote:
> On February 16, 2004 10:34, Robert Tilley wrote:
> > I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE 3.2.0
> > existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from the
> > "unstable" or "testing" branches.
> >
> > I will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-02-16 17:12, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:47:03PM +0100, cobaco wrote:
> > stable has 3.2. available from the kde-mirros
>
> OK, but that's not debian, that's KDE backporting it for your
> convenience.
AFAIK these are done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 04:47:03PM +0100, cobaco wrote:
> stable has 3.2. available from the kde-mirros
OK, but that's not debian, that's KDE backporting it for your
convenience.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
`. `'`
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:58:58 -0500
Mark Bucciarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MB> On Monday 16 February 2004 10:44 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
MB> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:34:14AM -0500, Robert Tilley wrote:
MB> > > I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE
MB> > > 3.2.0 exi
On February 16, 2004 10:44, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:34:14AM -0500, Robert Tilley wrote:
> > I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE
> > 3.2.0 existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-02-16 16:44, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:34:14AM -0500, Robert Tilley wrote:
> > I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE
> > 3.2.0 existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from the
> > "un
On Monday 16 February 2004 10:44 am, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:34:14AM -0500, Robert Tilley wrote:
> > I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE
> > 3.2.0 existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from the
> > "unstable" or "testing" branches.
On February 16, 2004 10:34, Robert Tilley wrote:
> I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE 3.2.0
> existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from the
> "unstable" or "testing" branches.
>
> I will have to give the KDE Team minus points on this one. While we
> all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 10:34:14AM -0500, Robert Tilley wrote:
> I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE
> 3.2.0 existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from the
> "unstable" or "testing" branches.
Except it's not.
On Monday 16 February 2004 10:34 am, Robert Tilley wrote:
> I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE 3.2.0
> existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from the "unstable" or
> "testing" branches.
>
> I will have to give the KDE Team minus points on this one. While
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:22:54 +0100, Philippe Merlin wrote:
>Recently i migrate from Kde 3.1.4 to Kde 3.2.
>I configure the screensaver with the kde configuration center, and very few
>screensaver among all proposed works and can be tested. But the screensaver
>does not work at all.
Hi Philipp
Hello,
Thanks for your mail, it was the solution, install xscreensaver and now its
work fine.
But i don't know why very few scrensavers work, about ten on one hundred ?
Another problem when i load an file with konkeror he proposed to registered
with ark when i say yes.
He make an sound and i d
* Philippe Merlin [Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:22:54 +0100]:
> Recently i migrate from Kde 3.1.4 to Kde 3.2.
> I configure the screensaver with the kde configuration center, and very few
> screensaver among all proposed works and can be tested. But the screensaver
> does not work at all.
Is KDM in
> Hello,
> Recently i migrate from Kde 3.1.4 to Kde 3.2.
> I configure the screensaver with the kde configuration center, and very few
> screensaver among all proposed works and can be tested. But the screensaver
> does not work at all.
Try installing xscreensaver and xscreensaver-gl.
--
To
Hi,
> > > When i upgrade my KDE from 3.1.4 to 3.2.0 and then start KDE, it
> > > behaves like KDE 3.1.4 in 100dpi mode - fonts are ugly big
> > > (right side of screenshots) at 9pt and much to small in 8pt -
> > > thats the reason why i run KDE 3.1.4 in 75dpi mode - here it's:
> > >
> > > PS: Sure
* Marcel Meckel [Sat, 07 Feb 2004 17:20:44 +0100]:
> ... who knows there are 2 config files for dpi settings ... *damn*
If I am correct, /etc/kde3/kdm/Xservers is used when your session is
started via kdm, and /etc/X11/xinit/xserverrc when you start if from
a tty via startx or similar.
Hi,
> > When i upgrade my KDE from 3.1.4 to 3.2.0 and then start KDE, it
> > behaves like KDE 3.1.4 in 100dpi mode - fonts are ugly big (right
> > side of screenshots) at 9pt and much to small in 8pt - thats the
> > reason why i run KDE 3.1.4 in 75dpi mode - here it's:
> >
> > PS: Sure, i changed
Hi,
> > i have some serious font problems with KDE 3.2 for Debian Woody.
> > For better understanding i made some screenshots you can see here:
> >
> > http://test.thermoman.de/kde/kde_font_problems.htm
>
> I had exactly the same problem. I tried starting X with
> startx -- -dpi 75 and that solve
Quoth Marcel Meckel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi and hello,
Hi,
> i have some serious font problems with KDE 3.2 for Debian Woody.
> For better understanding i made some screenshots you can see here:
>
> http://test.thermoman.de/kde/kde_font_problems.htm
I had exactly the same problem. I tried star
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 07 February 2004 01:11, Marcel Meckel wrote:
> Hi and hello,
>
> When i upgrade my KDE from 3.1.4 to 3.2.0 and then start KDE, it
> behaves like KDE 3.1.4 in 100dpi mode - fonts are ugly big (right side
> of screenshots) at 9pt and much to
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, peter vdm wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:27, Linus Gasser wrote:
> > Hi,
> > yes, I don't know how, but I got fixed on freetype2, but I should've
> > checked libfreetype6:
> >
> > Before:
> > apt-cache policy libfreetype6
> > libfreetype6:
> > Installed: 2.1.4-2
> > Candida
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:27, Linus Gasser wrote:
> Hi,
> yes, I don't know how, but I got fixed on freetype2, but I should've
> checked libfreetype6:
>
> Before:
> apt-cache policy libfreetype6
> libfreetype6:
> Installed: 2.1.4-2
> Candidate: 2.1.4-2
> Version Table:
> *** 2.1.4-2 0
>
On Friday 06 February 2004 09:27, Linus Gasser wrote:
> Hi,
> yes, I don't know how, but I got fixed on freetype2, but I should've
> checked libfreetype6:
Now I now: openoffice.org-1.1 from
deb http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/~sdier/debian updates/wup/
depends on freetype-2.1.4, this is where the trou
On Thursday 05 February 2004 22:30, peter vdm wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 03:18, Linus Gasser wrote:
> > /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `FT_Seek_Stream'
> > /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `FT_Get_Short'
> > /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 05:18:43PM +0100, Linus Gasser wrote:
> first of all thanks very much for the nice distribution. KDE 3.2 is really
> cool. But, why can't I compile a qt-application anymore?
Do you have the appropriate -dev packages? The reg
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004 03:18, Linus Gasser wrote:
>
> /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `FT_Seek_Stream'
> /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `FT_Get_Short'
> /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt.so: undefined reference to `FT_Forget_Frame'
> /usr/share/qt3/lib/libqt-mt
Am Dienstag, 3. Februar 2004 22:24 schrieb Bruce Miller:
> A number of applications which depend on libqt3c102-mt --- including
> all of KOffice 1.3, kvim, k3b, (and for those using Libranet)
> adminmenu --- were all uninstalled. I am certain that a resolution is
> in the works. Does anyone know th
> A number of applications which depend on libqt3c102-mt --- including
> all of KOffice 1.3, kvim, k3b, (and for those using Libranet)
> adminmenu --- were all uninstalled. I am certain that a resolution is
> in the works. Does anyone know the timing?
The debs on the KDE servers are for woody.
k m writes:
> Hello I have downloaded and recently updated kde-3.2 cvs source
> code. My Debian packages (.deb files) are fine, but some of them I
> must finish manually (dh_* scripts), because of debuild
> error. (debuild -rfakeroot)
> For example: there is no apidocs/common directory in kdebas
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 06:12:39PM -0500, Antiphon wrote:
| Sorry to whine about whining about whining but I believe you meant to say
| "whiner" instead of "whinger."
|
| ;-)
Nope, I definitely meant whinge and not whine. It's a real word - from
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=whinge :
Sorry to whine about whining about whining but I believe you meant to say
"whiner" instead of "whinger."
;-)
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 23:34:58 +0800, Cameron Patrick
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:16:14AM -0700, Doug Holland wrote:
| I just hope the developers don't pull a Bran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 09. Dezember 2003 14:53 schrieb Matthias Wieser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am looking for repository for the new 3.2 beta release.
> Has anybody seen one?
> Thanks, Matthias Wieser
For unstable there is orth's CVS HEAD Repository. While not
Matthias Wieser writes:
> I am looking for repository for the new 3.2 beta release. Has
> anybody seen one?
KDE 3.2 has not yet been released, I don't even think any RC's have
been released yet. Debian KDE packages will normally be made
available when KDE 3.2 is released.
cheers
domi
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 08:16:14AM -0700, Doug Holland wrote:
| I just hope the developers don't pull a Branden and be perpetually stuck
three
| versions behind.
Ahem. As I understand it, the reason that Debian's XFree is outdated
compared to upstream is that Debian supports a heck of a lot mo
El Martes, 9 de Diciembre de 2003 14:53, Matthias Wieser escribió:
> I am looking for repository for the new 3.2 beta release.
>
> Has anybody seen one?
KDE packagers are very busy, AFAIK. KDE needs still some work for entering in
Sarge, and there are some bugs in Sid, that should be fixed first.
On Tue 09 Dec 2003 6:53 am, Matthias Wieser wrote:
> I am looking for repository for the new 3.2 beta release.
>
> Has anybody seen one?
>
> Thanks, Matthias Wieser
Now I'm tempted. According to what I've read in dot.kde.org, there were a LOT
of bug fixes in beta2, and it's supposed to be very s
Le Mardi 27 Mai 2003 20:02, Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka a écrit :
> What am I to do now?
Look in the source for the email of the developer (he is French but I don't
remember his name) and send him your bug report.
Cheers,
Charles
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kde-france.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 6:40 pm, Syd Alsobrook wrote:
> Does anyone have a guesstimate on the release of kde 3.2?
>
> Thanks,
> Syd
Did you checkout what it says on http://developer.kde.org/ (There is a
release schedule link in the left hand menu).
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 01:40:26PM -0400, Syd Alsobrook wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> Does anyone have a guesstimate on the release of kde 3.2?
>
> Thanks,
> Syd
Next year sometime.
Chris
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 00:45, David Pashley wrote:
> On May 26, 2003 at 20:53, Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka praised the llamas by saying:
> > Hi, James,
> > thank you for your great work at KDE 3.2 CVS deb. I installed them last
> > night, installation went very smoothly and almost all is very fine.
> > T
On May 26, 2003 07:16 pm, James Michael Greenhalgh wrote:
> I didn't even realize qsa was still in my repository or listed as a
> package, it was just an experimental thing I was playing around with,
> although I know it's needed for kexi's scripting support. I will take the
> time to produce a cl
David,
Not sure how you ended up with this mail but many thanks for forwarding this
message here and replying to his queries. Let me add my thoughts on the one
point.
> > 4. I cannot install package qsa, which is also listed in your
> > repository.
>
> why is this? what was the problem?
>
I di
On May 26, 2003 at 20:53, Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka praised the llamas by saying:
> Hi, James,
> thank you for your great work at KDE 3.2 CVS deb. I installed them last
> night, installation went very smoothly and almost all is very fine.
> There are several problems I cannot handle myself, so can you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 29 September 2002 09:26 am, Paul Cupis wrote:
> print 'HTTP/`1.0 302 Found'
> print 'Location: ', newuri'
[I realize the original problem has now been solved (hooray!), and anyway, apt
doesn't like 30x status codes, however they are generat
lördagen den 5 oktober 2002 03.17 skrev Bitlov:
> Hi,
> Here is what I have reported :
> *) depedency problem :
> kdeadmin depend on kwuftpd
> kwuftpd depend on wu-ftpd
> or wu-ftpd conflict with other ftp servers that provide "ftp-server"
This is a problem. kwuftpd is useless without wu-ftpd.
I
Hi,
Here is what I have reported :
*) depedency problem :
kdeadmin depend on kwuftpd
kwuftpd depend on wu-ftpd
or wu-ftpd conflict with other ftp servers that provide "ftp-server"
In version 3.0.7.cvs20020824-1, kwuftpd didn't depend on wu-ftpd
*) xdmcp bug in 3.0.7 corrected in this new version (
måndagen den 30 september 2002 02.30 skrev Ben Burton:
> Hmm, just out of interest, what's the specific reason for having two
> separate branches of KDE 3.1 packaging? I just took a look at the sources
> and there do seem to be some non-trivial splits between your versions and
> the CVS versions
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 03:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Yes, yes, I *know* we don't support these packages, etc etc etc, but that
> > doesn't mean it's not worth coordinating to avoid these problems where
> > possible.
>
> Absolutely! As someone who is using "outside" debs, I have a vest
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
